disctrict14

[disctrict14]

it seems that leftists do not actually understand american lynchings at all. they launder an ahistorical analysis of lynchings to prop up their rampant male supremacy, by likening sexual abusers to potential lynching victims. they equate sexual abusers or those who are accused of sexual abuse to an oppressed class as a result, which could explain why most american leftist orgs devolve into cults that harbor male abusers. this is a serious error.

most lynchings were not even the result of a sexual assault accusation. lynchings were not a case of white people “taking the law too far,” undervaluing due process, nor were they a case borne out of a cultural disgust for rapists. the “cultural disgust for rapists” that leftists speak of doesn’t even exist—what they are seeing is a disgust for the sexual trespass of another man’s property. if a general fanaticism against rape was motivated by a genuine disgust of patriarchy, and this fanaticism actually existed, then both the left and the right wouldn’t attempt to decriminalize sexual abuse in various ways. this disgust has never existed, as rape was used as a tool to exert male power in the U.S. and beyond long before the colonization of the americas. rapists are not dehumanized under our current social order. they are coddled and rewarded, unless they violate another man’s property. it is not worth considering the humanity of the mostly women and children who are routinely victimized by this ideology. lynchings during segregation were a mechanism of antiblack terror, regulation and control—they were not motivated by a moral opposition to sexual assault, murder, robbery, etc.

white male supremacists were sexually abusing their own wives, daughters, slaves, and free black people while they were deploying criminal accusations against black americans for allegedly doing the same. the myth of the black rapist is an effective cultural weapon that is used to protect the private property claims of white male supremacists, portraying their own supremacy as so just and objective that murder and dehumanization of the out-group is permissible to protect it. white people who deploy this myth did not and do not have a moral opposition to rape, because white people utilized rape as a method of sexual discipline and control against women, children, and black people for centuries.

the white women who participated in white supremacist violence were not disrupting their position under white male supremacy—they were enshrining it, supporting the hierarchy that placed them below white men but above black americans, and gaining a relatively favorable reputation to their white male owners by engaging in antiblack racism and reproducing the hierarchy against other women. marginalized white people were free to attack the racial enemies of white people in general, but their own position in the hierarchy remained unchanged. in this framework, white men can sexually abuse anyone they please, including those in the out-group, because they are asserting their birthright by doing so. they must curb all women, everyone in the out-group, and white male sympathizers to oppressed groups from being able to threaten the hierarchy. this ideology sees sexual abuse as an adequate tool for men to use until other men are perceived to be trespassing property lines. this can even be seen today…

a significant amount of right wing white men will simultaneously complain about how marital rape laws undermine traditional families while fearmongering about out-group men sexually abusing white women. how can they seemingly view rape in both a positive and negative light at the same time, you might ask? this thinking is not paradoxical at all when you consider how patriarchal control works. it is ideologically consistent.

marital rape laws contribute to the legal subversion of the whole class of women as private property—it’s harder to claim a woman as private property if she is both socially and legally free to reject the disciplining act of heterosexual sex. an out-group man who sexually engages with a white woman is a violation of white men’s private property claims, whether she is being assaulted or not does not matter because the mere interaction itself, regardless of context, is seen as subversive to the white male supremacist.

white male supremacists are against interracial relationships, consensual or not, because they upend white men’s birthright in three ways. by taking white children out of the gene pool and undermining racial purity norms through interracial reproduction, by removing white women from the private control of white men, and by muddling the position of the out-group within the hierarchy since they are trespassing property lines. all of these positions are otherwise known as the white genocide anxiety. the white genocide anxiety is about white men losing their private property claims against man, woman, and nature itself. feminism, communism, and black liberation must be opposed, because when synthesized, they usher in a new world that denies the birthright of white male supremacy and disables them from maintaining it.

the white male supremacist culture does not have a moral opposition to sexual abuse or even criminality in general. they only respect laws if they exist to protect their class interests. they cynically pretend to have moral convictions against sexism and crime in order to shroud their real motivation: the protection of white men’s private property. they will lie, obfuscate, and kill to defend it. this is the true motivation behind american lynching.

[disctrict14]

Every post from a radfem that says something along the lines of "we talk about trans people too often" is missing the point. Transgenderism is inherently misogynistic, so we should be able to talk about them as we please. It's like saying we should stop talking about femicide because "we talk about it too often".

