juicifrost

[juicifrost]

People are like “it’s so beautiful no clouds at all” it could use a little clouds if I had to be honest.

[juicifrost]

💪🐻🥏

[juicifrost]

i’ve been playing that award-winning videogame about the young witch who is investigating the disappearance of her neighbour’s cat in a small village in the alps, and it’s really good, but i would prefer it if it used the same well-crafted narrative system & wonderful writing to tell a story about about a scientist who invents a glue that allows him to walk up and down anything

[juicifrost]

people b saying things so definitively. like man i think it depends

[juicifrost]

[juicifrost]

i cant breathe he just kept on fucking talking

[juicifrost]

I wish it was easier to talk about mobile phone addiction without sounding like a boomer

[juicifrost]

copper II sulfate wednesday on a thursday

[juicifrost]

the moulting weaner has a joyous demeanor

[juicifrost]

[juicifrost]

yup

yup

[juicifrost]

Many movements arose to mend the rift. America was awash in revival churches who doubled down. If science contradicts the bible, the science is wrong. You had the earliest murmurs of pagan reconstructionist movements, Romantic poets who wrote of an idealized pre-christian past dominated by druids, attic oracles, and wandering yogis. You had spiritualists who sold themselves as both spiritual re-awakening, and scientific study of those phenomena.

Much ink has been spilled as to whether Blavatsky was or was not a spiritualist. This misunderstands her. Blavatsky was peddling something unique. She was privy to the One True Religion, the ancient, secret tree of wisdom, from which all religion, science, and philosophy sprouted. The Bible conflicts with science? No it doesn't. The Bible you know is but a corrupted form, a third-hand translation of a translation of a translation of a lost text written in a lost divine language. Of course the bible conflicted with science. The Bible was just a pork chop. Blavatsky could show you the whole hog.

More Blavatsky, today on Patreon

[juicifrost]

[juicifrost]

[juicifrost]

[juicifrost]

re: “it’s OK to detransition!!! ❤️” post-US election hysteria: lol like i know im not the only one who encountered a whole lot of false positivity immediately after coming out from friends who reassured it was fine if i did not want to medically transition and i would still be fucking Valid or whatever. cannot tell you how many people admitted some deeply transphobic and reactionary sentiments around elective surgeries more broadly as soon as they were pushed on their “support” even a little tiny bit lol. i had to buck up very quickly and say no actually there are already plenty of engrained conservative forces telling me very clearly that i do not need to transition. but i am transitioning anyway. thank you for your support i hope it’s real when i behave the way i actually want to lol and that includes yucky icky medical procedures. i ❤️ modern medicine and you chickenshit cronenberg hannigram cannibalismcore bloggers need to get on board if you think you need to reassure people it’s cool NOT to mutilate their (white, potentially “cis”) bodies because of scary mean mr. trump. POSITIVITY POST for people who DON’T want to gain weight for sexual reasons!!!!!!!❤️❤️❤️❤️ thats what you sound like!!!!!! lol!!!!! like you are fucking gulliable if you think you’re doing anything but parroting run-of-the-mill conservative talking points under a thin veneer of body positivity or gender variance validity or whatever

[juicifrost]