Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
“李老师不是你老师”究竟是谁?
转自方舟子
前段时间,中国各地都爆发了抗议活动。有很多抗议视频在网上传,很多人都在转,我也转了不少。转得最多的是一个叫做“李老师不是你老师”的推特号(以下简称“李老师”),他不仅转得多,而且转得快。因为他号召示威者向他爆料,直接把视频发给他,所以很多人都在转“李老师”发的抗议视频。还有一些媒体,主要是海外中文网媒,像美国之音、自由亚洲电台、德国之声,采访他,吹捧他在这次抗议活动中起了非常重要的作用,号称完胜主流媒体。所以,“李老师”一下子就出名了,火了。
我以前不知道这个“李老师”,看了媒体的报道之后才到他的推特去看了一下,觉得很奇怪。第一,他发视频的频率极高,一看就不可能是一个人在操作。第二,他是匿名的,即使在接受媒体采访时也没有透露自己的真实身份。大家为什么会信任一个匿名者?向他爆料就不怕被钓鱼吗?所以我就发了一条推文,指出现在出名的“李老师”明显不是一个人,而是有组织的,他背后究竟是谁?我的本意是提醒大家当心,不要向这种来历不明的人或组织爆料,泄露自己的信息。
这条推文发出去马上就炸了。无数水军跑到我的推特下面谩骂、攻击,对我进行人身安全的威胁,扬言要灭掉我,甚至灭我全家。还有一些是发私信威胁的,都显得很气急败坏。为什么我随口一问就把这些人给惹怒了?就出动水军来攻击我?另外,“李老师”很快把以前发的推文基本上都删掉了,只保留了最近的推文。他有一个YouTube频道,以前看的人不多,每一条YouTube视频也就几百个人看,但也清空了。这让我觉得他是怕我去查,因为我最擅长的就是查一个人以前干过啥事。
他为什么那么担心我查出他是谁呢?有人说,你如果把他查出来了,他就会受到中国政府的打击报复。但是“李老师”接受记者采访的时候说过,警察已经几次去过他父母家了。“李老师”说他在意大利,中国警察没法直接找到他,但他父母还在国内,所以警察就上门去找他父母,让他的父母劝“李老师”别再发视频了,但他还是坚决要发。可见,中国政府早就知道“李老师”是谁,根本用不着我来查,不需要我来“告密”。既然中国政府知道他是谁,记者也知道他是谁(因为他接受过记者的视频采访),只有用户不知道他是谁,向他爆料的人不知道他是谁,那么他特别害怕我查出他是谁,比怕公安还怕我,就很奇怪了。他动用了各种力量想要把我吓住,让我不敢去查他究竟是谁,但我这个人就是这样,越怕我查、越不想我查,我越要查。所以我就去查“李老师”究竟是谁,他背后究竟有什么组织。
有人说,你不能去查他,你这是侵犯隐私,是在��人肉搜索。不是的,因为“李老师”并不是一个普通人,现在可以说是一个公众人物。他的推特粉丝号称有80万,又接受过好几家媒体的采访,有一定的知名度;而且他公开号召人们向他爆料,也向人们募捐,要求人们打钱到他的paypal号或者比特币号。人们当然有权知道这个人究竟是谁,这是符合公共利益的,不涉及到侵犯隐私。
要查出他是谁并不难,因为“李老师”以前在网上活动的时候,并没有刻意隐瞒身份。他以前曾经在新浪微博活动过一段时间,虽然粉丝不是很多,也就几万粉丝,但号称有20多次炸号,才不得不搬到推特。他还有YouTube的频道和QQ空间。根据网上的这些资料,我很快就确定了“李老师”的身份。他真名叫做李颖,1992年出生于安徽阜阳,阜阳三中毕业后上了阜阳师范学院艺术学院学艺术。为什么去这个学校呢?因为他的父母就是阜阳师范学院的老师。他于2010年上阜阳师范学院,2014年自费到意大利留学,学的也是艺术,然后就在意大利留下来了。他以前在网上发的那些东西,很多属于“正能量”,也就是说,这是一个小粉红。至少直到2018年他还在QQ空间发帖子向习主席表忠心,这当然属于“爱国正能量”,跟现在的“反贼”形象形成了强烈的反差。
