erotomox

[erotomox]

"UM OP DON'T YOU REALIZE THAT THIS INNOCUOUS VIDEO/IMAGE/POST IS ACTUALLY FETISH CONTENT"

might not be true at all and might be puritan panic you bought into but ok

even if it IS true, ok?? and?? based

[erotomox]

[erotomox]

AEW Dynasty | April 6th, 2025

[erotomox]

Who remembers

Whore members

[erotomox]

Who remembers

Whore members

[erotomox]

Who remembers

Whore members

[erotomox]

The Mikeball.

[erotomox]

NOT THE BAlD LOL 😂

[erotomox]

it's important to talk about how pop psychology sucks ass. but that shouldn't distract you from also talking about how Serious, Official, Legitimate Psychology also sucks ass.

[erotomox]

NUMBERS

1984

[erotomox]

NUMBERS

1980

[erotomox]

NUMBERS

1984

[erotomox]

drink some fucking water

[erotomox]

[erotomox]

when morning bad but warsaw trams smile devilishly at you

[erotomox]

Radical Feminist theory has no home in Intersectional theory. Radical Feminism is practically innately antithetical to Intersectional Feminism. The ideas and criticism that would create the framework of Intersectional Feminism pre-Kimberlé Crenshaw came to be as a near direct result of questioning Radical Feminist practices and ideology.

Audre Lorde, bell hooks, Angela Y. Davis, Judith Butler, Leslie Feinberg, all wrote/have written in ways that challenge and defy the core principles of Radical Feminist dogma. Kimberlé Crenshaw created terminology, Intersectionality, to envelope it all. People like Patricia Hill Collins, Mikki Kendall, Roxane Gay, Kate Bornstein, Leah Thomas, and Emi Koyama continue to write in ways that challenge Radical Feminist ideology - half the time purely by the nature of their framework.

You don't need Radical Feminism. Radical Feminism is not your friend. It will never be your friend. There is better Feminism out there - I promise you.