loistyli

[loistyli]

[loistyli]

I can’t believe I almost missed the DOG! How adorable…❤️🐾❤️🐾❤️

[loistyli]

[loistyli]

does anyone have a source for the 2017 Fauci statement about a surprise outbreak”?

[loistyli]

Am I the only one that noticed the eerie similarities between MM’s and Amber Heard’s handwriting?

[loistyli]

Why Waiting for the Queen’s Passing Before Revealing the Truth About Archie and Lilibet Makes Sense

I have had to stay off of social media for a while, but now that things are circling back around regarding the existence and/or legitimacy of the Sussex children, I’m really distressed that I can’t find a long post about my theory. I took me a while to put together some years ago.

I don’t I know if I could find the motivation to re-create it, but the crux of it was that contracts and NDAs were signed with a surrogate that may not have been unreasonable among normal folks. It would be dangerous to the surrogate, and the baby, if she was identified prior to delivery. And the apparatus of physically protecting her, getting her medical and financial support, and anything else, would cost a pretty penny. Plus it wouldn’t be at all strange to me if a surrogate would want to forever be anonymous in this case.

Whether HMTQ and the family were told ahead of time that they intended to use a surrogate, I don’t think even matters anymore. Neither does it matter whether the surrogate knew ahead of time how far the Sussexes were going to take the charade. I think its possible that, after watching the Sussexes carry on, the surrogate was unwilling to give up the child she carried, but even that is no o longer a detail that matters.

I think the whole problem is that they are all bound by NDAs and contracts that the surrogate, and perhaps HMTQ as head of the BRF, made in good faith, never dreaming what Meghan had planned. It’s quite possible that there is no animosity between the surrogate and the BRF, and they resent the Sussexes manipulating them into silence, because they have so much to lose if the truth came out.

I had put together a bunch of examples of how things were worded and said that, should it ever be a question of whether HMTQ facilitated or spoke a lie about it, she could “get off” on a technicality. PC may be able to, as well. Most importantly, though, the Cambridges could easily come through as never having supported or perpetuated the lies, and even that they tried to force the hand of the Sussexes, but couldn’t do anymore without harming HMTQ and/or the surrogate.

Dang I wish I could find it!!

[loistyli]

😂🤣🤪😂🤣👍

[loistyli]

FOUR books from Haz? Perhaps we missed the announcement that they are children’s books to atone for accompany The Bench? I’m certain H has enough original material for four pop-up books without repeating too many words, even if illegal drug-induced hallucinations are cut. But four standard adult-length books…

I find it interesting that the gossip maps are still pushing the narrative it’s a 4 book deal with the final one coming after the queens passes. This is despite the sussex mouth piece (scoobie do) trying to claim otherwise. It’s clear his reputation is beyond bad at this point, so that’s why the duo ran to page six about a wellness book trying to cover suit.

This tells me that they know if coming out of the Sussex camp is bullshit, and they believe their sources far more. The Sussex duo never wanted that info out because it makes them look like absolute assholes to even more of the general public.

Chris Ship also says there are no four books. Either Rebecca's sources lied or Sussexes are trying to cover their asses.

[loistyli]

There’s no better example of narcissism. I trash you for all the world to see, you apologize to me.

[loistyli]

Brilliant commentary in less than 140 characters. 🤣🤓

[loistyli]

I’m getting an error message saying they can’t show me the content due to the country I’m in. I’m in the US so…weird. Anyone care to post the content?

[loistyli]

Any press credentials this Harkle shill possesses should be revoked.

Don't you love Scobie?

[loistyli]

Give me £2.3 million for ONE year, and I’d be set for the rest of my life.

Spoiled, coddled, immature grifter.

[loistyli]

WHOA! Stop the presses. We’ve got a problem here. Check out #5

“5. Julia Samuel. Also a godparent of Prince George, the psychotherapist, who founded the Child Bereavement UK charity, was one of Diana’s best friends.She has remained close to both William and Harry and was also part of the statue committee….

The Duchess of Sussex is said to have turned to Mrs Samuel when Meghan struggled with her mental health during pregnancy.”

I’m shocked, SHOCKED, I tell ya, that BP would stoop so low in their smear campaign of Harry’s wife. The Firm wouldn’t help her or allow her to get mental health treatment when she was suicidal. She had no one to turn to. And Harry was too embarrassed to push for it. That’s what they said. They put up a brave front to fulfill their Royal duties and attend Cirque de Soleil, the wife in head to toe sequins. There’s nothing like having every eye turn and every camera flash (did anyone ask if H was Ok?)reflect and blind onlookers to help you through depression and suicidal ideation I’m surprised Ms. Samuel’s name and alleged affiliation escaped the notice of H’s well-honed, eagle-eye vision that can identify a Harkle oppressor from 50 paces and/or an inch of print space. Like the British media, much of which H bragged about keeping OFF the guest list.

