Text
watching the sun rise
749 notes
·
View notes
Text
i’m possibly about to make something so amazing and so niche. stay tuned
24 notes
·
View notes
Text
"I knew her before you, loved her before you. But I wasn't as lucky as you."
Notorious (1946) dir. Alfred Hitchcock
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
OK so I don't usually bring personal stuff to this blog but I am being hunted for sport by my book club for the way I read my books and I just want to check how badly I have misjudged what is "normal" in this situation lol
So far I have been called "unhinged", "profoundly disturbed" and a number of variations thereupon for my habit of just... closing the book. Which I guess isn't what everyone else is doing. Apparently.
Also please, if you have very strong feelings about this, yell to your heart's content - I can direct you to an entire book club of people who will yell right along with you 😅
5K notes
·
View notes
Photo
Bonfire in Snow - John Sloan , 1918
American,1871-1951
oil on canvas 61 x 48.9 cm.
287 notes
·
View notes
Text
Can the new Goncharov be the Pre-Code film I just made up in my head? William Powell and Ronald Colman star as a detective and jewel thief except it becomes increasingly unclear which of them is which. Kay Francis is also there and has a big identity reveal at the end. Is she the actual thief? Is she the actual detective? You have to watch to find out! Also, they're all in love with each other.
#oh and lubitsch directs. of course#kay francis deserves TWO boyfriends#sorry ive been getting into bill powell's films and now im desperately wishing he and ronnie did a film together#i mean they did two silemts together but they barely interact#i need them to have some crazy suave dialogue#ronald colman#william powell#kay francis#fuck off me
0 notes
Text
Ravenous (1999) dir. Antonia Bird
Ives & Boyd + looking at each other
494 notes
·
View notes
Text
The General Electric Theater radio adaptation of Random Harvest is insane??? It's post-WWII instead of post-WWI yet they don't actually explain how that caused his amnesia because after Smithy's second bonk on the head (which is what it starts with) he thinks he should be in London instead of fighting, there are some other bizarre plot changes, Charles actually says the title, Paula (played by Benita Hume Colman) is Cynthia Hanson instead of Margaret and it's Melbury instead of Melbridge, there's no child and no Kitty... what was going on here????
#i know its only half an hour and i kinda vibe with switching the first half and the second half around but some of these are so weird!!!!!#still almost cried when he said 'paula' in that very specific way at the end... couldnt though because im on the bus#random harvest#fuck off me
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
Last Light - Rebecca Denton
British , b. 1980s -
Etching , lithographic inks , 50 x 50 cm. Ed. 40.
496 notes
·
View notes
Photo
I love this terrible movie for reasons beyond my control. Those reasons are Ginger Rogers and Ronald Colman.
Lucky Partners 1940
39 notes
·
View notes
Text
Hate it when the remake is the most famous and well-regarded but the original film is also very well-regarded like okay which do I watch
#ive been planning to watch gaslight 1944 for a long time but then i found out about the 1940 film some weeks (months?) ago and now idk!!!!#and like the same with ben-hur. i ended up watching the 1925 film a few days ago and ill watch the 1959 later but was that the right order?#i made a poll to decide between make way for tomorrow or tokyo story first but like no one voted :/#fuck off me
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
THE TERROR — 1.02 "Gore"
347 notes
·
View notes
Note
Who is the biggest hater in history?
Me when I'm in a mood
22K notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm so charmed by this Victorian etiquette book's stance on crossdressing (The Illustrated Book of Manners: A Manual of Good Behavior and Polite Accomplishments, 1866) and distaste for laws that regulate what people wear. If the amount of happiness, immediate or ultimate, is increased by any costume, it is right to wear it!!!
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
crime and punishment is such a funny book because on one hand porfiry is playing six dimensional chess, psychologically torturing, viciously gaslighting raskolnikov into confessing the crime by making himself inescapable and raskolnikov’s heart is beating out of his chest as he’s like he’s too smart for me, he knows everything, how can I possibly outsmart this madman. but then also porifry will ask questions like “do you think some people are allowed to kill others and that you are one of those people” and raskolnikov will just be like “yeah”
141 notes
·
View notes
Text
Antonio Basoli - Night scene with architectures, 1810.
553 notes
·
View notes