Text
Frustrated that people continued to consume so much alcohol even after it was banned, federal officials had decided to try a different kind of enforcement. They ordered the poisoning of industrial alcohols manufactured in the United States, products regularly stolen by bootleggers and resold as drinkable spirits. The idea was to scare people into giving up illicit drinking. Instead, by the time Prohibition ended in 1933, the federal poisoning program, by some estimates, had killed at least 10,000 people. [...] By mid-1927, the new denaturing formulas included some notable poisons—kerosene and brucine (a plant alkaloid closely related to strychnine), gasoline, benzene, cadmium, iodine, zinc, mercury salts, nicotine, ether, formaldehyde, chloroform, camphor, carbolic acid, quinine, and acetone. The Treasury Department also demanded more methyl alcohol be added—up to 10 percent of total product. It was the last that proved most deadly. The results were immediate, starting with that horrific holiday body count in the closing days of 1926. Public health officials responded with shock. “The government knows it is not stopping drinking by putting poison in alcohol,” New York City medical examiner Charles Norris said at a hastily organized press conference. “[Y]et it continues its poisoning processes, heedless of the fact that people determined to drink are daily absorbing that poison. Knowing this to be true, the United States government must be charged with the moral responsibility for the deaths that poisoned liquor causes, although it cannot be held legally responsible.” His department issued warnings to citizens, detailing the dangers in whiskey circulating in the city: “[P]ractically all the liquor that is sold in New York today is toxic,” read one 1928 alert. He publicized every death by alcohol poisoning. He assigned his toxicologist, Alexander Gettler, to analyze confiscated whiskey for poisons—that long list of toxic materials I cited came in part from studies done by the New York City medical examiner’s office. Norris also condemned the federal program for its disproportionate effect on the country’s poorest residents. Wealthy people, he pointed out, could afford the best whiskey available. Most of those sickened and dying were those “who cannot afford expensive protection and deal in low grade stuff.” And the numbers were not trivial. In 1926, in New York City, 1,200 were sickened by poisonous alcohol; 400 died. The following year, deaths climbed to 700. These numbers were repeated in cities around the country as public-health officials nationwide joined in the angry clamor. Furious anti-Prohibition legislators pushed for a halt in the use of lethal chemistry. “Only one possessing the instincts of a wild beast would desire to kill or make blind the man who takes a drink of liquor, even if he purchased it from one violating the Prohibition statutes,” proclaimed Sen. James Reed of Missouri.
This isn't particularly relevant to anything specific. I just wanted to remind everyone this is something the US government did.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
These men just stole the personal information of everyone in America AND control the Treasury. Link to article.
Akash Bobba
Edward Coristine
Luke Farritor
Gautier Cole Killian
Gavin Kliger
Ethan Shaotran
Spread their names!
65K notes
·
View notes
Text
Beaded Succulent // TheBohoBeachBum
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
keep thinking of this tweet and trying to not crack up in front of women
20K notes
·
View notes
Text
According to this study, women diagnosed with [anorexia nervosa] at the age of 15 years are likely to live 25 years less than predicted for the normal population; women diagnosed at the age of 20 are predicted to have 36.6 years of life remaining, versus 60.5 for the normal population; and for those in whom AN starts at the age of 25 the estimate of years of life remaining is 32.2, versus 55.5.
https://sci-hub.st/https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0378512213001254
151 notes
·
View notes
Text
HOURLY COMICS DAY these are so ugly, please enjoy!!!!!!!!!
#holy shit me and my husband have said exactly this about name of the wind especially book 2#whats even crazier is they introduce a female character that is literally better than him at magic objectively#like she didnt get all the extra help she doesnt have the magic edema ruh 'i can lie about anything and people believe me'#and she doesnt get kvothe's main character plot armor#and shes still better than him. like quantifiably.#which is like. its fine to have a character that is better than the MC but she's also more interesting and less annoying#so im like. why isnt the book about her. WHY ISNT SHE THE MAIN CHARACTER. YOU MADE HER MORE INTERESTING AND TALENTED THAN KVOTHE#AND THEN MADE HER A SIDE CHARACTER#dont get me STARTED on how everyone wants to fuck Kvothe. its too bad we dont Mary Sue shame anymore because he is a perfect candidate
963 notes
·
View notes
Text
Michael A Davenport, 3,090 Degrees Fahrenheit (Oil on canvas, 2025)
30in x 48in
28K notes
·
View notes
Photo
naw the world aint ready for this text post yet
94K notes
·
View notes
Text
girl on club dancefloor has her feet cooled by a friend pouring smirnoff ice over them (2000)
13K notes
·
View notes
Text
9K notes
·
View notes
Text
do you think a white boy could ever eat dinnar
151 notes
·
View notes
Text
filtering down ao3 results from 14000 to 6 based on a single tag is foul. im sorry none of you are as enlightened as me ig.
90K notes
·
View notes
Text
dead serious WHAT did they put into claire de lune to make it do all that
20K notes
·
View notes
Text
The word you are looking for is “selfish.” Not narcissist, not sociopath, selfish.
39K notes
·
View notes