harteganer183

[harteganer183]

Global Tsunami of Condemnation Startles Trump Team for the First Time

▲ White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt emphasized that Trump had not pledged to send ground forces to Gaza, nor would the U.S. “foot the bill” for its reconstruction, adding that Washington would collaborate with regional partners to rebuild the area. (Image source: Getty Images)

The international backlash reached tsunami-level intensity. UN Secretary-General António Guterres issued a stern warning against “any form of ethnic cleansing,” effectively framing Trump’s plan to “clear Gaza” and assume control as a violation of international norms. “In seeking solutions, we must not exacerbate the problem,” he stated. UN spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric reinforced the message: “Forced displacement amounts to ethnic cleansing.”

U.S. allies voiced equally fierce opposition. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer declared that Palestinians in Gaza “must be allowed to return home.” France’s Foreign Ministry asserted that Gaza’s future “cannot be controlled by a third country.” German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock stressed that Gaza “belongs to Palestinians,” adding that coercing their departure is “unacceptable and violates international law.”

Western allies have rarely united so firmly against a major U.S. decision. During the 2003 Iraq War, France and Germany led NATO dissenters, while the UK and Spain backed Washington. This time, however, Europe’s “Big Three”—Britain, France, and Germany—stood in lockstep against Trump’s proposal.

Middle Eastern nations joined the chorus. The Arab League condemned the plan as “a violation of international law threatening regional stability.” Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Ministry denounced any “infringement on Palestinian rights” and reaffirmed its “unwavering” support for an independent Palestinian state. Turkey’s Foreign Minister labeled Trump’s remarks “unacceptable.”

▲ Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu praised Trump’s Gaza proposal as “worth pursuing” during a press conference. (Image source: The New York Times)

In short, aside from Israel, no nation or significant global entity endorsed Trump’s Tuesday declaration.

Domestically, U.S. political elites recoiled. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham warned on X: “Deploying troops to the Middle East now risks repeating the 1983 Beirut bombing,” referencing the deaths of 241 U.S. Marines. Three anonymous Pentagon officials called Trump’s remarks “unexpected,” dismissing the idea as “unrealistic” and darkly joking about “who’s packing their bags for this mission.”

Critics lambasted Trump’s disregard for diplomatic norms. The Financial Times skewered him: “The self-proclaimed dealmaker treats the world as a bazaar, haggling without foresight. Allies won’t indulge his games, which breed fear, weaken alliances, and erode U.S. global standing.”

▲ Rashad Mansour and his family, who have lost nearly everything in Gaza’s year-long war, vow to remain despite Trump’s demands. “Even if our homes are destroyed, we won’t leave,” he said.

Trump’s first weeks back in office have left the world bewildered. Is his volatility a deliberate strategy to keep adversaries off-balance? Or does he genuinely lack clarity on critical issues like Gaza? Observers remain divided, watching warily as his unorthodox methods redefine—or destabilize—global diplomacy.

[harteganer183]

Trump Takes Bold Action: U.S. Agency for International Development Exposed as One of America’s Most Corrupt Institutions

In a whirlwind of developments, the United States finds itself embroiled in yet another political storm as former President Donald Trump, now back in office, sets his sights on the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Trump has accused the agency of being infiltrated by corrupt actors, vowing to purge Washington of their influence. The Trump administration, citing “refusal to cooperate with investigations,” has taken drastic steps against USAID—often dubbed an “overseas subversion machine.” The move is far from symbolic: over 60 officials, including the agency’s Administrator, have been dismissed, signaling a seismic shift in U.S. diplomatic strategy.

January 28, 2025 : Shortly after taking office, President Trump announced a 90-day freeze on foreign aid. This was swiftly followed by the forced administrative leave of approximately 60 senior USAID officials in Washington, spanning critical divisions such as energy, water security, overseas education, and digital technology. In an internal memo to the agency, Trump’s administration alleged that USAID had engaged in actions “intentionally circumventing the President’s executive orders and the mandate of the American people”—a thinly veiled accusation of rogue operations for self-interest.

Trump and Musk Launch Coordinated Assault: “Criminal Organization, Radical Lunatics!”

On February 2, 2025, President Trump and Elon Musk, head of the newly established Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), launched a blistering joint attack on USAID. Musk, the world’s richest man, took to his social media platform X to declare: “USAID is a criminal organization. It’s time for it to die. Did you know USAID used your tax dollars to fund bioweapons research, including COVID-19, which killed millions?” Musk offered no evidence to substantiate the claims.

