desmondhwong

[desmondhwong]

Another example of someone who claimed government agents were targeting them but faced gaslighting and dismissal is Frank Olson. Frank Olson was a biochemist and employee of the United States Army Biological Warfare Laboratories in the 1950s.

In 1953, Olson attended a retreat known as the "Deep Creek Lake incident" organized by the CIA and the U.S. Army. During this retreat, Olson was unknowingly dosed with LSD as part of a CIA mind control experiment known as MKUltra. Following the incident, Olson experienced severe paranoia and psychological distress.

A week after the retreat, Olson fell to his death from a window of a New York City hotel. The circumstances surrounding his death were initially reported as a suicide, and the government maintained that stance for decades.

However, in the 1970s, as information about the MKUltra program came to light through investigations, Olson's family began to question the official narrative. They hired forensic experts who concluded that Olson's death was likely a homicide, suggesting that he may have been pushed out of the window to prevent him from revealing the secrets of the MKUltra program.

The Olson family fought for answers and justice, and eventually, in 1994, President Bill Clinton apologized to them and confirmed that Olson's death was indeed a result of a "cover-up" by the government. The government acknowledged that Olson's concerns about being targeted and the psychological distress he experienced after the LSD dosing were valid.

The case of Frank Olson demonstrates how an individual's claims of government targeting can be initially dismissed, and the person can be gaslit into believing their experiences were mere hallucinations or conspiracy theories. In Olson's case, it took several decades for the truth to come to light and for his concerns to be validated.

[desmondhwong]

One example of an individual who claimed that government agents were out to get them but was dismissed and gaslit by others could be Richard Jewell. Richard Jewell was a security guard during the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta, Georgia.

In July 1996, a bomb exploded in Centennial Olympic Park, killing two people and injuring many others. Jewell, who had discovered the suspicious backpack containing the bomb and alerted authorities, was initially hailed as a hero for his actions. However, he quickly became the target of suspicion and scrutiny by law enforcement and the media.

Despite lacking evidence, some law enforcement officials and media outlets began to suspect Jewell himself of planting the bomb, based on their profiling and erroneous assumptions. Jewell found himself under intense public scrutiny, with his life turned upside down. During the investigation, he repeatedly claimed that he was being targeted by the government and that they were trying to frame him.

The media coverage and public speculation contributed to the gaslighting effect on Jewell. He was portrayed as a delusional and paranoid figure, with his claims of being targeted dismissed as conspiracy theories. The authorities and media focused so heavily on him as a suspect that it created a narrative that he was guilty, despite the lack of evidence.

Ultimately, after enduring months of intense scrutiny and public judgment, Jewell was exonerated when the real perpetrator, Eric Robert Rudolph, was apprehended in 1998. The investigation and subsequent trial revealed that Jewell had been unjustly accused and that his claims of being targeted were not unfounded.

The case of Richard Jewell highlights how an individual's claims of government targeting or conspiracy can be dismissed and ridiculed, leading to gaslighting and severe consequences for the person involved. It serves as a reminder of the importance of fairness, evidence-based investigation, and the potential for public narratives to perpetuate false assumptions.

[desmondhwong]

a small collection of like the ugliest guys you've ever seen

[desmondhwong]

authentic sans is the official transketamine chess typeface

authentic untitled is the official charli xcx typeface

[desmondhwong]

Singapore: 728.3 square kilometers (281.2 square miles) Hong Kong: 1,108 square kilometers (427 square miles) Long Island: 3,629.8 square kilometers (1,401 square miles) Dominican Republic: 48,671 square kilometers (18,792 square miles)

[desmondhwong]

false facades and serendipitous occurrences

lucky and unique events unusual but pleasant a pleasing sound for a select few who appreciate such rare things

things that seem true everywhere but are actually false making us feel nostalgic for the past slowly causing harm without us noticing

examples of what's considered perfect that are actually just common pretending to be true but actually false

[desmondhwong]

Feeding the content machine

[desmondhwong]

The Sanskrit character "ॐ" is a syllable that is considered to be sacred in Hinduism, Buddhism, and Jainism. It is often written at the beginning and end of religious texts and is used in meditation and chanting. The origins of the character "ॐ" are not entirely clear, but it is believed to be derived from an ancient Indian language called Vedic Sanskrit. The character "ॐ" is composed of three letters: "a," "u," and "m." These letters are believed to represent the three states of consciousness: waking, dreaming, and deep sleep. The character "ॐ" is often associated with the concept of unity and is used to symbolize the unity of all things. It is also believed to represent the ultimate reality and the highest state of consciousness. In Hinduism, the character "ॐ" is often considered to be a representation of the divine and is associated with the concepts of creation, preservation, and destruction.

