midna4105

[midna4105]

“Astronomers” Lmao, in the 1700s on the least developed continent? Yeah, sure

THISSSS! A thousand times, yessss! 🙏🏽

[midna4105]

Fucking FOX News calling ICE agents “agents” instead of people

[midna4105]

Then tell your doctor about your disability you murderer

Anti-vax moms are just pro-life moms who don’t want their kids anymore

[midna4105]

No offense, but are we ruling out human trafficking? No real parents can be this condoning of pedophilia

Really? Y’all are seriously going to claim that it’s “homophobic” to be concerned about an 11 year old boy dancing for the enjoyment of grown ass men at an adults only event in exchange for money?

Bitch, many of the people calling this shit out are LGBT themselves. Because it’s fucking creepy.

Allow me to reiterate. An 11 year old boy performed in drag at a gay club for men several times his age, at an event that was explicitly for people aged 21 or over, in exchange for money. You seriously don’t see anything wrong with that? This is the kind of shit that homophobic pundits would use against us.

YOU SHOULD BE OUTRAGED ABOUT THIS! THERE’S NOTHING GOOD ABOUT THIS SITUATION! THERE’S NOTHING THAT SHOULD BE CELEBRATED HERE!

[midna4105]

Yeah, I knew since day one that that woman was bad news. Being proudly Palestinian is basically just admitting to being anti-American imo. It’s like if any of those defectors were PROUDLY North Korean...

Link   

[midna4105]

$47,000? I didn’t know Gamestop was a college

A landmark due process case that led to an appeals court ruling that students need to be able to cross-examine their accusers and witnesses against them has come to an end, with the university and the accused student reaching a settlement.

The University of Cincinnati (UC) has agreed to pay a student $47,152 in attorneys’ fees and will end his suspension from the university and drop all disciplinary sanctions, according to WCPO Cincinnati. The outcome of the student’s school disciplinary hearing will not appear on his transcript, and the school will remove the “responsible” finding from his record. UC will also make no public statements about the case. The student, in turn, will not contact his female accuser or publicly disclose her identity.

This appears to be the first time UC has ever settled with an accused student.

The case arises from an incident involving John Doe and Jane Roe, as they are referred to in court documents reviewed by The Daily Wire, that occurred on September 6, 2015. The two UC students met on the dating app Tinder and sent messages back-and-forth for a little over two weeks before meeting in person.

The two talked and flirted for a little bit in John’s room in his apartment off campus before they began to kiss and make out. The encounter “escalated fairly quickly,” according to John’s lawsuit. The two removed their clothing. John took out a condom. Jane, according to the lawsuit, asked John to “hold on” before the evening escalated to intercourse. John obliged, and the two talked a little longer before engaging in sexual intercourse.

After the two had sex, they continued to spend time together in John’s room. Jane, according to the lawsuit, told him she didn’t want their encounter to be a “one-night stand.” John, however, did not call her again and couldn’t contact her through Tinder anymore.

A month later, Jane accused John of sexual assault.

She said the encounter occurred on August 30, 2015, that she met John on Tinder, but had agreed to meet him for dinner. She told a UC interviewer that she was going to study after the dinner, but John suggested she do so at his apartment, to which she agreed. She said she studied while sitting on his bed and drinking a glass of wine, which “lowered her inhibitions” about what she and John talked about. She said they flirted.

Jane said the two started kissing and that John “kept progressing” the physical contact, to which she never said “no.” The two engaged in oral sex and digital penetration. She said the two had sexual intercourse and that John tried to engage in anal sex.

Jane said during this initial interview that John walked her to her car after the sexual encounter.

A week after her initial interview, Jane was asked more specific questions on November 6. She now claimed John was forceful with her during their encounter, and said John made her feel guilty even though she never gave any definitive statements, instead saying she responded “I don’t know” to some of his conversation topics. She also said she flirted with John and kissed him, engaged in sexual intercourse in multiple positions, including her on top, and that she performed oral sex on John. She also said she asked John to walk her to her car.

None of this made UC interviewers question whether an assault actually occurred, as they went forward with this accusation.

More than a month after Jane went to campus officials, she reported the incident to campus police, telling them she went to a house after a date with a man later identified as John.

She told campus police that she and John were kissing and flirting on the bed, but that she “set a line for herself for no sex.” She also told them John was forceful with her, yet police noted that she was able to move about his room freely — texting her friends and using the restroom.