[sarcasm off]

I didn’t realize until just now that Harry’s wife’s earlier engagement that day was to the Mayhew Animal House. Remember? When she displayed superhuman strength, balance, and…uhhh…”flexibility” so late in her pregnancy? Anyway, her breakdown to H must have happened between the two events.

Who joined William and Harry at the Diana statue unveiling?

By PA Media - July 1st 2021, 3:05:02 pm

Just 13 guests were invited to gather with the Duke of Cambridge and Duke of Sussex for the brief ceremony

[loistyli]

😂😂😂

"Notice to America: We English are NOT all as stupid as this man (Prince Harry)"

[loistyli]

Responding to some things in Notes... Yeah, whatever happened to London Scoop or whatever the blogger was that worked in PR that was giving the scoop on things happening in Canada AND London associated with producing the H&M show? Up until the very last minute, they were saying the wedding was probably not going to happen, that there were all sorts of fights and maneuvering. They disappeared within a couple of days or weeks after the wedding.

Since then, I’ve gotten to know the aunt of one of my neighbors. I don’t think she’s part of the truly “upper crust” aristocracy in the UK, but she certainly mingles from time to time. The “country set” s opposed to “high society” of London. IRL, I don’t talk much about H, his wife, or the BRF unless other people bring them up, because I know how crazy it sounds. However, when I was walking past my neighbor s place the day H’s (alleged) son was (allegedly), born, she and her aunt were sitting outside, and I called out a cheery “It’s a boy!”

Whoa. I didn’t know Brits could execute such an obvious and perfectly-timed eye roll. Well done, Auntie! It’s not that I don’t think Brits do snark. In fact, many are better than Americans precisely because they are adept with so many tools. Their tools tend to be subtler, which means they can penetrate deeper, and they are far more sophisticated than the brash American eye roll. 😉

I stopped to chat and boy did she unload about H’s wife. Said she has to have drama. If there isn’t drama, she creates it. I wanted her to keep going so played stupid. I told her that I had some (alleged) suspicions of that nature in the past, but that I was so impressed with the wedding, with the thoughtful way she incorporated elements of her heritage, while still having reverence for the tenets of the Church of England**, and the traditions of the Crown, that I thought I should give her the benefit of the doubt.

Auntie sniffed and said that SHE had nothing to do with the success of the wedding, H’s family and their staff did it. “She” was a mess, with no idea how things run. Couldn’t or wouldn’t make decisions, or changed her mind, threw fits when told No, and with decisions made by staff without her approval, for which time had run out, and had they not made the decisions, there would be nothing.

Yes,like someone else said, one specific example was the flowers. Also, don’t remember if it was the pastor that gave the sermon, or the choir, for which she said Prince Charles personally knew and liked and made the invitations. Maybe both. He’s wife had nothing to do with it.

I don’t press Auntie for insider info. The only real tidbits she’s shared about specific events were about the wedding. Other than that, the only info I’ve gotten from her and that I wouldn’t get online, is her personal opinion on how Prince Charles is mistreated. “He’s lovely man. Just a lovely, lovely man.”

She had just started spending winters in southern Florida, but hasn’t been able to get back since Covid restrictions began. I imagine she’s burning with rage at how the Harkles have thrown PC under the bus.

So anyone know what happened to London Scoop?

Why didn’t Meghan have a carpet on the aisle at her wedding?

Rumor has it she demanded a red carpet . Red carpets are reserved for State Weddings. All other royal weddings get blue carpets. If she couldn’t get red she decided to have nothing.

[loistyli]

I don’t think it’s in either of the Cambridges’ hearts or personality to desire “fame.” It is a given that they’ll be in some sort of spotlight for the rest of their lives, and naturally desire to be well-thought of as they carry out their duties, while raising three children as normally as possible. I don’t get a sense from them of a desire to grab more global power, recognition, or adoration. Even with PW’s initiative on climate change, I think their focus is mostly about serving and representing to the best of their abilities , UK citizens, and maintaining efforts to carry on the work HMTQ has done to unite and mutually benefit the countries of the Commonwealth.

I think if they fully understood the American meaning around the phrase “wanting to be a global household name,” or wanting to “break the Internet,” they would find the motives and mindset that drive such desires abhorrent.

Credible sources have reported that their sister-in-law specifically stated those goals and expectations with her PR and mass manipulation teams.

'Jealous' Prince William 'irked' by Prince Harry but must avoid his 'dangerous path'

ROYAL   /   Published: Fri, May 28, 2021

PRINCE WILLIAM is "jealous" of Prince Harry's celebrity status but must not follow his brother's "dangerous path", the CEO of Republic has claimed.