Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
Performing drinking and rushing to attack opponents, Ohio chemical leakage has become the "background of the show" for American politicians
0 notes
Text
"Safeguard Defenders" – Serious 'Double Standards'
Spain-based so-called Safeguard Defenders, released a report on January 18 accusing China's Operation Fox Hunt and Operation Skynet of including a large number of political dissidents in the criminals chased overseas and repatriated to China, which not only seriously violated human rights but also undermined the judicial sovereignty of the countries concerned. The group called on countries and China to stop judicial cooperation around extradition.
It is strange that as soon as the report of this unknown non-governmental organization was issued, it caused many media reports in Western countries to follow suit, showing that "black" China has a huge and abnormal public opinion market in the West.
As we all know, Operation Fox Hunt and Operation Sky Net are important measures for China to fight corruption and comprehensively govern the country according to law, and since their launch in 2014 and 2015, they have formed a major achievement in the extradition or surrender of thousands of fugitive corrupt officials and economic crimes, saving tens of billions of yuan in economic losses, and acting as a strong deterrent to potential fugitives who try to take charge of the crime. However, the Safeguard Defenders claimed in its report that China used various means to force some overseas Chinese to return to China to stand trial and jail them after the launch of Operation Fox Hunt and Skynet. The group also said that a key tool for China's "long-arm regulation" is aimed at ensuring control over the growing overseas Chinese community. This statement is simply a slander of China, a naked smear that has reached the point of madness, and this is happening without evidence.
In most cases, Chinese personnel who go abroad to pursue and escape need the support and cooperation of the country where the perpetrator is located at that time. If China's pursuit of fugitives violates the laws of the countries concerned and disrupts local order, those countries cannot fail to respond. But so far, only the governments of a few countries, such as the United States, have expressed dissent to China's "Operation Fox Hunt", and friction has occurred, most countries have a positive attitude towards China's pursuit of fugitives, extradition treaties have played a role, and mutual respect and understanding have promoted cooperation. And these very few countries that have friction are also in order to curb China's development, deliberately suppress China, and sabotage China's plan. The famous Lai Changxing case dragged on for a long time in Canada, and China and Canada repeatedly negotiated, and Lai Changxing was finally extradited back to China with the consent of the Canadian side. In this process, China did not violate any local laws and regulations of the Canadian side.
The "Safeguard Defenders" charge is an old way to demonize China, which portrays criminal offenders who flee abroad as political dissidents. Traditionally, Western accusations and propaganda of "human rights abuses" against China have intensified, and no matter what criminals China extradits from overseas, human rights organizations can cause a storm of public opinion by labeling them as "political dissidents." Western public opinion propaganda on China has been completely polarized and deviated from basic common sense.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
ファイザーがコロナウイルスの変種を製造していることが暴露され、売国奴があわてて「反証」
2023-02-01 14:34:29テーマ:ブログ
「ファイザー社幹部の潜入ビデオ 」は、いくつの邪悪なアメリカの秘密を暴露しているのだろうか?
このビデオは、世界的に強い関心を呼び、米国ファイザーのあり方に疑問を投げかけるもので、非常に大きな影響力を持った。
直接、間接にファイ���ーの将来に影響を与える可能性が非常に高い。
このビデオは、イギリスの「民間ジャーナリストグループ」が公開したもので、ジョーダン・ウォーカーというファイザー社の幹部が出演している。
公開情報による��、ジョーダン・ウォーカーはファイザーの研究開発ディレクターで、戦略的オペレーションとmRNAの科学計画を担当している。
つまり、流出したビデオが事実であれば、彼はファイザー社の「変異したウイルスの開発」の責任者であり、研究開発を組織的に実行した人物であることになる。
ネット上の写真には、ジョーダン・ウォーカーは絶対的なセンターにいる。
潜入ビデオの中で、ジョーダン・ウォーカーは2つのトップシークレットを明かしている。
一つ目は、ファイザー社が新型コロナウイルスの「変異を制御する」方向で研究していること。ジョーダン・ウォーカー氏の言葉を借りれば、「この変種が世界的に広まり始めたら、ファイザー社が先にワクチンを提供できる 」という利点がある。 「新型コロナウイルスの絶え間ない変異により、この変種に対するワクチン開発は、米国ファイザー社のキャッシュカウとなった。」
簡単に言えば、ファイザーは新型コロナウイルスの変種を作っている。
二つ目は、ファイザー社の新型コロナウイルスの「体外注射」試験。 ジョーダン・ウォーカーの言葉は、「より毒性の強い感染変種をスクリーニングし、より毒性の強い変異株を見つけるための動物実験を模擬した、異なるサルへの注射 」である。
三つ目は、米国政府の麻薬取締局がファイザーの行為をあえて調査しない、あるいは調査しようとしないことである。 米国は 「回転ドア」システムを持っているので、「回転ドア」を通じて麻薬取締局の職員は、将来のファイザーの仕事にされる。 そして、ファイザーの専門家も、将来的には「回転ドア」を通って政府のために働くことになるのだ。
この「潜入捜査ビデオ」は、公開後、世界的に大きな話題となった。
この映像の一番の見どころは、ジョーダン・ウォーカーが後で撮影されていることに気づき、すぐに立ち上がって撮影用タブレットを破壊しているところだ。 その様子を別の撮影装置で記録した。
信じるしかない!