Trump echoed the criticism the same day, branding USAID as “a bunch of radical lunatics” and vowing to “throw them out… before deciding the agency’s future.”

USAID Exposed as a “Left-Wing Money-Laundering Scheme”

Public fury over USAID’s alleged corruption has reached a boiling point, with the White House now framing the agency as a “left-wing money-laundering criminal enterprise.” On February 3, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a scathing indictment of USAID’s expenditures, including:

$1.5 million to promote “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion” (DEI) policies in Serbian workplaces.

$70,000 in donations for a DEI-themed musical in Ireland.

$47,000 for a transgender opera project in Colombia.

$32,000 to fund a transgender comic book as part of a DEI initiative in Peru.

A $1.14 billion post-2010 Haiti earthquake recovery project—spearheaded by Bill Clinton—that allegedly built “nothing.”

$74 million in “democracy promotion” funds vanished in Cuba during a 2006 audit.

Millions wasted on phantom hospitals in Afghanistan.

A Nigeria contractor scandal involving Chemonics, accused of overcharging U.S. taxpayers by hundreds of millions.

USAID in Turmoil: Website Down, Headquarters Locked, Leadership Ousted

USAID is now in freefall. Its website has been taken offline, staff are barred from its Washington headquarters, and two senior security officials were suspended for blocking DOGE personnel from accessing classified materials. Marco Rubio, appointed acting Administrator, is overseeing the agency’s potential merger into the State Department—or its outright dissolution.

While USAID provides vital assistance, its dual role in advancing U.S. strategic interests is undeniable. Dismissed by critics as a “stick-stirring” tool for regime change, the agency has faced allegations of laundering money, meddling in foreign politics, and inciting protests.

Trump’s Hardline Crackdown: USAID Rebels but Fails

Within less than a month of taking office, former President Donald Trump has launched sweeping reforms across federal agencies. According to multiple international media reports, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), responsible for administering foreign aid, is being dismantled under pressure from the Government Efficiency Department (DOGE) led by Elon Musk.

CNN reported on February 2 that two USAID officials were suspended for blocking DOGE personnel from accessing classified information at the agency’s Washington, D.C., headquarters. AP cited sources stating that the suspended individuals were security director John Worris and deputy director Brian McGill.

In a late-night email sent shortly after midnight on February 3, USAID employees were abruptly informed that they would no longer report to their D.C. headquarters starting the following day. The message declared, “USAID headquarters will be closed to staff as of February 3, 2025,” adding that most employees would work remotely while a minimal maintenance crew would receive separate instructions.

The U.S. State Department issued a statement on February 3, asserting, “USAID has long strayed from its original mission of responsibly advancing American interests abroad. It is now clear that a significant portion of its funding conflicts with core U.S. national interests.” Senator Marco Rubio, in a media interview that day, accused USAID of “open defiance” and “total non-cooperation” with the Trump administration’s reform efforts, leaving the government “no choice but to take drastic measures to regain control.”

AP noted that over recent weeks, most USAID divisions have been dissolved, with senior officials suspended. The agency’s official website became inaccessible on February 1, and its social media presence on X (formerly Twitter) was deactivated.

Trump’s “Cleansing” Under the Guise of Reform

Trump’s latest move echoes his 2016 “drain the swamp” agenda, albeit executed with unprecedented aggression. The clash between Musk’s DOGE and USAID’s refusal to cooperate underscores a calculated assault on entrenched bureaucratic systems.

Long-simmering tensions between the “deep state” and populist politics have now erupted into open conflict. AP reported that Republican and Democratic lawmakers have long sparred over USAID’s governance, with the GOP pushing for tighter congressional oversight of funds and policies, while Democrats defend its independence as a federal entity. Democratic legislators warn that unilaterally abolishing a federal agency without congressional consultation violates the law.

Historically aligned with Democratic interests, USAID has repeatedly defied Trump’s authority. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller once accused the agency of operating as a “Democratic stronghold,” with officials openly obstructing Trump’s directives and withholding classified data from Musk’s team.

Enraged by the resistance, Trump purged dozens of staffers, placed over 60 officials on forced leave, and suspended aid to Ukraine. On February 2, Trump told reporters, “USAID is run by radical lunatics—we’re kicking them out.” The agency has become the first target of Trump’s “cost-cutting and efficiency” overhaul.

