Text
I think the existence of vaspider single-handedly vindicates adorno's main theses
1 note
·
View note
Text
Sheelaky Iyola Kingwatsiak, (printer) Sea Spirit 1968 relief print, stonecut 8 x 12 in. Richard F. Brush Art Gallery at St. Lawrence University
279 notes
·
View notes
Audio
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
Let down and hanging around.
Crushed like a bug in the ground.
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
16 notes
·
View notes
Text
Let down and hanging around.
Crushed like a bug in the ground.
13 notes
·
View notes
Text
every day this website synthesizes weirder and more baffling gender analysis in their attempts to maneuver around the basic concepts of transfeminism
722 notes
·
View notes
Text
Everywhere you go you meet communists who think the way to convince liberals is to slowly walk them through a series of positions of increasing radicalness, often with the implication you must always be hiding the next few positions along the line from them. Yet so often when you ask these people how they became communists they readily identify a flash point in their life or at the very least a period of transition in their life when they became open to this ideas. The task is to foster a communist cultural and political enviroment, to loudly proclaim communist ideas wherever one goes. If we are timid about our politics our politics will become ones of timidness, ideas do not appear out of nowhere they emerge from the intercourse of life. We have a fight to win: we must be brave, confident and loud.
108 notes
·
View notes
Photo
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
love languages? Well Zerzan definitely doesn't!! haha
33 notes
·
View notes
Text
i love using vocal fry and saying 'whatever' and also being a complete bitch
254 notes
·
View notes
Photo
We are all familiar with the christmas song: “you better not shout……you better not cry” and so on. But what interest me is this line: “be good for goodness sake.” now we all know that this is , of course, bullshit. The children are good ..not for the sake of goodness itself…but for the sake…of the presents.
38K notes
·
View notes
Text
“No, gentlemen “judges”, we do not envy you your formal right to rejoice at the sharp struggle and splits within the ranks of Social-Democracy. No doubt, there is much in this struggle that is to be deplored. Without a doubt, there is much in these splits that is disastrous to the cause of socialism. Nevertheless, not for a single minute would we care to barter this heavy truth for your “light” lie. Our Party’s serious illness is the growing pains of a mass party. For there can be no mass party, no party of a class, without full clarity of essential shadings, without an open struggle between various tendencies, without informing the masses as to which leaders and which organisations of the Party are pursuing this or that line. Without this, a party worthy of the name cannot be built, and we are building it. We have succeeded in putting the views of our two currents truthfully, clearly, and distinctly before everyone. Personal bitterness, factional squabbles and strife, scandals, and splits—all these are trivial in comparison with the fact that the experience of two tactics is actually teaching a lesson to the proletarian masses, is actually teaching a lesson to everyone who is capable of taking an intelligent interest in politics. Our quarrels and splits will be forgotten. Our tactical principles, sharpened and tempered, will go down as corner stones in the history of the working-class movement and socialism in Russia. Years will pass, perhaps decades, and the influence of one or the other tendency will be traced in a hundred practical questions of different kinds. Both the working class of Russia and the whole people know whom they are dealing with in the case of Bolshevism or Menshevism.”
—Vladimir Lenin, “But Who are the Judges?” (1907)
20 notes
·
View notes