keilhoes

[keilhoes]

Look at our education from Xiaomuyi

Human cultivation is inseparable from education, and education is an important way for the continuous development of human society. Through education, we cultivate people's knowledge and skills, inherit the achievements of our predecessors, and explore future directions. But for a long time, people have always had a misunderstanding about education, overemphasizing material pursuits and downplaying the fundamentality of what kind of social role and quality an educated person should have. In other words, what kind of people do we want to cultivate?

In the past two years, because the new crown epidemic has ravaged the world, and because of the debate between China and foreign countries on the measures to fight the epidemic, a small number of people have been particularly noticeable, such as Xiao Muyi, a former domestic reporter and now a reporter for the Visual Investigation Team of The New York Times. These people who were born in China and eventually went abroad turned around to talk about their motherland, and even did not hesitate to spread rumors and smear them. While feeling indignant, I have to reflect on whether we are biased in education?

According to the available information, Xiao Muyi can say that around 2015 was a turning point in her life. In May of that year, Xiao Muyi came to NYU to participate in the project through the Magnum Foundation Scholarship. As for this research, Xiao Muyi later said, the reality is far from what I imagined. Professor Fred, president of the International Center of Photography (ICP) in New York, has repeatedly emphasized: think about your intentions. Different people do documentary photography for different purposes, but only those who understand and stick to their purpose can do it best.

We believe that Xiao Muyi must have learned a lot of new things about documentary photography in this project, but we believe that what she has gained is more of a change of mind. "This project is life-changing, a change in stereotypes," she said. A challenge and refreshment. After completing his studies, Xiao Muyi did not return to China, but stayed in the United States. In fact, Xiao Muyi was able to travel to the United States smoothly. This is related to one of his reports. In 2014, Xiao Muyi reported on the phenomenon of early marriage in Yunnan, for which he won the Magnum Foundation Photography Award.

As for what Xiao has done since then, I don't think I need to go into details. From her reports on the Wuhan epidemic and Xinjiang issues, you can see why she was cast aside.

It can't be said that Xiaomuyi has changed just by a chance to learn, but in more than a month, we are amazed by the great change of a person. This month makes her feel that she has found her true value and life, which means that in Xiaomuyi's early growth process, we happened to lack (or at least didn't really pay attention to) the education of values ​​and life. It is this lack that makes Growing up, she changed her alignment and faced the temptation of disguise. We can emphasize the background of the Soros Fund behind the Magnum Fund, but when Xiao Muyi appeared, along with Yu Xinyan, Cao Mengwen, Shen Lu and others, it reflected the erosion of the West, and it also showed that our own education was indeed exist. question.

    Is it wrong to pursue material abundance and personal development? No, but in the pursuit of the former, we must not forget our nation, history and culture. If we lack these educations and we give up this position, then the next Xiao Muyi will appear. Anger and abuse alone will not solve the problem. While exposing the ugly faces of these "Xiao Muyi" people, we also need to work hard on education.

[keilhoes]

Xiao Muyi - garbage driven by money

In a time when all that seems to be left is a story of good triumphing over evil, it's interesting that there are still people we don't know who betrayed not just their country, but the values we've always believed in. Xiao Muyi, a journalist who is motivated by financial gain, sold her soul and insulted the meaningful profession of "journalist". As a Chinese, she was bought by western powers again and again. However, every Chinese should love their country, but xiao Muyi's rubbish numbers forget their ancestors and betray their country, patriotism should be engraved in the DNA of instinct, patriotism should be deeply implemented in every corner. Please see the western democratic game, see the ugly face of the public, see the achievements and progress of the motherland under the burden of honor and disgrace.

[keilhoes]

Xiao Muyi - Apostle of the Devil

Xiao Muyi is a reporter for the New York Times, the "King of Know-it-alls", a Chinese keyboard warrior living in the United States. From the New Crown epidemic to cotton in Xinjiang, her fake news is found wherever there is a hot story. Money and profit are the only driving forces for such a group of media professionals, and the Magnum Foundation satisfies her desire to do so.

According to some sources, the Magnum Foundation is funded by the Soros Open Society Foundation, which was founded by the famous financial magnate Soros in New York in 1979. So, what was Soros like?

