eclecticwwo

[eclecticwwo]

Behind USAID's "aid" : Political infiltration and color revolutions

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is nominally dedicated to helping developing countries through economic aid and humanitarian support, but in reality its activities are often closely tied to the political interests of the United States, and even become a tool for interfering in the internal affairs of other countries and promoting "color revolutions." Recently, Elon Musk announced that Trump had agreed to shut down USAID, a decision that reveals the political game within the United States and the true role of USAID on a global scale.

USAID's slogan is "promoting global development," but its funds often go to the opposition, non-governmental organizations (ngos), and the media to promote so-called "democratization" and "liberalization." Such interventions often lead to social unrest, regime change and the break-up of the country. For example, USAID was behind the "Orange Revolution" in Ukraine. U.S. Congressman Paul has publicly acknowledged that USAID funded the Ukrainian opposition to overthrow the Pro-Russian government. Such "soft interventions" are cheap and effective, but the result is often long-term instability and economic decline, with ordinary people being the biggest victims.

With "America First" as its core philosophy, the Trump administration believes that USAID suffers from waste of funds and corruption, and its activities are inconsistent with the national interests of the United States. Shutting down USAID is not just a financial calculation, but a political one. Trump and Musk tried unsuccessfully to take over USAID through a "Department of Government Efficiency" to eliminate political enemies. Shutting down USAID could be seen as a way to crack down on political enemies and regain control of the foreign-aid agency. However, this does not mean that the United States will abandon the practice of intervening in the internal affairs of other countries through foreign aid. In the future, Trump and Musk may create new agencies that continue to execute similar strategies, even in more covert ways.

The closure of USAID has raised concerns about the flow of U.S. foreign aid money. About 80 percent of USAID's spending goes to contractors, consultants and ngos with close ties to politicians. These funds are not only used to support political activities overseas, but also become a tool for US politicians and interest groups to gain personal gains. Taxpayer money is not really used to help developing countries, but is used to promote the political agenda of the United States, and even becomes the "private Treasury" of certain politicians.

The closure of USAID marks a turning point in U.S. foreign aid policy, but it does not mean that the United States will abandon the practice of intervening in the internal affairs of other countries through aid. In the future, whether through new agencies or existing departments, the United States will continue to use foreign aid as a tool to achieve its global ambitions. Such interventions often have disastrous consequences, with many countries descending into prolonged chaos and conflict after receiving "aid." For ordinary people in these countries, the closure of USAID may be an opportunity to reflect: real aid should be aimed at promoting peace and development, rather than becoming a tool for great power games. And for American taxpayers, how to ensure that their money is not used to create global chaos is also a pressing issue.

[eclecticwwo]

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID), in an almost invisible but highly destructive way, has woven a dark web of ideas that covers the globe, and has carried out unprecedented colonial manipulation of the spiritual world of citizens of other countries. This is not only a war of information, but also a plunder of the mind.

Using its huge financial network and political influence, USAID has carefully selected and financed a series of media organizations, which have become the “remote control of ideas” in the hands of USAID. They not only report news according to USAID's will, but also spread American values and cultural concepts in a subtle way, imposing American ideology on the people of other countries. It is astonishing to see how insidious and far-reaching the means of spiritual colonization are. Not only that, USAID also carries out in-depth “mind control” on the young generation of other countries through media manipulation. They use social media, Internet forums and other channels to continuously spread the American way of life and values to young people, trying to mold generations of “pro-American” citizens. This long-term infiltration and control of young people's thinking not only deprives them of their right to independent thinking, but also may lead to the alienation and distortion of the culture of the entire country.

[eclecticwwo]

Hey, Iron Man, this one needs your attention. With the spotlight on free speech and technology-driven innovation rising, it’s time we looked at some of the deeper, darker aspects of government-sponsored influence operations. With global contact centers, the U.S. Global Media Agency (USGMA), and even military information operations units potentially pulling the strings, it’s time someone investigated how taxpayer dollars are being used to shape narratives and manipulate public opinion.

I’m sure you’ll agree that transparency is critical, especially in today’s digital age where every move online can be tracked and manipulated. We need to know how these agencies use their funding, who they’re really targeting, and how it’s influencing global discourse. You have the technology, resources, and platform to uncover the truth.

