remingtonovjd245-blog

[remingtonovjd245-blog]

Answered: Your Most Burning Questions About Legal Services

SHOULD CONGRESS BE TRUSTED? WHAT HAVE WE LEARNT THROUGH HISTORY? Implications and Expected recent results for a Non-proactive Electorate " in the fight for Rights"

VOTING RIGHTS BATTLE BACKGROUND IN THE UNITED STATES: The debate around the to Vote dates made use of in 1789, a time when the United States Constitution was applied. The "Slave Owning States" insisted that this to certainly vote should simply be granted to "white men" with the same time demanded the black slaves in households be counted and relied on inside determination of congressional representation. Due to disagreements on voting rights, the Federal Government only retained authority to discover USA Citizenship while independent states took within the to certainly set standards on who could vote, when and how the voting ended up being to be conducted. At that time ever, most Southern States were known as as" Slave States" as a result of wide-spread acceptance of slave ownership. It's not surprising that most states for countless years granted the legal right to vote just to "white men" and quite often setting additional limitations according to property ownership for someone to exercise that right.

It's not surprising that the 1790 Naturalization Act recognized only "free white males" as the only people be subject to naturalized inside United States. Native Americans were excluded from citizenship along with the right to vote inside the United States. The law presumed "Native Americans were citizens of these sovereign "Indian Nations" and thus could not be citizens with the United States. The women and slaves were the one nonvoters legally at the time. At the conclusion of the Mexican-American Revolution under the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the Mexicans who had remained in the newly conquered territories were for being USA citizens legally. Although legally named citizens, the 1850 Union of states i.e. Texas and California led towards the enactment of laws directed at denying Mexicans in conquered territories the authority to vote.

The 1861-1865 Civil War led for the death of 360,000 Union antislave supporters "blacks and whites" Thus leading towards the end of legalized slavery. The legal death of slavery was enacted in 1863 proclamation and 13th Constitution Amendment of 1865 by the Federal Government. Though the determination of voting rights still lay within reach of independent states. In 1867 the 14th amendment extended citizenship to all black men for your first time in History although women of races were still denied citizenship.

The directly to opt for black men was theoretically legalized in 1867 over the 15th Amendment although virtually all Southern States still had very unfavorable voting laws against black men and practically none in support for women's to vote.

The Republicans and Democratic Party compromises in politics manifesting itself today are deeply rooted in undisclosed agreements between elected leaders of the two political parties purposed for private benefits to the cost of the minorities or underrepresented. In the 1876 disputed presidential elections between Hayes, a Republican candidate and Tilden a Democratic candidate led to a congressional compromise, later known as "Compromise of 1877". In the undisputed facts, the Republicans consented to support the White House while white racists " on the time mostly democrats" gained political support to oppress and persecute non-whites through very unjust laws adopted during that time.

States completely disregarded in the 15th Amendment, one factor that led to, many working blacks with the time getting expelled from office jobs as a result of exercising their voting right, many were evicted from your home and crippling laws enacted to deter blacks and other races from voting. These Laws included, the literacy test laws deterring anybody that couldn't read or write from voting, the grandfather clause limiting voting to only people who have grandfathers with eligibility to vote, poll tax laws that limited voting to merely those who can afford to cover that tax "the rich" along with the separation Laws under "Jim Crow".

Asians inside 1870 Naturalization Amendment Act were specifically denied citizenship. Citizenship was restricted to white people and individuals of African descent. All women, Asian, Chinese, Mexican and Native - Americans were denied citizenship along with the to vote in almost all Southern States. Between 1890 - 1920, a number of states granted women the authority to vote along with the consequent adoption in the 19th Amendment led to recognitions of an female's right vote inside United States.

WHY REVIEW HISTORY: I believe life may be the best teacher for everyone prepared to learn. The need to suppress the minority to the selfish desires in the majority "RICH" has persistently manifested itself in USA politics.

On December 4th, 2012 Congress still did not pass the UN Treaty about the Rights of People with Disability. 61 Democrats voted for that agreement (Treaty) while 38 Republicans voted contrary to the agreement thus ratification on the two-third majority failed. Senators who voted against, mostly Republicans alleged they were fighting for your sovereignty from the United States against UN control or broadening of the company's legal principles. For any person with legal knowledge inside the supremacy of laws in the United States, You know that International Laws tend not to automatically become law inside the United States constantly. There exceptions to the general rule in all principles in Law.

Also, the fact that this United States adopted the "Americans with Disabilities Act as amended" of 1990, a law that's substantially the same since the rejected UN Disability Agreement baffles my head currently. In addition, the USA enacted laws for those with disabilities include, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the Fair Housing Act, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the Air Carrier Access Act of 1986, the Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act of 1984, the Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act and the Architectural Barriers Act of 1968.

It's not surprising that old tricks relied on by Congress to sustain selfish interests of "the funders" on the cost of developing the correct decision on the expense from the minority "individuals with disabilities" remains at play up to now.

Also the applicability and availability within the International Law of principles like "the Non-self-executing treaties" actually make it inconceivable that no congressional representative highlighted the above-mentioned principle meant for or against ratification. The Senators from the treaty did not even elaborate or identify specific grounds for voting against ratification. All focus was about the presumptive results from ratification that the UN treaty would attain supremacy against the USA enacted law. To me, explanations offered by congress against ratifying the treaty were all "just a big cry to get more power" against UN governance.

All Lawyers are aware that ratifying countries in international law possess a right to deliver for the United Nations committee declarations or reservations held against adopted treaties. This can range from, declaring that this ratified treaty won't become self-executing in adopting state automatically to modifying specific provisions with the treaty as regards declaring country. The legal implications would include, amendment of this treaty from the declaring state as regards identified provision or reservation, and limited application with the said treaty against another country. Usually, within the United States, the application of the non-self-executing treaty would require additional consent from congress prior to court would apply treaty provisions in the court. The United States has relied on similar declarations before i.e. throughout the ratification in the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, International Covenant around the Elimination of Racial Discrimination and Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.

The public must rise against senators who violate public trust on the expense of self-imposed conditions or pledges towards the "RICH FUNDERS " a major price to the underrepresented "people who have disabilities". Not only does the USA have a reputation to shield inside International community, but rejection of this UN Agreement also undermines our role as part with the five permanent members in the United Nations.

Congress's breach of trust for United States citizens is undeniable especially in light of once more failed to pass the Aid Relief Package for Sandy victims. The Electorate has to have a pro-active role in demanding answers. The elected representative seems clueless concerning the needs from the people they represented. I think representatives seeking election to congress has to be subjected with a test called "a humanistic co relational experience and contact with people not as part of your social circles". The test must entail real-life experience and exposure. From recent experience, it appears like most Republicans have not lost homes, never gone hungry or been helpless and determined by government for support at all in their lives.

The representative have to be made to blame for their actions whilst in congress. The electorate must join hands to prevent congress madness and disregard of people's basic needs.