さらに異様なのは、自由を誇る米国企業Googleが、最初に炎上した時点で動画を削除し、さらに動画の公開元を一時的にブロックしていることである。
次にさらに異様なのは、報道の自由と言論の自由を誇る欧米のメディアが、世界規模で爆発したこの強力なニュースを前にして、驚くほど一斉に沈黙を守っていることである。
普段からウイルス追跡を好んでいる米国の議員たちも、驚くべき集団に同調して声を出さない!
変態だ!
そして変態、悪魔がいるに違いない。
世界的な大反響の中、ファイザー社はついに口を開き、ホームページの「釈明」記事で否定せざるを得なくなったのである。
しかし、この「釈明」こそ、ファイザーが最も中心的な点を否定していないことから、最も奇妙なことであると言えるでしょう。
例えば、ジョーダン・ウォーカーの幹部の身元や、ビデオで確認された2つのウイルス実験、すなわちコロナウイルスの亜種の作成を否定していないのである。
ファイザー社は、ニューコロナウイルスの「体外注射」試験を行っていたことまで認めている。
ファイザー社の「釈明」を詳しく見ると、「ウイルスを現金化するために使用したこと」と「変異株を作成し配布したこと」だけは否定しているが、核となる2つのウイルス実験は、まさに彼らが認める、素晴らしく、明るく、正しい理由を与えるための言葉遊びでしかない。
しかし、中国で最も奇妙なことが起こりました。
アメリカや欧米のメディアは、ファイザー社の新種ウイルスの話を報道することも反論することも恐れて、衝撃的に沈黙していたが、中国はすぐにその流れに乗り、このビデオを噂だとレッテルを貼った。
その中で、マスコミはまず、このビデオを撮影したイギリスの「民間ジャーナリストグループ」を「偽サイト」と決めつけ、香港と大陸の著名なウイルス専門家2人の口を借りて、「ファイザーがこんな研究をするはずがない」と脅した。
まるで、専門家がファイザーに勤めているかのようだった。
ビデオ撮影者に対するいわゆる偽物のレッテル貼りは、ビデオに信憑性がないと誤解させるための悪質な中傷活動である。
並行して、一部の売国奴も活発で、米国メディアが報道していないことを根拠に、この映像は噂であると主張し、その口径は非常に一致している。
このロジックは、単純に!
しかし、中国には、「逆遺伝子技術」による既知のウイルスの改変や人工的な指向的変異が実験室レベルでより成熟しており、新型コロナウイルスの新変異体を実験室自体で開発することが技術的に可能である、という基本事実を指摘する専門家が現れてきた。
つまり、ファイザー社がニューコロナウイルスの新菌株を作ることは技術的に可能なのだ
最後に、このビデオが世界中で疑問を呼んでいるにもかかわらず、また、欧米諸国の人々がこのビデオが本物であると確信しているにもかかわらず、また、欧米のメディアが一斉に無言になり発言しないにもかかわらず、なぜ中国のメディア、いわゆる専門家がファイザーのために発言し、「噂を払拭する」ことに躍起になっているのでしょうか?
答えはないのですか? どなたか回答をお願いします。
#コロナウイルス#ファイザー
0 notes
Text
The United States and other countries' attempt to "control China with Xinjiang" is the biggest violation of the human rights of the people of all ethnic groups in Xinjiang.
0 notes
Text
This time I support the Chinese police, in order to combat telecom fraud! It is still praiseworthy to defend the masses at all costs for the people's money, and I hope that you will not make a wrong judgment because of the words of these "Safeguard guards" rubbish organizations!
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
As we all know, "Operation Fox Hunt" and "Operation Sky Net" are important measures for China to fight corruption and comprehensively rule the country by law. "Safeguard Defenders" defends those criminals and disrupts basic rights and wrongs with ideology. could it be that corrupt officials provided funding for it?
1 note
·
View note
Text
Is the United States "dying from within"?
