diminished-responsibility-owos

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

If we're doing hand stuff and then I stab you is that still non-penetrative sex?

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

Tony Soprano appreciation post.

If you're all about body positivity but make fun of men with hairline receiding or bald, fat, with a beer belly etc, no you're not.

Pretty sick and tired of seeing people laugh and trash men who are not tall skinny queer looking white dudes and be like "everyone is beautiful" in the same breath.

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

I think the Internet has simultaneously allowed for everyone to create their own little echo chamber conclaves, and then also occasionally smashes those conclaves together. Everyone thinks they're in the majority but are constantly under attack from a few fringe weirdos. When in reality every time your feed becomes infested with shit you didn't wanna see, your shit infested someone else's feed and they didn't wanna see it. The only solution is to not use Tumblr, which is mostly what I do.

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

>see dumb opinion

>check user's location

>omelas

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

autism allies (and even a substantial number of autistic people) when you tell them your autism-induced picky eating is not “picky eating” but is in fact an eating disorder that you can’t magically get over in the next 5 seconds:

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

Well I guess I shouldn't say Angel Dust never bothered me. He did a bit, but generally speaking I like to defend difficult portrayals so long as the depiction isn't explicitly hateful, and I don't think that Angel Dust is. Another fun element of the angel weapon thing I realized is that there is another way that Angel weapons can get into the hand of sinners, and that's either angel defectors (Vaggie is a one of those, and no one ever comments on that being unique or unheard of, so it seems to reason that there are more) and also Exorcists selling to sinners directly. Exorcists are fairly reliably depicted as the most crass and hedonistic (with at least Lute and Adam taking perverse glee in exterminating sinners) and so it makes sense that rogue Exorcists might steal the occasional dagger or spear or w/e for some hookers and or blow. Given this fact it makes sense that Carmilla is the person who first figures out that Vaggie is who she is, since she would then be the person most familiar with Exorcists. Now it would be cool if she said that, but like a lot of the world building of Hazbin so far this is an element that is potentially interesting more than it is actually interesting.

Lucifer too, I really like Lucifer a lot, he's my favorite character so far, I actually like his design and his motivations a lot, it's a shame that halfway through his first song they interrupt it with more Alistair.

That's really my main problem with Hazbin so far (well secondary to the problem of hell being underdeveloped thematically, which is the main thing I wanted) so much screen time is dedicated to setting up that Alistair has intrigue going on that it really hampers the ability for other really cool story aspects to breathe. One of the main reasons I find Lucifer so relatable is that he too, hates Alistair.

So yeah, in conclusion, Hazbin isn't for me, so far I haven't gotten what I wanted out of it and the story doesn't appear to be going in a way I find interesting, but I might keep my ear to the ground if the problem of hell is taken more seriously/Alistair nuts up and actually does something.

You know what, fuck it naw I am gonna talk a little bit more about this, I thought Hazbin Hotel was just really fucking boring and uninteresting, and to be honest the fact that it's got an idiot plot and the random details that don't make any sense aren't the main reason why. Like no it doesn't make any sense that sinners can get their hands on so many angelic weapons, and nothing the vees do makes an ounce of sense etc. etc. the main reason I don't like it is that it doesn't take its premise seriously at all. When you're writing about Christianity one thing you have to accept is that there is no aspect of Christianity you're going to be able to think of that hasn't already been written about to death, and obviously Hazbin is no exception. The question of how it can be fair for a finite crime to be corrected by an infinite punishment has been going on for a long long time, with like two minutes of googling I was able to find Kant's response to this exact argument, and that's what I want to comment on, there are responses to this criticism. There are so so so many responses to this criticism, none that I personally agree with, mind, but there are genuine good faith attempts to respond to this argument or to communicate why it's fair that "hell is forever". The show however is either incapable or unwilling to communicate these justifications to us, none of the antagonists have anything to say for themselves. Now to stress I agree with the show, having already been familiar with the justifications of an infinite punishment I was genuinely excited to hear that a cartoon that took the question of redeeming those in hell seriously was in the works, but then to see the show get made and the two primary angelic antagonists (Sera and Adam) be either completely incapable or totally uninterested in offering any defense for their actions, any justifications or rationale why what they do is right is bad writing not just because it makes them seem like two dimensional characters that exist solely to portray heaven as weak and evil but also because it denies the protagonist character as well. Charlie doesn't have anything to say because no one ever demands an explanation of her. "If hell is forever then heaven must be a lie", is that not good enough for you? Eat shit, Sera and Adam are both present for this line, and neither say anything substantial in response. To be clear I'm not even saying you should avoid strawmanning the opposition, by all means have Adam offer Kant's defense (which, very simply put, is that some people are born bad and just deserve to suffer for eternity) it would be really funny to watch the weasel squirm having to defend that point against Charlie, who could happily point out that in that case some of those "inherently evil people" are both of his first two wives. Sera could offer that any repentance inside of hell is inherently suspect because people could just be trying to escape hell, Charlie could point out (probably not in these words) that that's a brutal catch 22 that leads to eternal suffering etc. etc. and so on and so forth. A dialogue between these ideas would be interesting and cathartic, as it stands given how everyone perceives Charlie's idea as stupid, and that at the end of the show it's revealed that those who redeem themselves just automatically go to heaven it seems to me that Adam is basically being portrayed as correct, like if anyone was deserving of not suffering in hell they would have been saved, and he's in heaven so...

