'cause Old Yharnam kinda sucked. (also video games are my life). Trans woman. 28 year old with the life experience of a sheltered 14 year old.
Last active 4 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
truly blessed to live somewhere I can log off, go outside and touch grass while still being surrounded by gay furry art
27K notes
·
View notes
Text
here's the story. i know expressvpn has been recommended in some 🏴☠️ how-to posts but it is not trustworthy. the parent company, kape technologies, not only used to distribute malate but has ties to multiple state surveillance agencies. and be careful where you look for info about good vpns, because kape technologies owns a bunch of "vpn review" sites too
93K notes
·
View notes
Text
36K notes
·
View notes
Text
there is a judge in Seattle who does the weekly name change hearings, and who says it's her favorite part of the week. she says she doesn't read out previous names, or ask about the reasons why people want to change them. she says it's a beautiful moment, and a celebration; a claiming of a new identity, or a reclamation of an old identity. she encourages the room to clap for folks. then she welcomes everyone up, one by one, by last name and with warmth; she shows them the court order where nobody else can see, asks them to double check the spelling, and then they're done! do they want a picture? do they want their friends and loved ones who came with them to be in it too? do they want the court order in the photo? she helps everyone pose, shakes hands and stands with them for as long as they need to take it, recruits the clerk for help taking photos of the folks who came alone. then she tells them where to go next, congratulates them, and claps along with the rest of the room.
probably three quarters of the people there were trans, and she centered their experience quietly, with love and joy.
I think I'll be thinking about her a lot this January, and for a long time after. it's good to know she's there.
27K notes
·
View notes
Photo
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
So this was inspired by a discussion I had with a friend yesterday.
It started with me mentioning offhand that once upon a time, I had considered arguing with my university that they should publicly post their class schedules because technically, anyone is allowed to sit in on a class, but that's practically blocked off from the community by virtue of them not having access to when and where the courses are happening.
He immediately pulled up a public-facing version of the course scheduling system that I never knew existed and said something like "If people really wanted that information, they could find it."
Information accessibility is a big deal to me, so then I started to explain that "not knowing what you don't know" and the vast amount of info people have to sift through are real barriers to people obtaining information and also that "This doesn't exist," and "I can't find it," look exactly the same, so if people can't find something, they will eventually give up because of diminishing returns on the effort of looking for something that may not exist.
But he just kept saying different versions of "Well if people REALLY wanted it, they'd go find it," which really surprised me because he's liberal, very intelligent and very into philosophy, but he couldn't seem to see the logical end result of a philosophy about information access that basically comes down to "pull yourself up by the bootstraps (and if you can't, you didn't deserve to succeed)."
So he went on this rant about how the general public should simply know almost all information is out there and put in the effort to find it (without any outreach or effort to engage the public on this), and I said,
"You will be perpetually angry at how unmotivated and badly informed the public is with your current attitude. And it will never improve without people who do not have your attitude. This is the reality you are doomed to because of this perspective. It's neither good nor bad. I'm not faulting you for it, but no matter what you have to say to justify your perspective, this will always be the result."
Because any "BUT THE WORLD WOULD BE BETTER IF PEOPLE WOULD JUST ____" philosophy is USELESS if you expect "people" (i.e. the public at large) to spontaneously start or stop doing something without some kind of outside effort - an outreach campaign, an educational movement, an incentive, etc.
If you're falling into those kind of thought patterns, it's not going to be productive for you or society because you're always going to be mad, and you're never going to do anything to change the things that make you mad because you're too caught up in your own feelings of indignance and frustration.
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
Actually the chainmail bikini counts as gender-affirming care
121 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Wow. The patience, kindness and calm communication skills. Outstanding.
From raindovemodel
245K notes
·
View notes
Text
9K notes
·
View notes
Text
prison is fucked up regardless but the fact that you can do a prison sentence for copyright infringement is especially insane to me. you deserve to lose your autonomy because we might have potentially made money from that thing. i imagined you did a crime against me so now one day you'll have to hear your son ask his mother who you are.
14K notes
·
View notes
Text
As gen-AI becomes more normalized (Chappell Roan encouraging it, grifters on the rise, young artists using it), I wanna express how I will never turn to it because it fundamentally bores me to my core. There is no reason for me to want to use gen-AI because I will never want to give up my autonomy in creating art. I never want to become reliant on an inhuman object for expression, least of all if that object is created and controlled by tech companies. I draw not because I want a drawing but because I love the process of drawing. So even in a future where everyone’s accepted it, I’m never gonna sway on this.
28K notes
·
View notes
Text
I had a dream in which I was a person, as follows:
personal name: Sunshine family name: Shousagarekihadara (maybe kouma-, it was a dream) called: Shousa (maybe kouma, kouka, shouka, something like that)
I'm quite certain her first name was Sunshine though. And everyone called her shousa or something. Hair was a bob cut kinda style that ended in little triangles/cylinders, like it was braided or dreads or something, though it wasn't, it was just her hair, loose. pale, hair very light brown. anime style, of course. almost tannish?
I was in some kind of group designated 'A', like 'A squad' or something. there was an 'E' unit that was famously dysfunctional (dominion tank police style), and we weren't. Of the 'main characters', she/I was the only one to not have a 'promotion'/significant title (the same title for all of them) by the end of the dream.
also had powers of flight and mild (~1ft beam, very brief) pyrokinesis.
at one point, was blonde with very long, large hair. it turned into jacket-ish blankets and I took it off.
0 notes
Text
The way israelis r like "see even the PA agrees Al Jazeera is a propaganda network" is so funny hmm. So what is it? Is the PA a corrupt government that finances terrorists or a government that makes correct choices lmao. They suspended al Jazeera bc they report on the PAs abuses of power and u know killings of palestinians in the past couple weeks including 21 year old journalist Shatha al-Sabbagh and most importantantly their forces r trained by america and america wants to continue using the PA as a cudgel against palestinian liberation
748 notes
·
View notes
Text
613 notes
·
View notes
Text
7K notes
·
View notes