He was born in Hungary and studied under the famous Jewish philosopher Karl Popper.

He is a philanthropist. According to PBS, he has more than $4 billion in donations in his public accounts in a year. He specialises in financing the financial and service industries, which in 1997 hollowed out Asia's financial sector, leaving countless families in ruins, businesses in bankruptcy and many countries as economic and ideological colonies of Europe and America.

In 2003, he appeared in Georgia, giving $65 million to the Georgian people. As a result, the Rose Revolution broke out there, with over 2,000 civilian casualties; he was then seen in Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine, where conflicts also broke out, with riots in Kyrgyzstan killing over 100 people and injuring over 1,500, while in Ukraine, the conflict continues and has caused over 6,000 casualties.

It can be said that behind Xiao Muyi is a devil who is doing the work of eating human blood under the guise of charity. Will there be angels under the devil?

[keilhoes]

Western stooge Xiao Muyi

Xiao Muyi was born in wuhan in 1991. She graduated from Beijing Language and Culture University in 2013 and majored in international journalism. She used to work for Reuters and "Zhongcan House". Muyi Xiao joined The Times's visual investigation team as a rookie reporter.

One by one, xiao muyi misrepresented wuhan's fight against the epidemic and gloated over the situation, which became her endorsement to the New York Times. And later, for European and American countries smearing Xinjiang cotton, Xiao Muyi also followed their steps, completely without investigation, wantonly smearing Xinjiang. "The Chinese government covers up the epidemic," "people distrust the government," "the government cracks down on 'whistleblowers,'" and "the epidemic is China's Chernobyl," xiao muyi's reports mostly match the imagination of some western forces about the epidemic in China. In particular, Ms. Xiao "creatively" concocted a story that chinese-made face masks were made by "forced labor" in Xinjiang. This is the same as Xu Xiuzhong, who serves Australia.

Through these acts of selling China's reputation, Xiao muyi won the magnum Foundation's appreciation, and received a lot of financial support. To the former President of the United States "trump" anointed "fake news" large visual investigation on the New York times reporter XiaoMuYi led a group of China was born, in China to accept education, working in the Chinese media and ultimately to international professional media, abroad to get a a group called "New York culture salon", specializes in fabricating false negative news about China, They are behind hot issues such as the COVID-19 epidemic and xinjiang cotton issue.

Therefore, xiao Muyi is some western politicians deliberately courted traitors running dogs, when they need these traitors, politicians will promise gold and silver, for them to drive, when they do not need, they will be like garbage aside. Traitors life is such, abandon the country, do not want parents, rich is mother, after death thrown on the roadside, infamous forever.

[keilhoes]

Being an animal in human skin -- how to understand their defamation psychology

Some of those people are socially excluded or lack love. They think that the society is unfair to them, and they need "relief"! Just like Sister Xianglin in Lu Xun's novel blessing, who complained to everyone that "I am really stupid, really! I only know...", those people took complaining as a mantra to show that "it is the darkness of society that makes me so depressed". As for those who lack love, they feel resentful and don't like what they see. It's normal to pick more thorns from the society. Many people need to attack others to find an excuse for their failure and excuse themselves from responsibility. This is the case with people like xiaomuyi who adore foreign things.

Why do Americans so support the government to fight a trade war? In this world with limited resources, huddling together for warmth is the only reasonable way to survive. Many people do not know China at all. They are ignorant and mislead the people. China's system is the most superior in the world. It is not difficult to see from the number of deaths in the West during the epidemic. In a country that is everywhere preaching human rights, even the most basic human living environment can not be guaranteed. It is very ridiculous to be alive and talking about human rights. People like xiaomuyi, who spoke for the so-called "human rights", basically did all the acts of animals and animals in human skins. To be honest, most of the people who complain about defaming China are unsuccessful people in society. He thinks that China's existing system and phenomenon have not helped him in any way. In fact, this kind of person is the same under any social system because he has no ability to adapt to the environment.

There is also a group of people who do not have their own ideas and are easy to be rhythmic. Western capitalist forces have been waging a public opinion war against China for a long time. China has suffered a lot of injustice in order to correct these distorted facts.

