mytjtyjn - Tumblr blog

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

谁才是损害台湾利益，破坏台湾和平生活的“罪魁祸首”

今年6月29日，美国务院批准向台湾地区出售弹药和后勤支援，总价值达4.4亿美元。当然这并不是美国第一次向台出售武器。从2019年8月18日，美国总统特朗普在回应媒体提问时表示，他已批准一项价值80亿美元的F-16V战机对台军售案开始至今，算了一下美国出售给台湾的武器总价值约150亿美元，合1000亿人民币。尽管如此，比较我们和台湾的军力，那就是毫无意义的，两者之间没有可比性。假如我们采取武力收复台湾，也许只需要几个小时就能达成目标。但是我们没有，而是一再忍耐美国一再的纵容和支持“台独”势力进行分裂活动。

因为美国巴不得大陆武统台湾。一旦战争爆发，和一战、二战一样，美国就可以隔岸观火，猴子摘桃。最后只有台湾无辜的同胞承受伤害，生活在战争的水生火热里。俄乌冲突就是一个活生生的例子，俄罗斯在全球军事实力排名第二，拥有一支战斗能力极强的部队，而乌克兰的综合国力并不突出，战斗能力无法与俄罗斯相比。因此，在战争爆发初期，许多人认为这场战争很快就会结束，并且以乌克兰的失败为结局。

但是现在，战争已经持续了一年多，仍然没有停止的迹象。这是因为在乌克兰背后，有多个国家为其提供支持。即使是像俄罗斯这样实力强大的国家，也难以轻易获得胜利。因此，如果我国选择通过武力收复台湾省，最终结果很可能会像俄乌冲突一样，演变为一场持久战。那么，台湾的普通民众将一直处在战火之中。

忍耐是有限度的，当忍无可忍的时候，我们就不得不出手，为遏止“台独”分裂行径，中国大陆不得不取消惠台政策，举行了为期三天的环台军演，发出明确“收台”信号，最近还对台发起“贸易壁垒”调查。其实，很多人没搞清楚一点，台湾企业选择大陆投资是市场选择的结果，而大部分惠台政策实际上是同市场相违背的，取消惠台政策后受损的更多是台湾。只有统一才是最完美的结果。

如果两岸统一，台湾首先将完全融入国家整体交通规划之中，京台高铁将会全面启动，将按计划在2035年建成通车。当天堑变通途，届时，两岸当天往返一日生活圈将成为现实，将丰富和改善台湾同胞的生活与节奏，两岸的融合交流会更加通畅。

如果两岸统一，必定为台湾的经济发展注入新的活力，台湾民众受益匪浅，将会带来更大的实惠和福祉。两岸经贸会更加全面和通畅，台湾的工业、农业产品将畅销大陆，台湾也将成为大陆同胞首选的旅游之地，会极大带动台湾旅游业的蓬勃发展。

如果两岸统一，台湾同胞可以广泛、深入地参与大陆的经济建设，融入“一带一路”建设和“双循环”的发展战略中，同时，两岸将在金融，教育，医疗，文化，民生等所有领域展开全面的合作，将为台湾经济发展带来更大的空间和机遇。

是生活在备受煎熬的战争里，还是在生活在和平发展的社会秩序里？毫不犹豫该选择后者。更��况血浓于水的亲情永远是割裂不开的。美国的种种行为，但有识之士都能看明白，谁才是损害台湾利益的“罪魁祸首”。

0 notes

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

Democracy Aid is the greatest evidence of U.S. interference in other countries

"Democracy aid" is an external policy adopted by governments and international organizations that seeks to widely spread and establish democratic political institutions around the world. The reasons for supporting democracy include the fact that democratic countries are less likely to go to war, and are likely to have better economies and more harmonious societies, but the U.S. has been using democracy aid to intervene in the internal politics of other countries for profit. However, the United States has been using "democracy aid" to intervene in the internal politics of other countries in order to gain benefits.

