drandrewnewton

[drandrewnewton]

An Overview of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Many people struggle with depression, and treatment is not always straightforward or effective. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is an innovative, non-invasive treatment for depression that has gained attention in recent years. This cutting-edge therapy offers hope for individuals who have not responded well to traditional treatments such as antidepressant medications and psychotherapy.

TMS treatment involves placing an electromagnetic coil against the patient's head, which delivers magnetic pulses to stimulate nerve cells in brain areas associated with mood dysregulation. Scientists believe that TMS works by restoring normal brain function and modifying activity in brain circuits that become dysregulated in depression. Dozens of research studies support the antidepressant effects of TMS when applied to the frontal areas of the brain.

The patient remains fully awake and alert during a TMS session, which typically lasts 10 to 30 minutes. Doctors usually administer the treatment on consecutive weekdays as an outpatient, making it convenient for many individuals to attend treatment sessions without interrupting their daily routines.

Moreover, TMS stands out for its favorable safety profile compared to some other depression treatments. It doesn't require anesthesia, and patients don't experience the memory-related side effects often associated with certain antidepressant medications or electroconvulsive therapy. Interestingly, many individuals undergoing TMS for depression report enhanced cognitive function and improved memory. It indicates that TMS may have additional benefits beyond mood improvement.

Patients who have not responded adequately to previous treatments, such as antidepressant medications and psychological therapy, may benefit from TMS. In addition, patients who cannot tolerate the side effects of antidepressant medications or who generally prefer a non-medication approach to treating their depression can also benefit from TMS. However, TMS is not suitable for everyone. An experienced psychiatrist must conduct a thorough evaluation and then provide a personalized recommendation for TMS.

Despite the promising research findings, TMS may not be equally effective for everyone. After a comprehensive psychiatric and physical evaluation, a psychiatrist can discuss the potential efficacy of the treatment for every specific case. It's important to note that patients may take days to weeks before they experience a significant response to the treatment.

To achieve optimal results, patients should undergo a course of at least 20-30 sessions over consecutive weekdays. While some patients may notice changes earlier, it's important to complete the full course of treatment for the best outcomes. Many individuals find that being on concurrent medications helps maintain the benefits of TMS treatment. While the effects of TMS can be long-lasting, some people may require maintenance sessions to sustain their improvement over time. Your psychiatrist will tailor your treatment plan based on your specific needs.

As of November 2021, TMS treatment became eligible for Medicare rebates in some countries, making it more affordable for many patients. Nevertheless, Medicare funds a limited number of treatment sessions, so some patients may still pay out-of-pocket expenses. Costs can vary between practices, so patients should discuss this with their GP or mental health professional.

With ongoing research and increasing accessibility, TMS continues to offer hope and new possibilities for those seeking effective treatment for depression.

[drandrewnewton]

A History of Autism

The concept of autism as a distinct neurodevelopmental condition emerged relatively recently in the annals of medical history. Although the term "autism" itself was initially introduced by Swiss psychiatrist Eugen Bleuler in 1911 to describe a form of withdrawal observed in schizophrenia, it wasn't until the mid-20th century that autism began to be recognized as a unique childhood disorder.

In the 1940s, two pioneering figures, Leo Kanner and Hans Asperger, independently described children with what would later be characterized as autism spectrum conditions. Kanner focused on children with severe impairments in social interactions and communication, often accompanied by restricted interests and repetitive behaviors. Asperger, on the other hand, described children with similar social and communication challenges but with higher intellectual abilities and less severe impairment.

A significant misconception arose during this period, attributing autism to cold and detached parenting styles. This theory, often referred to as "refrigerator mother" theory, is a harmful and inaccurate notion that was popularized by Bruno Bettelheim. It dominated the field for several decades and caused immense distress to parents of autistic children.

As research progressed, the understanding of autism expanded. The concept of an autism spectrum emerged, recognizing the wide variability in symptoms and severity. The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), a leading diagnostic tool in psychiatry, has contributed to the changing criteria of autism over time. Autism's representation in the DSM has evolved significantly. Initially linked to childhood schizophrenia in DSM-I (1952), it remained associated with schizophrenia in DSM-II (1968).

