faefox9

[faefox9]

Well fucks? Get to it!

[faefox9]

Despite popular belief, smelling bad is not actually a crime and should not be used to judge someone's morality or character. Lots of good people smell stank as hell. Real bad. You can acknowledge that bad smells are unpleasant, and how you might not want to be around someone who stinks (I choose to suck it up personally, just acknowledging it as an option!) without perpetuating a sentiment that causes disadvantaged people to face more harm and scrutiny. Stand up for stinky people I'm being so genuine rn.

[faefox9]

Daily fucking reminder that Luigi Mangione is innocent, completely and fully. He has been convicted of no crime. He has had no fair trial. He is a SUSPECT. Luigi Mangione is entirely innocent and everyone needs to stop parroting this insidious propaganda that he “committed” the crime he is only SUSPECTED of. He is not a murderer. He is not a criminal. He is an innocent man.

[faefox9]

[faefox9]

At one of the shows of the local production of Sweeney I saw when Pirelli blew a kiss to the crowd the Beadle caught it

"or should i run down the street to my good pal beadle bamford" - pirelli

i just realized beadle x pirelli is real, and not just something i made up because they are both effeminate men with falsetto voices

[faefox9]

storytime!

okay so. for context, this year my school is doing a production of newsies, i play Davey and my friend plays Jack

so we were running lines in our auditorium during break and our director/choreographer was there as well, i’ll call him Mr. A (that sounds so formal help) (along with some other classmates, but most of them were outside hanging out)

so anyways my friend forgets part of his line and goes “Ain’t reporters supposed to be non-parmesan”

and i’m laughing and go “partisan?”

and then we just continues normally, but then mr. a is like “do you guys want to add that diologue in?”

and that’s how we added a few lines of dialogue into our show

the official new lines are:

JACK: Ain’t reporters supposed to be non-parmesan?

DAVEY: Non-partisan?

JACK: Ain’t that what I said?

*scene continues normally*

[faefox9]

Hey, a lot of people asked if I’d do another Shakespeare translation, so here it is.

“Where art thou Romeo,” has got to be one of the most misquoted and misunderstood lines in Shakespeare just after “If music be the food of love��.

Also, my phone got so hot filming this, it glitched the video.

(I’m a guy, by the way, but I’m fluid in Shakespeare characters 😂)

[faefox9]

pussy from a guy who was "the weird girl" growing up

[faefox9]

mentally taking a drag of my mental cigarette because I don’t smoke but life has been very smokable lately

[faefox9]

I'M DOING AN EXPERIMENT

To prove something to a friend, please

REBLOG IF YOU THINK ASEXUALS BELONG IN LGBTQ+ SPACES

LIKE IF YOU THINK ASEXUALS DON’T BELONG IN LGBTQ+ SPACES

[faefox9]

[faefox9]

What is or isn’t a slur can be highly contextual, y'all.

“Jonny Sims bummed a fag off my ma” doesn’t contain a slur, but “What are you, some kind of fag?” does.

“Queer studies”, “the queer community” and “I’m queer”? Not a slur. Some bigot calling you a “dirty queer”? Slur.

“Be gay, do crimes” and “He’s gay” ≠ slur, but “Ew, that’s so gay” = slur.

In conclusion, stop buying into this fucking “q slur” bullshit. Queer people talking about the queer community aren’t using it as a slur any more than a gay man calling himself gay is using that term as a slur.

[faefox9]

Look, all I'm saying is, when I went to a facial hair removal clinic I was advised that hirsutism in women is a serious medical condition and before paying up i should make sure my doctor would note in my journal that i have it, so that it would be eligible for coverage

So I checked aaaaaaand nope, not when you're trans, specifically. Then there's no proven psychological benefit of removing facial hair, apparently.

That is the difference.

[faefox9]

like to charge, reblog to cast <3

[faefox9]

not to oversimplify an extremely complex discipline but if i had to pick one tip to give people on how to have more productive interactions with children, especially in an instructive sense, its that teaching a kid well is a lot more like improv than it is like error correction and you should always work on minimizing the amount of ‘no, wrong’ and maximizing the amount of ‘yes, and?’ for example: we have a species of fish at the aquarium that looks a lot like a tiny pufferfish. children are constantly either asking us if that’s what they are, or confidently telling us that’s what they are. if you rush to correct them, you risk completely severing their interest in the situation, because 1. kids don’t like to engage with adults who make them feel bad and 2. they were excited because pufferfish are interesting, and you have not given them any reason to be invested in non-pufferfish. Instead, if you say something like “It looks a LOT like a tiny pufferfish, you’re right. But these guys are even funnier. Wanna know what they’re called?” you have primed them perfectly for the delightful truth of the Pacific Spiny Lumpsucker

[faefox9]

yuri and yaoi are some of the best, most sacred things in the entire world