The campus police investigation was sent to the Cincinnati Police Department and closed without charges against John.

John was not informed that he was being accused of sexual assault until February 19, 2016. A week later, on February 24, Jane was interviewed again. This time she said repeatedly that John was “strange” or “creepy.” She now said she sat on his lap while they kissed but described her consent for his removal of her dress as “gray.”

When John was interviewed about the incident, he said everything was consensual. Interview notes for him contain editorial comments from the interviewer. Such comments did not appear in any notes about Jane’s interviews.

UC interviewed several witnesses for Jane, including an ex-boyfriend she told about the alleged sexual assault several days after her encounter with John. Another friend of Jane’s claimed Jane said she told John to stop repeatedly, but that he didn’t, something she never alleged in her own interviews.

Jane didn’t even attend the campus hearing regarding her claims against John, which gave him no opportunity to cross-examine her or question her story. John said in his lawsuit that if he had been able to question Jane, he would have been able to pick out inconsistencies in her statements and show that she received generous accommodations from the school — changes to homework deadlines, grades, class schedules, test schedules, and even receiving job opportunities — which created an incentive for her to claim she was a victim.

John was not able to question any of Jane’s witnesses or even the campus investigators who put together the “Investigation File” for hearing members.

Without being able to question any of the allegations against him, John was found “responsible” by UC and suspended. He appealed and lost, so he sued the school.

What makes this case so important is that it reached the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, which created a precedent-setting ruling stating that cross-examination is important, especially when the case boils down to a he said/she said where credibility is at stake. The ruling has been cited multiple times since.

It’s also likely that this September 2017 ruling helped pave the road for the settlement reached in this case.

Josh Engel, one of John’s attorneys, told The Daily Wire in a statement, “We are glad the case has been resolved so my client can get his degree and move on with his career.”

@ MEN, just walk away.

[midna4105]

The spoiled college student’s pathetic whataboutism aside, her argument makes no sense. The rich are also harmed in those situations because their investments (and therefore sources of wealth) are directly damaged. The upper class relying somewhat on the middle is the only thing the commies got right, and yet here they are ignoring it

[midna4105]

[midna4105]

These people do realize that the SECOND EPISODE involved Spongebob getting a crush, right?

it doesn’t bode well

[midna4105]

A bit late for the game but Merry Xmas Joyeux Noël Sretan Božić Srećan Božić Feliz Navidad folks :3

[midna4105]

He’s right though. Too many of those stories don’t describe the start of his interest in her...

[midna4105]

If he’s accused, he’s guilty. If he takes steps against being accused, he’s misogynistic (and guilty)

“they’re burning all the witches” 

ARTIST CREDIT

[midna4105]

You’re the one who sought him out lmao. Also, you seem confused on the difference between them being offended by you challenging then and them just destroying you

I do not know what @lesbianmouse was attempting to accomplish with such remarks, but I do not wish to help keep this kind of vitriol hidden.

[midna4105]

The offending animal dies by its own rules because it’s weaker than us, though. It wouldn’t eat a baby right in front of the baby’s parents that are stronger than it, just as it shouldn’t eat any of us lest it anger the strong. Hunting it will trigger better survival instincts that will benefit us

Unpopular Opinion

Animals eat the weak. This includes babies, adolescents, sick adults, the elderly, weaker animals, so on. That’s just what they do.

So, it isn’t fair to hunt down animals that ate a kid or an old person or whatever. Unless they’re a repeat offender, I understand hunting down repeat offenders.

Mourn and carry on, because the animal didn’t do anything wrong. It did right by it, and that’s all you can ask.

Keep a close eye on your kid in areas with dangerous animals, and accept that misfortune does occur, and pray it doesn’t to you.