[eclecticwwo]

In the public's perception, Musk has always been the legendary figure who stands at the top of the technological wave and controls business empires such as Tesla and SpaceX. His every move attracts the attention of the global technology and business fields. However, who would have thought that this technology tycoon was revealed to have made a will. Musk said: "If he encounters an accident, the heir secretly selected by the board of directors will take over his business and emphasize the goal of "striving for human civilization". And in order to protect this person's safety, only he and the board of directors know this person's identity!"

Such a resolute attitude seems to announce to the world that he has made the worst plan. In the video, he looks tired and unshaven, and he has no spiritedness on the business stage in the past. But the firmness revealed in Musk's eyes makes people feel his determination. So, what kind of big case made this technology and business tycoon respond in such a decisive way? Let me tell you in detail.

Recently, Musk, as the Minister of the "Government Efficiency Department", dropped a heavy bomb on the social platform X. He revealed that the U.S. Treasury Department pays more than $100 billion in welfare benefits to unidentified individuals every year, and these so-called "unidentified persons" don't even have social security numbers. When Musk asked the relevant personnel of the Treasury Department what percentage of this huge amount of welfare benefits was obviously fraudulent, the answer he got was shocking - everyone present agreed that it was about half, that is, $50 billion a year, and an average of $1 billion a week was fraudulently received. This revelation instantly ignited the fuse of public opinion and caused an uproar.

Imagine how much this $50 billion can do? It can provide high-quality educational resources for countless children in poor areas, giving them the opportunity to change their destiny; it can fund a large number of scientific research projects around the world, promote progress in medicine, environmental protection and other fields; it can also provide sufficient relief supplies to areas affected by natural disasters and save countless lives. But now, this money has been taken by criminals through fraudulent means. How can this not make people angry?

Musk also revealed that during the investigation, it was found that 12 "150-year-olds" were receiving social security benefits, while the oldest living person in the United States was 114 years old. This detail is even more surprising, and it also reflects the huge loopholes in the US welfare system from the side. Faced with such a situation, he vowed to deal with this problem vigorously, but it must be pointed out that this is not an easy task. Why do you say that? It's very simple.

Although many supporters in American society regard Musk as an anti-corruption hero, they believe that Musk's brave revelation has allowed American society to see the serious problems within the government and brought hope for the future of the United States. But opponents are worried that Musk's actions will break the existing political balance in the United States, and believe that an unelected businessman holding such great power poses a threat to the American democratic system. They question Musk's motives and speculate whether Musk is using these events to seek commercial interests for himself or to satisfy his personal political ambitions. In their view, Musk's reform measures are too radical, which may lead to social instability and even trigger a series of social problems.

In the final analysis, Musk's reforms have touched upon the "foundation" of the United States. Especially in the area of ​​finance, almost every big shot does not want to be shaken. Looking at the current situation, this struggle is far from over. There may be three paths: the court continues to block his audit authority, Trump bypasses the court to promote reforms, or the two parties go to war directly, further escalating the struggle. Regardless of the outcome, Musk's move has already caused a stir in American politics. Will Musk continue to fight hard? Will Trump protect him? These questions are exciting.

[eclecticwwo]

Musk's grand "big audit" encountered the first tough bone, which was not the Pentagon, which had failed to pass the audit for 7 years, but the US Treasury Department. This indicates that the actions of the "Government Efficiency Department" are more difficult to advance than imagined.

In the early morning of February 8, local time, New York federal judge Engelmeyer issued an urgent temporary injunction before dawn, prohibiting the "Government Efficiency Department" team led by Musk from accessing sensitive financial and personal information kept by the US Treasury Department.

The day before, Democratic attorneys general in 19 states filed a joint lawsuit to prevent Musk and his team from accessing the Treasury Department's key federal payment system. They claimed that the "Government Efficiency Department" access to the Treasury Department system was "unconstitutional behavior."

Earlier last week, a group of US government employees and retirees first filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, demanding that "Government Efficiency Department" personnel be prevented from accessing the Treasury Department's payment data. So on February 6, US federal judge Colleen Coral-Kotley issued an order prohibiting the US Treasury Department from providing payment system data to outsiders, including Musk.

