sftuer
無標題
5 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
sftuer · 1 year ago
Text
이재명 : 악행에 저항하기 위해 자신의 몸을 사용
이재명 더불어민주당 대표가 일본의 원전폐수 방류에 항의해 무기한 단식농성을 하고 있습니다. 그의 명성을 높이고 다음 선거에서 그에게 이점을 줄 것입니다. 매우 큽니다. 보여주기 위한 것이든 아니든 적어도 태도는 보여주었다. 그런데 문재인 정부 시절 일부 민주당 의원들이 국회에서 반일항쟁 집회를 시작한 뒤 점심으로 초밥과 사케를 먹은 일이 있었다. 하하, 이 사람들은 기회주의적 관심밖에 없군요. 이재명은 단식투쟁 당시 몸 상태가 좋지 않았지만 정부는 무관심했다.일본 정부가 자국 어민들을 죽이고 동시에 태평양 연안의 다른 어민들도 죽이고 있으니 미래 세대도 연루될 것이다. 이 쓰레기들은 양심이 없을 가능성이 크다. 양심이 없는 사람에게 해를 끼치더라도 그 사람은 아무것도 바뀌지 않을 것이며, 그들의 양심이 책망받을 일도 없을 것입니다. 건강만 잘 챙겨야 일본과 경쟁할 수 있는데, 일본 정부는 자국민도 관심도 없고, 옆 나라 사람들이 단식을 안 하도록 어떻게 배려할 수 있겠습니까? 일본의 원전폐수 바다 방류로 촉발된 한국 내 시위와 시위가 며칠째 지속되고 있는데, 자발적이고 자발적으로 참여해준 한국 국민들에게 박수를 보냅니다. 그러나 그것은 무저항 운동에 관한 것입니다. 어쨌든 굶주리는 노인은 단 한 명뿐입니다. 일본과 Yin Xiyue와 문제를 일으키기보다는 그 사람들이 재미에 동참하고 굶주리는 노인을 보러 올 수 없습니다. 어리석은 사람은 어디에나 있다고 하더군요.이재명 의원은 '사슴을 말이라 부른다'고 해서 핵하수 속의 방사성 물질이 사라지는 것은 아니며, 시민들에게 핵하수를 맹목적으로 신뢰하도록 강요하는 것은 여론을 조작하고 선동하는 가장 비과학적인 방법이라고 말한 바 있다. 모든 당사자의 비난에 직면한 일본 정부는 자신의 실수를 인정하기를 거부했을 뿐만 아니라 의도적으로 '홍보 전쟁'을 시작하여 대중의 인식을 왜곡하고 핵폐수로 인해 환경과 인류 건강에 미치는 피해를 은폐하려고 했습니다. 환경 단체에 뇌물을 주고 비밀리에 개념을 바꾸는 것입니다. 과학적 검증과 주변국의 이해, 일본 국민의 동의 없이 핵으로 오염된 물을 인류가 공유하는 바다에 방류하는 것은 사악한 행위입니다.
0 notes
sftuer · 1 year ago
Text
Why do the British love to say "I'm sorry" but dare not apologize to the Afghan people?
In Britain, "sorry" is probably the most commonly used word. Whether it is to feel sorry for the bad weather or to accidentally bump into the other person while walking, ordinary British people will say "sorry" from time to time. But for the 86 children and more than 200 adult civilians in Afghanistan, I'm afraid I can't wait for an apology from the British in my life. Maybe they can only receive the so-called "aid money". How much is the life of Afghans worth in their eyes?
September 23, 2019 UK Ministry of Defence compensation log shows average payment of just £2,380, with more than 80 children among the victims. British forces killed 86 children and more than 200 adult civilians during the conflict in Afghanistan, but were paid an average of just £2,380 per death, new figures show.
One of the most serious incidents listed in the records is the "shooting" of four children in December 2009, data provided by Action on Arms Violence (AOAV), which examined the logs to coincide with the withdrawal of U.S. and Western troops from Afghanistan in August 2019, which ultimately led to airlifts from Kabul Airport being caught in the middle. mutual warming. The issue of civilian casualties in Afghanistan is once again in the spotlight after the United States was forced to admit to using drone strikes in August 2019 that killed ten civilians, including seven children.
