imjusthereforashorttime

[imjusthereforashorttime]

once every month with 20k notes: *person so chronically online they've looped* i think we should consider agreeing with the status quo

[imjusthereforashorttime]

waiting for this shit idiot country to choose their president because for some reason this affects literally everyone else on earth. what kind of fucking bullshit–

[imjusthereforashorttime]

radblr can hate me but my priority will always be daughters

[imjusthereforashorttime]

In Prince's funky name, amen.

[imjusthereforashorttime]

"dont be hostile toward men because what if they're closeted trans women" becoming a genuine talking point the queer community is starting to use is making my head hurt oh my days

[imjusthereforashorttime]

"We aren't raising kids; we're raising adults. If you want a kind 16-year-old, teach a 6-year-old kindness and give them 10 years of practice. If you want a __ adult, teach a kid how to be __ and give them __ years of practice." - Jon Acuff

[imjusthereforashorttime]

sure. I was too literal with the "have to" I meant "they don't have to but most want to".

I thought you were saying that they are both bad but homestaying and not having a job is better. And I would not agree with that for various reasons like staying out of working so long can make it harder to get a job later, they are at a man's mercy if all the money coming in is his, stronger feeling of ownership over a woman etc.

A lot of women I know irl are some combination of feminist+trad+fds.

But idc too much abt this.

Yeah separatism won't thrive in a sense that we'll be having a female only functional village or a city but I still hope to find and meet some like-minded women today

Feminists are losing the battle with tradwives and "High Value Women".

Men nowadays have to pay only 50% of the bills and still do a minimum of chilcare and domestic labor. Women give men 50% of their money, they can't save money, they enter in debt and they still earn less.

Breadwinner women are more likely to be cheated on and have less hours of leisure since they are doing most of the household chores anyway.

They also have to give birth, something that takes a toll on women's body and their mental state. Some women literally become disabled after giving birth.

And then, when some women after seeing this are opting out or choosing to only date men who at least pay 100% of the bills so they don't have to stress out about it and save money for themselves and at least feel compensated if they get cheated on or the relationship ends, feminists lose it.

I have talked about it with feminists, and it is gross how they assume that women who want a provider are prostitutes, how they exchange sexual favors with money. Men are selfish interested creatures unless you give them half of your money and 100% of your care, then they are all angels who don't coerce, manipulate or neg women into "duty sex".

When I tell them that men today still have a caveman mentality and the only difference is that they ask for half of your money, they say that women have to fight for equality. Some of them even suggest that men are being exploited, but are incapable to see how the traditional system doesn't benefit them.

I don't know how they seriously can say: well, women have to fight with their partners to obtain equality. If you have reached the point of thinking that you have to explain a grow ass man to treat their partner with decency, wipe their asses and pick up the socks from the floor, you are braindead.

They are literally pushing women to be in a no-win situation. Males are good at tricking women, at playing DARVO. They are telling to vulnerable women to FIGHT with men, they are telling that even after birthing children, even after coming back to home completely stressed, they have to fight with their partners in order to make them understand that they are equal to them.

Obviously, women should stop dating men. But I think that if they will do it anyway, it's better for them do be smart about it. It's objectively better to marry in order to have a lifestyle and don't have fights with men over money, over sex, over who is more stressed by work, over childcare. It's safer, it's less risky, it's more in tune with what men do even nowadays.

[imjusthereforashorttime]

'they want to instate kamala' hey guess what. multiple high profile people who want trump to win? multiple leaders? guess how presidential elections work?

musk and trump fanboys are so stupid "trump is the underdog" "musk wants free speach and he is going against the norm" one that won without popular vote and made a mess once he didn't win the second time???? one of the richest males on planet and extremely irrational??

The brainrot. Actually, was there any brain to rot to begin with?

[imjusthereforashorttime]

musk and trump fanboys are so stupid "trump is the underdog" "musk wants free speach and he is going against the norm" one that won without popular vote and made a mess once he didn't win the second time???? one of the richest males on planet and extremely irrational??

The brainrot. Actually, was there any brain to rot to begin with?

[imjusthereforashorttime]

tbh I hate even thinking about female-male relationships, it is so annoying. and don't like to talk abt it. but hey since I have to see them everyday and experience (in a way) second-hand I do have some opinions.

[imjusthereforashorttime]

being 100% dependant on scrotes' money is not "being smart about it" and they don't have to give birth please be serious.

Feminists are losing the battle with tradwives and "High Value Women".

Men nowadays have to pay only 50% of the bills and still do a minimum of chilcare and domestic labor. Women give men 50% of their money, they can't save money, they enter in debt and they still earn less.