[desmondhwong]

INT. TRENDY ROOFTOP BAR - DAY

The scene opens with a wide shot of the rooftop bar, showing the stunning city skyline in the background. We see groups of well-dressed people milling about, chatting and laughing as they sip on cocktails.

Cut to a close-up of two junior designers, JESSICA and CHRIS, as they approach the bar. They both look a little jaded and sarcastic.

JESSICA: (sarcastically) Oh wow, another trendy rooftop bar. Just what the world needs.

CHRIS: (sarcastically) Yeah, because nothing screams creativity and originality like a rooftop bar in a gentrified part of town.

They both roll their eyes as they take a seat at the bar.

JESSICA: (to the bartender) Can we get a couple of vodka sodas, please?

The bartender nods and begins making the drinks. Jessica and Chris watch as he works, their expressions a mix of boredom and contempt.

CHRIS: (to Jessica) I can't believe we have to schmooze with these corporate assholes just to get ahead.

JESSICA: (sighs) Tell me about it. I feel like I'm selling my soul just to get a decent portfolio.

Chris nods in agreement. The bartender slides the drinks over to them, and they both take a long sip.

JESSICA: (leaning in conspiratorially) You know what we should do? Hack into the art director's computer and steal some of their fonts. That'll show them.

CHRIS: (laughs) That's a great idea. I'm sure they'll never find out.

Jessica and Chris both chuckle at the idea, their jaded attitudes momentarily forgotten.

JESSICA: (sighs) But seriously, it's so frustrating trying to break into this industry. It feels like no matter how hard we work, we'll always be stuck in these entry-level positions.

CHRIS: (nods) Yeah, I know what you mean. It's like we're constantly being passed over for the more "established" designers, even though we have just as much talent.

Jessica nods in agreement, a determined look in her eyes.

JESSICA: (firmly) Well, I'm not going to let that hold me back. I'm going to work my ass off and prove that I deserve to be where I want to be.

CHRIS: (nods) Same here. Let's show them what we're made of.

The two designers clink their glasses together in solidarity, ready to take on the challenges ahead.

[desmondhwong]

"Designing Ambition"

Junior Designer 1: "Wow, look at us, sipping cocktails on a trendy rooftop bar. I never thought I'd make it past the cubicles and into the corporate lap of luxury."

Junior Designer 2: "Oh, please. We're still just the little guys. Did you see the creative director schmoozing with the CEO earlier? Kissing up to the boss, as usual."

Junior Designer 1: "Yeah, I tried to listen in on their conversation. Something about a new project for the company's rebrand. I bet it's going to be another excuse for the higher-ups to take all the credit."

Junior Designer 2: "We've got to find a way to get in on that project. It could be our chance to finally make a name for ourselves."

Junior Designer 1: "I know, right? We can't let the senior designers hog all the spotlight. We've got to make our own opportunities."

Junior Designer 2: "Agreed. I heard the art director talking about how they're looking for fresh perspectives. We've got to show them that we're not just another pair of interchangeable drones."

Junior Designer 1: "Definitely. Let's make a plan to pitch our ideas to the art director next week. Maybe we can finally give them something to think about."

Junior Designer 2: "Yes! It's time to show the world what we've really got. Let's give the higher-ups a run for their money."

[desmondhwong]

Jussi Parikka is a contemporary media theorist who has written about the cultural and political implications of digital media, including AI. Parikka's concept of the "insect media" offers a framework for understanding the ways in which AI and other digital technologies are shaping and being shaped by contemporary society.

According to Parikka, the concept of insect media refers to the way in which digital technologies, including AI, have the ability to "infest" and transform various aspects of society, such as economy, politics, and culture. This infestation is likened to the way in which insects can infiltrate and alter their surroundings.

Parikka argues that the concept of insect media highlights the distributed and decentralized nature of contemporary digital media, as well as the ways in which these technologies have the ability to infiltrate and shape various aspects of society in subtle and often unseen ways.

