snazzlebazzle

[snazzlebazzle]

I mean, it's white people and men being influenced by ideology. Like it's not endemic to white people, I don't think bring conservative is a genetic trait, but acknowledging the demographics responsible for trumps election isn't bad. It should be studied to see how to avoid this situation in the future, but we must see who voted for him to deal with any issues first. That's because these are people susceptible to this rhetoric, not by genetic whiteness, but other factors too. However, I think it's foolish to deny identity also plays a part in voting.

[snazzlebazzle]

I mean, we have numbers about it right now. We don't have census data on a lot of very old historical events, that's why we talk about current historical things. They're also relevant to people currently alive.

And uh yeah, in those contexts, those demographics would be an issue? White people in nazi Germany? Ruling castes in India? Yeah, those demographics were issues historically. Didnt act the best.

We literally have numbers showing it's a white problem in America. Not exclusively, but white people and men showed up more for trump than Harris. Sorry.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/election-trump-harris-demographic-breakdown-b2643412.html

[snazzlebazzle]

I mean, I really don't think hearing the occasional "men suck" is why people go far right? Like idk if blaming the left for conservatism is fair, the move right happens regardless of leftist rhetoric.

[snazzlebazzle]

https://apnews.com/article/election-harris-trump-women-latinos-black-voters-0f3fbda3362f3dcfe41aa6b858f22d12

Not an exclusive problem, but let's not act like white people didn't mostly vote trump. And that moderate gains weren't with men.

[snazzlebazzle]

I can't imagine the devastation palestine will face now

[snazzlebazzle]

No offense, I don't think that being popular means being held to arbitrary moral standards. He could have gone through what you mentioned solely as a younger child. AUs do not have to conform to themes of the original work

[snazzlebazzle]

Still one of the best screen shots from a game ever.

[snazzlebazzle]

an erotic poem:

leg so hot

hot hot leg

leg so hot u fry an eg

[snazzlebazzle]

I’m actually going insane over Gun Devil: Lady Liberty edition bc her design is fucking crazy

She’s all bones and no guts. Gutless, heartless, only cold and unfeeling bones.

The only flesh on her is her arm muscles, developed by repeatedly performing one action: raising the gun. There is no substance to her besides her right to “bare” arms. She has no hands, she is not able to put down the weapon. Her sole function is to uphold violence.

She has eyes to see and yet she keeps them closed. She has ears to hear, but no hands to cover them. So she cannot avoid hearing all of the cries from all of the people who suffer by her and her mother. But she has no mouth to speak with.

She has no voice. She has no ability to communicate outside of violence. She has no choice.

All she can do is raise the fucking gun.

[snazzlebazzle]

Girl, you can't start a shit situation and then walk out on it. Just stay out of everyone's buisness. Your own CIA admits to meddling in foreign elections through the past 100 years, stop with this victim complex

[snazzlebazzle]

Stop using the word degenerate to mean horny challenge

[snazzlebazzle]

You don't like New Yawk? 🗽? Bada Bing?

[snazzlebazzle]

[snazzlebazzle]

Adaptations are good, but frankly L take that the OGs aren't good. We wouldn't be so fixated on them if that were the case, and the retellings would be more widely loved than OGs if that was the case

I blame Marvel, especially the MCU, for all the complaints about Kaos “ not accurately portraying Greek MYTHOLOGY”.

Like bruh, the show is fun and you want a straight up adaption of the Greek mythology instead of realizing they could modernize it and change some character’s fates because the original kinda sucked?

Are you allergic to fun? Has no one ever seen a straight up adaption of the source material? NO because it doesn’t need to be a straight up adaption.

MCU movies/tv have truly made people think in terms of black and white when it comes to characters that they can’t recognize when characters are complicated and sometimes the source material can be thrown out and changed for the better.

[snazzlebazzle]

Recycled tumblr humor

[snazzlebazzle]

when all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail. when all you have is a paintbrush, everything looks like a canvas. when all you have is a cock, everything looks like the exhaust pipe of a 2014 honda civic. so yes, to answer your question, i am stuck. please call the emergency services

[snazzlebazzle]

Stan's Twin Theory

Hey, this is a new blog dedicated to Gravity Falls, and specifically to theories about Gravity Falls. We have some interesting (possibly far-fetched) theories. This is one of them.