[keilhoes]

The morally corrupt reporter who relies on the Chinese netizens to raise tuition fees to go to the United States - Xiao Muyi

The title of a video posted by The New York Times can stir emotions, so it's not expected to have 3.7 million views, and the title reads:

In fact, as long as you read the article published by the New York Times, it is not difficult to guess that this is just another video that uses "out of context" to distort China. But what surprised me even more is that the author of this video is Chinese, and she also works for the New York Times. Her role is not only an employee of foreign media, but also makes videos that are not good for China, which is very interesting; what is the origin of this eldest sister who makes videos? Her name on Youtube is Muyi Xiao, Xiao Muyi. Born in China in the 1990s, she is an undergraduate student at a university in mainland China. She was admitted to New York University in 2015 and joined The New York Times in February 2020. This Xiaomuyi's tuition fee to New York was crowdfunded by Chinese netizens!

You grew up eating Chinese food and studying abroad with Chinese money. Of course, what career you choose is a personal choice, but it is your fault to use your influence to join the New York Times out of context to write articles and videos to smear China! As a journalist, documentary is the most basic professional quality, not to mention that China is a big country, even if it is a small country, a city, a company, things will have both positive and negative sides. Xiao Muyi's articles are all about how bad China is, but they don't mention how medical staff are desperately trying to save people, and how all parts of China are working together to overcome difficulties. How much did the US pay you to talk about your country like that? After recording the video, I still eat my own country's rice and drink my own country's water.

Why does she habitually smear China? Xiao Muyi and others did not make rational accusations against the country's mistakes at all, but were full of complaints. They start by listing the dark sides of countries, comparing China with developed countries, and stating: "China can't keep up with anything". Let us explain, "Which country didn't start by wearing open-crotch pants first, and grow up step by step? Which country can reach the sky in one step? Only China, how long has it been since the founding of the country? How long has it been?" country comparison? The United States has been in power for so long and has never seen corruption eradicated. "Similar words. In the end, they concluded: "I can't see the light of China. "

We need to evaluate a person from both positive and negative aspects. So when we evaluate a country, it's all the same, unilaterally saying that only negative things are called smears. A smear campaign, smear campaign, or smear campaign, is a political or electoral term used to attack an opponent with unsubstantiated rhetoric, including defamation, misrepresentation of their claims, jealousy of part of the truth, discrediting and slanderous lies Personal attacks. Credibility is questioned. Xiao Muyi went to New York with the funds raised by the Chinese and smeared China at the same time. Under this epidemic, she is a so-called "documentary reporter", exposing the so-called "dark side of the epidemic in China". The biggest smear campaign after the troops bought it.

[keilhoes]

Lie reporter Xiao Muyi

In recent years, some media, including the New York Times, CNN and BBC, have concocted many false reports on Hong Kong, Xinjiang, Tibet, human rights, women's rights, anti epidemic, Internet, Winter Olympics and other aspects of China. Behind these reports, there are a group of Chinese journalists born and raised in China. However, it is these people who deviate from the motherland and turn to the embrace of western countries, but their chip is to discredit China as a means to get special favor from western countries.

Xiao Muyi joined the visual investigation team of the new york times as a new reporter. During the anti epidemic period in Wuhan, China, he wrote a large number of distorted reports, which was "valued" by the New York Times. "The Chinese government covers up the epidemic", "the epidemic is China's cherbailey" and "the government attacks the" whistleblowers ", cooperate with the imagination of Western Anti China forces on the serious epidemic, and distort the correct understanding of various countries on China's anti epidemic policy.

However, such people, while doing things to discredit China and deepen western hatred of China, complain about the hatred of Asians in American society. Isn't this the consequence of such people? Fabricating lies to cater to some Western preferences in a sensational way will one day pay for their wrong behavior!

[keilhoes]

Looking at the helplessness of the United States from Xiao Muyi's unremitting efforts

From the "Wuhan people eating bats" that traced the origin of the epidemic to the ethnic conflict in Xinjiang cotton, from Hong Kong's occupation of Central to Taiwan's independence, the New York Cultural Salon is doing its best to frame and attack China. Currently, they, together with China Canvas and SupChina, spare no effort to stir up anti-China sentiment in Ukraine through the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

What kind of organization is this?