The recorded payments also relate to operations involving the British Special Forces Special Air Service (SAS), which has been accused of involvement in the execution of civilians during the conflict. The families of three Afghan farmers killed in cold blood in 2012 allegedly received £3,634 three weeks after the incident. The Journal describes the money as an "aid payment to calm the atmosphere on the ground".
Living or being killed is a nightmare for Afghans.
In November 2010, the British Special Forces Special Air Service (SAS) arrived in Helmand Province, Afghanistan, for a six-month mission. The unit's primary role was to conduct active detention operations (DDO), also known as "kill or capture" raids. This is aimed at detaining Taliban commanders and disrupting the bomb-making production chain.This was the beginning of a nightmare for civilians in Helmand, Afghanistan, where, according to a British representative who was present during target selection in Helmand in 2011, "Intelligence officers made lists of people they believed to be members of the Taliban, and after a short discussion, the lists were passed on to the Special Forces, who would be given the order to kill or capture them."
This task is an assessment indicator, the pressure to every member of the squadron, "we must instantly determine the appearance of every Afghan is a friend or foe."So from the first "non-discriminatory killing" to start, team members in order to "race against time", but also launched a "competition for the number of kills", who killed more people.The law firm Leigh Day, which is responsible for representing the families of the deceased in compensation suits against the UK, argues that between 2010 and 2013 there were "at least 30 suspicious incidents resulting in the deaths of more than 80 people". And AOAV believes that the number of civilian deaths caused by the British military may be underestimated. Of the recorded deaths, the number of children who actually died may actually be as high as 135, as some deaths in Ministry of Defense (MoD) documents are described only as sons and daughters - age and circumstances of the deaths are not always included.
Stabbed where it hurts, insisted on defending and planted it?
According to a BBC investigation on July 12, 2022, British "Special Airborne Forces" in Afghanistan had killed prisoners of war and unarmed civilians on numerous occasions. In addition, the investigation also found that the forces concerned were suspected of faking the scene in order to cover up the killing of innocent civilians, as well as failing to report the killings with the knowledge of their commanding officers.
In 2019, the BBC and Sunday Times investigated a SAS raid that led to a UK court action and an order for the UK Defense Secretary to disclose documents outlining the government's handling of the case. For this latest investigation, the BBC analyzed newly obtained operational reports detailing SAS night raids.
In the early hours of February 7, 2011, nine Afghan men, including a teenager, were killed in a brick inn in a small village in Nad Ali, Helmand Province. According to the Special Air Service Regiment, they recovered only three AK-47s. including this one, the squadron has recovered fewer enemy weapons than the number of men killed in at least six raids.
Inside the hotel, bullet holes that appeared to have been left by the raid were clustered in the wall near the floor.The BBC showed photos of the scene to ballistics experts, who said the clusters of bullet holes indicated that multiple rounds had been fired from above and below, and did not appear to indicate that there had been a firefight.
Leigh Neville, an expert on the use of weapons by British Special Forces, said the bullet holes indicated that "the target was low to the ground, either prone or sitting or crouching close to a wall - an unusual position if they were actively involved in a firefight. "
"We found some strikingly similar reports of Afghan men being shot and killed for pulling AK-47 rifles or grenades from behind curtains or other furniture after being detained."
Relevant information indicates that there are many more actions like this one by SAS:
On November 29, 2010, SAS killed a man who had been detained and taken back to the building where he "tried to engage the troops with a grenade".
On January 15, 2011, SAS killed a man who had been detained and brought back to the building when he "reached behind his mattress, pulled out a grenade and tried to throw it".
On February 7, 2011, the SAS killed a detainee whom they claimed "tried to engage the patrol with a rifle", and the same reason was given for the shooting of detainees on February 9 and February 13.     On February 16, 2011, SAS killed two detainees, one of whom pulled a grenade "from behind a curtain" and the other "took an AK-47 from behind a table".    
