sn33z3s

[sn33z3s]

putting all my stanky related playlists in one spot cuz why not

stan/kyle

stan’s pov

kyle’s pov

stan only mix

kyle only mix

[sn33z3s]

(It's because it's the best album ever)

@sn33z3s made a little Kyle playlist for his birthday, so as a companion piece to the art I made alongside her recent Stan mix, I drew this too 💚 Happy bday Kyle!!

[sn33z3s]

mothers day in the broflovski-marsh household

[sn33z3s]

goofy aah comic

[sn33z3s]

with sneeze's blessing, i did a continuation of this with the idea being "what if they still didn't get together" 😅

[sn33z3s]

thinkin bout dads

[sn33z3s]

Girl, gimme something I can break 💥

(drew this playing my gf @sn33z3s' Stan mix on repeat, which u can listen to here 🫶🏻)

[sn33z3s]

if you can do whatever you want, then technically so can everybody else. in general i think some sp fans should sit down and have a long talk with themselves about why “it’s fictional” seems to apply to everything except kyle’s feelings. if he can’t be hurt because he isn’t real, then why does he suddenly have free will - instead of just being a tv show plot/commentary device - when he does whatever aligns with your subjective opinions about sp? kyle’s pain is just a joke but the character who inflicts it upon him deserves to be treated with humanity; why? and what grants other characters the ability to be depicted “femininely” in fanon if not just different forms of stereotyping? do antisemitic tropes not also exist in portraying kyle as overly aggressive and dangerous? i ask all of this genuinely

a fictional character headcanon’d as a gay man (in fan art drawn by a gay man) calling himself “mommy” is deeply problematic but the same character’s trauma and abuse being seen as passable so that he can be coupled with the source of his trauma and abuse is okay. because it’s just fictional.

[sn33z3s]

a fictional character headcanon’d as a gay man (in fan art drawn by a gay man) calling himself “mommy” is deeply problematic but the same character’s trauma and abuse being seen as passable so that he can be coupled with the source of his trauma and abuse is okay. because it’s just fictional.

[sn33z3s]

[sn33z3s]

hey i opened commissions again! email hrluver201@gmail.com with as many references/pose ideas as possible. all prices are usd and go through paypal. prices vary by complexity. 

i was fired last week and i need an alternate income while i go jobhunting, reblogs are appreciated, thank you!

[sn33z3s]

Just wanted to say I really love reading your analysis posts, and although I view things a bit differently regarding Stan and Kyle’s dynamics, for the large part what you said was deadly accurate. It also changed my perspective on some aspects of the boys, they really do just need each other, whether they want to or not. Also great how you pointed out the post Covid ending when stan and Kyle straight up admitted they lose everything after the friendship (what losers) anyways thanks for the great reads!! 💕😊

hi, omg. no need to thank me! thanks for sending this??!! if u ever wanted to share, i'd love to know what your thoughts are on style's dynamic; i'm always reworking my analyses and rewording myself in order to better articulate how i feel abt fandom characterization so i also love discussion with other ppl, it makes studying the canon all the more fun and gratifying... for example, as u said, they "need each other whether they want to or not" - don't they want to? when we apply the red string of fate idea to style, is the implication that they are aware of their dependency on each other and simply choose to indulge in it, or do they just want to be with each other and don't even realize how entwined their relationship is? do they resent each other a little bit? of course, they're fictional: they are only able to break the 4th wall as much as is written, but lmfao, ygwim

ANYWAY, thank u again. these messages make my day 💗

[sn33z3s]

for obvious reasons it’s very hilarious that there’s such a split in stan’s characterization within the fandom to the point of this episode potentially splitting said dichotomy further. i have to say though that another episode premiering wherein stan plays a board game (which is a significant but still recent and therefore smaller aspect of his overall personality) doesn’t really shake my conception of stan because sometimes characters do things for plot. like, yes, stan loves board games -- but to then jump to the conclusion that it is essentially not just his only interest, but also an interest which prevents others (such as sports) is funny because that misses the point of the episode 

it’s important that stan loves board games because people in the real world like andrew tate - who randy is a mouthpiece for here - believe that certain traits can’t coexist with more “traditional” standards of masculinity. in fact, board games are such a gate-kept, male-dominated hobby and culture that randy’s attempt to pin it down as an effeminate interest or something like that just adds to the dramatic irony. stan is no stranger to pridefulness and aggression like his dad, but the joke is that stan is acting “manlier” than randy is in the episode because stan doesn’t worry, most of the time, whether or not he’s even perceived as manly enough

[sn33z3s]

i love your style fanart! can we get more kissing scenes of those two scrimblos?

a few tips on how to kiss your best friend without it being suspicious!

[sn33z3s]

i just read an old post you did on stan and kyle and i just need to express how like that actually changed my perception of style just a little. the one where you said they quite simply needed each other.

my main point is just,,, idk. i really like your longer text posts i think they’re interesting i love reading analyses on south park just because i feel like they’re really interesting to read about. i read a few more posts by you and i just enjoy reading what you have to say a lot so ty haha

hi anon, this is such a nice message, what the heck. i think that "need" trumps a lot of other aspects of stan and kyle's relationship, but in my opinion "need" also doesn't necessarily come from a predestined concept of soulmates (i.e. they need each other because they have no other option - though they do depend on one another to a fault). rather, i think they need each other because they just want to have each other that much. by the canon of post-covid, the good timeline of south park needs them, but to me a very primary characteristic of stankyle is that they just need each other because they choose to need each other, for better or for worse and no matter how explosive it is

...i kind of went on a tangent there, but thank u, i appreciate it!! on paper, meta/analysis/essay writing/whatever about south park sounds silly (and is lol) but if u look at all that dumb subtext and metaphors with intention it can be surprisingly sharp, regardless of the show's very erratic tone. or maybe because of? anyway. i'll do my best to keep talking about whatever inane style-related thoughts i have since sp unfortunately seems like it'll be around for a while <3 have a good one anon!

[sn33z3s]

SP FAVE BRACKET! FINAL ROUND:

Vote for your fave, reblog, and find out who the most loved fourth grader really is!

[sn33z3s]

a neat coincidence, sorry i’m a bit late though!!

there’s maybe a decent amount of bots that make up this number but that’s ok. thank u all so much; i apologize for not being more active but i’m touched y’all like my... content??

it’s a small thing but i recently split up my style playlist into two different sides for those who listened and thought “wait, is this kyle to stan, or stan to kyle?” (lol) so here’s kyle’s side and stan’s side. (some songs are still in the main mix because they’re like. both)

thanks again :] ❤️