peoplesrazor

[peoplesrazor]

Say what you want about Lily's dipshit fanbase but at least they keep to themselves. One age-regressing "I was groomed into sexually assaulting a 13 year old" babytime dog princess has one disagreement with someone who used to do lily crit content on tumblr and her fans reply with harassment towards random unaffiliated blogs, rpf shipping, and rape threats. I'll take one little polish twerp giving Sai money and sending blogs to random youtubers any day over some of these absolute freaks

[peoplesrazor]

seeing that raystarkitty has made art for patricia taxxon does not surprise me at all given ray has been called out before for similar and other deplorable interests

and you know who else they're associated with? ezra toonimal. you know, the guy running a site full of pedophiles?

[peoplesrazor]

Happy Holidays

Hey everyone. I'm going to take a break from here for the seasonal festivities, so hopefully I'll see all of you very soon.

Take care. Keep well. Peace!

[peoplesrazor]

Just putting this here.

[peoplesrazor]

Lily Kisses Mikaila and in a low growl calls her a good girl

No, I don't wanna. Will be skipping this.

Not the video, the video has good info in it. Just the kiss and condescending attitude.

Some Glass of Water Style Ramblings from Lily

All the classics are here: Rebecca Sugar is a terrible artist, Sai is a "tub of goo", TCOAL is "accidentally about trauma bonding", and she misinterprets socialist literary criticism.

Highlight at 5:58 Lily Kisses Mikaila and in a low growl calls her a good girl. Cringe warning for that lol

[peoplesrazor]

Slipped right in to the Holocaust Denial again, didn't they?

Again, for anyone who hasn't kept up. This is Holocaust Denial/Distortion, because they are comparing people they don't agree with with a group that committed one of the worse genocides on record. And they are doing it mostly because we didn't immediately fold when they attacked us.

Don't do this, kids. Making the comparison can only lesson the idea of how horrendous the Holocaust was and will not make the person you are it saying about look worse, because you are attempting to turn it into a schoolyard insult. And you are sadly succeeding on that front.

If you don't want to believe some rando on the internet, I've got an authority on the subject for you to look into.

United States Memorial Holocaust Museum.

If you want to call this revisionist, there here is that link: Museum of Tolerance.

And if you want to whine that Americans are too sensitive and blah, blah. We can go to one of the sources.

AUSCHWITZ-BIRKENAU

This is why people invoke Godwin's Law and say this is an automatic loss. If you can't argue your point without calling your opponent a member of one of the most dangerous extremist groups ever, then you clearly had no point to begin with.

On a much less important note. Who the hell is doing this for a living? Are you so inexperienced you think that? Really? Even the rare few who do make a little money on this, make most of their money at other jobs or make other content. It's just weird to think this is some kind of job.

I, mean, was it your job to make this post?

I'm not even going to address the transphobia accusations this time. It's just getting to be an even weaker claim from over-use. No matter what crimes we show evidence for, you say we are transphobes who are mad about a cartoon. So be it.

You knob ends are going to say it, because you have no defense for the things she's done and won't look at the evidence even when we toss it right in front of you.

[peoplesrazor]

This you?

I'm ready for it, what have you got to say about Patricia

Patricia has repeatedly stated she's interested in incest and bestiality on top of openly being interested in cub porn.

I'm not posting that here of course, but it's easy enough to find. This is all disgustingly easy to find, including her and her fans and her MOTHER apparently bullying a 13 year old into silence after they were subjected to porn and her masturbating in calls with them.

But that's ok because...abusive childhood and she threatens to kill herself whenever anyone even lightly criticizes her.

Also the eflashing

Then she'll apologize, go onto her private twitter and say shit like this

How much do you want to know about this rancid person because I can go all day.

Then the day after mocking us for being critical of Lily Orchard, an incest obsessed cp writing rapist who's also viciously racist towards asians, and dismissing the claims against her with a handwave

She says

Yeah, I'm not buying it and I'm sick of people buying it and I'm sick of this person getting undue support because she's a transwoman when she's gleefully spreading hate towards transmascs then playing victim while my friends get anons calling them things like zippertits and not really trans.

Same shit as Lily Orchard.

You only deserve affirmation, you do not deserve attention or good faith support of anything, but your most fundamental human rights.

I'm so fucking tired of this shit.

[peoplesrazor]

Yeah, they are just a tourist trolling:

Very proud of it though:

I'm genuinely curious about what you were hoping to accomplish lobbing baseless accusations of transmisogyny and harassment at Ant (agramuglia). And I say this was baseless becuase you refused to give any concrete examples of your claims - anyone can just lie on the internet, and everyone knows that, so your vague, uncorroborated examples will just be dismissed by everyone like you never posted anything to begin with. So why do this? Was it to vent? Was it in the hopes that gullible people will believe whatever fits their world view or narrative? This isn't bait for an argument, this all just makes no sense, and I'm honestly just curious.

I'm just having fun on the internet honestly

I've actually witnessed that worm you like to defend harass trans women, yes other than the lolcow you're obsessed with. People like you wont be convinced a man can do anything wrong. And I guess that's not even strange. You're a drop in the ocean that is transmisogyny.

And like why would I give you proof of what he's done. I'm not trying to actually cause his to be removed from the transmisogyny site or be shunned from the wannabe kiwifarms people. Anyone with any awareness of transmisogyny could see clear as day what a worm he is.

Fuck off or whatever

[peoplesrazor]

love how that anon doesn’t know or ignored the fact that you went into Lily’s videos with the idea that she was hated for her horrible takes, THEN found out about all the horrid shit she did AFTER you criticized her shit SU takes.