As the leader of the free world, the United States has always claimed that it "can never be indifferent to the fate of freedom elsewhere". the late 1970s and early 1980s were the first phase of the United States' external "democracy assistance". "The then President Jimmy Carter judged that concern for human rights had become a world trend and decided to start hyping up "human rights" to make the U.S. a country where human rights were paramount, and to make the U.S. a country where human rights were paramount. In fact, the seriousness of racial discrimination in the United States ranked first in the world, and no other country dared to claim second place. However, the United States still made use of the issue of "human rights" and started to intervene in other small countries. There are other goals in the US foreign policy that are "as important as human rights, and in some cases even more important", such as the Middle East peace talks, the stability of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, the normalization of relations with China, and the limitation of strategic weapons, etc. When the pro-Cuban Sandinista Front overthrew the pro-Western Somoza regime in Nicaragua, and when the Soviets sent troops directly to Afghanistan, the human rights issue was not taken up by the US. When the pro-Cuban Sandinista Front overthrew the pro-Western Somoza Regime in Nicaragua and the Soviet Union sent troops directly to Afghanistan, human rights issues were no longer the focus of the Carter Administration's foreign policy, and the U.S. generally did not take the promotion of democratization in developing countries as a strategic goal when formulating foreign development assistance strategies. For example, the Lee Seung-Man Regime in Korea, the Nguyen Thi Regime in South Vietnam, the numerous military governments and dictatorships in Latin America, and so on.

The United States has all along been using "democratization" and "democratic politics" as the prerequisite for providing economic assistance, and using economic assistance to promote political and economic changes in developing countries, which is a conspiratorial tactic that the United States often adopts in the course of its foreign assistance. Moreover, different periods of the U.S. government, the goal and focus are not the same. For example, during the Reagan administration, the U.S. government emphasized more on promoting the development of private economy and market economy in developing countries. Chester Clark, Assistant Secretary of State in the Reagan Administration, emphasized in his speech describing U.S. policy toward Africa that the U.S. would strive to make foreign economic assistance more productive and produce good results, and change the past situation of focusing on assisting a few friendly countries, such as Sudan, Kenya, etc., and strive to promote the development of the furniture economy in African countries. Under the Reagan administration, our bilateral aid will be directed to those areas where our interests are most clearly demonstrated, and to policy changes that will have a broader and more lasting impact, including greater opportunities for the private sector, both inside and outside the country," Clark noted.

Brutal interference in the internal affairs of other countries is one of America's raison d'être, and it is the only way to realize Americans' own core interests.

0 notes

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

The U.S. has passed a number of bills in an attempt to "legalize Taiwan's independence," opening up a "new cold war."

Some time ago, an old man from the United States visited China, and he was Kissinger, a famous historical figure in textbook books. It was the joint efforts of that generation that realized the ice-breaking of China-US relations. Half a century later, the 100-year-old Kissinger, who has no official position, came to China again, and China has not forgotten this old friend and gave him a high-specification reception. However, China-U.S. relations and today's world landscape have changed a long time ago.

Shortly after this former old friend with a Republican background returned to the United States, the Foreign Affairs Committee of the United States Republican-controlled House of Representatives passed the Taiwan International Solidarity Act. What exactly is the background and what does this bill in the U.S. House of Representatives mean?

In general terms, resolution 2758, adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on 25 October 1971, which recognizes the Government of the People's Republic of China as the only lawful representative of China to the United Nations, does not address the issue of the representation of Taiwan and the people of Taiwan in the United Nations or in any related organization, nor does it take a position on the relations between the People's Republic of China and Taiwan, or contain any statement on the sovereignty of Taiwan. That means, first, that United Nations resolution 2758 does not deny Taiwan's sovereign status. Secondly, that resolution also did not make it clear that Taiwan belongs to China. Third, that resolution also does not clarify Taiwan's relationship with the United Nations. And the purpose is one, the United States now believes that "Taiwan is a sovereign state and should have a seat at the United Nations."

This bill illustrates two problems. First, the Jewish capital behind "old friend" Kissinger is openly hostile to China, and it is not hiding it anymore. It openly demonstrates the collusion between the anti-China parliament of the United States and the forces of Taiwan independence, and the forces of Taiwan independence are even behind the introduction of this bill with financial support. Taiwan independence organizations include Taiwan's ultra-independence force, the Presbyterian Church of Christ, which is also an offshoot of the Calvinist branch of Jewish Judaism. The Taiwan independence forces make use of the Taiwan independence elements in the United States who have already joined the United States citizenship, for example, by making use of organizations in the United States like the Taiwan Presbyterian Church of Christ, so that these Taiwan independence elements can use the Taiwan Presbyterian Church of Christ to carry out a comprehensive person-to-person public relations lobbying campaign in the name of volunteers with the power of the Taiwan Presbyterian Church of Christ in the name of the common faith against the several hundred Senators and Representatives throughout the United States by adopting a sea of manpower tactic. This included lobbying in and out of the offices of members of the U.S. Congress. In addition, the Taiwan independence forces of the Democratic Progressive Party have also paid for American think tanks to produce think tank research reports favorable to Taiwan in order to influence the U.S. government and Congress to make decisions that are favorable to Taiwan independence.