🍫

[disctrict14]

no MEN made all of the things on that list fetish content and this is the result. and all of yall let them do it for the sake of "kink". your idiotic libertarian approach to sexual abuse made it normal for men to have the easiest access possible to degrade women and masturbate to abuse. so blame men and yourselves please instead of pretending this happened out of nowhere.

[disctrict14]

This viceo is actually the perfect encapsulation of the problem with the modern trans movement and why it gets into beef with feminists so often.

A clothing store was selling a “women’s empowerment” tshirt (much to question in how empowering a fast fashion shirt is considering they’re likely made by underpaid women and girls in the global south) with the phrase “not a doll” on it.

The message is to to speak out against how women are objectified, and often called doll as a degrading nickname

now here comes the transwoman, (semi ironically) upset that a shirt and statement against objectification “I’m not a doll” is popular at the same time “protect the dolls” (doll= transwomen) is popular

So, while explaining the term “doll” is “positive affirming femininity” for transwomen she exes out the part of the shirt that says “not” and does a little photoshoot 🙄🙄

There are people in the comments who are completely UNIRONICALLY upset that the clothing store didn’t “do more research” before they sold the shirt, as well as female TRA’s being like

“Well I don’t really understand why yall want to be called a term that has been used to degrade and objectify women but I support even if I don’t understand 🥺”

Why should feminists have to change our language because transwomen want to call themselves a degrading term? Why do women have to stop speaking out about objectification because some transwomen enjoy being objectified! This is the one of the questions at the heart of the disagreement between radical feminists and choice feminists.

These people think intersectionality means bulldozing over issues that are specific to female people who grow up in a world where there femininity is forced not affirming.

[disctrict14]

i always thought this meant the opposite like if you weightlift without eating enough calories you can't bulk and grow muscle properly 😭

"Excercise with a bad diet is a waste of time" Ummm not tf it's not. I hate it when people say this. Please continue to exercise regularly even if your diet is far from perfect. Exercise has about literally 10,00 benefits that aren't fat loss related (literally scientists can't stop finding things exercise improves about human health!!) - it's genuinely mind-boggling how much that gets downplayed. Fat Loss is literally 1 out of thousandsss of benefits. And even then, maintaining muscle in your body + improved metabolic function w exercise will effortlessly contribute to weight loss or at least weight maintenance when you're not in deficit. It's worth creating a workout habit even if your diet isn't ideal right now.

[disctrict14]

Violence & murder is often weaponised to legitimise the argument of the marginalisation of trans-identifying individuals. Whilst the murder of anybody for any reason is devastating- the actual statistics are often misconstrued by transactivists. What is left out are other contributing factors such as systemic racism, poverty, relationship to perpetrator & prostitution. All of which were over-represented amongst transgender victims. In addition, while it is difficult to always pinpoint the perpetrators intent, a vast amount of the victims were not linked to being targeted solely because of their transgender identity, if at all.

———

2020-2024 in the US, the number of transgender people who were murdered: (according to hrc.org)

In 2020, HRC documented 37 victims

In 2021 HRC documented 59-60 victims

In 2022 HRC documented 41 victims

In 2023 HRC documented 32 victims

In 2024 HRC documented 32 victims

(above screenshot in the context since 2013-2024 from hrc.org)

Now, if we look at the demographics of those victims, the vast majority of them are not the white males who frequently weaponise the murder rate.

———

Here is an article from 2018 about the misinformation & warping of the statistics. “The murder rate for females in the United States in 2018 was also, though just barely, higher than that of the transgender population at about 2 per 100,000 females. Overall, a trans-identifying individual is less likely to be murdered than a woman, or any member of the general population.” Which can be logically concluded also, because while males perpetuate 99% of homicides against women, males murder other males at a higher rate. & communities suffering from systemic racism & discrimination are even more at risk.

The above mentioned article also states “Trans-identifying individuals were actually murdered at less than half the rate of the general population. The Washington Times reported murder rates similar to what we find crunching these numbers for the general public and for transgender people” (here is the (archived) article from the Washington Times).

———

Now going back to murder rates that can be attributed to other factors~ first we have systemic racism. As the HRC says, black trans women were 61% of the overall victims since 2013. This already echos the violence that black Americans face as a population due to racism & higher rates of poverty.

———

Next, an important demographic are those in prostitution. HRC tells us that 10% of transgender victims were killed by a “client”.