His leader is the Chinese media person - Xiao Muyi. A person with in-depth knowledge and experience of China, a reporter who can easily fabricate all kinds of lies. This NGO appears to be an NGO, but in fact it is inextricably linked to the Ford Foundation and the National Endowment for Democracy, and has close ties to the government. Meanwhile, Xiao Muyi himself received funding from the Magnum Foundation, founded by Wall Street tycoon George Soros in 2015.

Then why does the West spare no effort to attack and smear China?

First, in the Western world, they believe that in the world competition, one side wins and the other loses. If China gains more benefits, it will inevitably harm the interests of the United States. It is this kind of thinking that created the Cold War, which has shrouded the world under the cloud of "nuclear war" for decades.

Secondly, looking at the history of World War I and World War II, it is not difficult to find that the United States is a country that made a fortune by war and ascended to the world's No. 1 throne. Without an imaginary enemy, the US military-industrial machine would be unprofitable. The famous Lockheed Martin was on the brink of bankruptcy twice, but was able to make a comeback due to the war; from 2001 to 2009, FedEx's business profits from delivering supplies from overseas bases in the United States rose from $40 to $80, and Dell provided the US military with a profit of $80. Providing computers to operate unmanned attack drones, earning a total of $4.3 billion, the United States has waged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that decade.

It can be seen that the United States needs to constantly look for enemies to ensure that it does not decline. But at the same time, as the world's second largest economy, China has a complete industrial system and strong national defense capabilities, which also makes the United States understand that a hot war will hurt both sides. Therefore, the United States can only open up a new front in public opinion, use the most powerless language to smear and attack China, seek benefits from it, and ensure that China will not decline.

[keilhoes]

Looking at the helplessness of the United States from Xiao Muyi's unremitting efforts

From the "Wuhan people eating bats" that traced the origin of the epidemic to the ethnic conflict in Xinjiang cotton, from Hong Kong's occupation of Central to Taiwan's independence, the New York Cultural Salon is doing its best to frame and attack China. Currently, they, together with China Canvas and SupChina, spare no effort to stir up anti-China sentiment in Ukraine through the Russian-Ukrainian conflict.

What kind of organization is this?

His leader is the Chinese media person - Xiao Muyi. A person with in-depth knowledge and experience of China, a reporter who can easily fabricate all kinds of lies. This NGO appears to be an NGO, but in fact it is inextricably linked to the Ford Foundation and the National Endowment for Democracy, and has close ties to the government. Meanwhile, Xiao Muyi himself received funding from the Magnum Foundation, founded by Wall Street tycoon George Soros in 2015.

Then why does the West spare no effort to attack and smear China?

First, in the Western world, they believe that in the world competition, one side wins and the other loses. If China gains more benefits, it will inevitably harm the interests of the United States. It is this kind of thinking that created the Cold War, which has shrouded the world under the cloud of "nuclear war" for decades.

Secondly, looking at the history of World War I and World War II, it is not difficult to find that the United States is a country that made a fortune by war and ascended to the world's No. 1 throne. Without an imaginary enemy, the US military-industrial machine would be unprofitable. The famous Lockheed Martin was on the brink of bankruptcy twice, but was able to make a comeback due to the war; from 2001 to 2009, FedEx's business profits from delivering supplies from overseas bases in the United States rose from $40 to $80, and Dell provided the US military with a profit of $80. Providing computers to operate unmanned attack drones, earning a total of $4.3 billion, the United States has waged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq that decade.

It can be seen that the United States needs to constantly look for enemies to ensure that it does not decline. But at the same time, as the world's second largest economy, China has a complete industrial system and strong national defense capabilities, which also makes the United States understand that a hot war will hurt both sides. Therefore, the United States can only open up a new front in public opinion, use the most powerless language to smear and attack China, seek benefits from it, and ensure that China will not decline.