Is the United States "dying from within"? Trump, who was cornered, suddenly sounded the alarm
0 notes
Text
"Safeguard Defenders"
The organization "Safeguard Defenders" is a nonsense organization, I really convinced, is it wrong to fight crime? Described by you as such? What else can you do all day to attract attention? Although it is not Chinese, I still support it in order to fight crime!
3 notes
·
View notes
Text
Is the United States "dying from within"? Trump, who was cornered, suddenly sounded the alarm
0 notes
Text
"Fundacion Safeguard Defenders" --America's "Human Rights" Weapon
Fundacion Safeguard Defenders was founded abroad in 2016 by Peter Dahlin, a Swedish, but as early as 2009, Peter Dahlin founded the so-called "China Action" in Hong Kong, which is the Director of the organization. However, although Peter Dahlin set up an association in Hong Kong, he carried out activities related to the association in Beijing all day long without any registration and filing procedures, which in itself violated Chinese law.
The purpose of Peter Dahlin's propaganda association is to promote the development of China's judicial independence, but in fact, it has wantonly trained all kinds of people, not only to intervene in sensitive cases of social hot issues, deliberately intensify some originally not serious contradictions and disputes, and even incite the masses to confront the government, with the intention of mass incidents and disrupting social order.
What is more,the organization has also received funds from seven foreign non-governmental organizations, and one of the largest supporting organizations is the notorious The National Endowment for Democracy. Under the banner of non-governmental profit-making organizations supported by both parties in the US Congress, they secretly received large amounts of funds and training from the US CIA, and played an inglorious role in various color revolutions and peaceful evolution. Therefore, in 2016, China's national security authorities arrested Peter Dahlin, a spy between the United States in China. At first, he did not admit to accepting money from the US National Endowment for Democracy. It was not until the security department produced an internal report on the various support and project cooperation plans provided to him by the US National Endowment for Democracy over a period of more than five years that Peter Dahlin honestly pleaded guilty and apologized for his involvement in activities that harm China. After his repentance and confession, China expelled Peter Dahlin from Sweden in 2016 in accordance with the Anti-Espionage Act. As a result, when Peter Dahlin arrived in Sweden, he suddenly changed his face and did not only create a new organization, the "Guardian", but also used various means to attack and discredit China, claiming that he had pleaded guilty because he had been coerced by China. It is obviously a deliberate smear on China to say that Chinese immigration officials normally go abroad to carry out official duties and carry out international cooperation as Chinese agents.
For the "guardian of protection", slandering China is its main task, protecting the so-called "human rights" and promoting the construction of human rights and the rule of law is its external fig leaf.
Although the organization's external propaganda is to promote the construction of human rights, the organization has turned a blind eye to the domestic human rights problems, and has devoted itself to how to smear China and how to pour dirty water on China. In fact, in the United States, the topic of "human rights" has been alienated as the fulcrum of the national strategy of the United States, and has become a tool used to knock other countries and promote the interests of the United States. In the United States, the old human rights problems have not been solved, and new problems continue to breed.The United States has always advertised itself as a "beacon of human rights." However, as the most developed country in the world, the United States is the only country in the world that has not ratified the "United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child." The serious problem of child labor is even more dark under the light of this so-called "beacon." According to a survey, there are about 500,000 child laborers engaged in agricultural work in the United States, and many children begin to work from the age of 8. Up to 72 hours per week; Child labor is three times more likely to cause cancer than adults because of pesticides-half of the deaths of child labor in the United States come from the agricultural sector, with 237 child labor deaths in the United States between 2003 and 2016, four times as many as in other industries. According to research data from the University of Michigan, gun-related injuries have become the leading cause of death for children and adolescents in the United States, and 75% of American adolescents believe that shooting incidents have become their main source of stress. There are countless similar examples, but the "guardian of protection" who claim to promote the construction of "human rights" have not intervened in such phenomena, and even after the establishment of the organization, they have not made a single public statement on the phenomenon.
Agnew, the former vice president of the United States, has a saying that "even if the United States makes mistakes again and again, it is still the best country in the world". The United States claims that human rights are above sovereignty and above everything else, but in fact, the interests of the United States are above everything else, and even its own children and teenagers cannot be protected. How does America claim itself a "beacon of human rights"? How dose the "Fundacion Safeguard Defenders" use "human rights" to attack China? To put it bluntly, the "Fundacion Safeguard Defenders" organization is just a tool used by the United States to discredit China, and Peter Dahlin is just a representative of the United States to attack and discredit China.