In this study (ranging from 2012-2020 in the US as well as Puerto Rico), “identified 321 sex work-related homicides (54% female, 41% male, 6% transgender). Among female victims, 94% were sex workers, and 54% of their suspects were clients.”

———

Then we have intimate-partner violence. 26% of transgender victims were killed by their intimate/romantic partner.

If we look at the female homicide victims & victim/offender relationships (in the US in 2021): “Of the estimated 4,970 female victims of murder and nonnegligent manslaughter in 2021 … 34% were killed by an intimate partner”. We already know IPV & domestic violence is a massive contributor to the probability of being murdered.

———

Overall, an “epidemic of violence against transgender people” is disingenuous & purposely misleading. Instead, it’s an epidemic of racist violence, intimate-partner violence & in general, male violence.

———

& finally, HERE IS A POST that goes much more into depth & analysis & has more information/statistics.

[disctrict14]

the afab trans woman discourse was still the funniest shit in the world like i actually love all the "afab trans women" running around they are hilarious. what's that? postmodernism isn't so fun when it's not being used to consolidate male power over the narrative? lol.

[disctrict14]

Did y'all hear about the Brazillian feminist who was granted asylum in the EU because the Brazillian government wanted to throw her in the slammer for 25 years for "misgendering" a trans identified male politian. Same country that struggles to stop insanely high rates of feminicide, rape, pedophilia and domestic violence btw. If this a progressive movement, why would enforced "Trans Rights" be trending alongside elevated rape, domestic violence and injustice against female people? It's almost as if the whole thing is a patriarchal movement that thrives in male dominated societies.

[disctrict14]

No one cares about men's pain because they masturbate to ours.

[disctrict14]

yeah there's alot of examples of gender/trans ideology aligning well with conservative ideology. And no it isn't niche, if entire states like Iran officially adopt into legislation.

To conservatives, a gnc man or woman is much more threatening to their hierarchy than a gnc man or woman who pretends that being gnc makes them the opposite sex. To them, it fixes the cognitive dissonance produced by gender non conformity. They can see a male who is gay, feminine etc and to them it makes more "sense" of that man is labelled a woman, because highly restrictive gender roles are essential to conservatism.

Ever think why the first records of modern transexualism/transgenderism were from nazis? And earlier examples of othered sex class being just gnc people like mentioned above

Just found out one of my cousins on my dad’s side is trans and my grandma accepts it, now I don’t really have a problem with this despite me being a TERF but I just find it weird that my Grandma who is constantly committing racial micro-aggressions to me and making misogynistic statements about women in general is okay with this. IMO this just kinda proves that transgenderism isn’t a radical movement for gender abolition but rather reinforces gender stereotypes so much to the point where my conservative homophobic grandma can accept it💀

[disctrict14]

when amber heard was sued for publishing an article in which she didnt even name her abuser, a total of like 3 people were alarmed about womens/survivors right to free speech. Oh but now some incestuous rape simulator games were taken down so we have to have a society-wide crash out about censorship. shows what the priorities are

[disctrict14]

men reveal their priorities and total lack of imagination with this subject. we already have irl porn stores. you can buy porn with your id (real or fake) and cash. you can go to a strip club and find a stripper who does peep show stuff in the VIP. there are brothels... but this does not satisfy rapaciously entitled, braindead men, who must have 24/7 access to free, instant, unconstrained, and endless depictions of sexual violence against women. why? is it really such a challenge to jerk off? men's priority is not freedom from censorship or data privacy or gay rights or even sexual liberation. men's priority is the power trip they get from knowing that anytime, anywhere, they can see women demeaned in ways beyond their wildest dreams.

[disctrict14]

An underclass of women reserved specifically for sex/rape is a necessity in patriarchy. There has never been a society that was so religious+ traditional that it was completely devoid of prostitution/sex slavery. Prostitution IS the tradition. Sex work expansionists aligning themselves with "progressive" ideologies is so backwards because sex work is actually a part of traditional, religious and conservative cultural norms.