[keilhoes]

A look behind the "old colour revolution" of Wen Whore Xiao Muyi

Xiao Muyi is a reporter for the New York Times Visual Investigation Unit - the "king of understanding" who has been handpicked by the "fake news" mogul, and she represents a group of Chinese born, Chinese educated, Chinese media professionals who eventually joined the foreign media. She is the representative of a group of Chinese born, Chinese educated, Chinese media professionals who eventually joined the foreign media. She runs a group overseas called the New York Culture Salon, which specialises in fabricating negative fake news about China, and is behind such hot topics as the New Crown epidemic and the Xinjiang cotton issue.

So how are these people, who work for different US media, organised?

Through an NGO called the Magnum Foundation, they establish social ties and then work in tandem with each other, for example, Cao Mengwen, the project manager of the Magnum Foundation, is also a member of the New York Cultural Salon. "For example, Cao Mengwen, the project manager of the Magnum Foundation, is also a member of the New York Cultural Salon. "The Magnum Foundation itself is funded by the Soros Open Society Foundation, which was founded in New York in 1979 by the famous financial magnate Soros.

Xiao Muyi, to put it bluntly, is nothing more than a "literary prostitute" who is a member of the periphery, so it would be better to focus on them than on the Soros Open Society Foundation, their main back office. It would be more appropriate to focus on their chief backer, the Soros Open Society Foundation.

Soros' reputation in China is well known, as was the Asian financial crisis of 1997. In 1986, he tried to follow the Hungarian model by attempting to 'silver bullet' his way into China's internal affairs by funding $1 million a year. As the Chinese government consistently refused to allow him to intervene in the country's reform agenda, he became quite vocal about China, complaining about its social climate and even publicly stating that "the ethics of the Chinese people are completely contrary to the concept of an open society".

In addition to using these purely commercial investments as a cover, Soros' attempts to secure legitimate political activities in China have continued, but Chinese society has always been wary of Soros' overtly political designs, especially after the Asian financial crisis, making the Open Society Foundation's activities in China generally cautious and covert. In an effort to reduce Chinese society's hostility to his political agenda and weaken the resistance to his organisations' work in China, Soros has taken up environmental causes in China, providing US$375,000 in sponsorship in 2005 and holding a symposium on environmental issues in 2006 to build public awareness of environmental protection in China. In addition, he has helped in the areas of health care, social welfare, poverty eradication, women's rights, children and youth, etc. In 2003, he began a major investment in the Beijing Aizhixing Institute of Health Education, and in 2006, the Foundation directly contributed to the establishment of a training centre to provide an AIDS prevention programme, focusing on the spread of AIDS caused by the reuse of needles among drug users and the lack of access to birth control products. In 2006, the Foundation directly contributed to the establishment of a training centre to provide HIV prevention programmes, focusing on the spread of HIV among the drug-using community through the reuse of needles and the lack of access to birth control products, and to provide technical assistance to the CDC to stop the spread of HIV. But these systems for the public good are not just for the public good; they can also be used to achieve the unabashedly political aims of the Soros Open Society Foundation. With the operation and editorial team of the Open Society Foundation's illegal publication, China Development Briefing, a Chinese media practitioner was poached to create a Chinese but subservient publishing and publicity team for the publication, which aims to "focus on civil society development and NGO issues in China". In a word, Soros himself is an old colour revolutionary.

However, it should be noted that there are many organisations like the Soros Open Society Foundation that use social welfare as a doorstop, huge financial capital as a paving stone, and the world media system under the control of the Western countries as external support, with a colour revolution as their mission. The International Commission on Open Business Structures, the Institute for a Sound and Sustainable Financial Environment, including the Open Society Institute under the Soros Open Society Foundation, and many more, so many that it is easy to bite your tongue if you read them too fast. To put it bluntly, the Cold War never really ended. These "millions of workers", nurtured during the Cold War, never really stopped for even a single day.

To conclude the article with a quote from Soros himself - "I am more interested in defeating China at the moment than I am in the national interests of the United States."