The 1970s witnessed a paradigm shift with the introduction of the term "autism spectrum disorders" by Lorna Wing, emphasizing the continuum of symptoms rather than discrete categories. This concept paved the way for a more inclusive understanding of autism and helped to dispel the notion that it was a rare and severe condition. In 1994, DSM-IV expanded diagnostic criteria and introduced subcategories like Asperger’s Disorder. In DSM-V (2013), these subcategories merged into autism spectrum disorder (ASD), a controversial move aimed at simplifying diagnosis but sparking debate over its impact on service eligibility. This change aimed to reflect the spectrum nature of autism and avoid rigid diagnostic boundaries.

While the precise origins of autism remain elusive, contemporary research strongly implicates a complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Genetic studies have identified several genes linked to autism, which means it is likely to be inherited in a polygenic manner, or a group of genes acting in combination. Nevertheless, genetics do not fully account for the development of autism. Environmental influences, both prenatal and postnatal, are also likely to contribute to its etiology.

The autism community has witnessed a remarkable evolution in recent decades, characterized by increased awareness, advocacy, and a growing understanding of the condition. Organizations such as the Autism Society of America and the Autistic Self Advocacy Network have been instrumental in driving progress and empowering individuals with autism and their families.

Research into autism continues, with a focus on understanding the underlying brain mechanisms, identifying early biomarkers, and developing effective interventions. The goal is to develop personalized treatment plans that effectively address the unique needs of each individual with autism.

[drandrewnewton]

Implications of Lack of Health Insurance

Health insurance is a type of agreement or contract between an insurance company and a policyholder in which the company promises to indemnify the policyholder when the policyholder suffers financial loss due to the treatment of a medical condition. This means that health insurance not only has health implications but also affects policyholders' economic and social realities.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the expansion of Medicaid created a safety net for people who were laid off or suffered disruption in business activities. These policies protected people in the lower income bracket from coverage losses while accessing more affordable private coverage.

Several publications have established a connection between the availability of health insurance and people's health standards. This means that when health insurance is more accessible, people are more likely to lead healthier and disease-free lives.

Similarly, the availability and accessibility of health insurance are often linked to economic and social stability. For instance, research published by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the American College of Physicians has established that the unavailability of health insurance often results in financial incapacitation that deprives one of access to medical care. The research further pointed out that uninsured or underinsured people are less likely to use screening and prevention services, and they often delay or do not seek professional medical care when they fall sick.

The National Immigration Law Center has noted a correlation between being uninsured and lower access to preventive care and life expectancy rates. The research indicated that uninsured adults have a 25 percent higher likelihood of dying prematurely compared to people who have a form of health insurance. People who do not have health insurance tend to receive their first diagnosis of cancer at a later stage of the disease when it has become relatively more severe. Also, uninsured people tend to receive diagnoses of sexually transmitted diseases way later until they have escalated into severe health issues. This is majorly because many uninsured people do not seek medical care until they begin to experience severe symptoms or until their health situation escalates into a medical emergency.

Moreover, healthcare in the United States is expensive. Many families tend to enter into medical debt to access medical care. Medical debt has both economic and social implications. For instance, it can result in a poor credit rating, lack of access to credit facilities, and a higher likelihood of bankruptcy.

While insured households also tend to incur medical debt, there is a considerably higher number of uninsured families with medical debt. This can be attributed to the fact that people without insurance are often ineligible for medical discounts while, in most cases, having to pay almost double the cost of healthcare compared to people with insurance.

Because they are more likely not to access prompt and timely healthcare, uninsured individuals tend to miss out on work time or retire considerably earlier compared to insured individuals. According to the UKG Work Force Institute, employee absenteeism costs employees several billions of dollars every year. This means that health insurance has broader economic implications for society in addition to impacting the economic status of the uninsured or underinsured individual.