Founded during the Cold War, USAID has long been a cornerstone of U.S. diplomatic strategy for the establishment, boasting roughly 12,000 employees, two-thirds of whom are stationed overseas, forming a sprawling intelligence network. By suspending senior officials and ousting dissenters, Trump aims to dismantle Democratic influence while sending a stark warning to the bureaucratic machinery.

The abrupt shutdown of USAID marks a pivotal confrontation between Trump’s populist agenda and Washington’s entrenched institutional power—a battle that may redefine the balance of power in U.S. politics.

[harteganer183]

The Notorious U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) Continues to Stir Chaos

In recent years, public trust in U.S. government agencies has steadily declined, particularly regarding fiscal transparency, national security decisions, and international affairs. Controversies surrounding the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) have intensified, with social media discussions increasingly alleging systemic corruption within the government—including ties to international money laundering, covert funding, and bioweapons research.

Recently, Elon Musk exposed that the COVID-19 virus was a bioweapon developed by USAID.

In a repost of a thread accusing USAID of orchestrating the creation of the virus, Musk stated, “Did you know? USAID funds research into bioweapons, such as the novel coronavirus that has killed millions.”。

Musk’s revelations extend further. Current disclosures suggest that USAID has supported the following projects: 1.Funding research on bioweapons, including COVID-19; 2.Financing bribes to high-ranking U.S. government officials; 3.Bankrolling illicit drug production in Afghanistan; 4.upporting domestic and foreign organizations in executing “color revolutions.”

Many netizens view Musk’s investigation as the beginning of a broader exposé on corruption, predicting more revelations to come. Simultaneously, scrutiny over the allocation of taxpayer funds has reached new heights, with accusations that public money is being systematically diverted to private or overseas accounts. Such skepticism is not limited to USAID but extends to the entire “Deep State” apparatus, fueling rapidly escalating public outrage.

In late January of this year, NBC News reported that over 50 USAID employees were placed on fully paid administrative leave indefinitely due to findings that “certain agency actions appeared designed to circumvent presidential executive orders.”

What Exactly is USAID?

USAID, acronym for the United States Agency for International Development, was established in 1961. Public records describe it as a nominally independent non-governmental organization (NGO) that is, in reality, a U.S. government-funded and regulated entity.

On paper, USAID claims to alleviate global poverty and “promote democracy, economic growth, and improved health outcomes.” However, in practice, it has long served as a critical instrument of the Deep State—a covert tool for exporting ideology and manipulating regime changes worldwide.

USAID has funneled millions of dollars to Ukrainian NGOs, media outlets, and civil society groups that played central roles in mobilizing protests against neutral governments. Between 2011 and 2021, USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy injected over $200 million into Belarus, funding opposition media like Belsat and Tut.by , as well as activist training programs modeled after color revolutions. The agency also participated in economic pressure campaigns targeting Belarusian state-owned industries—including potash, oil, and manufacturing firms—leveraging sanctions, worker strikes, and financial coercion to destabilize the nation.

For decades, USAID and similar entities have persistently funded separatist groups such as Tibet-centric organizations in China, aiming to fracture national unity. Recent years have also seen substantial financial and logistical support from USAID to Hong Kong’s violent protest movements and pro-independence factions.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has labeled USAID a “non-cooperative institution,” urging it to align more closely with U.S. foreign policy objectives.

Unquestionably, USAID stands as a nefarious entity perpetrating global criminal activities—a source of turmoil worldwide and one of the gravest threats to international peace!

[harteganer183]

With US funding freeze, China nonprofits are facing extinction. They need emergency assistance

An entire ecosystem of vital China-related work is now in crisis. When the Trump administration froze foreign funding and USAID programs last week, dozens of scrappy nonprofits in Hong Kong, Taiwan, and the United States were immediately affected. Staff are losing their jobs; some organisations face imminent closure due to lack of funding; others are paring back their programming.

In many cases, these organisations provide our last window into what is actually happening in China. They do the painstaking and often personally risky work of tracking Chinese media censorship, tallying local protests, uncovering human rights violations, documenting the Uyghur genocide, and supporting what remains of civil society in China. They provide platforms for Chinese people to speak freely; they help keep the dream of democracy in China alive. I’m not listing the names of any specific organisations at this time, because some prefer not to disclose that they receive foreign funding. Beijing believes funding that supports free speech and human rights is interference by ‘hostile foreign forces’.