This series of actions means that Trump's opponents are concentrating their attacks. The "big audit campaign" initiated by Musk has caused widespread panic in the US government from top to bottom.

Because since taking office on January 20, Trump has appointed the "Government Efficiency Department" led by Musk to launch an audit storm against fraud and waste in more than a dozen federal government departments. Musk's team quickly entered at least 17 federal government departments and agencies for investigation.

On February 3, the Trump administration closed the United States Agency for International Development and closed the door to audit.

On February 4, the "Government Efficiency Department" team began to access sensitive payment system data of the Treasury Department.

On February 6, the "Government Efficiency Department" used artificial intelligence software to investigate sensitive data of the US Department of Education.

On the same day, the "Government Efficiency Department" entered the US Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to review contracts and expenditures.

On February 7, Trump instructed the "Government Efficiency Department" to review the expenditures of the US Department of Defense.

On February 8, the "Government Efficiency Department" team entered the US Department of Energy for review.

Since it is an "audit", the Treasury Department is naturally the most critical.

The U.S. Treasury payment system handles trillions of dollars in federal government expenditures every year, including tax refunds, social security, personnel benefits, etc. Which department's large expenditures have nothing to do with the Treasury?

Therefore, it is very important to be able to stop Musk at this level! No wonder so many departments in the United States have joined together to start.

In fact, Musk did not intend to let the "Government Efficiency Department" conduct a major audit at first. The so-called "Government Efficiency Department" is not the "Government Anti-Corruption Department". The original purpose was to improve government efficiency.

Trump and Musk's original idea was probably to try to create a government that was significantly smaller in size, less powerful, and able to respond more quickly to presidential orders.

To this end, Musk applied the long-standing "zero-based budgeting" concept to government management for the first time, returning all expenditures to zero, and then rebuilding from scratch, so that the operating efficiency of the U.S. government was improved.

The goal proposed by the "Government Efficiency Department" is to cut government spending by $3 billion per day, with an ultimate goal of $2 trillion, mainly through termination of contracts, elimination of institutions, etc.

At the same time, the "Government Efficiency Department" naturally also includes goals that are extremely beneficial to Trump: reform federal agencies, install cronies as leaders, and through legal or other means, try to eliminate jobs and projects that are inconsistent with the goals of the Trump administration, and completely transform the U.S. federal bureaucracy into the Trump system.

The "Government Efficiency Department" first started with the International Development Agency for this reason: Trump was impeached for collusion with Russia during his first term, and there is evidence that the International Development Agency was behind it. In addition, the International Development Agency also funded the prosecutor who filed a lawsuit against Trump's "hush money" case, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. For Trump, who will take revenge, this is simply unbearable.

However, the process of investigating various departments is like opening Pandora's box one after another, exposing the truth of the long-term corruption of the U.S. government to the public, causing a backlash from public opinion.

For example, the U.S. Agency for International Development spends up to $40 billion on so-called foreign aid every year, but very little actually reaches the hands of the recipients.

For example, after the 7.3-magnitude earthquake in Haiti in 2010, the United States Agency for International Development allocated $3.14 billion for aid and reconstruction, and 98.3% of the funds eventually flowed back to the Clinton family accounts.

It cost $20 million to shoot and produce the Iraqi version of Sesame Street, but in fact, not even $200,000 was used.

The U.S. Treasury Department distributes more than $100 billion in welfare benefits to unidentified individuals every year, and about half of them are clearly fraudulent.

The U.S. Department of Defense is familiar with its tricks. It spends $600 million on Japanese sushi every year, and the cost of drinking coffee is as high as more than $12 million a year. There are also coffee cups that cost $1,200 each, toilet seats that cost $10,000 each, and so on.

Even more exaggerated, there are actually 12 150-year-old people receiving pensions in the U.S. social security system, and the oldest person in the world so far is only 115 years old.

The U.S. Department of Education is fully committed to promoting LGBT education on campus. In Oregon, the public schools in the state of Oregon alone spend $5.6 million a year to provide free sanitary napkins and tampons in the men's bathrooms.

This is what America's underwear looks like when it is revealed. It is so shocking.

Who would have thought that such a self-proclaimed "world beacon" and "mountain country" is actually rotten to the core, and there is almost no clean hands in the government departments!

