spicydangeryaoi

[spicydangeryaoi]

The Girl from the Other Side (Totsukuni no Shoujo) by Nagabe

[spicydangeryaoi]

[spicydangeryaoi]

“If you love him, follow your heart”

[spicydangeryaoi]

the three most dramatic hoes you will meet on your travels

[spicydangeryaoi]

what sucks about coming back to tumblr is finding out which people you followed and liked turned into AI art is real art chumps.

Like finding out your old buddy you played pokémon cards with is alt-right.

these groups make a circle in the venn diagram by the way.

like. ok. i think a urinal on a wall is art so obviously this shit is art too but the people making it are so much worse than the dadaists

[spicydangeryaoi]

I need to renovate this fucking place

[spicydangeryaoi]

the only way to tell if a man is truly gentle is if he has green moss and algae all over him from sleeping quietly, motionlessly, at the bottom of a crystal clear riverbed

[spicydangeryaoi]

There is a voice in your head that wants you to prove that you're actually the smartest person in the room. That voice is the devil, and it will make you chronically unfuckable.

[spicydangeryaoi]

I think now that queens dead they should have her stuffed and put on display in Cairo for the next 150 years.

[spicydangeryaoi]

bisexuals annoying people about their sexuality versus pansexual is the all lives matter of unactivism

[spicydangeryaoi]

bisexuality isn't explicitly inclusive and pretending it is is lying to everyone.

acting like it is is gaslighting literally every person who had to deal with trans exclusionist bi people. wanting to clean up your image or not relating to these people doesn't invalidate why pansexuality came into existence.

Do you think that if bisexuality had been a proper refuge anyone would have left it in favor of needing to make a new home?

Stop lying to us all and stay in your own lane. Every time i see bisexuals talk lately it's only to be homophobic or panphpbic and that is a disgusting look. you aren't the supreme sexuality and i'd love if you stopped acting like it.

also leave neil gaiman alone? jesus christ

[spicydangeryaoi]

I have been reading a bit on the OTW elections and the whole Tiffany G thing, but most of all, I've been reading comments from people supporting Tiffany saying that she just wants to clear AO3 from all the CP (child pornography) content and I don't know who needs to hear this but:

If someone comes to a predominantly QUEER space (like AO3) and tells you that censorship is necessary to eradicate CP... it's not actually CP they want to eradicate...

I've seen this type of discourse about Pride and about queer literature and queer movies and queer communities. It's a tried and true technique of the right and conservative movements.

First, they say there is a DANGER to the community through CP and they conflate the actual threat of CP in the community (we all know someone who thinks that writing a love story between two characters who are 16 is CP...), and make you believe that censorship is the only way to PROTECT THE CHILDREN. And since most people are (rightly) mind-bogled at having to explain that of course they don't support CP content, they bow down and accept the censorship for the greater good, without anyone actually trying to have a conversation about what qualifies as CP (which needs to, you know, actually involve real children and not fictional characters who are 17 and losing their virginity with their crush in a Mature-rated story about high school football and first love based on the author's own experience of losing their virginity at 17 to their crush in high school).

Then, they tell you that there are other forms of DISTURBING CONTENT, and what they really mean is porn that THEY find disturbing, for ex, (and I kid you not, I have seen comments like that) porn featuring disabled characters, which they consider to encourage the exploitation of vulnerable individuals, or BDSM porn (which supposedly encourages violence and lack of consent), or rough p*rn, or any kind of porn that isn't two (preferably white and skinny) able-bodied people doing it missionary style while lovingly gazing in each other's eyes. SO TO PROTECT VIEWERS, that needs to be banned as well.

And then, they tell you that even that sanitized version of porn is still porn and that people under 18 or under 21 or under whatever age they consider too young to view anything sexual regardless of the fact that not all countries have the same law about the age of maturity, should be free to surf the site without having to *gasp* filter out properly tagged works. So TO PROTECT THE CHILDREN, every explicit content is censored.

And then finally, when all that is left is a sanitized, white-washed, ableist, puritan type of content featuring General-Audience approved gay works of two nice men or two nice women holding hands and chastely kissing each other on the lips... Well guess what? :) CHILDREN SHOULD NOT BE EXPOSED TO QUEER CONTENT SO WE NEED TO BAN THAT AS WELL, and since we've basically done purge after purge before and there are still a handful of people on the website, well surely they won't mind/care anymore, will they?

It's not just a slippery slope, it's something that has been done time and again, and that is why censorship on AO3 will never, never have a positive outcome.

Thank you for coming to my TED talk.

[spicydangeryaoi]

Are you a Gold Star lesbian? (Just in case you don't know what it means, a Gold Star lesbian is a lesbian that has never had sex with a guy and would never have any intentions of ever doing so)

I’m a gay leaning pansexual man. Where...the hell did you get this idea.....

[spicydangeryaoi]

[spicydangeryaoi]

i propose an alternative to british and american english where instead of o/ou its now u. neighburhood. colur. humur.

[spicydangeryaoi]

[spicydangeryaoi]