Tumgik
pasalesabin · 10 months
Text
Nepal
Nepal initially existed as a distributed power. Prithivi Narayan Shah played a pivotal role in unifying and forming Greater Nepal. Throughout this historical period, various Ranas held sway as leaders, while numerous Shahs ascended the throne as kings. Despite the passage of many dynasties, Nepal managed to remain isolated from the rest of the world.
During the British rule in India, Nepalis sought employment beyond their borders, particularly in regions like Darjeeling and Assam controlled by the British. Nepal exhibited a rent-seeking mentality, desiring external rule and guidance. Unfortunately, a pervasive attitude emerged where individuals were reluctant to instigate change, contributing significantly to our challenges. The issue of brain drain became prominent in 1815 and escalated rapidly in the 1850s. Initially, it was fields like Darjeeling in India that attracted Nepalis due to British influence. However, in contemporary times, destinations such as Australia, the USA, and Dubai have become magnets for Nepali migrants.
The historical pattern in Nepal reveals a recurring cycle of distributed power, followed by centralized rule under a king, then a shift to democracy. Interestingly, it appears that democracy has gained favor among the populace. Nevertheless, Nepal consistently finds itself positioned between two influential countries, China and India, both examples of distinct development models—one democratic and the other more isolated from the global arena.
In contemplating the cyclical nature of events, it's crucial to recognize that in times of war, it's the soldiers who bear the brunt, not the kings.
The key to progress lies in fostering a mindset geared towards improvement rather than a mere desire for change.
2 notes · View notes