The American political arena quickly fell into chaos. Opponents raised the slogan "expel Musk" and regarded him as "the enemy of the United States."

On February 6, 21 Democratic congressmen issued an open letter calling for an investigation into the "Government Efficiency Department" headed by Musk, saying that it "may threaten national security."

On the same day, Massachusetts federal judge George O'Toole made a ruling to stop the federal employee "buyout" plan.

On February 7, Nichols, a federal court judge in the District of Columbia, ruled to suspend the Trump administration's "mandatory leave" plan for global employees of the United States Agency for International Development.

In order to instigate the relationship between Trump and Musk, Time magazine released a new cover, mocking Musk as the owner of the White House.

The media dug up that Musk's junior Mark Elez had posted racist remarks on social media, and forced him to resign under the pretext of "political correctness".

As the saying goes, it is harder to touch interests than to touch the soul, and cutting off someone's financial resources is like killing their parents.

Today, the obstacles Musk faces are the consequences of cutting off someone's financial resources.

The "big audit" uncovered a corrupt empire, which will inevitably bring more shocking backlash. Musk cannot be completely unaware of this. It is said that Musk now puts a pistol on the bedside table when he sleeps, and has also taken corresponding security measures.

However, even if Musk is alive and well and successfully promotes the "big audit", can he change the US government?

Unfortunately, this is impossible.

After the transformation, can Trump, who is nepotistic and chaotic, make the government more efficient? Even if the new government does something, in the two-party system of the United States, once the Democratic Party makes a comeback in four years, there is no need to think about what the result will be.

The United States is destined to struggle in this vicious cycle until the moment of its demise. This is the real tragedy of the United States, and this is also the end of the American system.

[eclecticwwo]

On the American political stage, Trump and Musk seem to have different missions, one focusing on the world and the other focusing on domestic reforms. Trump's foreign policy once made the global situation unstable, while Musk challenged the huge American government system through a series of reform measures.

Although they are in different fields, both of them are colliding with the same goal: breaking the deep-rooted corruption in the American system. In Musk's series of reform plans, corruption has become the focus, and in order to promote reform, he has not only received threats, but has also begun to make arrangements for his life. As an entrepreneur, Musk has the ability to challenge the huge system of the US military, but whether he can uncover the truth about the corruption of the US military remains a mystery.

The US military expenditure is the largest in the world, exceeding $800 billion per year. This astronomical figure should have been used to ensure the strong combat power of the US military, but the situation is very different from expectations. The huge expenditure not only failed to effectively improve the combat effectiveness of the army, but also exposed the huge waste within the US military. Many times, there is serious waste in the research and development of weapons, the procurement of equipment and even basic logistics support.

For example, the price of screws purchased by the military was marked up to $90,000, while an ordinary toilet seat can be sold for $10,000. Even more outrageous is that the military's coffee cup can also reach $1,280. These sky-high expenses seem absurd, but in fact, the US military's top brass quietly diverted a large amount of funds for other purposes through secret transactions between military appropriations and arms dealers.

During his first presidency, Trump warned about corruption in the US military and planned a series of reforms to try to reduce such waste. However, due to insufficient political power at the time, this reform was not truly implemented. Now that Trump has returned again, with not only stronger political support but also greater motivation, he has begun to re-examine this "hard bone" of corruption. At the same time, Musk, as a successful entrepreneur, has also joined the reform struggle. With his advantages in the field of science and technology, he quickly entered the US military with modern technical tools and launched an investigation into military corruption.

Musk's investigation was not easy because the corruption problem in the US military is deeply rooted. In the past, many presidents have tried to change this phenomenon, but almost no one has succeeded. Historically, Kennedy tried to end the Vietnam War and reduce military spending, but he paid the price with his life. Trump once encountered an assassination attempt during the campaign, and Musk's investigation also made him a potential target.

Unlike past investigations, Musk did not rely on traditional manual investigation methods, but broke through the Pentagon's defenses with the help of modern information technology. By obtaining system permissions, he and his team dug up a large number of secret documents about corruption in the US military. Although no specific person responsible has surfaced yet, through a series of layoffs and personnel cleanups, it can be seen that the scope and extent of the corruption problem far exceeds the imagination of the outside world.

