katan-a-rama
Words are overrated
5K posts
Yoo | 31 | I write things here I guess
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
katan-a-rama · 29 days ago
Text
it’s december 1 where’s the christmas tail kitten bring him to me
305K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 1 month ago
Photo
Tumblr media
If you see this on your dashboard, reblog this, NO MATTER WHAT and all your dreams and wishes will come true.
171K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
all right everyone let's hear it for ACETAMINOPHEN let's give it up for STORE-BRAND TYLENOL let me hear you make some NOISE
6K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
i forgot a crucial part of pet ownership: bothering that animal a little
53K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
) <- super parenthesis. reblog to close all parentheticals you opened and forgot to close in your life and return to equilibrium
52K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
302K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
How to Argue Like an Asshole
Good evening, friends, let me tell you some Secrets on how to argue like (and with) assholes. I’m writing this because I keep running into a particular asshole, and I need to stop engaging with them, and so this is an instruction sheet for myself as well as you guys. 
First, try to avoid assholes; they don’t deserve your time and energy. But, if an Argument is unavoidable, here are a few tips on how to emerge unscathed. 
Let go of the idea that you’re going to win. 
You’re not gonna win. Nobody wins in an argument with an asshole. But, on the other hand, you can make them lose. You can deprive them of their entertainment and their triumph. 
How??? 
Do not present your side of this debate. 
This is so counter-intuitive for most of us who believe in things like, oh, science, or real facts, or the idea that real facts can be determined by science. Here’s a cool terrible thing about humans: certainty has nothing to do with facts. And when people are certain, that is when they become assholes. 
When someone’s only goal is to win an argument, any real evidence or facts you give them is just ammunition for them to turn against you. 
You will not convince them. So what should you be doing? 
Destroy their arguments.
This is a thing of joy, because it’s what assholes are used to doing. They are, at heart, morons who don’t know how to construct, only how to destroy. 
I used to be super emotional about arguments like this. I couldn’t think of anything to say while the other person ranted on about their horrifying bigotry. Now I’m a lawyer, and I’ve learned to weaponize my essentially nitpicky nature. For money. 
So here are some easy tactics you can remember and deploy: 
- Make them define the words they use. Nitpick the definitions. 
- Turn questions back on them. If they ask you “why do you believe x”, ask them why they believe y. If they pull some “I asked first” shit, ask them why they’re afraid to defend their beliefs. 
- Call them emotional.  If possible, pick out specific emotions. This is especially devastating when you’re debating a man, as he will get more emotional as a result. 
- “Why is that funny? I don’t get it.” Making people explain mean jokes can be a delight; they just wilt the more you question them about the underlying assumptions. 
- Laugh at any especially dumb shit. Like they use some slogan or catchphrase that’s obviously untrue, due to science, or essentially ridiculous, like “we’ve made America great again,” and you just blurt out laughing. If they get mad, tell them – oh, so sorry, I’ll shut up, I’m giving you the floor to talk about your beliefs. I’m respecting you. This is a goddamn power move. It gives you the high ground, and also the implied control over the situation. The floor belongs to you, but you are yielding it to someone because you can. 
- If they make an awkward exit, let them. Especially if they call the discussion “political.” It means they’re feeling attacked. Graciously allow them to retreat with their tail between their legs. If they storm off, allow them to do that too. Congratulations; you’ve ended the argument and you don’t have to deal with it anymore. 
Basically: hand the asshole a shovel, and let ‘em dig. Relieve yourself of the burden to convince them they are wrong, and just sour their fun instead. 
Additionally, these are the tactics that assholes use, consciously or subconsciously, all the time. Recognize them. Once you know what they are, you can become immune to the intimidation and belittling tactics. 
Good luck. 
84K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
Haven't figured out a politic way to word this but before saying someone/thing "makes you uncomfortable" please ask yourself this important question: is it any of your fucking business
28K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
Okay listen we need to allow Americans the same ability to claim their versions food by adding their country’s name in front of it the way the rest of us do. We had some Texans living with us for a week and when we talked about American food one of them said “I don’t want to include pizza because we didn’t invent it” and we were like “Just say American pizza. It’s way different to an Italian pizza anyway. Shit, as a Dane I can tell a Swedish pizza from a Danish pizza”
Like there’s a reason why it’s called Swedish Meatballs it’s because literally every country has their own version of a meatball. Look, on the left are Swedish Meatballs and on the right are Danish Meatballs. We live right next to each other!
Tumblr media Tumblr media
So as long as you know you didn’t invent it and that it’s different from the original I think it’s perfectly fair to say American pizza or American meatballs for that matter. I mean, American Italian food is acknowledged as a thing so loosen up a bit and have a snack.
2K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
I hate it when my phone autocapitalizes jesus I do not respect the lord
16K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
156K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
sometimes my cat will suddenly go very fast. But don't let this fool you. It does not reflect an urgent change in circumstances
17K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
Sometimes I stumble across a particular species of queer discourse post on this site and I get a vivid mental image of the OP paging through an enormous rulebook with furrowed brow muttering "come on, there must be someone I'm allowed to be homophobic to".
10K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
On twitter I’m seeing dozens of threads from Black activists warning people against burnout, giving all sorts of useful tips about preventing and managing it for the sake of a long-term, sustainable effort.
On tumblr I’m seeing a hell of a lot of young white kids yelling at anyone who actually follows those steps, and acting like burnout is a moral falling rather than a well-proven psychological phenomenon.
Be careful who you get your information from. Don’t let guilt lead you to make choices that will harm both you and the movement.
141K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
things I'm fond of:
vampires as a metaphor for surviving a trauma but becoming "different" because of it: control and vulnerability
werewolves as a metaphor for having something inside you that everyone else hates and fears: repression and release
ghosts as a metaphor for the pain, suffering, and anger of past generations: revenge and healing
1K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
Tumblr media
I'm certain this is on Tumblr somewhere, but I haven't seen it around, so I'm sharing it myself
79K notes · View notes
katan-a-rama · 2 months ago
Text
Concept I've been stewing on for a while here. I've got a name for it now and I'm calling it the Shot Dog Factor. It's a numerical value, assignable to any internet post, which represents the average number of engagements it needs to reach before someone comes along acting like this post shot their dog.
And for the sake of High Number = More Danger, which feels like the intuitive and sensible read, let's call it the inverse. As in the chance that any given interaction results in a Shot Dog response.
"Hee hee haa haa" type of silly shitpost? Low Shot Dog Factor. Largely safe. A genuine political opinion? Critically high Shot Dog Factor. Guaranteed to elicit such a response if it breaks containment.
As a result of this phenomenon, you see phrasings and circumventions added specifically to lower the Shot Dog factor. Every "now I know this doesn't apply to EVERYONE'S specific situation, but I just think--" about something where the non-specificity was obvious, but OP needed to add that disclaimer to avoid the Shot Dog from someone who thinks it needs to apply to them.
And another--perhaps the most--critical thing to understand about the Shot Dog factor is that 0 is not a valid value. There's a discontinuation at 0. And as such, the Shot Dog limit, as engagement goes to infinity is, in fact, 100%. Any and every post you have ever made, given enough containment breaching, WILL piss someone off in wild ways. You can lower the Shot Dog factor but it is never 0. Sometimes when a post of yours escapes containment, you must simply sit back and accept this reality.
19K notes · View notes