[midna4105]

https://www.twitter.com/TobySinbad/status/1041589969410838529

Y’all should see the comments hoo boy. Not blocking names because I really don’t care. Don’t harass these people but feel free to puruse the comments if you’re in the mood for cringe. I wanna kms

[midna4105]

The only reason I gave him less of the benefit of the doubt than I would normally was that I could totally see an actor getting addicted to alcohol and doing something like that tbh. It’s more believable than someone doing it sober. This is just insane though. There goes my Aquaman ticket and here comes my Fantastic Beasts iTunes purchase (you know, the movie that got boycotted for this slander)

you know hes like. a known abuser right lol

*she

Amber Heard abusing Johnny Depp

For two years now we know that she abused Johnny, yet everyone keeps ignoring it. Today Johnny made a claim in court papers which he can proof with photos. there also are a lot of other things that proof her abuse:

At the Sept. 14 premiere of Johnny Depp‘s new film Black Mass at the Toronto International Film Festival, photographers captured the passion on the red carpet between the star and his wife, Amber Heard, who kissed and cuddled for the cameras.But away from the shutterbugs, a source says, the newlyweds got hot and bothered in a different way. Amber, 29, hovered near her hubby as he schmoozed, and when she saw him chatting with a young woman, the source says, “she stormed over and tried to butt in.”When Johnny, 52, continued the conversation, she “looked livid” and quickly pulled him aside. The source says, “She talked to him like a child. Johnny smiled awkwardly and seemed to calm her down, because the next minute they were holding hands again and she was all smiles.”According to the insider, this volatility is nothing new for the couple, who wed in February and bicker about everything from his female fans to Johnny’s recent weight gain. She’s bothered so much that Amber has begun dictating his diet. “She says he looks like a mess now,” says the source.“Amber is very loving toward Johnny — but if things aren’t the way she wants, all hell breaks loose,” the insider says.Friends who’ve witnessed the actor bend to Amber’s controlling ways are wondering what happened to his rebellious spirit. “He’s blinded by love,” the source says. “He’ll do anything she wants — and she knows it.”http://www.celebitchy.com/449943/star_amber_heard_was_livid_at_johnny_depp_but_all_smiles_for_cameras/

there are more stories like this example: at the lone ranger premiere in disneyland she was super rude to everyone basically,

when they were on their honeymoon Johnny was greeting fans and got annoyed by that

she hits him multiple times during that stupid Overhaulin’ episode he did specially for her

she pulled him away from his fans at a Japanse airport in 2013 (notice how she really pulls him and just refuses to let go)

she also pulled him away while he was in the middle of a conversation with someone at the hollywood film awards in 2015

she taunted him on instagram by posing with her fist and adding a comment about ink (referring to his former slim tattoo) she had made countless of refs to him in interviews in such, still taunting him

she can’t do an interview without mentioning him, bullying him

combine this with Doug Stanhope’s statement:

We’d watched it build like this since before they were married. We’d watched her manipulate and f— with him for years. We didn’t say a word. To each other, yes, but never to him. When your friend is in an awful, abusive relationship — man or woman — …http://www.thewrap.com/johnny-depp-is-being-blackmailed-by-amber-heard-heres-how-i-know-guest-column/

and here abusing her ex-wife:

http://www.tmz.com/2016/06/07/amber-heard-domestic-violence-arrest-partner-tasya-van-ree/  (in this link you can find an audio of her in the court room)

https://people.com/movies/amber-heards-arresting-officer-speaks-out-i-am-so-not-homophobic/http://www.inquisitr.com/3185259/amber-heard-arrest-the-homophobic-cop-is-a-gay-woman-tasya-van-ree-was-lying-to-protect-amber/

and the statements from his bodyguards and the police:

normally she was the one who had to be physically pulled off of Johnny. Reportedly she would throw bottles, scream and “charge” at him. The guards will testify during the restraining order hearing in June. http://hollywoodlife.com/2016/05/31/amber-heard-johnny-depp-bodyguards-no-abuse-claims/

On May 21, 2016, officers responded to a domestic incident radio call…” LAPD Sgt. Marlon Marrache says. “The person reporting the crime [Heard] did not insist on a report and no report was warranted. There was no evidence of any crime. A crime did not occur so the officers left the scene and left a business card.”Marrache adds that if there had been any signs of abuse, officers would have conducted an investigation, regardless of what Heard said had happened.http://ew.com/article/2016/05/27/johnny-depp-amber-heard-police-investigated-abuse-claim-no-evidence-crime-found/

a part of the court doc (from johnny suing the sun for defamation because the called him a wife beater which he clearly isn’t) in his evidence list which can be found below you can see that johnny has photos as evidence that match the timestamp of this attack

the complete document can be found here:https://www.docdroid.net/JU2xOOU/johnny-depp-assault-amber-heard-iphone-incident-doc.pdfit describes in detail her abuse and lies

and his evidence list: (which includes text, photos, witnesses)

see full here: http://bybyeblackbird.tumblr.com/post/168411141303/so-it-turns-out-that-the-evidence-and-witness

after that witness list was revealed she dropped the case and ro with prejudice:

court doc: http://becauseitisjohnnydepp.tumblr.com/post/173707760332/since-the-link-i-was-using-doesnt-work-anymore

also this interview where he talks about the false accusations: https://www.gq-magazine.co.uk/article/johnny-depp-interview-2018