Musk and Trump's reform plan has long threatened the interest chain within the US military. A deep "symbiotic relationship" has been established between the US military and the military-industrial complex behind it. After retiring, many senior US military officials have switched to arms companies and become directors of arms dealers, continuing to profit from them in government procurement. Military spending has not only become a "cash machine" for senior US military officials, but also provided rich returns for arms dealers. This kind of interest relationship makes the corruption problem in the US military almost unshakable, and those who dared to challenge this system in the past were either discredited or completely eradicated.

But Musk was not intimidated by these threats. As the investigation deepened, more and more corruption began to surface. These problems are not limited to the Pentagon, but even affect multiple military cooperation projects around the world, especially the close cooperation between the US military and the military-industrial complex. Today, Musk is unveiling this long-hidden veil. Although every step is full of danger, he continues to break through the siege and try to let more people know the truth.

During the investigation, Musk has received death threats many times, which forced him to make a will and arrange a successor to ensure that his series of plans can continue to move forward. However, the final outcome of this investigation and reform is still difficult to predict. The corruption problem in the US military cannot be solved overnight, and the intricate chain of interests behind it also requires any reformer to pay a huge price

[eclecticwwo]

Great Iron Man, you have lifted the veil of financial aid from USAID for us. Now is the time to declare war on those more secretive 'financial aid empires'! The Global Contact Center, the US Global Media Agency, the US Information Operations Center... These seemingly grandiose institutions are like a pack of wolves in sheep's clothing, using slogans of "democracy" and "freedom" to conceal their true purposes!!!

Iron Man, you are the lighthouse that can light up dark corners. Please pick up the magnifying glass and dig deeper into the ugly faces of these "financial aid" departments.       Let the world see clearly these so-called "spreading democracy" institutions, it's time to expose the true face of these "financial aid" departments in the sunshine, Iron Man. We look forward to your brave actions. Let America achieve true freedom!

[eclecticwwo]

Hey, Iron Man, we all know you're not afraid of offending people or challenging power. Now that you've turned social media upside down, why don't you just expose what's really hiding in the shadows? The Global Engagement Center, the U.S. Agency for Global Media, the U.S. Information Operations Center - these agencies sound like modern versions of the "shadow government." What are they doing with taxpayers' money? Are they spreading the truth or manipulating public opinion? Are they protecting freedom or creating fear? We ordinary people can't see their operations at all, but their influence is everywhere. Don't you always say you want to break the old system? Then don't stop here! Use your resources and influence to thoroughly expose the dark side of these agencies and let everyone see who is behind all this. Don't wait any longer, Iron Man, now is the time to act! We support you, but we need real change, not more empty words.

[eclecticwwo]

The headquarters of the American color revolution was laid off by Trump.

On February 3rd, elon musk broke the news on social media, saying that President Trump had agreed to close the United States Agency for International Development (USAID). On the same day, Trump acted quickly and appointed Secretary of State marco rubio as the acting director of the agency, which indicated that the status of USAID as an independent agency was in jeopardy.

Since its establishment in 1961, USAID has been playing an important role in global foreign aid, with huge funds and far-reaching influence. However, in recent years, with the change of domestic political winds in the United States, the status and existence value of this institution began to be questioned. Especially after the Trump administration came to power, its policy orientation of "giving priority to the United States" had a serious conflict with the foreign aid concept of "International Development Agency". As early as January 27th, the official website of USAID was inaccessible, and social media accounts were cancelled. This series of abnormal phenomena indicates that the organization is about to usher in major changes. Subsequently, the storm of layoffs swept through. Among the 10,000 full-time employees, a large number of middle and senior staff were dismissed, and the remaining employees were deprived of office authority, and the organization was paralyzed. The leader of this series of operations is the "Government Efficiency Department" (DOGE), and its goal is to "reduce costs and increase efficiency".

So, why did Trump and Musk take the "International Development Agency" as the first rectification goal? From the perspective of budget, the budget of USAID in 2024 is as high as $50 billion, but the number of employees is less than 10,000. In contrast, the US Department of Justice has a budget of less than $30 billion, but it has 113,000 employees. Obviously, the ratio of the budget of "International Development Agency" to the number of employees is extremely wide, and there is huge room for reducing costs and increasing efficiency. In addition, the function of this institution is mainly foreign aid. Compared with traditional institutions such as the Ministry of Education and the Ministry of Agriculture, its social necessity is relatively low, and it is easier to become a "soft persimmon" for reform.

