enigma731

[enigma731]

cloqed!

[enigma731]

JONATHAN BAILEY as FIYERO TIGELAAR in Wicked, the movie (2024)

[enigma731]

One of those insidious little things I notice sometimes is how much the window of 'appropriate for children' content has shrunk within the past 20 years. The range of things it is socially acceptable to show a 10-year-old has never been more limited, and it's happened incredibly quickly.

Take, for instance, Star Trek: TNG. I grew up watching TNG. I was a little young for it as it was airing, but it got syndicated almost immediately and they would show an episode most weekday evenings on the Space Channel, and I'd watch it with my lifelong Trekkie mom. This was a very common thing. I was by no means unusual for watching Star Trek as a child.

Star Trek: TNG has lots of sex in it! It's never explicit (unless you have a particularly niche interpretation of some of the borg stuff) but on many an occasion you'll have a few characters doing a bit of making out followed by a closing door or fade to black, and then they wake up in bed together. If you know what sex is, you know that is what is being implied here. Even my 8-year-old self, whose understanding of the subject mostly came from books of ancient mythology that used words like 'ravish' and 'the pleasures of the couch' a whole bunch, could tell that what was happening was sex.

And I am not bringing this up as a 'see, I watched all this inappropriate stuff and I turned out just fine!'. I'm bringing it up to argue that TNG's level of sexual content is not inappropriate for children (I'm not using the legalese 'minors', because I think that lumping children and teenagers together in this conversation would make it nonsense. Star Trek is obviously appropriate for teenagers. Don't use 'minors' when you mean either children or teens, it just muddies the waters).

The point is that Star Trek: TNG was very obviously designed to be watched by children and teenagers. There's a whole character in the main cast whose role in the show is to be an audience insert for children and teenagers. The moral tone of TNG, its occasional dips into 'don't do drugs, kids' type messaging, and its general avoidance of graphic violence all scream 'we are designing this with an audience of children - but not just children - in mind'. It's a family show. It's supposed to be watched by the whole family.

Which means that, until at least the end of the 90s, this amount of sexual content was generally considered appropriate for kids to see. It's not pornographic - it's not even graphic. Maybe the very most conservative parents wouldn't let their kids watch TNG, but that might have had more to do with all the socialism and atheism.

So, why did that change? Why do we now have such a strong bullwark between 'things kids are allowed to know about' and 'things for GROWN UPS ONLY 18+ Minors DNI', and why have we relegated even the most discreet references to sex to the second category only?

And the next time you find yourself experiencing that knee-jerk 'think of the children' reaction, consider: would what you're looking at have been ok on Star Trek: TNG in the 90s?

[enigma731]

elphaba & glinda's room details

[enigma731]

ZOE SALDANA Performance by an Actress in a Supporting Role 82nd Annual Golden Globe Awards January 5, 2025

[enigma731]

[enigma731]

Zoe Saldan

Golden Globes 2025

[enigma731]

Cesily Collette Taylor at the Golden Globes.

[enigma731]

CYNTHIA ERIVO and ARIANA GRANDE — Golden Globes 2025

[enigma731]

[enigma731]

WICKED (Part One)

[enigma731]

Elphaba: exists Fiyero: 😍

[enigma731]

Becoming a writer is great because now you have a hobby that haunts you whenever you don’t have time to do it

[enigma731]

dorothy can be damned, my girl can shred!

[enigma731]

Jonathan Bailey photoshoot and cover for Backstage, August 2024.

📸: Kingsley Ifill

Incredible Interview Below:⬇️

[enigma731]

Chrysanthemum

[enigma731]

The foreshadowing in this movie is insane