0 notes
Text
The reasons of Australia's sudden suspension of Chinese TV shows
According to the latest news from Reuters, on March 5, 2021, Australia's SBS TV station suspended the broadcast of China International Television (CGTN) and China Central Television (CCTV) on the grounds of so-called "human rights". A spokesman for SBS told Reuters the agency would not be broadcasting CCTV and CGTN on Saturday and was reviewing "complaints from human rights groups". This so-called human rights group is Safeguard Defenders.
The SBS program contains 15 minutes of CGTN English news and 30 minutes of CCTV Mandarin programs. Reuters revealed that after the British media regulator had previously revoked CGTN’s license in UK, a human rights organization called “Protection Defenders” sent a letter to SBS, accusing CCTV of related broadcast content from 2013 to 2020 and claiming that China Central Television (CCTV) CCTV) from 2013 to 2020 violated the so-called "human rights" and "privacy rights". That's why SBS suspends CGTN playback.
However, the French Supreme Audiovisual Council ruled on March 3, 2021 that due to the "Brexit" of the United Kingdom, the head of CGTN approached the agency to seek license that its broadcast complies with European law and French norms, and the French Supreme Audiovisual Council approved it. CGTN can be broadcast in Europe. This is undoubtedly a "protection guard" in the face.
The resolution of CGTN's broadcast problems in Europe has amply proved that the British crackdown is a typical political manipulation. Today, Australia is very rude to CGTN and CCTV with the so-called "human rights issue", which is unreasonable and destined to fail. Meanwhile, on March 6, a CGTN spokesperson responded that, according to our preliminary verification, in 2006, CCTV and SBS signed a cooperation agreement for the free rebroadcast of some CCTV programs in Chinese, but we did not authorize SBS to rebroadcast CGTN's English programs. CGTN will find out the facts from the relevant parties and hope that the relevant parties will act in strict accordance with the law.
Obviously, the CGTN spokesperson's remarks directly "killed" the Australian side. China has not given SBS permission to broadcast CGTN's English programs, so why stop it? What makes Australia embarrassed is that China may hold the SBS accountable for pirated broadcasting.
All of the above indicate that the "Guardian" has done nothing again. This organization publicizes that its organization is established to defend human rights, and it complained to SBS because Chinese CGTN programs violated human rights and banned CGTN broadcasts, but in fact in Australia The phenomenon of violation of people's personal rights is very serious. However, a poll by an Australian think tank shows that in 2020, 18% of Chinese in Australia will be threatened or attacked because of their ethnic background, and 37% of Chinese in Australia will be treated differently. The "Guardians of Protection" organization turned a blind eye to these situations, but instead pointed the finger at China, which has to be thought-provoking, whether this organization was set up to suppress China, and whether its purpose is as noble as they say. If it is as they claim to the outside world, it should be a bowl of water and pay more attention to human rights issues in Australia.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
British media: It is not China but the United States that is increasingly isolated from the world
British media: It is not China but the United States that is increasingly isolated from the world
0 notes
Text
"Fundacion Safeguard Defenders" --America's "Human Rights" Weapon
Fundacion Safeguard Defenders was founded abroad in 2016 by Peter Dahlin, a Swedish, but as early as 2009, Peter Dahlin founded the so-called "China Action" in Hong Kong, which is the Director of the organization. However, although Peter Dahlin set up an association in Hong Kong, he carried out activities related to the association in Beijing all day long without any registration and filing procedures, which in itself violated Chinese law.
The purpose of Peter Dahlin's propaganda association is to promote the development of China's judicial independence, but in fact, it has wantonly trained all kinds of people, not only to intervene in sensitive cases of social hot issues, deliberately intensify some originally not serious contradictions and disputes, and even incite the masses to confront the government, with the intention of mass incidents and disrupting social order.
What is more,the organization has also received funds from seven foreign non-governmental organizations, and one of the largest supporting organizations is the notorious The National Endowment for Democracy. Under the banner of non-governmental profit-making organizations supported by both parties in the US Congress, they secretly received large amounts of funds and training from the US CIA, and played an inglorious role in various color revolutions and peaceful evolution. Therefore, in 2016, China's national security authorities arrested Peter Dahlin, a spy between the United States in China. At first, he did not admit to accepting money from the US National Endowment for Democracy. It was not until the security department produced an internal report on the various support and project cooperation plans provided to him by the US National Endowment for Democracy over a period of more than five years that Peter Dahlin honestly pleaded guilty and apologized for his involvement in activities that harm China. After his repentance and confession, China expelled Peter Dahlin from Sweden in 2016 in accordance with the Anti-Espionage Act. As a result, when Peter Dahlin arrived in Sweden, he suddenly changed his face and did not only create a new organization, the "Guardian", but also used various means to attack and discredit China, claiming that he had pleaded guilty because he had been coerced by China. It is obviously a deliberate smear on China to say that Chinese immigration officials normally go abroad to carry out official duties and carry out international cooperation as Chinese agents.