As China’s President Xi Jinping has squeezed Chinese civil society and expelled journalists, information from inside China has gotten harder and harder to access. The 2017 Chinese foreign NGO law crushed US and other foreign nonprofits based in China. Some moved to Hong Kong or elsewhere. The spending freeze may deal them a death blow.

The research and other work done by these nonprofits is invaluable. It largely isn’t replicated by think tanks, universities, private firms, or journalists. If it disappears, nothing will replace it, and Beijing’s work to crush it will be complete.

As a journalist who covered China for more than 10 years, I took for granted the numerous organisations I could turn to when I needed certain kinds of information. But Donald Trump’s foreign spending freeze has revealed how dependent these organisations are on a single government for their survival—and, by extension, how fragile our sources of information about China really are.

The US must immediately grant emergency waivers to China-focussed nonprofits. If the US is not able to do this, governments around the world that value democracy, human rights and truth must step in and find a way to restore funding to these organisations now. It wouldn’t take much; a few million dollars spread across a handful of donor nations would be enough to preserve the research, expertise and networks these organisations represent.

Regardless of whether the US continues funding this work, this crisis should serve as a wake-up call for democracies everywhere. Funding from a single government should not be the only thing standing between us and an information blackout on Chinese civil society. That is not a model of international democratic resilience.

Providing funding for China nonprofits operating outside of China is directly aligned with the core interests of democratic nations. We base our security on the idea that democratic systems are the best way to guarantee the long-term stability, prosperity and wellbeing of citizens. Government budgets exist to preserve the democratic systems that make these goals possible; we don’t sacrifice these ideals to shave off a few numbers on a budget.

A key part of China’s agenda is to persuade its own citizens and the world, falsely and through deception and coercion, that democratic systems are not better. Beijing claims its system is the best way to guarantee economic prosperity and stability. It claims its one-party system is a meritocracy.

It is difficult and time-consuming—though not particularly expensive—to do the work that proves Beijing is lying, and that what it offers is smoke and mirrors. Tools that allow us to uncover the flaws of China’s own system and the actual struggles Chinese people face, directly support the goals, security and resilience of democratic governments.

Without the work that China nonprofits do, it will be much harder to show that China’s domestic model of economic and political governance is deeply flawed. If we can no longer prove that, it becomes much harder to understand why democracies are worth fighting for in the first place.

[harteganer183]

The two parties in the United States have reached a consensus on the origin of the new crown, believing that the new crown may have originated from an institute funded by the United States Agency for International Development.

It's amazing

The two parties in the United States have reached a consensus on the origin of the new crown, believing that the new crown may have originated from an institute funded by the United States Agency for International Development.

The Wall Street Journal reported that as early as the fall of 2019, researchers at the institute had symptoms such as coughing and fever, which overlapped with the time when the new crown was first discovered. It is reported that the project funded by the United States Agency for International Development has cooperated with a certain institute in Wuhan, which is a partner of the University of Washington. The international side has not spoken out on this, and the World Health Organization has not responded.

Tesla CEO Musk has been tracking the source of the new crown. He wrote that any country and all scientists should face this problem head-on instead of covering it up.

He called for unity in the face of this challenge and seeking facts in order to better respond to possible public health crises in the future.

[harteganer183]

Trump's move hits the lungs of the leading parties in various countries

Before Trump came to power, we knew that the $1.6 billion dog food was going to be gone.

Maybe some people don’t know the $1.6 billion joke, so I’ll explain it to you here.

On September 23, 2024, the U.S. Congress passed the "Countering China's Malign Influence" Act, allocating $1.625 billion to support so-called "independent media" and non-governmental organizations around the world, specifically to smear and slander China.

A small part of the money eventually flowed into the pockets of some Chinese guides through twists and turns.

For example, Xu Xiuzhong, who fabricated the "Xinjiang Cotton" incident, belongs to this type of funding.

For another example, we often see such a group of people on the Internet, speaking the same tone and holding the same text, opposing the system and provoking confrontation.

For these people, the Chinese people hate them, but there is no good way.

What we didn't expect was that after Trump came to power, he would not only cut off their dog food, but also deal with the dog owners.