I sure did.

ALL I ever wanted to do was dunk on Lily's shitty media takes. It was so much more fun when I thought she was just saying out of pocket crazy bullshit. But now? I can see the Matrix. I can trace back every single one of her stupid opinions to some personal hang-up she has, or some critique about her writing, or some grudge she's been holding for a decade.

I hate that I understand how she thinks now.

[peoplesrazor]

I wanna make my views on some recent stuff going on clear:

Kinks do not make someone wrong or bad.

Harming actual people does.

That is all.

[peoplesrazor]

Okay, I'm a pendant, but damn, these kids are giving me a work out today.

"Godwins Law is some stupid shit online discoursers made up to dismiss opinions they don’t like..."

Inncorrect.

Godwins Law was was put into effect by attorney and author Mark Godwin in the 1990s. He was concerned with arguments in usenet groups which ended in comparisons he considered Holocaust Denial. (For the record, according to the National Holocaust Museum, he is correct.) He introduced the concept as a means of an experiment in memetics. (coined by Richard Dawkins, just so I don't have to make that post.)

You could, at best, argue that Sai isn't using it the way Godwin intended, but that is the way it's most often used today. Godwin intended for this to lead to larger discussions. In other words, how, is disagreeing with you on something, the same as being a Nazi?

If you can't provide that context, then yeah, you are engaging in Holocaust Denial.

That's what Godwin's Law is.

Godwins Law is some stupid shit online discoursers made up to dismiss opinions they don’t like, bringing that up would be like treating Rule 34 as a real reason for why my little pony porn should exist

Nah pretty much as soon as you start calling people Nazis because you don't have an intelligent response your opinion should be disregarded.

[peoplesrazor]

OED is descriptive, how we use words, not prescriptive, how words are suppose to be used. And yes, there is no way an etymologist or linguist is ignoring this. It is sort of inherent to those studies to understand that language is fluid because of this reason.

A real world example of people getting this wrong is insisting the tower housing the bell called Big Ben, be called the Elizabeth Tower. That is, indeed the name given to that tower. But do you know what British historians, tour guides, city planners, et al, call it?

Big Ben.

Because that's what everyone calls it.

Sorry for butting in, but I'm an professional pedant. This person is clearly a rank amateur.

So according to ludo-nadir, you have to be specifically intellectually disabled to say retard?? So slur reclamation is not on the basis of someone who’s being called said slur may reclaim it, it’s only those who the slur is directly definition-based targeting? So I can’t use Queer even if I’m gay just because I’m not weird enough? I can’t use the F word because I’m not a bundle of sticks??

Not only that, but words need to have a singular definition that never once wavers in colloquial usage.

He is using etymological terminology to justify what he's saying, but anyone who studied etymology can tell you how ridiculous what he's saying is. Any dumbass in college can access the OED and see the origins of a word. And only a dumbass would think quoting the OED on its own makes you sound smart.

[peoplesrazor]

Okay, just a clarification.

I know this has been talked about already, but where events fall on timelines can be important for context. On a personal note, this is just bugging me so I'm going to correct the misconception here.

Lily Simpson said what she did well before Lily Orchard recommended her video on Moon Girl. It's been at least a few weeks and as much as a month ago, by now. It's possible Simpson said more on other social media since then, but Anon seems to be quoting what she said in that video word for word. This was clearly already what she thought.

This was not a response to Lily Orchard talking about her video.

As others have mentioned, this is not a compliment. Your hair looks nice, is a compliment. Watch this video because I'm too uninterested in talking about the issues of other trans people, is not.

Also, anon, calling Lily Simpson transphobic is quite the wild take, the kind that would require a lot of evidence to be believed. She built her youtube channel on covering trans-focused episodes of tv shows and pointing out which she feels are positive and which she feel are negative. That is, almost exclusively, what she does.

Addendum: Because some one asked. It's this video on Two and a Half Men. At about 19:50 she brings up wanting to do a pokemon video and talks about Lily Orchard.

Also, it was 2 months ago.

[peoplesrazor]

The problem is, Lily, your media takes often contain evidence of your racism, your ableism, your incest fetish, your fake leftism, and so on. They should be covered, for those reasons alone.

Even without that evidence, pointing out where you a lying about how production works, how animation works, how much power writers and showrunners have, and discussing your personal attacks on creators is an effective way to deter more people from being influenced by you.

Seeing these things can also serve as validation for those who have already left your little cult that they made the right choice.

Also, no. Even if none of the rest of this was true, people might still cover your increasingly unhinged and wrong takes. They are that bad. Will I be talking about your Dragon Age videos a few months from now? Probably not.

Because you will have a new bad take by then for me to discuss.

There are a lot of your videos/posts I don't touch. While I admit, lately, it's because you keep saying, basically, the same thing: Gee, I wish this story was a different story and the only argument for that is: well it's not. There are other videos I'm sure have insanely bad takes, weird tangents, and so on that I never mention because I am not familiar enough with the media you are covering to feel comfortable giving an opinion on those videos.

However, when you talk about something I know well, I feel justified in discussing my views on it. If I know you are lying about a creator, I feel justified in giving evidence to prove you wrong. If you compare a fictional setting to a concentration camp, I am well within my rights to call you a holocaust denier.

Because that's how that works.

[peoplesrazor]

It all just gives "we're more worried this persons actions may make us look bad than the fact this person is a child predator and abuser in the first place" and it's fucking sick and very worrying

THIS ^^^^^

[peoplesrazor]

Oh yeah here's this whole argument if you guys wanted that.

[peoplesrazor]

Who the fuck would dare cancel Sesame Street