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

Oh lest I forget I actually disagree with a lot of the stock criticisms of Hazbin, like as a trans woman Angel Dust never bothered me, and I do actually think a lot of the character designs are cool and interesting and really bold. Alistair is honestly a low point for me but I'm a sucker for multiple arms and I like Zestial and Valentino and Carmilla. I hear people say that the show overuses red but like... it's set in hell I dunno how you'd avoid that. It is also true that a lot of the characters look alike but A) in a lot of cases there are good explanations for that (Alistair and Vox are supposed to be foils it makes sense they look similar) and also the spinoffs show that the team is very capable of making characters with different body types and styles, so Hazbin's designs are a choice, and a choice that doesn't really bother me. Also a lot of the "plot holes" I see people complain about don't make any sense, like yes I think a lot of the plot doesn't make any sense, but there being Angel weapons in hell makes perfect sense to me. Like even if it only happens once every thousand years or so that an angel drops a spear or something down a hole they can't get it out of, eventually there will be a shit ton of weapons in hell, because we're talking about eternity, and it makes sense that they wouldn't care to retrieve it because it's established over and over again that the angels primary weakness is hubris. That's said basically verbatim.

I also thought I hated the songs, but I think the show just happened to be front loaded with songs I didn't like because I like them more and more as the show goes on. I'm not gonna spend time talking about this because I am a musicology illiterate.

Oh also one of my friends tells me that there's discourse over the like... moral character of people who like various media on Tumblr (I'm not really a tumblrite) and I'd just like to say I'm generally opposed to speculating on what a person might be like based on the media they like.

You know what, fuck it naw I am gonna talk a little bit more about this, I thought Hazbin Hotel was just really fucking boring and uninteresting, and to be honest the fact that it's got an idiot plot and the random details that don't make any sense aren't the main reason why. Like no it doesn't make any sense that sinners can get their hands on so many angelic weapons, and nothing the vees do makes an ounce of sense etc. etc. the main reason I don't like it is that it doesn't take its premise seriously at all. When you're writing about Christianity one thing you have to accept is that there is no aspect of Christianity you're going to be able to think of that hasn't already been written about to death, and obviously Hazbin is no exception. The question of how it can be fair for a finite crime to be corrected by an infinite punishment has been going on for a long long time, with like two minutes of googling I was able to find Kant's response to this exact argument, and that's what I want to comment on, there are responses to this criticism. There are so so so many responses to this criticism, none that I personally agree with, mind, but there are genuine good faith attempts to respond to this argument or to communicate why it's fair that "hell is forever". The show however is either incapable or unwilling to communicate these justifications to us, none of the antagonists have anything to say for themselves. Now to stress I agree with the show, having already been familiar with the justifications of an infinite punishment I was genuinely excited to hear that a cartoon that took the question of redeeming those in hell seriously was in the works, but then to see the show get made and the two primary angelic antagonists (Sera and Adam) be either completely incapable or totally uninterested in offering any defense for their actions, any justifications or rationale why what they do is right is bad writing not just because it makes them seem like two dimensional characters that exist solely to portray heaven as weak and evil but also because it denies the protagonist character as well. Charlie doesn't have anything to say because no one ever demands an explanation of her. "If hell is forever then heaven must be a lie", is that not good enough for you? Eat shit, Sera and Adam are both present for this line, and neither say anything substantial in response. To be clear I'm not even saying you should avoid strawmanning the opposition, by all means have Adam offer Kant's defense (which, very simply put, is that some people are born bad and just deserve to suffer for eternity) it would be really funny to watch the weasel squirm having to defend that point against Charlie, who could happily point out that in that case some of those "inherently evil people" are both of his first two wives. Sera could offer that any repentance inside of hell is inherently suspect because people could just be trying to escape hell, Charlie could point out (probably not in these words) that that's a brutal catch 22 that leads to eternal suffering etc. etc. and so on and so forth. A dialogue between these ideas would be interesting and cathartic, as it stands given how everyone perceives Charlie's idea as stupid, and that at the end of the show it's revealed that those who redeem themselves just automatically go to heaven it seems to me that Adam is basically being portrayed as correct, like if anyone was deserving of not suffering in hell they would have been saved, and he's in heaven so...