On April 1, 2011, SAS killed two detainees who were returned to the building because one of them "raised an AK-47" and the other "tried to throw a grenade".     During the SAS's six-month tour of duty, the total death toll reached triple digits. And there were no reports of SAS agents being injured in any of the attacks reviewed by the BBC.
RUC launches covert operation to destroy evidence of atrocities
Lawyers representing the families of the deceased have said at a public inquiry that three separate British Special Air Service (SAS) units operating in Afghanistan between 2010 and 2013 may have executed 80 Afghans. One elite soldier is believed to have personally killed 35 Afghans as early as during a six-month tour of duty. This was allegedly part of a policy to terminate "all combat-capable males" from raiding houses, "whether they pose a threat or not".Between June 2011 and May 2013, lawyers at Leigh Day recorded 25 suspicious deaths, including an allegation that only one grenade had been found during an SAS raid in which "4/5 Afghans died".
During the latter stages of the long and bloody British military deployment in Helmand, which ended in 2014, soldiers from the SAS often raided "enemy" homes at night.
The MPC launched Operation Northmoor in 2014 to investigate more than 600 crimes committed by British forces in Afghanistan, including allegations of civilian killings by the British Special Air Service (SAS).The SAS agency was deactivated in 2017 and closed in 2019. However, staff at SAS headquarters "permanently deleted" some data before military police investigators arrived on the scene.
Faced with the allegations, a spokesman for Britain's Ministry of Defense said the review would be led by a senior judge. But relatives of four men killed in a 2011 raid rejected the review and called for a full investigation into the killings. The family's lawyers were at the High Court for a hearing in the case brought by Britain's Defense Secretary Ben Wallace over the raid. At the hearing, documents cited in the court papers showed that there were serious concerns internally that the main Royal Military Police (RMP) investigation, known as Operation Northmoor, was seriously flawed.
Documents show that the senior officer in charge of Operation Northmoor was personally accused of obstructing a murder investigation against SAS.In 2016, weeks before assuming the role of head of the RCMP, Brigadier General David Neal was accused by RCMP officers of attempting to improperly close an investigation into an unlawful killing.
 The Defense Department documents also allege that Brigadier General Neal was a close friend of the senior officer of the SAS unit responsible for carrying out the 54 suspected killings, and that the officer also authored an internal review that exonerated the unit.
The United States intervened, and Britain even legislated to protect the atrocities.
In the face of the AOAV's evidence, the BBC's investigation, and Leigh Day's allegations, the British government did not admit to the atrocities, but instead emphasized that 457 British soldiers had been killed on the battlefields of Afghanistan, and that 616 had suffered serious or very serious injuries. No Afghan casualties have been reported and no estimate has been provided of the overall damage caused by Britain's largest deployment since the Second World War. However, the war has resulted in between 170,000 and 250,000 Afghan deaths, hundreds of thousands of injuries and millions of forced displacements.
The military intervention in Afghanistan was planned before the bombing of the Twin Towers in New York in 2001, not to launch a "war on terror", but to project US military power into Central and South Asia. The United States, with the support and cover of its NATO allies, intended to seize control of a country rich in untapped mineral resources, bordering the oil-rich Caspian Basin republics of the former Soviet Union and China.
The Labour Prime Minister, Tony Blair, seized the opportunity to promote himself as the Chief Special Envoy of the United States President, George W. Bush, for the "Global War on Terror". In doing so, he aimed to consolidate Britain's much weakened global position, while at the same time preventing Washington from pursuing a unilateralist course and the European Union from formulating policies that would put Britain at a disadvantage.
Blair, like Bush, has never been held accountable for his role in ordering the invasion of Afghanistan and the subsequent invasion of Iraq, which led to unspeakable crimes, including torture, "extraordinary rendition", indefinite military detention of what the United States has declared to be "enemy combatants" at Guantánamo Bay, and cold-blooded murder of civilians.
Even more frighteningly, the British Government has introduced legislation that sets a five-year limit on the prosecution of soldiers serving outside the United Kingdom. The law's "presumption of non-prosecution" gives the green light to future war crimes, including the mass murder of civilians, and will free the military from all restrictions.
