20 • Poland • INFJ • ♍ • archival science • classic literature
Last active 2 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
so i just watched beetlejuice beetlejuice and EXCUSE ME MARIA SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE WAS POLISH SHE LITERALLY NAMED POLON AFTER HER COUNTRY
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
Monument at the mass killing site in Derazhnia, western Ukraine, 1995. Approximately 4,000 Jews and Roma were shot here in September 1942 by German soldiers and Ukrainian policemen.
209 notes
·
View notes
Text
"The Wedding" (The First Dance), 1919, by Moshe Rynecki
351 notes
·
View notes
Text
“RZUŁTY” (yellow)
Oil on canvas, 140 x 180 cm, 2023
424 notes
·
View notes
Text
it's always a good day to complain about English speakers
190K notes
·
View notes
Text
new disney movie but it's based on slavic mythology and legends when
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
esc girlies this is ur final (hopefully) reminder to NOT vote for blanka in this semi final, do i HAVE TO REMIND U GUYS OF THE FUCKIN DRAMA??
50 notes
·
View notes
Text
Reasons to end the monarchy: Charles Edition
Well it’s the coronation so you know what it’s time for.
The entire concept of a monarchy is actively undemocratic. The head of state should not be someone who is only in that position because they were born into a certain family.
Having a monarchy upholds classism as a specific family of great wealth and power are viewed as superior to others.
They stand for a history of racism and imperialism. This country has done some truly terrible things in its history and the monarchy are a symbol of that. In order to attempt to begin to undo the harm that we have done, we need to remove this symbol of oppression.
The royal family have previously lobbied the government to hide their own personal wealth. Despite this, we are obviously aware that they have a large amount of wealth.
Prince Charles has himself lobbied the government on a number of occasions. His ‘black spider memos’ show that he has repeatedly pressured ministers on a wide range of topics from the Iraq war to badger culling to alternative therapies. He has used his power to lobby the government on subjects that would affect him.
The monarch does not occupy a ceremonial role as is frequently claimed. Ministers and civil servants have to consult the monarch. Civil servants have to get the consent of the royals on pieces of legislation, which can cause delays on implementation.
Even if the monarch did occupy a purely ceremonial role, as a literal billionaire he wields a ridiculously high amount of power over people.
Windsor Castle brings in less money than Windsor Legoland does. The many castles that are owned by the royal family could be used to create spaces for the public to enjoy or to be used as a shelter for the homeless. The Louvre in Paris used to be house of the French monarchy and gets over twenty times the tourists. Edinburgh castle hasn’t had the monarchy live in it for centuries and yet still brings in tourism.
Prince Andrew is widely known to be connected to Jeffrey Epstein; yet he has not had to face any repercussions for his actions despite blatantly lying when being asked about his actions. The royal family have defended him and prevented him from facing the consequences of his actions.
They cost around £334 million per year. This money could be used to help the poor, given to the NHS, to repair and build infrastructure, to support small businesses that are struggling, pretty much anything.
The royal household publishes a much lower figure about the cost of the royal family, so they are actively trying to cover up their cost.
Charles has had access to confidential Cabinet papers, undermining our democracy.
He has publicly championed alternative medicine and has repeatedly promoted it. He sent at least seven letters to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, that then shortly relaxed the rules governing the labeling of herbal products, ones he as part of Charles’s Duchy Originals produces.
He lobbied the health secretary regarding greater provision of alternative treatments on the NHS.
In 2018, 46% of Britons wanted him to abdicate immediately after Elizabeth died. He’s barely wanted by the country even with the sheer amount of pro-monarchy propaganda going around. Charles specifically is very unpopular.
In order to speak to him, broadcasters had to sign a 15-page contract, which includes Clarence house attending the rough and fine cut edits of films and if unhappy can remove that contribution, as well as stipulating that all questions directed at him must be pre-approved and vetted by his representative.
His personal wealth is £1.8 billion. He inherited a large amount of this from Elizabeth, with it being exempt from inheritance tax. Having an immunity from this tax when others don’t is ridiculous.
The Duchy of Cornwall was named in the Paradise papers.
The coronation is going to cost £100 million during a cost of living crisis.
People have been banned from protesting Charles with official warning letters were sent to anti-monarchists.
Protestors who block roads, airports and railways could face an entire year behind bars. Locking yourself to others, objects or buildings could go to prison for six months and face an unlimited fine. Police are allowed to head off disruption by stopping and searching protestors that they suspect.
The public were encouraged to swear allegiance to the new King when he gets sworn in, this is a deeply disturbing suggestion.
He’s a billionaire who’s going to use the public’s money to celebrate himself.
The monarch has sweeping immunity from many laws
He owns business parks and small rented cottages, six of the ten top residential homes, 285,000 acres of mineral rich land. He’s ridiculously rich in a country where so many people are facing extreme poverty.
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
Am I the only one here who is so damn angry about the fact that a large portion of the Slavic representation on the Western media is either Russian, Russian-coded (e.g. the Grisha Universe by Leigh Bardugo) or copies the narratives about other Slavic nations that exist in the Russian discourse about them?
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
People stepping out of a synagogue in Zhabokrich, Podolia, 1924
Zhabokrich in the Vinnytsia oblast can be found between the watersheds of the Southern Bug and the Dniester rivers. Jews settled in Zhabokrich in the 17th century. They were raftsmen, shoemakers, millers, traders, furriers, carpenters and blacksmiths. German and Romanian forces occupied Zhabokrich on about July 20, 1941 and perpetrated a large massacre, annihilating nearly the whole Jewish community.
28 notes
·
View notes
Text
44K notes
·
View notes
Text
If youre not Polish or dont live in central/eastern europe shut the fuck up. Literally shut your mouth. Stop talking about world war 3 or article 5. Stop spreading fear and misinformation. Check your fucking sources. On behalf of my people, shut the fuck up.
878 notes
·
View notes
Text
Fyi jokes about Poles wanting war aren't funny. At all.
Nobody here is happy about war. All we want is for Russia to leave us alone forever. But since we apparently can't have that we're looking for ways to protect ourselves. Trying to misconstrue that is dangerous and stupid.
767 notes
·
View notes
Text
Polish people: "Don't erase Maria Skłodowska-Curie's Polishness. And please call her Skłodowska-Curie, everyone calling her Marie Curie is why so many people think she was French"
Westerners, coming up with 547 excuses not to refer to a historical figure by the surname they used for themselves:
My favourite is all the ways Westerners are trying to argue that prejudice against Poles doesn't exist and this is just "white people trying to be oppressed", which is 72 kinds of bullshit
65 notes
·
View notes
Text
It's not the first day of summer
It's the 97th day of war
277 notes
·
View notes