And this:

“In his GQ interview, Mr. Depp is simply defending himself against Ms. Heard’s lingering, false abuse accusations,” Adam Waldman, Depp’s lawyer, said in a statement issued to Newsweek. “Johnny Depp is a victim of violent abuse.”

Depp’s team rejected that statement, and his attorney suggested the “shameful psychological abuse” it mentions stems from Heard’s “continuing cynical manipulation of the important #metoo movement and its real victims.”

“Ms. Heard has been previously arrested and spent the night in jail for domestic abuse (an arrest that was initially blamed on police homophobia, although the arresting officer later averred to being a gay rights activist),” Waldman said in the statement to Newsweek. “Ms. Heard has admitted to multiple violent attacks against Johnny Depp that caused serious injury. Eyewitness, photographic, and previous sworn testimony will be presented to the court.”

Added Waldman, “Regarding the confidentiality agreement of which Ms. Heard’s counsel complains, Ms. Heard started violating it before the ink dried, first with a statement, and soon after with a domestic violence PSA asking ‘how is this happening to me?’ purporting to give advice to real victims. More breaches followed.”

Waldman confirmed to Newsweek that court proceedings into the abuse allegations will take place in November in Britain. Depp’s team intends to submit evidence proving Heard “faked” all allegations of abuse. Depp’s camp will present “clear evidence of the violence committed serially against him by Ms. Heard and the serious injuries that he suffered,” Waldman added.

https://www.newsweek.com/johnny-depp-victim-abuse-amber-heard-1153422?utm_medium=Social&utm_source=Twitter&utm_campaign=NewsweekTwitter

and this:

“Two days ago, Amber Heard’s lawyers professed their ‘outrage’ to the media that Johnny Depp had finally spoken in self-defense,” Depp lawyer Adam Waldman of The Endeavor Group wrote in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter on Friday. “I responded with what happens next — we will submit overwhelming evidence to a U.K. court next month that Ms. Heard repeatedly violently attacked and severely injured Mr. Depp, and then faked abuse allegations against him. Ms. Heard became in the process an imposter in the #MeToo movement who abused the trust and experiences of real survivors for her own reputational gain.”

Depp’s team is previewing the evidence that it will present in the upcoming court hearing in the U.K. this fall tied to a defamation lawsuit against The Sun for an article that labeled the actor a “wife beater.”

“Our evidence will include photographs, sworn testimony and admissions, and eyewitness accounts,” Waldman wrote. “Ms. Heard, who has a prior arrest for domestic abuse, and her lawyers have responded to these remarkable disclosures with two days of profound silence, excepting social media posts of Ms. Heard wrapped in an American flag asserting: ‘we survivors…’”

Waldman concludes, “Ms. Heard’s lawyer publicly claimed Ms. Heard has unconsulted witnesses, but none have materialized. We would like to hear, and believe the public should hear, what, if anything, such ‘witnesses’ have to say, so that those statements may be held to account against our imminent court filings.”

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/johnny-depps-legal-team-prepares-court-hearing-amber-heard-abuse-claims-1149731

and this:

An attorney for Depp tells PEOPLE in a statement, “Were Ms. Heard’s faked abuse claims presented yet again at a real #metoo event this week a ‘confidential arbitration’? Ms. Heard (and lately her new attorney) have been peddling easily disproven fake abuse claims for over 2 years in public, and now that real evidence is coming, exhibit a sudden and predictable desire for confidentiality.”

https://people.com/movies/johnny-depp-speaks-grindelwald-jk-rowling-supporting-him/

 Amber Heard is an abuser

[midna4105]

The trans community cares more about cancer patients stealing their wait times than they do about tucutes stealing their wait times

Y’all should see the comments hoo boy. Not blocking names because I really don’t care. Don’t harass these people but feel free to puruse the comments if you’re in the mood for cringe. I wanna kms