gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

That was put in the manga purely for comedy reasons💀 Sarada only looks up to naruto because her dream is to be the hokage.

Sakura treated Naruto

Like shit

The whole manga

Just for her daughter to see HIM as the prize

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

Not sure if it's just me, but I absolutely despise when I'm reading a book and the author describes what the character is wearing. I absolutely hate it. More often than not, I find it absolutely hideous.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

This is def a kink

How to be a Good Submissive Wife

1. Cook lots of healthy food for the family to help them stay big and strong.

2. Always wear pretty dresses.

3. Always wear pretty clothes and be clean, fresh and well groomed.

4. Never take birth control, children are a blessing.

5. Keep the house beautiful, clean and bright. Make it a peaceful home.

6. Help him relax after work by waiting at the door to greet him.

7. Be a good mommy to all the babies and never shout or get cross.

8. Be good, quiet, doting and adoring when in public. Let the whole world see how good a wife you are.

9. Stay fit and healthy, so you’re body is always ready to make another baby.

10. Never ever say no to him. He knows best, so you must trust his judgement and do as he says.

11. Be a good girl when out and about.

12. Be proud to be carrying his babies and don't hide the baby bump. Enjoy being pregnant by him. This is what you were born for.

13. Tell him your problems. Don’t let them make you unhappy, frowny or grumpy. He will know how to fix them.

13. Tell him every how much you love and appreciate him.

14. Love and look after his extended family, he likes knowing you respect and care for them.

15. Always kiss him goodbye, hello and thank you.

16. Sit on his lap whenever he wants you too. Be a good girl and let him enjoy his innocent submissive wife.

19. Go to bed whenever he tells you to. A good wife is well rested, strong and ready every morning to make pleasing her husband the main priority of her day, every day.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

Thoughts on the exit polls…screenshots taken from NBC’s exit poll.

Men really, really do not want to vote for a woman. I’ve seen this viewpoint branded as TERF rhetoric so lemme just say in advance that I’m non-binary. It is not TERF rhetoric to blame sexism for this loss, and I think we need to confront the ways in which, yes, sexism runs deep with U.S. men and we need MORE feminism, not less.

Trump did make some inroads among Black voters: 92% went for Biden in 2020. Way more Latino voters shifted, though: 66% voted for Biden in 2020. Asian voters also dropped from 63% in 2020. What on earth could account for the —

Support among white men dropped from 48% for Biden to 39% for Harris. Support among Black men ticked down very slightly but not much. The biggest change: Latino men went from supporting Biden by 59% in 2020 to 44% in 2024.

The bottom line: yes, it was the men. Men across multiple races and ages supported Harris less than Biden, and we need to be clear-eyed about that. Unfortunately in the short term I think that means, Absolutely do not run a female Democratic candidate in 2028. Because we can’t even talk about this issue without someone taking exception and wailing “NOT ALL MEN!!”

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

The whole tradwife “i don’t want to work women aren’t supposed to work, feminism ruined our leisure 😩” nonsense is utterly baffling to me. Historically unless you were lucky enough to be a member of the wealthy upper class, women have always always always worked. Throughout the entirety of human history. Often backbreaking labor, often unpaid. Idiots cosplaying a farm wife like that didn’t entail working from sunup to sundown every day without fail because cows don’t care if you’re sick while simultaneously having baby after baby after baby and the invisible labor of housework, until you very likely died young. The TV housewives of the fifties, like they didn’t all explicitly have hired help (AKA A WOMAN WHO WORKS). Even in their vision of the future, the fricken Jetsons have female-coded robot Rosie as their domestic servant!

Women have always worked, with the very rare exception of the wealthy, who employed them. Washerwomen and laundresses and seamstresses and maids and ladies maids and cooks and nurses and governesses and teachers and farm laborers and spinsters and weavers and and and and. Sex work literally is the oldest profession. Women who had the good fortune to marry well were also supposed to be able to manage the household workforce and keep the budget (omg 🤪 girl math). Brenda in Accounting has some very marriageable skills!

And none of these women, the laborer or the housewife, had much recourse at all if their husband or employer abused them or their kids. They had no security in their future if the men running the show squandered the (his.) money or they could not depend on their children to care for them in old age, should they even reach it.