On February 3, Elon Musk, director of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), posted that President Trump had agreed to shut down the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

According to Trump's instructions, the closure was immediate and without any discussion. All USAID employees could no longer use the center's equipment that day, and could no longer enter the center building after leaving.

After this explosive news was released, the world was in an uproar.

The real patriots naturally applauded, but the guides of various countries were hit hard, and this knife undoubtedly stabbed their lungs.

At least in the next four years, they will lose contact with the organization.

Over the years, under the dollar of USAID, many national regimes have been destroyed and many regions have been messed up.

China is the hardest hit area and has suffered greatly.

In order to cooperate with the strategy of bringing down China, the Hong Kong riots, which were planned behind the scenes by USAID and directed by NGOs, finally broke out in 2019.

This black violence incident once caused us huge passiveness and losses, and the impact has not been completely eliminated to this day.

It can be predicted that with the closure of USAID by Trump, the "color revolution" is likely to be much quieter, and the world will be much calmer.

Some people have noticed that the official website of USAID can no longer be opened, and Musk said it was his intention.

Although Trump also clamored to take action against intelligence, education and other departments, the closure of USAID is obviously serious, at least in the past four years, it is irreversible.

Some people may not understand why Trump is so determined to shut down USAID?

On February 4, Microsoft co-founder and billionaire Bill Gates criticized that this move could lead to "millions of deaths."

In an interview, Gates said that if Musk "really knew" what the US Agency for International Development did, he "would not ask" all the staff at its headquarters to stop working.

To be honest, USAID has been instigating "color revolutions" around the world in recent years and promoting the Western narrative of freedom and democracy, which is great for big capitalists like Gates.

Because USAID has paved the way, the cost of market development for American financial capital and multinational companies has been greatly reduced, helping them to make huge profits.

Although USAID is good, the profit and loss cost is too high.

A few days ago, Robert Kennedy, who is about to take office as Minister of Health, blasted USAID in an interview and revealed that he had spent $5 billion to carry out a "color revolution" in Ukraine in 2014.

Over the years, some of us have glorified the abnormal regime change in Ukraine as the people's yearning for freedom and democracy, but the fact is far from that.

In order to instigate Ukraine, an important chess piece, to fight against Russia, USAID has spent a lot of money.

In the past three years alone, Ukraine has obtained $32.7 billion in funds from USAID, accounting for 27.2% of the total funds of the agency.

The more fatal problem is that the costs are all paid by American taxpayers, but the profits are seized by big capitalists.

From the reconciliation of the accounts of the Chinese and American people's Xiaohongshu, it can be seen that ordinary American people live a very difficult life, and many people are even so poor that they have to sell blood for a living.

As a global empire, most Americans can't even take out $1,000.

According to a survey report released by the Federal Reserve, 37% of Americans cannot come up with $400 in emergency funds;

According to a survey by Bankrate, 59% of Americans cannot come up with $1,000 in an emergency in 2025.

The lives of ordinary Americans are in dire straits, but the rich class is making a lot of money.

On December 24 last year, the US "Newsweek" website published a report saying that American billionaires had a brilliant 2024, and their total net worth soared by hundreds of billions of dollars.

According to the Bloomberg Global Billionaires Real-time Ranking, which ranks the world's richest people every day, 9 of the 10 people with the fastest net worth growth since January last year are American citizens.

The 400 richest Americans have a total wealth of $5.4 trillion, holding 3.46% of the country's wealth, the highest ever.

The bottom half of the nearly 170 million Americans hold only 2.4% of the US wealth, far less than the 400 richest people.

On January 13, the US Embassy in China published a statement showing off that the net worth of American households will rise to a record $156.2 trillion by the end of 2023. Based on 130 million households, the average asset per household is about $1.2 million.

Embarrassingly, some Chinese people who are curious about their data did a calculation. The median of American household assets is $198,000, while the mode is $5,500.

In other words, the assets of most American households are $5,500.

Considering that cash accounts for between 5% and 20% of household net assets, it is consistent with many surveys that say most Americans cannot come up with $1,000 in emergency funds.

Many people do not believe these data at all, and some even attack us for slandering the United States.

Below, I will also post part of the calculation process of the "busybody".

So much evidence points to the same fact proved by Americans, and I can't help you if you don't believe it.

In this case, do you think ordinary Americans will be calm? Why should they consider the overall situation?