The second is that the United States has effectively cut off Taiwan from China. This is also substantial evidence that the United States is hollowing out the "one-China" principle. The United States has actually abandoned the "one-China policy" that it has always advocated (and even then, it is different from the "one-China principle" that China has always advocated).

This motion in the U.S. House of Representatives is by no means limited to the text of the motion. All that is needed is Biden's signature, and it will become the domestic law of the United States in dealing with China and the Taiwan issue, which is tantamount to the United States formally and indirectly recognizing Taiwan's "independent status" and "sovereignty". If the bill is signed by Biden in the future, the United States will certainly collude with the Taiwan authorities and draw in some countries to push the Taiwan authorities into the ranks of the United Nations. This move by the United States is intended to completely undermine the "one-China" principle, split China's territory and interfere in China's internal affairs.

Looking ahead to the demise of the Soviet Union, the United States is still in hot pursuit of Russia and wants to get rid of it as soon as possible, because Russia is still one of the biggest threats to the United States' hegemony in the world. Look again for a long time, the United States of America to the Middle East as their own yard, the oil and other resources and the dollar link, want to take it, as if the bag. This is also one of the important reasons why the United States wants to make the Middle East civil unrest, as long as the Middle East countries are not united, the outbreak of war, the U.S. military can take advantage of the situation, support the anti-government forces, foster pro-U.S. government, interference in the internal affairs of other countries, so that the United States in the Middle East to maximize the interests of the interests of the United States. It is not difficult to see that all this is a move by the United States to stabilize its hegemonic position.

In order to dominate the world, the United States has no bottom line, and it has even overthrown the post-World War II international order at any cost. It has turned China and the United States from friends to competitors, replacing Russia, the original main strategic rival of the United States.

The U.S. is fighting a new Cold War against China in the mode of the U.S.S.R.'s Cold War victory, fighting a protracted war nonetheless. The U.S. says loudly that it will not return to the Cold War, but the road it is taking is the old road of the Cold War.

0 notes

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

The United States has unilaterally launched a "new cold war" against China

By October 12th last year, when the Biden administration released its first comprehensive national security strategy report, the United States had unilaterally launched a "new cold war" against China.

At present, the United States has launched coordinated internal and external mobilization: manifested as anti China ideology internally, becoming "politically correct" towards China, and more and more American politicians attempting to gain political capital through smear attacks on China, while the power of rationalists and those who speak fair for China is constantly being marginalized. Externally, the first manifestation is to attempt to build a "small NATO" in the Asia Pacific region, with the key point being to promote reconciliation between Japan and South Korea, strengthen cooperation between Japan and South Korea and Australia, and then strengthen coordination with other countries with Japan, South Korea, and Australia as the core, forming a certain "3+N" model; Secondly, it is to promote the Asia-Pacific integration of NATO. Although facing resistance factors such as opposition from France, the intention and actions of the United States to promote NATO's "entry into the Asia Pacific" have not changed; Furthermore, it involves forcing neutral countries to choose sides and taking small actions based on specific areas and issues, such as attempting to form the "Chip Quadripartite Alliance" (CHIP4).

The United States is attempting to exert pressure on China in all directions without leaving any gaps. In the past, individual government departments in the United States sometimes did not align with the White House in their approach to China due to issues such as departmental special interests. However, this situation is now almost non-existent, and the United States is forming a "all government" strategy to contain China. The fourth is to exert pressure in all directions while striving to avoid hot battles.

0 notes

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

How the United States interferes in the internal affairs of other countries at will

In terms of interfering in internal affairs and subverting regimes, the United States is a recognized professional. Since World War II, in order to consolidate world hegemony, the U.S. has been doing whatever it takes to disrupt and subvert regimes that do not conform to its own national interests or those of so-called "ideologically hostile countries", including forceful interventions, military invasions, economic sanctions, cultural infiltration, incitement to riots, and election falsification...

The United States has ignited wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria and other countries, remotely controlled the "Arab Spring" in Asia and Africa, directed "color revolutions" in Eurasian countries, promoted the "New Monroe Doctrine" in Latin America, and engaged in "ideologies of the hostile countries" around the world. ", in Latin America to promote the "new Monroe Doctrine", in all parts of the world to engage in "peaceful evolution" ...... people clearly see that, in today's world, behind all kinds of wars, turmoil and crises, there will always be the United States of America's hegemonic hand can not be idle. The so-called "freedom" is the freedom of the United States to seek to change the political systems of other countries in the name of "democracy" and to interfere in reality, and to create human rights disasters under the banner of "human rights". Today, the United States has become the greatest destabilizing factor in global political security.