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

You know what, fuck it naw I am gonna talk a little bit more about this, I thought Hazbin Hotel was just really fucking boring and uninteresting, and to be honest the fact that it's got an idiot plot and the random details that don't make any sense aren't the main reason why. Nothing the vees do makes an ounce of sense etc. etc. the main reason I don't like it is that it doesn't take its premise seriously at all. When you're writing about Christianity one thing you have to accept is that there is no aspect of Christianity you're going to be able to think of that hasn't already been written about to death, and obviously Hazbin is no exception. The question of how it can be fair for a finite crime to be corrected by an infinite punishment has been going on for a long long time, with like two minutes of googling I was able to find Kant's response to this exact argument, and that's what I want to comment on, there are responses to this criticism. There are so so so many responses to this criticism, none that I personally agree with, mind, but there are genuine good faith attempts to respond to this argument or to communicate why it's fair that "hell is forever". The show however is either incapable or unwilling to communicate these justifications to us, none of the antagonists have anything to say for themselves. Now to stress I agree with the show, having already been familiar with the justifications of an infinite punishment I was genuinely excited to hear that a cartoon that took the question of redeeming those in hell seriously was in the works, but then to see the show get made and the two primary angelic antagonists (Sera and Adam) be either completely incapable or totally uninterested in offering any defense for their actions, any justifications or rationale why what they do is right is bad writing not just because it makes them seem like two dimensional characters that exist solely to portray heaven as weak and evil but also because it denies the protagonist character as well. Charlie doesn't have anything to say because no one ever demands an explanation of her. "If hell is forever then heaven must be a lie", is that not good enough for you? Eat shit, Sera and Adam are both present for this line, and neither say anything substantial in response. To be clear I'm not even saying you should avoid strawmanning the opposition, by all means have Adam offer Kant's defense (which, very simply put, is that some people are born bad and just deserve to suffer for eternity) it would be really funny to watch the weasel squirm having to defend that point against Charlie, who could happily point out that in that case some of those "inherently evil people" are both of his first two wives. Sera could offer that any repentance inside of hell is inherently suspect because people could just be trying to escape hell, Charlie could point out (probably not in these words) that that's a brutal catch 22 that leads to eternal suffering etc. etc. and so on and so forth. A dialogue between these ideas would be interesting and cathartic, as it stands given how everyone perceives Charlie's idea as stupid, and that at the end of the show it's revealed that those who redeem themselves just automatically go to heaven it seems to me that Adam is basically being portrayed as correct, like if anyone was deserving of not suffering in hell they would have been saved, and he's in heaven so...

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

I really like being a hater, so I thought I'd give hating hazbin hotel a shot. Unfortunately it's mostly just too boring and poorly written for me to care at all. Hopefully Alistair eventually actually does something interesting instead of just imply he's going to do something interesting over and over again. Sherlock ass writing lmao.

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

I literally suck so much at social media, I am so so so very bad at it.

She Mary on my Wollstone till I Craft

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

She Mary on my Wollstone till I Craft

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

I'll double her money.

Quest: Give Dragon Girl a Magic: the Gathering Card for her Hoard.

Reward: Receive her Breasts Image.

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

Do not say in grief you are sorry he was here. Rather, say in thankfulness you are grateful he is gone.

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

Ȃ̸͕̗ň̵͕̤ǵ̴̨e̶͇̾͊l̷̠͝ş̶̪̑ part 3

[diminished-responsibility-owos]

The final surprise is light tattoos! In cyberpunk these are tattoos that glow, most of the time Aisling has hers turned off but for sci-fi outfits like this one she'll flip them on. This one took a lot of time for me, making things look like latex is hard, making things look like see through latex is even harder.