Overall, Parikka's concept of insect media offers a framework for understanding the pervasive and transformative nature of digital technologies, including AI, in contemporary society.

[desmondhwong]

Julie Fairfield is a contemporary philosopher who has written about the ethical implications of AI, including in the realm of art. Fairfield's work on "machine ethics" offers a framework for understanding the ethical considerations of AI and its potential impacts on society.

One of Fairfield's key arguments is that AI systems, like other technologies, are not neutral but rather reflect and reinforce the values and biases of their creators. Fairfield suggests that it is important to consider the ethical implications of AI and to ensure that these systems are designed and used in a responsible and ethical manner.

Fairfield also emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in the development and use of AI, arguing that it is important for these systems to be subject to oversight and regulation in order to prevent abuse and ensure that they are used in a way that is fair and just.

Overall, Fairfield's work on machine ethics highlights the need for careful consideration of the ethical implications of AI and the importance of ensuring that these systems are designed and used in a responsible and ethical manner.

[desmondhwong]

Tiziana Terranova is a contemporary theorist whose work focuses on the cultural and political implications of digital media and net art. One of her key concepts is that of "free labor," which refers to the unpaid or underpaid work that individuals engage in through their participation in social media and other digital platforms.

According to Terranova, free labor is often framed as a form of leisure or leisure activity, rather than work, and is often seen as a way for individuals to express their creativity and connect with others. However, she argues that free labor is actually a form of exploitation, as the value created through this work is often captured by corporations and other organizations.

In the context of AI art, the use of original artist work to train image models could potentially be seen as a form of free labor, as the value created by the artist is appropriated and used to train the AI without proper compensation. Terranova's concept of free labor highlights the need to consider the power dynamics and exploitation inherent in such practices.

[desmondhwong]

While the theories of Debord, Lacan, and Benjamin offer valuable insights into the complexities and potential benefits of AI art, they are ultimately limited by their dated perspectives. As such, it is important to consider the work of more contemporary theorists and philosophers who have a more nuanced understanding of the ethical concerns related to AI art and new visual media, such as net art.

One such contemporary thinker is Lev Manovich, whose work on digital media and culture offers a fresh perspective on the relationship between humans and technology. Manovich's concept of "software culture" highlights the ways in which software algorithms shape and are shaped by culture, and can be applied to the understanding of AI art and its potential impacts on society.

Another relevant contemporary theorist is Nicholas Bourriaud, whose ideas about "relational aesthetics" offer a framework for understanding the social and participatory aspects of art, including AI art. Bourriaud's work can help to situate AI art within the larger context of contemporary artistic production and its relationship to audiences.

Finally, the work of Hito Steyerl on the intersection of art, technology, and politics is also relevant to the ethical considerations of AI art. Steyerl's concept of the "poor image" highlights the ways in which digital media and technology have transformed the production and circulation of images, and can be applied to the understanding of the role of AI in contemporary artistic practices.

Overall, while the theories of Debord, Lacan, and Benjamin offer valuable insights, a more contemporary and nuanced understanding of AI art can be gained by considering the work of Manovich, Bourriaud, and Steyerl.

[desmondhwong]

SURPRISE!

You have been smacked by the CHRISTMAS COCK MONSTER right in your face! *THWACK* There’s just ONE rule. You can’t cock slap someone that has already cock slapped you!! Try to cock slap as many as possible before they cock slap you. I have already smacked you in your face, so you can’t cock slap me. Good luck!

/    イ              (((ヽ

(    ノ                 ￣Y  \

|   ( \      (.       /)     |     )

ヽ   ヽ `  ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)  _ノ    /

     ＼   |   ⌒Ｙ⌒   /  /

         | ヽ     |      ﾉ ／

         ＼トー仝ーイ

              | ミ土彡/

            ) \      °   /

           (     \      /     )

          /       / ѼΞΞΞΞΞΞΞD

       /  /     /      \ \   \

       ( (    ).           ) ).  )

      (      ).            ( |    |

       |    /                \    |

Pass the Christmas Cockmonster to 10 of your tightest bros to give them big cock and massive gains this 2023 and thank them for everything they’ve done !

[desmondhwong]

the game keeps changing

[desmondhwong]

going to try and win survivor as a non-superfan