It’s a horrifying mix of calculated evil from conservatives who want to be able to freely beat their wives again and ignorant twaddle from women who are so ill-educated or just so eager for male attention that they cosplay that shit fully confident that they’d be the exception, it would be okay for them because they’re different and Good enough that they wouldn’t be harmed.

Yeah, work sucks, we all know it. But women have never been able to escape it and in every case I’ll take a steady paycheck, my own bank account, and a 401k match over what was most likely to be my lot in every other period of human history. Yeah being idle rich would probably be nicer, but chances of that are vanishingly slim so you gotta make the best of what you do have, yaknow?

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

It's a crime that we didn't see shinobu use her shoe knives again.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

I don't have any respect for house wives.

Sure their are exceptions, but 95% of the time it’s women who are too fucking lazy to break out of the roles assigned to them. The fact that someone would CHOSE to contribute nothing to society and depend on a man for is pathetic, not fucking empowering.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

The divorce rate for same sex couples are lower than opposite sex couples. Gay men: 19 percent lesbians: 34 percent heterosexuals: 40 percent or higher.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

Then they get upset when you call their lifestyle a kink. Clearly, they have a breeding and power imbalance kink. Mix that with their cottagecore lifestyles and you have a trad wife.

the white trad wife girlies piss me off because they say things like "i really miss when women could be stay-at-home moms and get married and have babies and be fEmiNinE instead of having to go to college and work a job" like... you can still do that? you can literally still live your 1950s dream life? go find that man sis! but leave the rest of us the fuck out of it.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

yea. us people who were raised in difficult homes are triggered by the trad wife/trad life "movement"- you know why? bc we spot the power dynamic, a power dynamic that can easily turn horrific and disastrous. this "agreement" of "you hold x amount of power and I hold this x amount of power"... your partner's power is out in the real world, outside of this isolated box that you call "our home"- and your power is in said box. you're power is worthless. a shell on sand. if and when your box is taken away by the man, who was not your partner but instead your "husband", who owns it. it could happen to you. you are not an exception. your love, your morals, and what you offer is not an exception to the possibility of betrayal. it will happen to you. because the foundation of an exploitable power dynamic was already there.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

“its my choice to be a trad wife and start a family young” okay but what r u gonna do when he starts using finances to manipulate you. when he starts blaming financial struggles on you. what abt if he beats you? and if hes doing that hes probably already isolated u from ur family and friends so who are u gonna go to? you have no degree to fall back on, no previous work experience. you have no money of ur own. now u are completely alone and trapped in abuse. now u are his to control. and how r u gonna solve that? what if he beats the kids. and you have no money to take them away from that. what if hes in debt and now youre all suffering? are u gonna be able to find a job with, again, no experience, that will be enough for u and ur husband and ur six children. being a trad wife is dangerous and its not something that any women should aspire to.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

!!!

“traditional values” and conservative ideologies are intertwined with systemic misogyny. 

Traditional values are often framed as ideals of family, gender roles, and social order. People who advocate for these values emphasize women’s roles as the homemaker, mothers, and supportive wives. But here’s the truth: these so-called “values” are rooted in patriarchy, and they exist to keep women in their place. It’s an illusion of value—a trap that keeps women believing they are something they’re not.

conservative women are fine with being "property" because they assume they’re valuable property. They’ve been taught that fulfilling traditional roles gives them worth, that by being the perfect wife or mother, they somehow rise above the rest (I’ve seen many examples of this) But in reality, they fail to see the bigger picture—no matter how "traditional" they are, they are still property in a system that devalues women as a whole. A misogynistic man sees all women as below him. It doesn’t matter how obedient, “traditional,” or pure a woman is. To him, she is still less than. Still not enough. Still something to be controlled, used, and disposed of when it suits him.

Women think they’ve found safety and respect within these roles, but it’s all conditional. It’s a “value” that disappears the second they step out of line or no longer fit the mold. 

the whole idea that women gain worth through their roles as wives and mothers is a fallacy that keeps them tethered to a system of control, without them even realizing it.

"Traditional" = Subordinate

The reason this is inherently misogynistic is simple: these “traditional” roles are built on a hierarchy. Men are at the top, and women are expected to stay at the bottom. The "complementary" roles that conservative ideologies push aren’t about equality—they’re about reinforcing the idea that men lead and women follow. Men are providers, protectors, and decision-makers. Women are nurturers, caretakers, and supporters. This system might seem perfect to some, but when you break it down, it’s nothing more than a way to keep women from ever having true power.