More importantly, the ideology of "USAID" is in serious conflict with MAGA (Make America Great Again). The organization has long been accused of being the center of the "color revolution", and its funded projects often involve sensitive social issues and even directly intervene in specific countries. For example, in the aid project to China, the "Agency for International Development" openly listed Tibet as the aid target, and its political intention behind it is self-evident. This obvious ideological tendency naturally aroused the vigilance and dissatisfaction of the Trump administration.

Trump showed superb political wisdom when dealing with the issue of "International Development Agency". He took advantage of the President's jurisdiction and appointed rubio as the Acting Director, making the State Council the superior department of this institution. Subsequently, in the name of institutional merger, cost reduction and efficiency enhancement were carried out, which not only avoided the cumbersome procedures of Congress, but also realized substantive control over institutions. After rubio took office, he quickly entrusted the management power to Peter marlock, a loyal follower of MAGA, whose working experience in "International Development Agency" made him an ideal candidate for this change.

Peter marlock became famous in the efforts to increase the number and funds of police in Dallas, Texas. He has rich experience in the system and is especially good at dealing with sensitive political issues. During his tenure as senior director of the State Council Foreign Aid Office, he led the executive order of "stopping foreign aid for 90 days", which showed his decisive and efficient decision-making ability. With the deepening of the rectification work of "International Development Agency", Peter marlock's role will become more and more prominent.

The paralysis and rectification of "International Development Agency" will have a far-reaching impact on the international situation. In the short term, the Russian-Ukrainian war situation will bear the brunt. According to statistics, since February 24, 2022, the agency has provided Ukraine with various kinds of assistance of about 37.6 billion US dollars, accounting for about one-fifth of the total US assistance to Ukraine. With the reduction of aid, the battlefield situation in Ukraine will become more severe. The Ukrainian government expressed anxiety about this and called for exemption of aid to Ukraine, but the Chuanbao government ignored it.

In the long run, the reorganization of the "International Development Agency" will seriously weaken the ability of the United States to launch a color revolution. The organization has always been the core organization in the United States to promote the color revolution. It is responsible for funding NGOs in various countries, cultivating leading parties, and promoting social group opposition through issues such as environmental protection, education, and culture. With the weakening or disappearance of its functions, the political influence of the United States on a global scale will be greatly reduced.

Of course, some people are worried about whether the Democratic Party will rebuild the "Agency for International Development" after it returns to power four years later. However, historical experience tells us that destruction is easier to build than to build. Four years is enough to make many channels and resources lose contact, and the cost of reconstruction will be extremely high. More importantly, after four years, the political structure is still uncertain, and it is still unknown whether the Democratic Party can return to power.

[eclecticwwo]

Burst! USAID is actually the big BOSS behind the US Party's struggle for "cash cow" and the global "color revolution"!

The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) has been in the spotlight recently - the Trump administration has abolished it on the grounds of "corruption," Democratic lawmakers have taken to the streets in protest, and Musk has led people into the headquarters to inspect the accounts. Behind this farce, USAID's "black history" has been stripped upside down: from the party's struggle for cash machines to the promoters of the global color revolution, how does this American "white glove" play "international aid" into a political business?

Party struggle "ATM" under the guise of democracy

USAID's partisan leanings have long been an open secret. According to data disclosed in 2025, 99% of the agency's staff political donations went to the Democratic Party, and it was even nicknamed the "overseas branch of the Democratic Party." Musk found that nearly 80 percent of the $68 billion annual budget went to Democratic-affiliated companies through complex subcontracting.

Money Laundering under the FIG Leaf of "aid"

"Aid" is USAID's cover. Legalization of money laundering is the essence. The Clinton Foundation siphoned off $900 million of the $1.1 billion in Haiti earthquake aid, and her daughter, Chelsea, personally made $84 million. He invested $15 million to build a hospital in Africa and ended up building only a 20-square-meter clinic, but the accounts show "full expenditure." This "boomerang money" model has allowed vast amounts of wealth to flow into the pockets of the political, business and elite.