Breadwinner women are more likely to be cheated on and have less hours of leisure since they are doing most of the household chores anyway.

They also have to give birth, something that takes a toll on women's body and their mental state. Some women literally become disabled after giving birth.

And then, when some women after seeing this are opting out or choosing to only date men who at least pay 100% of the bills so they don't have to stress out about it and save money for themselves and at least feel compensated if they get cheated on or the relationship ends, feminists lose it.

I have talked about it with feminists, and it is gross how they assume that women who want a provider are prostitutes, how they exchange sexual favors with money. Men are selfish interested creatures unless you give them half of your money and 100% of your care, then they are all angels who don't coerce, manipulate or neg women into "duty sex".

When I tell them that men today still have a caveman mentality and the only difference is that they ask for half of your money, they say that women have to fight for equality. Some of them even suggest that men are being exploited, but are incapable to see how the traditional system doesn't benefit them.

I don't know how they seriously can say: well, women have to fight with their partners to obtain equality. If you have reached the point of thinking that you have to explain a grow ass man to treat their partner with decency, wipe their asses and pick up the socks from the floor, you are braindead.

They are literally pushing women to be in a no-win situation. Males are good at tricking women, at playing DARVO. They are telling to vulnerable women to FIGHT with men, they are telling that even after birthing children, even after coming back to home completely stressed, they have to fight with their partners in order to make them understand that they are equal to them.

Obviously, women should stop dating men. But I think that if they will do it anyway, it's better for them do be smart about it. It's objectively better to marry in order to have a lifestyle and don't have fights with men over money, over sex, over who is more stressed by work, over childcare. It's safer, it's less risky, it's more in tune with what men do even nowadays.

[imjusthereforashorttime]

[imjusthereforashorttime]

[imjusthereforashorttime]

I don't think women who believe in the status quo need coddling. A woman who thinks women need to give birth does not need her hand held through a conversation about women's rights. You can tell a prolife women to shut the fuck up when she starts yapping about being anti abortion. You can tell a woman it's stupid to be with a man. Asking women who actually care about liberation to baby and coddle and gently explain is bonkers to me. Anyone who believes in what's considered "normal" has had their hands held for their entire life. I am not wasting my time and energy and emotional intelligence on women who consciously and actively erode my own rights.

Talking "aggressively" to a misogynistic woman is not misogyny. Y'all just can't tell the difference between actual misogyny and women expressing frustration and rage. Which is also... misogyny.

If you believe that babying women will get them on our side, you're greatly mistaken. A woman who only comes over to our side because you were nice to her will run the moment she realizes our side is being attacked by everyone. The women who are here and STAY here are the ones who actually care about liberation who can take the hard hits. Who can take the actual misogyny. Who can stand their ground. I don't know why we insist that every woman can make it over here. They can't. Only the ones with tough skin last.

[imjusthereforashorttime]

How can you do this and not be disgusted by the similarities? It's so close to being self aware, then isn't.

[imjusthereforashorttime]

"Male loneliness epidemic" is not real

"Male loneliness epidemic" is not real, is a male supremacy psyop and is a disgrace that feminists have fallen for it. They repeat the same incel discourse without realizing it.

Incels: dating is harder than ever because women are picky and only want a selected group of men. Men have to put 2x effort in dating women who are 10x worse than our grandmas were; that's hoeflation.

Feminists: actually, men are lonely because men are porn addicts and we are choosing better. Now that women don't rely on men's money to survive, men have to offer more to the table.

You are talking the same, you are saying the same thing!

Any data that proves that "men are lonely" has been debunked, but people just can't stop talking about it. Even the news are talking about it, even scientists have bought it.

Repeat after me: IT'S. NOT. REAL.

You have been tricked. I know it sounds pretty to buy into the "women are choosing better" narrative, because it gives you the illusion that women are waking up and being more feminists or being better choosers. But it's literally not happening, everything remains the same.

No, there is not a single young men crisis

No, there is not a sexlessness crisis

No, there are not more incel males than women

No, there is not a crisis or imbalance in dating because of dating apps.

Stop buying it, stop giving credibility to it. It's not a thing.

[imjusthereforashorttime]

How is selective abortion of male fetuses seen as a bad thing when we have proof csa is on the rise? Are we going to ignore that raising boys to be semi decent men is difficult in a world where women are objectified from birth? Are we going to ignore that unless you raise a boy in a cave far from any societal influence whatsoever, there's a chance he'll go on to be a rapist piece of shit? Remember, women have been training/raising men for centuries and so far they're still raping us to death.