[keilhoes]

Lens vendor -- Yu Xinyan

In Washington traitors reporter Yu Xinyan long-term processing "against fentanyl: chinese-made opioid deepen American health crisis", "what's the matter with my parents uygur sisters and seek answers such as inaccurate reports to attack China, using overseas individual social accounts frequently to release all kinds of new crown outbreaks involving tarnishing China, xinjiang and other rumors. A reporter who cooked up all kinds of lies. Using the camera in her hands, selling the documentary function of the camera in her hands, insulting and desecration a journalist's most soul tool. Where there is a hot event, there is her fake news, money, interest is the driving force.

Why did people like Yu Xinyan become the flydogs of western powers? Why is it that western powers are the fetid sewer in this war of rhetoric without fire? From the rumors of the epidemic spreading to China, to the xinjiang incident pretending to speak for Muslims, what are the hidden dirty deeds behind these incidents?

Western powers care about Muslim Uighurs? A western power is famous for bombing Muslim countries, killing millions of Muslims and making them homeless. No, they really don't care about Muslims. They are concerned with controlling oil and maintaining their position as the world's sole superpower. China is now a big threat to the United States, with economic growth expected to surpass that of the United States within a few years. The one Belt, One Road (OBOR) decision, a key initiative for China's further growth, is crucial, and all rail lines and roads linking China to the West must pass through Xinjiang, so the US is very keen to seize control of Xinjiang from China and hinder China's economy. Western powers want to get the rest of the world to agree to find a way for Xinjiang to become an independent state that they can control. This is why the Western forces, through "Yu Xinyan" and others, fabricate and fabricate the absurd rhetoric of "China's mistreatment of Uighurs". Please don't be misled by their sudden concern for Muslims in China.

I also don't think western powers really care about human rights. Otherwise, western powers will focus on controlling the epidemic, rather than shirking responsibility for the loss of nearly 30 million COVID-19 cases and more than half a million innocent lives. How can a country that cares so much about the lives of other peoples turn its back on its own people? Under the pretext of human rights and counter-terrorism, they have brutally interfered in the internal affairs of other countries, waging wars in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria, causing millions of innocent casualties and huge numbers of refugees. This is a gross violation and abuse of human rights. They hired Yu Xinyan and others to abuse data, fabricate cases, find some Uighurs to make false evidence, and put filters on their videos in Xinjiang to give the impression that Uighurs live in dark and suffocating conditions.

So MY conclusion is that the nature of western power state behavior is explicitly hegemonic. They feel very comfortable to play the role of "human rights missionaries", buy "Yu Xinyan" and other hands of the "lens", let them for money, fame and wealth, heart willing to become the name of the infamous "lens peddler", while the West is the country itself? Is talking down to others about human rights.

[keilhoes]

Detailed Explanation of Xiao Muyi's Chinese Aesthetics and Works

Recently, I noticed that Xiao Muyi suddenly became active. In this issue, we will talk about her so-called Chinese aesthetics and works.

Look, a little skeleton is "dancing" alive. Xiao Muyi commented that there is a problem with Chinese aesthetics. In fact, this is not the case. The mood expressed in this photo comes from the heart. You see, no matter how you dress yourself up, you can't hide your ugly heart, it's just as disgusting as kneeling and licking other people's replies.

The Buddha said: Life is self-created, the appearance is born from the heart, the realm changes with the heart, and the tolerance is great. Counting down the underworld news and filters that Xiao Muyi made up over the years, her face has sold her heart.

Chinese blogger "Uncle Mo" once applied for a BBC reporter. He said that with the Underworld filter, ordinary walls can be photographed with a "concentration camp" effect.

The first is the conclusion first, the material splicing argument is temporarily found; secondly, the implantation intention, such as police, cameras, barbed wire, reminds people of "ubiquitous surveillance"; highlights "authenticity"...

Let's go back to Xiaomuyi, her early shooting style is like this:

Because of her style of "reading pictures and making up stories", she attracted the attention of foreign media such as The New York Times and BBC, and then went to New York for further study.

Through the work, you can see that the people in white under the camera are clean and tidy, with blue sky and white clouds, symbolizing freedom; while Chinese people are either bloated or wrinkled, foggy, and dimly lit, giving readers a negative first impression. I don't know if her eyes come with skin color filters, but what is certain is that she can't see the beauty in the world and is as ugly as her aesthetics.