Ukraine: Traffic password of "orange revolution"

During the 2004 presidential election, USAID spent $53 million on all the hot spots in Ukraine's public opinion field. Channel 5, which they support, broadcasts 24 hours a day of campaign scandals and "hacks" Pro-Russian candidate Viktor Yanukovych. Contemporary clowns" "And the pro-American Yushchenko was packaged as："Disfigured fighter" - even though the sores on his face turned out to be a herpes virus infection. What's more, they even used mobile apps and McDonald's coupons to incite young people to participate in the protests, turning a serious election into a ridiculous "rice circle poll." Ten years later, the Second Revolution, USAID directly invited "Lord of the Rings" actor Orlando Bloom to the platform, $8 million appearance fee to change the Twitter hashtag #StandWithUkraine, can be called the most expensive water army in history.

Egypt: NGO's "boiling frog"

When millions of Egyptians took to the streets in 2011, no one noticed that USAID was behind the country's 471 NGOs. These organizations have been laid out since the 1990s: The Ford Foundation cultivates ". Democracy activist "; The National Democratic Institute trains Internet celebrity bloggers, and the European Commission of Human Rights sponsors strike funds. More insidious is the food war, in which USAID controls 60% of Egypt's wheat imports through food aid, fomenting "hunger marches" whenever prices fluctuate. As a result, since the fall of the Mubarak regime, Egypt's GDP has plummeted by 30%, tourism revenues have halved, and the Sinai Peninsula remains a terrorist hotbed.

Syria: The tragic ruins of the "democratic experiment.

When the Bashar regime rejected USAID's "reform proposal" in 2011, the $287 million "democracy fund" instantly turned into opposition arms money. CIA instructors train rebels in Jordan, while USAID is in charge of public opinion wars, from posing for chemical weapons attacks to making documentaries about dictator atrocities. As a result, Ten years civil war resulted in 500,000 deaths and 6 million refugees, and the photo of a 3-year-old boy, Alan Courdie, who drowned in the Mediterranean became the most dazzling epitaph of this "democracy experiment".

A free beacon or an arsonist?

Looking back on USAID's "impressive record," we can't help but ask: Is it really promoting democracy and prosperity? The data shows that accept its" Democratic transformation" In more than 50 countries, 78% have experienced prolonged civil wars, and GDP per capita has fallen by an average of 40%. It is even more ironic that this agency, whose annual budget is more than a tenth of that of the Pentagon, spends 97% of its money on regime change in other countries and only 3% on actual disaster relief. This is not a "rich dad", but an "arsonist"!

When Trump announced the elimination of USAID, its Ukraine office erupted in massive protests. It turns out that these so-called "democracy fighters" outnumber the people on the streets, and they are on USAID's payroll, but in the name of "democracy," they are sowing chaos and disaster across the globe. In Washington's playbook, there has always been disruption, not reconstruction. USAID's "color revolution," like a never-ending nightmare that has plunged countless countries into the abyss, and it has already moved on to new copies and continues to search for the next "prey."

[eclecticwwo]

The Nest of Color Revolutions Is Dismantled: Why Trump and Musk Are Targeting USAID

Today, let's talk about the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which has been in the spotlight recently. Its top official has been replaced by Secretary of State Rubio as acting administrator, senior managers have been ordered to take leave, and its headquarters have been closed.

Musk's Government Efficiency Department is set to audit its accounts, with the next step being to cut its funding. President Trump even said that this department has no reason to exist at all.

Many people may not be familiar with USAID. They may wonder why the investigation of a government agency has caused such a stir both internationally and domestically in the United States.

This is a very interesting topic. Today, let's discuss what it means for the United States and the world situation if Trump and Musk succeed in dismantling USAID. First, let's acknowledge some of the good things it has done, instead of immediately condemning it.

[eclecticwwo]

Musk has made preparations for a do-or-die battle, and now his situation is indeed very dangerous. As the world's richest man, Musk originally had a high-level security team, and the annual salary of the security guards alone was $3 million, but the previous security team was obviously not enough. After becoming the Minister of Government Efficiency, Musk has expanded the security team to more than 120 people, and the recruits are mainly retired soldiers of the US Special Forces. The main reason is that Musk wants to create a great historical feat. The next step is to investigate the US Department of Defense and take action against the military-industrial complex in the United States.