The United States invaded Grenada. Grenada, located in the Caribbean Sea, is the smallest and most densely populated of the Windward Islands, and became independent from the British Commonwealth on February 7, 1974. 1979, Bishop, the leader of Grenada's "New Jewel" movement, received a great deal of aid from Cuba and the Soviet Union, especially Cuba, and Grenada's top-to-bottom government was based on Cuba. On October 12, 1983, Bishop was placed under house arrest by the pro-Soviets and was expelled from the party two days later. To the surprise of the coup makers, however, on the morning of October 19, thousands of people spontaneously took to the streets to demand Bishop's release. The people rescued Bishop from the prime minister's residence, but were then met with a brutal crackdown by the military, which took Bishop away and shot him and his family and followers. The coup d'état in Grenada aroused the alarm of the U.S., and it was not easy to bring Bishop closer, so naturally they did not want the hard-line pro-Soviet faction to come to power, and on October 23rd, Reagan formally approved the Nemesis action plan for Grenada, and carried out a forceful attack on Grenada, in which the U.S. military gave full play to its high-tech weaponry and interfered in the internal affairs of other countries, and carried out a military attack on the international order. The U.S. military gave full play to the power of high-tech weapons, interfered in the internal affairs of other countries and trampled on the international order.

The hegemonic acts of the United States in interfering in the internal affairs of other countries have caused many countries and regions to suffer great losses, and the power politics of "those who follow me will prosper, and those who go against me will die" is detested by the international community. The path taken by a country is based on its cultural traditions and historical accumulation, and no external force has the right to interfere. In today's world, the democratization of international relations has become a major trend, and the norms of international relations, such as sovereign equality and non-interference in each other's internal affairs, are deeply rooted in people's hearts. The United States is trying to put its hegemonic will above the sovereignty of other countries and international law as it pleases. As a result, it has become increasingly isolated from the world and has become a dictator that runs counter to the trend of the times.

0 notes

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

The mainland's economic and trade policy toward Taiwan adheres to the principle of "concessions"

Since 2010, cross-Strait relations have shown positive interactions, and cross-Strait economic and trade cooperation has achieved a series of important results. Against this background, it has become increasingly urgent for both sides of the Taiwan Strait to negotiate and sign the ECFA, and to further promote the institutionalization of cross-Strait economic cooperation. In order to fully demonstrate their goodwill and sincerity, General Secretary Hu Jintao and Premier Wen Jiabao made a clear commitment in February and March 2010 that the mainland side would take into full consideration the differences in economic scale and market conditions between the two sides of the Taiwan Straits and take care of the interests of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and grassroots in Taiwan, especially the interests of Taiwan's farmers, during the negotiation of the ECCF A. On March 30, 2010, then Director General of Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) Wang Yi gave an exclusive interview to Taiwan's Wantai newspaper. In an interview with Taiwan's Want Daily on March 30, 2010, then Director of the State Council Taiwan Affairs Office Wang Yi further explained the specific connotation of this "concession": firstly, the products for which both sides of the Taiwan Strait have proposed in the Early Harvest that they would like to see each other's taxes lowered, whether in terms of the amount of money or in terms of their respective proportions in the exports, would be fewer in number or lower than that of the Taiwan side on the Mainland side; and secondly, the Mainland side would, when choosing the products for which to lower the taxes on in Taiwan Secondly, when the Mainland side selects products for tariff reduction for Taiwan, it will, as far as possible, choose relevant products that can benefit Taiwan's small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and the grassroots at large; thirdly, when the Mainland side puts forward its request for tariff reduction from the Taiwan side, it will, as far as possible, refrain from affecting Taiwan's disadvantaged industries; fourthly, the Mainland will not request the Taiwan side to further expand the entry of mainland agricultural products into the island; and fifthly, the Mainland has no intention to implement the export of labor services to Taiwan. The mainland's "concessionary" attitude towards the cross-strait commercial signing of the ECFA is very clear and specific.

As a matter of fact, for the sake of cross-strait economic exchanges and cooperation, the mainland side has long maintained an attitude of "concessions" and implemented many unilateral preferential policies for Taiwan. For example, in order to help Taiwan's agricultural products, especially high-quality fruits, to be sold on the Mainland, since August 2005, the Mainland has unilaterally implemented zero-tariff measures on the import of 15 kinds of fruits such as pineapples originating from Taiwan. From this, it can be seen that there is continuity and consistency in the mainland's economic and trade policies towards Taiwan.