[disctrict14]

the “psycho and silence of the lambs are transphobic” rhetoric is so funny to me bc like… no one said those characters were trans… so many serial killers (who are all male, no aileen wuornos doesn’t count) have dressed up in women’s clothing either for sexual pleasure/fetishism or to disguise themselves and get closer to women including robert durst, jerry brudos, dennis rader (btk), russell williams, ed gein (who is the “originator” of the “trope” but i actually find the least convincing as an obvious fetishist like the others). like it’s a real thing, it’s not made up, stop lying lmao. and it’s bc of porn addiction ok bye

[disctrict14]

Saw a post about the hatred & demonisation toward pregnant women. The discrimination, dehumanisation whilst also on the other side of the spectrum sexualisation & fetishisation (& dehumanisation in that side too). In fact in writing this post I branched out a lot then got many other ideas for like. Many other posts.

First off the fact that pregnant women have even LESS rights because society views them as Incubator For Baby, the leading cause of death for pregnant women being homicide, & medicine is denied (& DNR & other medical interventions are ignored in favour of the fetus). I saw a woman who had a chronic pain diagnosis. She was sobbing in her car because she was being denied the medication because IF she was pregnant it COULD hurt the fetus. A metaphorical pregnancy. & she’s in agony all day every day. I’ve heard the same for chemotherapy & other life saving treatments. Hell, even Accutane. Although we are all familiar with this to some degree. & not to mention women’s healthcare is pathetically under researched & underfunded.

That & socially pregnant women are not favoured in the workplace, being demoted & even forced to “resign” from their jobs because she is considered to be a write off. & the fact that giving birth is still treated barbarically (esp toward black women & the staggering difference of dying in childbirth in comparison to white women- & birthing is incredibly dangerous for all women to begin with).

But what was being talked about was the disgust by which pregnant women are treated because they are pregnant. There’s a quote by Andrea Dworkin:

“Pregnancy is confirmation that the woman has been fucked: it is confirmation that she is a cunt. In the male sexual system, the pregnant woman is a particular sexual object: she shows her sexuality through her pregnancy. The display marks her as a whore. Her belly is her sex. Her belly is proof that she has been used. Her belly is his phallic triumph. One does not abort his victory”

We can apply purity culture to this historically of course, as well as religion. Pregnancy is caused by sex, so even though having children is considered the most important thing a woman does in religion & traditional nuclear family sexist beliefs- it is still the woman’s “fault” in males eyes. Conservatives, the healthcare industry & patriarchal society not only others women in general, but especially when she is pregnant, she is not a person.

I saw a pregnant woman with a full burqa on tiktok be shamed by men for being sexual & inappropriate. I saw a woman in a dress that was literally incredibly modest with hardly any cleavage too that was shamed & told she was “showing off” her breasts & that she “could have just posted her belly”.

I reblogged a post yesterday actually about a husband forcing his wife to let his parents into the delivery room. A particularly disturbing example of the frequent dehumanisation of the woman, as a spectacle, a show, an incubator. Because she’s no longer her, she’s pregnant. I also saw a video of a woman who had just finished giving birth & while all her family was giving all their attention to the baby, her own mother squeezed past them, & went directly to her daughters bed to give her love& support. Whilst it did make me tear up a bit because it was really very powerful & heartwarming in itself- the blatant undertone of the video imo were really quite terrible. Mum went to her daughter first, everyone else cooed over the baby.

Idk. This is a hugely rambly post. & while I could apply the inverse-Freud womb-envy theory (which of course is applicable because men hate that they don’t have the same power we have). What I really think is the common belief is that it is a uniquely-blatantly obvious female experience that disgusts men not only the logistics of it because they’re also horrified by menstruation, but because the woman is not accessible to them as a “hole”. Quite frankly.

[disctrict14]

i’m so sick of “man is a terrible rapist/child sex offender/etc BUT!!! the nearest woman who did none of those things but may have known about it is definitely worse and to blame instead “

[disctrict14]

The “genital checks” fantasy is so fucking weird to me because literally nobody, except TRAs apparently, want that or have ever proposed anything even remotely close to that. We want government identification to accurately reflect people’s sex and, most importantly, for males to respect that they aren’t welcome in women’s spaces. And TRAs truly cannot fathom the latter being a possibility. So much so that they imagine the only way to keep these males out of women’s spaces is to go as far as to check their genitals. They know how brazen and entitled these men are, they tell us as much, and somehow are still confused as to why we reject them. Then in the same breath they’ll talk about how being amongst men puts TIMs in danger. But, again, somehow can’t connect that it’s that same threat of male violence that makes women not want them in our spaces. Despite the fact that TIMs maintain male rates of criminality.

Though I take comfort in knowing that it’s exactly this kind of irrationality and reality denial that is destroying their movement.