Text
youtube
Have you heard what this woman is saying? Former DNC Mid-Atlantic Regional Chair and women's Co-chair. Says she's left the party, and basically spilling all the goods.
She's highly intelligent and I think she sees that the whole farce has been exposed, and she's beating the rush as the first to come out and admit the fraud. She knows that the credibility of everyone who continues to tow the line for the Democrat party is going to be destroyed.
Says they all knew about Biden's cognitive decline and responses were scripted. Definitely seems legit. I don't think she fully realizes the gravity of what she's exposing.
87 notes
·
View notes
Text
This should be viral. The ONLY reason this isn't trending everywhere is because it is being suppressed. Do not let the censorship machine win. Watch and share/re-blog.
Censorship is not a tool of Democracy. It is a tool of Fascism.
youtube
Have you heard what this woman is saying? Former DNC Mid-Atlantic Regional Chair and women's Co-chair. Says she's left the party, and basically spilling all the goods.
She's highly intelligent and I think she sees that the whole farce has been exposed, and she's beating the rush as the first to come out and admit the fraud. She knows that the credibility of everyone who continues to tow the line for the Democrat party is going to be destroyed.
Says they all knew about Biden's cognitive decline and responses were scripted. Definitely seems legit. I don't think she fully realizes the gravity of what she's exposing.
87 notes
·
View notes
Text
youtube
Have you heard what this woman is saying? Former DNC Mid-Atlantic Regional Chair and women's Co-chair. Says she's left the party, and basically spilling all the goods.
She's highly intelligent and I think she sees that the whole farce has been exposed, and she's beating the rush as the first to come out and admit the fraud. She knows that the credibility of everyone who continues to tow the line for the Democrat party is going to be destroyed.
Says they all knew about Biden's cognitive decline and responses were scripted. Definitely seems legit. I don't think she fully realizes the gravity of what she's exposing.
87 notes
·
View notes
Text
https://rumble.com/v6q293s-ep.-2149-trump-zelenskyy-meeting-goes-totally-nuclear.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Here is a link to the Ben Shapiro podcast. It is the best breakdown and explanation of the oval office meeting with Ukraine's Zelenskyy that I have found to date. Apparently, Tumblr sill doesn't play nice with links from Rumble, so I'll include another link below that will hopefully link to the video.
Try this link:
Link to Shapiro podcast: ( Link to Ep. 2149 )
If that doesn't work, you need to go to Rumble.com, search for Ben Shapiro and watch episode 2149. Then hit up Tumblr and ask them what gives with links to Rumble.com
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
https://rumble.com/v6q293s-ep.-2149-trump-zelenskyy-meeting-goes-totally-nuclear.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Here is a link to the Ben Shapiro podcast. It is the best breakdown and explanation of the oval office meeting with Ukraine's Zelenskyy that I have found to date. Apparently, Tumblr sill doesn't play nice with links from Rumble, so I'll include another link below that will hopefully link to the video.
Try this link:
Link to Shapiro podcast: ( Link to Ep. 2149 )
If that doesn't work, you need to go to Rumble.com, search for Ben Shapiro and watch episode 2149. Then hit up Tumblr and ask them what gives with links to Rumble.com
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Criticism of Trump is that he's siding with Putin. But Trump knows, the reality is that you are either fighting Putin or negotiating with him. Zelensky wants a total surrender and withdrawal of Russian forces, but the only way that happens is if the United States joins the fight with boots on the ground and that could mean WWIII.
Note: This is opinion. I am not affiliated with any of the governments or political leaders involved in this discussion. This opinion is based on information and discussions seen on public media sources and platforms. If you have a differing opinion, please share, and be sure to use logical arguments based in fact and reason.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Criticism of Trump is that he's siding with Putin. But Trump knows, the reality is that you are either fighting Putin or negotiating with him. Zelensky wants a total surrender and withdrawal of Russian forces, but the only way that happens is if the United States joins the fight with boots on the ground and that could mean WWIII.
Note: This is opinion. I am not affiliated with any of the governments or political leaders involved in this discussion. This opinion is based on information and discussions seen on public media sources and platforms. If you have a differing opinion, please share, and be sure to use logical arguments based in fact and reason.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Share this with your liberal Democrat friends.
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
I have long argued that the liberal media role is often just to offer a plausible narrative that allows the Democrats and leftist voters to maintain their positions and explain away their mistakes with the simple explanation, " no, it's Trump's fault". In other words, avoid embarrassment and humiliation.
