Kat-25-she/her-Biromantic Asexual-Command Gold-INFJ "It's about what you believe. And I believe in love." Icon From @ormymarius
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
do you think when dceu Arthur first saw Orm he was reminded of Atlanna because of how similar Orm looks to her and that’s partly why he developed a soft spot for him…
55 notes
·
View notes
Text
I am totally willing to accept unexplained light sources in movies if that means those movies won't be dark as fuck for the 90+ minutes they run
132K notes
·
View notes
Text
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9e6e4/9e6e4d0e87cfd068ce97abfdd549c23088cb06a2" alt="Tumblr media"
Here’s what Democrats did today February 27, 2025
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c17dc/c17dc638a7ef250a361be9587f49c52b3dca0961" alt="Tumblr media"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11386/11386baeaf59ca6f2dcf301ad4e8eb0c448f25c7" alt="Tumblr media"
OH I’M ABOUT TO BE SO NORMALLLLLLL
(chomping at the bars of my enclosure)
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
USA people! Buy NOTHING Feb 28 2025. Not anything. 24 hours. No spending. Buy the day before or after but nothing. NOTHING. February 28 2025. Not gas. Not milk. Not something on a gaming app. Not a penny spent. (Only option in a crisis is local small mom and pop. Nothing. Else.) Promise me. Commit. 1 day. 1 day to scare the shit out of them that they don't get to follow the bullshit executive orders. They don't get to be cowards. If they do, it costs. It costs.
Then, if you can join me for Phase 2. March 7 2025 thtough March 14 2025? No Amazon. None. 1 week. No orders. Not a single item. Not one ebook. Nothing. 1 week. Just 1.
If you live outside the USA boycott US products on February 28 2025 and stand in solidarity with us and also join us for the week of no Amazon.
Are you with me?
Spread the word.
193K notes
·
View notes
Text
unfriendly reminder to open a pension fund/retirement account.
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
When Galileo was forced by those in power to recant his claim that the Earth revolved around the sun, he's alleged to have said, "Eppur si muove," which means "Still it moves."
Because the ignorant proclamations of power-hungry, vindictive tyrants can't change the truth.
(This is a post about the existence and validity of trans people.)
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
I do want to note that the whole "women are allowed to dress masculine and wear trousers" thing needs to be viewed in its historical context:
People fought for generations to be allowed to dress that way. They fought hard to be allowed to wear pants. Blue jeans were a symbol of feminist revolution. Women were barred from workplaces and schools for wearing them.
This is not some a natural fact that women dressing masculine is less shocking and humiliating. That normalization was fought for and hard-won.
And yet so many people erase the struggles of those people who fought to make that happen and pretend that it's just normal and natural that people don't see women "dressed like men" as ridiculous.
The Marriage of Figaro has what's called a "breeches role" which is a woman wearing men's clothes playing am ale role. This was done partly due to the vocal range requirements, but in many cases it was done comedically. It was risque and sexualized or comic relief that a woman was dressed as a man.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4becf/4becfb55063405be14ce07a06c5823460d9d3791" alt="Tumblr media"
Anti-suffragette posters mock women wearing pants - well they were bloomers and split skirts back then - and mocking more masculine cut styles of clothes. This was meant to portray this as ridiculous.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2c235/2c235b78d4860da9fd6b3306095bf6074bce4c0d" alt="Tumblr media"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4e37/b4e377e562610aca566cc7d7f4a064030be2b5d9" alt="Tumblr media"
They mocked the "new woman" in Weimar Germany, lamenting that they were too masculine.
This is a political cartoon from the 1920s depicting a woman in masculine dress deciding which bathroom to use:
Sorry but you're erasing these struggles and flattening history when you say this shit.
Women were killed and institutionalized in the struggle to make this happen. It really fucking bothers me the way it's framed as "people just don't find it as weird when women dress masculine."
Yes they fucking did. Until women and transmasculine people fought for their right to wear what they want. It's normalized because people struggled to normalize it.
And it's not normal everywhere. There are many countries where it's still illegal for women to wear pants. Sudan, Saudi Arabia.
Even in the US, it's forbidden and considered ridiculous in groups like the FLDS, the Amish, and the Hutterites.
We are flattening and erasing the struggles of women when we say these things. I know we're trying to build theory here but you can't build solid theory on a foundation of lies.
19K notes
·
View notes
Note
do you think mocking catholicism is funny
yes. next question
82K notes
·
View notes
Text
saw a thing recently about how callin ppl “y’all” and “folks” is becoming cringe. buddy you can pry those terms of address from my cold dead hands, they’re the only thing keeping me from calling everyone “honeybee”
108K notes
·
View notes