Stan’s Twin Theory:

Stan has to have a brother (although not necessarily a twin), because he’s Dipper and Mabel’s Great-Uncle, and they all share the same last name, therefore he must have a brother. However, we believe he has a twin. Here’s why:

twins are genetic (and the gene can skip generations) 

There are some pieces of evidence found in the show that supports our claim

We also believe that Stan’s twin may be the Author. Here’s why:                            

1. The Hiding Spot

Look, a hole in the ground

In Tourist Trapped, Dipper found the 3rd book in the forest near the Mystery Shack. This may seem like a stretch, but think about it! where would you hide something important that you might want to access easily? By your house.                                        

Gideon’s factory

In The Hand that Rocks the Mabel it is shown that Gideon’s family factory is located on Gopher Road, the same street as the Mystery Shack. 

The Mystery Shack’s address via the Deed is 618 Gopher Road.

This could explain how Gideon found the 2nd Journal. 

And it’s interesting to note that Gideon was searching for the 1st Journal at the Mystery Shack. 

Possible hiding spots

There are possible hiding spots listed in the 2nd Journal, they seem to be located around a building similar to the Mystery Shack.

2. The Bunker

The Bunker is located underground, in the forest near the Mystery Shack.

There is a sign on the wall of the bunker that says that it is a nuclear fallout shelter. Now, where would you build a fallout shelter? Near your house of course! During times of bomb scares people would build fallout shelters in their backyard.

And since the Author did experiments in the bunker and was observing a shapeshifter, it would be more convenient for him to have the bunker close to the place where he lived. 

3. The Glasses              

In Carpet Diem, a secret room is discovered in the Mystery Shack, and Stan finds a pair of glasses.                                                                  

Stan finds the glasses

Later he is seen staring at the glasses, and he frowns at them in both scenes.

Stan contemplating the glasses

This could possibly represent an old memory of a friend or *cough* brother. It is obvious that someone lived in that room at some point, so why would Stan want to cover it up?

!!!

In Dreamscapers, it is shown in the 2nd Journal that the Author was surprised to see glasses on the Bill Cipher wheel, possibly because those are his glasses.Take a look at the glasses, they are similar to the ones found in the secret room.

We don’t think these are Stan’s glasses because his glasses are square with rims at the bottom, while the glasses found in the room and on the wheel don’t have rims at the bottom and are rounded.

Also in Dreamscapers, is a flash back of Stan when he was just a wee lad.

Notice his glasses are square and have rims at the bottom.

Here is Stan a little bit older. Notice that he still has square rimmed glasses.

But, in The Time Traveler's Pig, a younger “Stan” is shown with round glasses without rims at the bottom. His glasses look exactly like the one’s found in the secret room. 

Is this really Stan?

Also, this “Stan” has a cleft chin, whereas we have never ever once seen Stan with a cleft chin (not even in flashbacks). 

4. The Calender

Another small point: the calendar in the secret room has the date July 4, 1982 circled. It can be assumed that 1982 is the year the room was abandoned.

The room definitely looks like it hasn’t been touched since the 80’s

However, in the Author’s bunker, there is a calendar on the wall. Guess what year is on the calendar. 1982.

The calendar in the Mystery Shack and the calendar in the Author’s Bunker are from the same year, 1982. 

This suggests that both the room in the Shack and the Bunker were abandoned around the same time. 

5. Wrestling Match Flashback

In a brief scene in Stan’s flashback in Dreamscapers, we see young Stan at a wrestling match. There is a kid reading a book in the stands that looks very similar to child Stan, he even seems to be wearing the same clothing.

Could this be Stan’s twin?

6. The Swing-set 

In Dreamscapers, Stan’s mindscape is very creepy. One notable object in Stan’s mind is a dilapidated swing-set. This is the stuff of horror movies. 

Good times

Since we can assume everything in the mind is a symbol of a significant part of Stan’s life, then this swing-set is very telling. It likely symbolizes a broken childhood. Since it is a two swing swing-set, it could symbolize another person, likely from Stan’s childhood. A close friend… or sibling…

The fact that only one of the swings is broken is also interesting. In Into the Bunker, the Shapeshifter states that the Author “hasn’t been himself in 30 years” suggesting that he probably went crazy. 

…

Are all these merely coincidences? Maybe… But this is Gravity Falls we’re talking about. This show is filled with foreshadowing, plot twists, and secrets. There is just no way that all of this could be a coincidence. 

So, what do you think? Is this a stretch? Or are we on to something? Feel free to comment with your own theories. The more the merrier! :)