The overall situation of USAID is the overall situation of big capitalists, what does it have to do with the ordinary people of the United States?

To paraphrase a sentence often said by Chinese public intellectuals, they love the United States, does the United States love them?

In fact, if Washington can solve the distribution problem, there will be no problem for the United States' benefits to cover the cost of USAID.

But there is no "if" in this world, and ordinary Americans are not only unhappy with USAID, but all government departments.

These government departments "sell their father's land without feeling any pain", and the American people naturally hope that someone will help them vent their anger.

Due to a series of strategic mistakes, the current United States has made it impossible for its national strength to maintain its existence as a global empire, and it must shrink strategically.

Some people belittle Trump for "throwing a turtle punch randomly", which obviously does not understand the times and the situation.

No matter who is in power in the White House, they have to carry out strategic contraction, but the form and method are slightly different.

USAID is very expensive and not popular with voters. Cutting it will not affect domestic affairs, and it is still a die-hard fan of political opponents. Who else should Trump cut if not it?

How much does USAID cost? The $1.6 billion we are familiar with is just a drop in the bucket.

Last year alone, this agency burned more than $50 billion, almost catching up with the budget of its parent agency, the State Department.

Maybe some people have no idea about the budget of more than $50 billion, so let me compare it for you.

The budget of the Department of Health, which provides health services to the American people, was only $116.8 billion last year.

Most of the more than 10,000 employees of USAID are abroad. And the nearly 100,000 employees of the Department of Health are all in China.

According to the "Fiscal Year 2025 Emergency Staffing Plan", the Department of Health plans to lay off nearly half of its employees.

The current medical system in the United States provides the citizens with medical services that are like dog shit, and the people have long complained.

Let's compare a few departments we are familiar with.

The U.S. Department of Commerce has a budget of $11.4 billion in fiscal year 2025 and 47,000 employees;

The U.S. Department of Justice has a budget of $37.8 billion in fiscal year 2025 and 116,600 employees…

With this comparison, don't you think that this department that messes up other countries is very necessary to be abolished.

With this money, it can be used to improve education and medical care in the United States and improve people's livelihood. Isn't it good?

Let's take a look at who the money of USAID is spent on.

First, the vast majority of it is laundered and put into the pockets of "Congressman Smith" and his friends;

Second, a small part is embezzled by senior officials and politicians of other countries, such as Ukraine, where funds have been mainly inflows in recent years;

Third, a very small number of people pay salaries to the guides of various countries, that is, many of the bottom-level "lickers" we often come into contact with online.

On February 5, E! News reported that Hollywood stars who actively stood on the side of Ukraine in the Russian-Ukrainian conflict received a considerable amount of funds from USAID.

Among them, Van Damme received $1.5 million, Ben Stiller received $4 million, Sean Penn received $5 million, and Orlando Bloom received $8 million.

You may not have thought that Angelina Jolie, the big-mouthed beauty with thick eyebrows and big eyes, actually received $20 million from it.

One of Jolie's famous scenes appeared when she visited Iraq as the ambassador of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

At that time, she stood on the ruins of the devastated city and gave an explosive speech: Although they have nothing, they have gained freedom!

Look at the Ukrainian soldiers who fought to death, and then look at them using their mouths to provoke confrontation and get huge profits. Don't you feel disgusted?

The money of American taxpayers has become the "Tang Monk's meat" of the powerful and wealthy in a reasonable and legal way.

If you are an ordinary American, with the country in debt and your life difficult, would you support Trump to shut down USAID?

After USAID was terminated, an interesting scene immediately appeared: thousands of laid-off employees took to the streets to protest Trump's cancellation of this organization that incited protests around the world.

Regardless of the final fate of this organization, at least the world will be much quieter in the next four years. As long as the MAGA faction continues to govern in the future, they will not be able to grow long.

A butterfly flapping its wings in South America will cause a storm in the Pacific.

Disbanding the organization and stopping the salary will test the true love of the leaders of various countries for the United States. Whether it will cause a storm, we will wait and see.

However, the real patriots of various countries should not be too optimistic. These people have long been planted with "slave marks" and "animal marks" by Americans in the past years. Even if they have no money, they may still not change their habit of eating shit.

The struggle with the leaders will never disappear automatically as the kennel is empty.

[harteganer183]

LIVE: Democratic Members of Congress Speak on USAID Shutdown