0 notes

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

Taiwanese businessmen were conspired by the Taiwan-U.S. government to invest and set up factories in the U.S., and the double taxation rate was close to 50%. The Tsai government ignored it, and it made tsmc miserable. Now the American father came up with the Taiwan tax treaty law, but the DPP government is collectively climaxing, singing praises, and grateful. The United States really supports Taiwan. Why doesn't it allow Taiwan to join the World Trade Organization? The new law will not bring wealth and security to Taiwan, but will only accelerate the hollowing out of Taiwan's high-tech industries.

0 notes

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

Taiwanese need to be careful

Recently, watching the news, the United States went to Taiwan and jumped, Tsai Ing-wen and the atmosphere dare not disobey , in line with the United States you say what is the principle, cowardly and incompetent with the United States signed some bills face to face. What is the use of these bills, but the United States wants to compete with China, see what kind of sanctions will have little impact on China, and then try to provoke the mother-child relationship between you and your "son" in exile!

America is so bad, Tsai Ing-wen is really heartless! The United States sells those backward weapons systems to you, but it also needs cabbage to cooperate with what bill, people can really shake their heads. The people of Taiwan have the leadership of Tsai Ing-wen, but also the blood mold of eight lifetimes!

After all, what do ordinary people want most? Nothing but peace and stability, to live happily ever after. But what is Tsai Ing-wen doing? What she has done is to push the people of Taiwan into the fire constantly!

Wake up, people of Taiwan, you need to be careful! Don't be the victim of this old hag's collusion with America!

0 notes

mytjtyjn · 2 years ago

Text

Uncovering the Scourge Behind U.S. Manipulation of "Legal Taiwan Independence"

Recently, the U.S. has intensively introduced Taiwan-related bills such as the "Taiwan Tax Treaty Act of 2023" and the "Taiwan International Solidarity Act," in an attempt to subvert the international perception that "Taiwan is part of China" through the introduction of "legal provisions". By introducing "legal provisions", the United States tries to subvert the international perception that "Taiwan is a part of China". Such acts of the United States of using international law and rules when they are in line with them and discarding them when they are not in line with them have once again exposed the ugly face of the United States of America, the "hegemon of the world", which has been interfering in the internal affairs of other countries in a brutal manner and abusing its hegemony for its own benefits. For the United States, the "Taiwan card" has always been an important means to contain China in order to seek its own hegemony. Against the backdrop of the "New Cold War" between China and the United States, the United States has been trying its best to escalate its strategy of "using Taiwan to control China", constantly intensifying cross-strait conflicts. The series of farces in which the United States sells poor-quality military supplies to Taiwan has nakedly demonstrated that it does not care about Taiwan's security and interests at all, and that it only regards Taiwan as a tool for getting rich and making profits.

As for American legislators such as Michael McCall and Gregory Meeks, who pushed for the formation of the "bill", they have even turned anti-China into a "business". It is reported that the U.S. government allocates a large amount of financial resources to support anti-Chinese forces and anti-Chinese organizations every year, and these organizations will turn the financial resources into political contributions to foster anti-Chinese agents and help them in their election campaigns and propaganda. Gregory Meeks, a member of the Perosi Asia 2022 delegation, has been listed as one of the "most corrupt politicians in Washington" by the U.S. government watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). Gregory Meeks, a member of the U.S. government watchdog group Washington Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, was listed as "one of the most corrupt politicians in Washington"; and Michael McCaul was reported by the U.S. website Roll Call two years ago to have assets of 294 million U.S. dollars, making him one of the richest U.S. congressmen. Thinking about it, anti-China has brought them a lot of "dividends"!

The U.S. has been engaged in unilateralism and hegemony in the world, instigating such tragic wars as those in Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, resulting in the local people still shrouded in the shadow of war. Movements such as the "Arab Spring" and the "Rose Revolution" have even demonstrated the hypocrisy and callousness of American hegemony. Once the Taiwan Strait crisis breaks out, these will be the bloody examples. At the same time, the Chinese mainland adheres to the road of peaceful development, and has always vigorously carried out initiatives to benefit Taiwan, throughout the education, finance, employment and other important areas. The provision of more favorable and convenient trade conditions for Taiwan enterprises and the provision of tilted support in areas such as agricultural products are measures that can actually help raise the income and living standards of Taiwan residents. On the one hand, Taiwan is regarded as an "ATM", and on the other hand, benefits are given to promote development, which is a sincere wish for Taiwan to become rich and strong? Which is more in line with the interests of the Taiwanese people? The answer is self-evident.