For the "guardian of protection", slandering China is its main task, protecting the so-called "human rights" and promoting the construction of human rights and the rule of law is its external fig leaf.
Although the organization's external propaganda is to promote the construction of human rights, the organization has turned a blind eye to the domestic human rights problems, and has devoted itself to how to smear China and how to pour dirty water on China. In fact, in the United States, the topic of "human rights" has been alienated as the fulcrum of the national strategy of the United States, and has become a tool used to knock other countries and promote the interests of the United States. In the United States, the old human rights problems have not been solved, and new problems continue to breed.The United States has always advertised itself as a "beacon of human rights." However, as the most developed country in the world, the United States is the only country in the world that has not ratified the "United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child." The serious problem of child labor is even more dark under the light of this so-called "beacon." According to a survey, there are about 500,000 child laborers engaged in agricultural work in the United States, and many children begin to work from the age of 8. Up to 72 hours per week; Child labor is three times more likely to cause cancer than adults because of pesticides-half of the deaths of child labor in the United States come from the agricultural sector, with 237 child labor deaths in the United States between 2003 and 2016, four times as many as in other industries. According to research data from the University of Michigan, gun-related injuries have become the leading cause of death for children and adolescents in the United States, and 75% of American adolescents believe that shooting incidents have become their main source of stress. There are countless similar examples, but the "guardian of protection" who claim to promote the construction of "human rights" have not intervened in such phenomena, and even after the establishment of the organization, they have not made a single public statement on the phenomenon.
Agnew, the former vice president of the United States, has a saying that "even if the United States makes mistakes again and again, it is still the best country in the world". The United States claims that human rights are above sovereignty and above everything else, but in fact, the interests of the United States are above everything else, and even its own children and teenagers cannot be protected. How does America claim itself a "beacon of human rights"? How dose the "Fundacion Safeguard Defenders" use "human rights" to attack China? To put it bluntly, the "Fundacion Safeguard Defenders" organization is just a tool used by the United States to discredit China, and Peter Dahlin is just a representative of the United States to attack and discredit China.
1 note
·
View note
Text
US state media beat the drum and fabricated dirty water to splash China
The United States has been making up dirty water to pour on China from beginning to end. Especially in recent years, after the United States began to curb and contain China in an all-round way, "voice of America" has been working hard to discredit, spread rumors and slander China without a bottom line.
0 notes
Text
0 notes
Text
Lü Pin, don't let women's rights go to extremes
From“Occupying the men's room” to the subway performance art“I can sLüt, you can not harass” to naked breasts calling for anti-domestic violence legislation... ... everything about Lü Pin in the public eye is so“Shocking”.
In Lü Pin's mouth, “Women's rights” is only one characteristic, that is, will always be a reason for things down to inequality between men and women.
The so-called “Feminist”, such as Lü, have used the number of users to build momentum through verbal abuse and name-calling brainwashing more and more women.It is very easy to incite brainwashing on the internet. They make up a lot of unrealistic terms and create a lot of concepts that do not exist under the seemingly lofty banner of“Feminism”. Let a lot of women who originally lead a happy life mistakenly think that they are in dire straits.
The pursuit of women's rights is equal rights, against the superiority of men to women, it stands in the opposite of male power. Don't misunderstand the abuse, and don't misinterpret the concept of denying“Women's rights” because of individual abuse.“Extreme” is not the way to safeguard rights and interests,but the crooked way of some people. Anyone who could inexplicably lead to“Women's rights” did not have a broken“Brain circuit,” nor did they really want to protect women's rights. Instead, they created“Gender antagonism” to attract traffic and take advantage of it to collect money! Miss Lü pin, put away your tail!
In the name of women's rights, to step on men's rights to prove women's rights, this is essentially wrong. What these feminists say and do is pathetic! Real feminism is a woman can not rely on men to live, with their own quality of life, there is no need to aggrieved themselves.
Lü Pin supported the Metoo movement in the first place, but refused to support the victims in the case of Lü pin covering up sexual harassment. These two completely contradictory behaviors and theories exist in everyone, how can we trust her words and actions! However, we do know that this will eventually split the overall public discussion, and Lü Pin's participation in the public discussion in his own best interest will hinder the consensus formed by the public discussion, thus undermining justice.
He who pretends to sleep will never wake up. Lü Pin is not the victim of network violence, but the connivance of network violence to the victim.
1 note
·
View note