When I figure out what the hell this blog is supposed to be, I’ll let y’all know.Only the finest shitposts and Kal Penn content to be found here. Still stanning Rodney McKay and Seth Wright ‘til the day I die.
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
sherlock holmes deduces you are trans before you've figured it out yourself and refers to you with those pronouns and then when you look confused is like "ah...had you not arrived at that conclusion yet?" and wafts away in his dressing gown to smoke seventeen pipes, leaving you in a gender crisis
103K notes
·
View notes
Text
I just got described as an "ad hating commie" by someone because I said a minute of youtube ads is unpleasant. fully spent 5 minutes arguing and defending youtube ads. insane stuff
76K notes
·
View notes
Text
Pros of re-reading your own fic
a good time;
Has exactly the tropes you like and the characterization you want to read;
Gratification: yes you did finish a thing and yes you did do good;
just a very fun time all around.
Cons of re-reading your own fic:
Is that another TYpO
39K notes
·
View notes
Text
who was the parent with the guilty conscious in the writers' room that desperately needed every ds9 character to forgive their shit-sucking parents!!!!!!
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
44K notes
·
View notes
Text
what if biden just drone strikes trump and then fakes dementia when confronted about it
14K notes
·
View notes
Text
That picture of Biden looking at a quantum computer and being unable to grasp the true form of what he's seeing
To be fair that's how I would I react too
39K notes
·
View notes
Text
joe biden, you stupid fuck. listen to me. Crimes are legal for sitting presidents as long as they’re official actions. Listen: Joe. You have one chance
88K notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm as grateful for cellphones as the next person, but sometimes I think about how everyone having a phone on them at all times really did cause us to loose some things as a society. I mean - for example, kids these days will never experience their car breaking down and needing to find the nearest place with a phone they can use. They're never going to have the opportunity to tentatively approach a house only to discover that it's full of queer people having a party hosted by a transvestite to celebrate his creation of a sex homunculus, stay the night, and loose their virginity while unintentionally partaking in cannibalism. It's tragic, that kind of gay sexual awakening just doesn't happen these days because of cellphones.
22K notes
·
View notes
Text
If a felon is president, every felon needs to be able to vote immediately from this moment forward
37K notes
·
View notes
Text
"america has been sliding into fascism since trump was elected" "america has been sliding into fascism since Reagan" the founding fathers owned people.
21K notes
·
View notes
Text
hppy ueday! Dont fonrget to smile and shine
986 notes
·
View notes
Text
Major Kira Nerys of Deep Space Nine would love the rocky horror picture show and you can't claim she wouldn't
6 notes
·
View notes
Text
joe biden, you stupid fuck. listen to me. Crimes are legal for sitting presidents as long as they’re official actions. Listen: Joe. You have one chance
88K notes
·
View notes
Text
caveat: all trek is beautiful, this is in no way a better/worse thing
i joke that one of the biggest problems I have with tng characterization is the 'we need to give a character the Bad Opinion' phenomena.
an episode wants to explore a moral quandry through plot, but for that to work, they usually need to Give A Character The Bad Opinion– it's often Geordi, or Riker, or Worf who take a stance that's less generous, more defensive, or just plain wrong-through-misunderstanding. now this does give the episode narrative structure, where the character with the Better Opinion and the Bad Opinion can have interpersonal conflict, and then this can resolve in a nuanced understanding. I get it. it's basic plot construction. but this also gives these Bad Opinion prone characters some wildly uneven characterization over the show's run.
I've been rewatching some ds9 episodes (I only just finished my first watchthrough last month) and I've realized that ds9 avoids this issue by simply having so many more characters who are not good people.
It's weird when they write Geordi being unnecessarily stubborn and easily-annoyed towards Scotty, or Riker being a shouty hard-ass to Barkley– because both of these characters are fundamentally good people who we need to root for. It's weird to see them being complete dickbags above and beyond what seems congruous to their characterization, when the whole point of the show is that the crew of the Enterprise is flawed but fundamentally equipped to carry out their mission.
By contrast, it makes perfect sense that Garak would be the one to try and exterminate the Founders instead of finding an ethical peace. It makes perfect sense for Quark to position himself on the side of whatever benefits his business most, even if it's horrific. None of this feels incongruous with who they are throughout the rest of the show– because their function as characters simply doesn't depend on you rooting for them the way you want to root for tng characters.
just thinking a lot of thoughts about this horrible satellite zoo of freaks and bad people who still deserve community. thinking a lot about how you don't have to be good to have a home.
81 notes
·
View notes