gusujay

[gusujay]

[gusujay]

[gusujay]

thinking normal thoughts about the writing in corvo’s cell

[gusujay]

corvoooooo

[gusujay]

for @thebibliosphere based on this post

[gusujay]

and are death and the maiden perhaps looking for a third

[gusujay]

Samuel, crouched down, trying to explain the loyalist betrayal to, what is essentially, a very hungover Corvo:

[gusujay]

Anselm Feuerbach (German, 1829-1880). "Self portrait", c.1871. oil on canvas

[gusujay]

i inspired from music "Бюро - Чума", and i think it personifies Daniil

[gusujay]

uh hey that person you just reblogged from used to be in our discord server but we had to kick them out because they admitted to watching t*m and j*rry... that show features violence and as such glorifies it.... when we confronted them all they said was "wtf its a show about a cat and a mouse"... if you dont believe me theres a whole callout post that features their name age and street address so you can go to their house and check... anyways you should unfollow them before people start thinking you like problematic media too :/ just trying to help

[gusujay]

"I'm just a girl", "girl math", "girl dinner", "divine feminine energy", "bimbocore", "clean girl", "girl's girl", "girlfriend brain" SHUT UPPP!!! SHUTT THE FUCKKKK UPPPPPP !!!!

[gusujay]

Sleeping at the Beach, Eyes Wide Open

[gusujay]

riches enfants déprimés rtw spring 2o25, pfw .

[gusujay]

me having a weird time: man this weird time sucks! i don't feel like myself! i wish i was having a normal time!

me having a normal time: well the weird time did have a certain je ne sais quoi...

[gusujay]

Periodic rent-lowering-gunshots:

Fiction is not reality.

You can enjoy things in fiction that would be awful in the real world. Like playing a murderhobo in a game! In the real world, being or supporting a murderer-thief would be pretty damn awful, while in the game it's just good fun. Same with anything else you choose to do with the pixels on the screen, like kinks that don't affect anyone real, so they're okay in fiction, but would be pretty damn bad in real life.

No one else is responsible for your online experience. They are required not to harass you, but they are not and never will be obligated to not post about ships, kinks, or tropes you dislike just to avoid you seeing them. It's up to you to blacklist words or phrases, block tags, or even block users as needed to avoid seeing content that upsets you.

No one can force you to read anything against your consent. Any content you don't like seeing can be instantly avoided by closing out of the offending post/fic.

You are not owed an online experience free of discomfort.

Nothing that happens in your imagination can ever make you a bad person. Words you write or read about fictional characters will never make you a bad person.

The claim that media consumption influences real-life behavior is intellectually dishonest and serves only to excuse the behavior of real offenders.

Fiction is a safe way to explore horrifying or confusing concepts. Therapists agree that fiction, even (or especially) about taboo topics is a good coping mechanism, especially, but not exclusively, for trauma survivors. Fiction is to adults what play therapy is to children. This doesn't stop being true if the work in question is of a sexual nature.

Sex isn't an inherently worse or better motivation than anything else. A work written to create feelings of arousal isn't dirty, shameful, or in any way less pure than works written to entertain, provoke moral questions, or for other reasons. And worth noting is that multiple purposes can exist in the same story, especially fanfiction.

You aren't entitled to an explanation for why someone reads, writes, or otherwise enjoys certain works, kinks, tropes, ships, etc.

[gusujay]

Dankovsky is such a wretched yet beautiful character. a rationalist who is also kind of a mystic and is also insane. who is doing it like him. The truth is the most important thing to him but his pursuit of truth is so desperate and determined that he gets tunnel vision over things he doesn’t even fully comprehend.

I rewatched stalker from 1979 and there is a scene where the guide says, “The zone lets through those who have lost all hope. Neither the good nor the bad, but the wretched” and YES thats exactly the emotion i feel dankovsky captures for me and part of why he is so complelling. He’s neither good nor bad, but wretched, and i think that’s beautiful. He truly wants to help people and save as many people as he can, but theres also something deeply and perhaps irrevocably wrong with him. Something which, if pathologic 3 sticks with the doll plot from classic hd, is woven into his design. He wants to save everyone in the town but simultaneously shows that he doesn’t hold their lives in particularly high regard (his scorched earth policy) which, for the sake of preventing the plague from spreading, would be “right” if not for the option to destroy the polyhedron, and the morally grey (very very morally grey i feel like its outside of the bounds of morally grey) reality that doing so would resign the entire town to death. Obsessed with his ending just as much as i am with Burakh’s, which, even though i am a dankovsky enjoyer, i always go with while playing the game.

Is this coherent am i making sense

[gusujay]

Now, now daniil fans, don't kill me just yet