17 notes
·
View notes
Text
We are finding out that some liberal media sources were receiving back door subsidies from USAID and perhaps other taxpayer funded agencies. Democrat voters should be furious at the news sources they had trusted to deliver unbiased facts and information about our nation's affairs.
29 notes
·
View notes
Text
Mark Zuckerberg has now publicly admitted that they were heavily pressured by the Biden administration to censor factual information about covid from the American public. My question is, do you think this was the only topic of discussion that they were pressured to censor by the Biden administration?
Hint: this is a rhetorical question. It's probably just the simplest one to admit to. Perhaps because it's the least partisan, although it's quite likely that even censorship of covid discussion was largely along political lines.
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
This is the type of insight and research I used to post on Tumblr before I felt that most of my posts were just going to be suppressed so why bother. This one got a total of (3) notes when I posted it 5 or 6 years ago.
Read these paragraphs I clipped from the Wikipedia page on Giant Sequoias and their adaptation to natural wildfires. And then I’ll explain why it’s relevant to today’s news cycle...
From Wikipedia:
Giant sequoias are in many ways adapted to forest fires. Their bark is unusually fire resistant, and their cones will normally open immediately after a fire.[20] The giant sequoias are having difficulty reproducing in their original habitat (and very rarely reproduce in cultivation) due to the seeds only being able to grow successfully in full sun and in mineral-rich soils, free from competing vegetation. Although the seeds can germinate in moist needle humus in the spring, these seedlings will die as the duff dries in the summer. They therefore require periodic wildfire to clear competing vegetation and soil humus before successful regeneration can occur. Without fire, shade-loving species will crowd out young sequoia seedlings, and sequoia seeds will not germinate. When fully grown, these trees typically require large amounts of water and are therefore often concentrated near streams.[citation needed] Squirrels, chipmunks, finches and sparrows consume the freshly sprouted seedlings, preventing their growth.[21]
Fires also bring hot air high into the canopy via convection, which in turn dries and opens the cones. The subsequent release of large quantities of seeds coincides with the optimal postfire seedbed conditions. Loose ground ash may also act as a cover to protect the fallen seeds from ultraviolet radiation damage. Due to fire suppression efforts and livestock grazing during the early and mid-20th century, low-intensity fires no longer occurred naturally in many groves, and still do not occur in some groves today. The suppression of fires leads to ground fuel build-up and the dense growth of fire-sensitive white fir, which increases the risk of more intense fires that can use the firs as ladders to threaten mature giant sequoia crowns. Natural fires may also be important in keeping carpenter ants in check.[22] In 1970, the National Park Service began controlled burns of its groves to correct these problems. Current policies also allow natural fires to burn. One of these untamed burns severely damaged the second-largest tree in the world, the Washington tree, in September 2003, 45 days after the fire started. This damage made it unable to withstand the snowstorm of January 2005, leading to the collapse of over half the trunk.
Basically, what this says is that the Giant Sequoias benefit from frequent wildfires in many ways, including pine cones being opened from the heat to aid in reproduction. It says fires also control ground vegetation and dead limb debris so that young sprouts don’t compete with other low plants for sun and nutrients. And for the record, I believe that there are many species of trees and plants that use fires to reproduce and refresh their populations, but the Sequoias are one example that most everyone is familiar with, and one we consider a national treasure of sorts.
Found elsewhere on the same page, is discussion that Sequoias and Sequoia forests have populated North America at least as far back as the last ice age (I’ll say 15,000 years although the climate change mob wants to re-write all those dates to suit their arguments) but fossil specimens of Giant Sequoia have been found to date back 10′s of millions of years.
I think a conclusion we can draw from this, is that wild fires have likely been burning and refreshing forests for 10′s of thousands or even 10′s of millions of years. Those fires would do the ground clearing or ‘forest maintenance’ that we are hearing about in the news today. When the ground tinder gets burned up every few years, the fires that sweep the area are smaller and may never turn into the raging infernos we see on the news today. But our society requires that we put out these fires as soon as they ignite, so the ground tinder builds up and waits to fuel the inevitable sweeping inferno that results.
The real problem however, is that we cannot just let the natural fires take their course because we have build neighborhoods in and around those forests. Sad but true.
Link to the wikipedia page —-> (sequoia page)
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
This post is from years ago. Still rings true...
The sad truth about the California wildfires. Those forests have been burned by wildfires for thousands and thousands of years. What has changed...??? People now live there...
10 notes
·
View notes
Text
Holding the news media accountable for their lies and false reporting is the first step in fixing our broken news media.
99 notes
·
View notes