A conservative woman might feel praised for her commitment to these roles, but that praise is just a mask. Her worth is only measured by how well she serves her husband, her children, or her family—and once she’s no longer in service, her value is gone. We’ve seen many examples of this either in real life or the internet, a man may admire her for being the perfect homemaker, but the second she wants something outside of that—whether it’s a career, autonomy, or independence—she is seen as a threat. The system doesn’t change because the roles don't allow it.

The Safety Myth: Protection That Isn’t Really Protection.

Conservative men tend to promise women safety, Women are told that if they embrace these roles, they’ll be protected, from what? But the reality is, this protection is a lie. The truth is, these roles offer safety only within the confines of strict gender expectations. Women are protected only as long as they fit the mold—play their part and never stray from it, and even then some women aren’t protected if they play that role, (what does women need protection from? other men? ) This isn’t protection. It’s control. It’s the safety of submission, and it comes at the cost of your own identity and freedom.

it doesn’t matter how much a woman conforms to the "ideal" that society sets for her—she is still seen as inferior. She is still less than. Her value is still attached to her relationship to a man, her ability to bear children, or her usefulness in the home.

This is the part conservative women fail to see: they aren’t exempt from the patriarchal systems that oppress women—they are merely playing into them. The idea that conservative women are somehow more valued by men than other women is just another lie told to keep them complicit in a system that seeks to control their every move. 

a woman’s worth is not based on how much she serves her husband, or how well she fills the traditional role; it’s inherent in who she is as an individual, regardless of her marital status, career choice, or motherhood. But that’s a message patriarchy doesn’t want women to hear.

True empowerment for women comes from the freedom to live outside of the narrow boxes that society forces women into, and from recognizing that no matter what role a woman plays, she deserves to be valued for who she is—not just what she does for others. 

How can we begin to break the myths around 'traditional values' and help women see the systems of control at play?

This post is centered around my other post where I mentioned “conservative women are fine with being property because they assume they're valuable property and they fail to realize that a misogynistic man views all women as not valuable, it doesn’t matter how trad and conservative the woman is. they’ll still below and worthless in their eyes”

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

Just found out that women have to borrow more to pay for college, and then take longer to pay back their loans. Parents save more money for their sons, because of the breadwinner gender role. Colleges avoid taking too many girls into their classes and give boys' applications a second look. Once in college, girls are more likely to send money back to their parents to help support them (the same parents who saved less for their college education, because sons are the breadwinners...). Lots of female dominated professions like nursing require degrees, but any field with 'too many women' pays less. Once they're in the field, even if it is male-dominated, women are again paid less than their male counterparts (women are more likely to be penalized for asking for raises etc, and more likely to be overlooked for promotions). If they become mothers, that sets them back even further.

But men still complain that there are special scholarships for women. Lol.

Sources:

Colleges avoid taking too many women:

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/09/08/magazine/men-college-enrollment.html

All other statistics:

https://www.stlouisfed.org/-/media/project/frbstl/stlouisfed/files/pdfs/iee/eei/wocstl-stlfed-03-nov-2022.pdf?sc_lang=en&hash=67A421B90B88E88EA3DF5FCBBFDCD4AE

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

Not wanting to be pregnant is the only reason a woman should have to give to be able to have an abortion. That’s it. No more explaining to misogynists that abortion can actually save a woman’s life, or trying to pull at their heart by showing a pregnant child, rape victim, or incest pregnancy. Abortion should be an unapologetic human right every female should have access to.

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

Do y'all think that this is helping you? Assuming that it's all men is nothing but a gross generalisation and just flat out dumb.

how many times do you need to be betrayed by men to realize that yes, it is all men, and no, they are not in your corner?

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

Y'all have genuinely lost your shit💀 there's no way people who think like this actually exist. Just a wake up call, not everything is about you.

TRANS WAS INVENTED SO THAT MEN COULD INFILTRATE FEMALE-ONLY SPACES & TAKE CONTROL TO PREVENT WOMEN FROM SPEAKING TRUTH, ORGANIZING, AND TRULY ACHIEVING LIBERATION

[gaydinosaurbananamilkcarton]

🖕🏽🎂🖕🏽