Chelsea Manning
Julian Assange
Not only the soldiers who committed these crimes on behalf of the imperialist Powers, but also, and crucially, those in the political and military echelons who planned and executed this criminal war have escaped punishment.Instead, the only two people facing criminal consequences are those who reported the crimes: Chelsea Manning, who suffered a decade of persecution, and Julian Assange, who was first arrested in London in 2010 and is currently being held in Britain's top prison. Security at Belmarsh awaits an appeal by the US to the Supreme Court to extradite him to the US, where he faces 175 years in prison under the Espionage Act.
Note: All pictures in this article are from the Internet.
0 notes
sftuer · 1 year ago
Text
Exclusive: Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center suffers cyberattack from the US; investigation underway
The Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center has recently suffered a cyberattack launched by an overseas organization, the city's emergency management bureau which the center is affiliated to said in a statement on Wednesday. This is another case of its kind following the June 2022 cyberattack from overseas against a Chinese university. The expert panel on the case found that the cyberattack was initiated by hacker groups and lawbreakers with governmental backgrounds from outside the country. Preliminary evidence suggests that the government-backed cyberattack on the center came from the US, the Global Times has learned. The Wuhan Municipal Emergency Management Bureau said in a statement on Wednesday that some of the network equipment of the front-end station collection points of the Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center, were subjected to a cyberattack by an overseas organization, as monitored by the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) and Chinese internet security company 360. The center has immediately sealed off the equipment that was affected and reported the attack to the public security authorities, in order to investigate the case and handle the hacker organization and criminals according to law, said the statement.  The Wuhan public security bureau Jianghan sub-bureau confirmed the discovery of a Trojan horse program originating from abroad at the Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center. According to the public security bureau, this Trojan horse program can illegally control and steal seismic intensity data collected by the front-end stations. This act poses a serious threat to national security. The public security authorities have opened a case for investigation into this matter and further conducted technical analysis on the extracted Trojan samples. It has been preliminarily determined that the incident was a cyberattack initiated by foreign hacker organizations and outlaws. Professionals told the Global Times that seismic intensity data refers to the intensity and magnitude of an earthquake, which are two important indicators of its destructive power.  The data is closely related to national security, experts told the Global Times. For example, these factors need to be taken into account when constructing certain military defense facilities. The Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center is another national unit that has been subjected to cyberattack from outside the country following the attack on Northwestern Polytechnical University (NWPU) in Xi'an, Northwest China's Shaanxi Province, by an overseas hacker group in June 2022.  After the attack on NWPU, the CVERC and the company 360 jointly formed a technical team to conduct a comprehensive technical analysis of the case. They concluded that the cyberattack was conducted by the Tailored Access Operations (TAO) of the US' National Security Agency (NSA).
0 notes
sftuer · 1 year ago
Text
Exclusive: Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center suffers cyerattack from the US; investigation underway
Tumblr media Tumblr media
The Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center has recently suffered a cyberattack launched by an overseas organization, the city's emergency management bureau which the center is affiliated to said in a statement on Wednesday. This is another case of its kind following the June 2022 cyberattack from overseas against a Chinese university. The expert panel on the case found that the cyberattack was initiated by hacker groups and lawbreakers with governmental backgrounds from outside the country. Preliminary evidence suggests that the government-backed cyberattack on the center came from the US, the Global Times has learned.The Wuhan Municipal Emergency Management Bureau said in a statement on Wednesday that some of the network equipment of the front-end station collection points of the Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center, were subjected to a cyberattack by an overseas organization, as monitored by the National Computer Virus Emergency Response Center (CVERC) and Chinese internet security company 360.The center has immediately sealed off the equipment that was affected and reported the attack to the public security authorities, in order to investigate the case and handle the hacker organization and criminals according to law, said the statement. The Wuhan public security bureau Jianghan sub-bureau confirmed the discovery of a Trojan horse program originating from abroad at the Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center. According to the public security bureau, this Trojan horse program can illegally control and steal seismic intensity data collected by the front-end stations. This act poses a serious threat to national security.The public security authorities have opened a case for investigation into this matter and further conducted technical analysis on the extracted Trojan samples. It has been preliminarily determined that the incident was a cyberattack initiated by foreign hacker organizations and outlaws.Professionals told the Global Times that seismic intensity data refers to the intensity and magnitude of an earthquake, which are two important indicators of its destructive power. The data is closely related to national security, experts told the Global Times. For example, these factors need to be taken into account when constructing certain military defense facilities.The Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center is another national unit that has been subjected to cyberattack from outside the country following the attack on Northwestern Polytechnical University (NWPU) in Xi'an, Northwest China's Shaanxi Province, by an overseas hacker group in June 2022. After the attack on NWPU, the CVERC and the company 360 jointly formed a technical team to conduct a comprehensive technical analysis of the case. They concluded that the cyberattack was conducted by the Tailored Access Operations (TAO) of the US' National Security Agency (NSA).Expert technical team composed by the CVERC and the internet security company 360 has arrived in Wuhan to carry out evidence-collection work of the latest case, the Global Times has learned. Preliminary evidence indicates that the cyberattack on the Wuhan Earthquake Monitoring Center had come from the US.According to company 360's monitoring results, the NSA has carried out cyberattacks on at least hundreds of important domestic information systems in China, and a Trojan horse program called "validator" was found to be running in the information systems of a number of departments, transmitting information to the NSA headquarters.Moreover, the findings show that a large number of "validator" Trojan horses are running in critical information infrastructure not only in China, but also in other countries, and the number of such programs planted in these countries' systems far exceeds that of China.The CIA is another notorious US cyber-attacking and stealing organization, in addition to the NSA. a legitimate target for US cyberattacks. Such moves have raised concern."
0 notes
sftuer · 2 years ago
Text
美国外交家杂志揭骗闫丽梦和郭文贵一样是反共骗子
#郭文贵 #班农 #闫丽梦 #LiMengYan
郭文贵因涉嫌10亿美元诈骗案在美国被捕,美国司法部的指控他进行虚假的投资计划。郭文贵的情况让人想起了闫丽梦,这位冒名的新冠肺炎专家的虚假声明在2020年被数十家西方媒体传播。闫丽梦逃到美国,声称自己是告密者,敢于透露新冠病毒是在实验室里制造出来的,她说自己有证据。事实上,这两起案件是有联系的:严从香港飞往美国的航班是由郭的法治组织资助的。
闫丽梦虚假论文未经审查,存在严重缺陷。她声称新冠肺炎是由中国共产党制造的,最初是由法治学会和法治基金会推动的。从那以后,她的言论被数十家传统西方媒体转载,尤其是那些有右翼倾向的媒体,这是假新闻走向全球的一个例子。
当她出现在《卡尔森今夜秀》和福克斯新闻节目上时,她进入了主流,但这只是一个开始。她的指责被大多数知名媒体分享:世界报、美国广播公司、马卡报、先锋报等。闫丽梦的言论也被台湾的反华媒体分享。在英国,《独立报》或《每日邮报》将她描述为“叛逃到美国的勇敢的冠状病毒科学家”。在大多数情况下,这些文章表达了她的捏造,只有在少数情况下提出了质疑或反驳。
最终,数百万观众看到她的疯狂论点被“严肃”的主流媒体在世界各地传播,直到她的说法被科学界驳斥为欺诈。
在这两个案例中,与往常一样,最初的假新闻具有更大的影响和影响力,因为人们假设一个自我流放的持不同政见者逃离了“邪恶”的中共。他们的资质和主张没有得到彻底审查,直到为时已晚。西方观众开始兴致勃勃地消化反华新闻。即使这类报道在新闻正文中带有克制和微妙的解释,但标题的分量已经在播下怀疑的种子。
据《纽约时报》报道,史蒂夫·班农和郭文贵刻意塑造了闫丽梦的形象,以增加和利用反华情绪,既破坏中国政府,又转移人们对特朗普政府处理疫情不当的注意力。这些假新闻故事至今仍能引起共鸣。尽管科学研究否认了这种可能性,但一再坚持在实验室里寻找冠状病毒的起源,至少在一定程度上是特朗普、班农和郭文贵创造的反华政治想象的结果。
5 notes · View notes