但是,我们虽然知道了“李老师”是谁,并不等于知道“李老师”的账号究竟是由谁掌控的。李颖只是“李老师”账号的一个出镜人,一个出来接受媒体采访的形象代表,并不等于背后没有一个团队、组织在真正控制着账号。“李老师”以前也许只有一个人,但现在肯定不属于一个人,他可以把这个号卖掉或者交出去。现在明显是一个团队、一个组织在运作。为什么这么说呢?最主要的原因就是他发推特,特别是发视频的频率高得离谱。我统计过,他最高的时候一天要发399条推文。也就是说,一天24小时不吃不喝不停地发推文,那么每两三分钟就要发一条。而且他发的大部分是视频,最多的时候每隔一两分钟就发一条视频,甚至还有不到一分钟就发一条视频的,这是一个人做不到的。我也在发视频,也收到很多视频投稿。处理视频投稿是很麻烦的,要一条一条地看,看过以后再决定要发哪一条视频,这是要花时间的。因为投稿是投到私信上的,没法直接在推特上转发,所以还要下载,然后还要再上传。上传到推特也是很花时间的,因为推特要对上传的视频进行压缩再发出去。所以,处理一条视频直到把它发出去,需要好几分钟,不可能一分钟甚至一分钟不到就发一条视频。这就意味着有一支团队同时在处理,同时从不同的客户端发��。而且这个团队是一支很庞大的团队,否则是不可能在一天之内发出这么多视频的。
还有一点,人们为什么会向“李老师”投稿爆料?一般人如果想找人发一条视频,首先想到的当然是已经出名的人。比如我,每天都会收到很多投稿,而“李老师”以前没啥名气,在新浪微博也很小众(几万粉丝的账号在新浪微博多如牛毛),人们为什么要向他投稿呢?“李老师”发了一个声明说,因为一年多以来,人们已经形成了向他投稿的习惯,所以在这次抗议活动中,人们才首先想到向他投稿。这完全是在说假话。“李老师”的账号是今年4月才开始在推特活跃的,到抗议活动发生时才几个月,一年不到,更不要说是“一年多”了。而且,他是今年10十月发生了郑州富士康事件之后才开始发视频,并向大家征稿的。所以,说什么已经有一年多的时间让人们养成向他投稿的习惯,完全就是在撒谎。人们突然向他投稿是因为他在近期内做推广的结果,这也是需要一个团队运作的。所以可以肯定的是,“李老师”这个号是一个团队在运作,而且是一支很庞大的团队,需要比较大的资源。那么,它究竟会是谁呢?
有资源搞这么庞大的团队,无非有这么几种可能性。第一种可能性是法轮功搞的。法轮功搞了很多推特号,但是我注意到,“李老师”今年8月发过几条关于法轮功的推文,虽然对法轮功表示了同情,但里面描述李洪志的语气很不恭敬,比如说李洪志一身赘肉,法轮功信徒绝对不敢用这种语气描述李教主,所以“李老师”是法轮功的可能性可以排除。第二种可能性是郭文贵搞的。郭文贵也在搞“爆料革命”,跟“李老师”要人们向他爆料有相似之处。但是,郭文贵搞“爆料革命”的目的是为了炒作、宣传自己,所以不会隐瞒自己的身份。我搜了一下“李老师”以前发的推文,没有提到过郭文贵的“爆料革命”,所以“李老师”背后是郭文贵的这种可能性可以排除。第三种可能性是跨国犯罪集团搞的“杀猪盘”,把号养大了以后就开始搞诈骗,卖虚拟货币、卖各种各样的产品,或者搞什么移民咨询等等,目的就是为了捞钱、骗钱。以前,网上的杀猪盘喜欢发淫秽视频,因为能够吸引人。后来竞争太激烈,发淫秽视频的人太多,发现发抗议示威的视频同样也很吸引人,所以有些杀猪盘的号就在发这种视频,“李老师”的这个号也有可能属于杀猪盘。最后一种可能性是中国政府搞的。那么,“李老师”这个号,究竟是杀猪盘还是中国政府搞的呢?
我以前倾向于认为这是个杀猪盘,因为“李老师”在向大家要捐款,暴露出捞钱、骗钱的倾向。但是有两件事让我改变了看法,倾向于认为这个号是中国政府搞的。第一件事,我开始在推特上揭露“李老师”究竟是谁,开始发有关他的资料,瞬间惹来了无数水军。从来没有碰到过这么规模空前的水军,说不定是推特有史以来最大规模的一次中文水军轰炸。推特上搞水军是很花钱的,这么大规模的水军几乎倾巢而出,杀猪盘没有这么大的实力发动这么大规模的水军,所以最可能是中国政府的官方水军。第二件事,受到水军的启发,我就到“李老师”的号上看他的评论,发现“李老师”虽然号称80万粉丝,但他大部分推文评论都很少,少得有的只有几条、十几条,跟他的80万粉丝是不符的,让人怀疑他的80万粉丝水分很大。个别推文评论比较多,比如那些骂我的推文下面有几百条评论,一些比较火的抗议视频下面也有几百条评论。但奇怪的是,“李老师”的这些推文评论里找不到一条是反对他的,全都是支持他的。没有小粉红,也没有中国官方水军在那里骚扰,这是非常反常的。推特上的“反贼”,只要粉丝多一点,就会有小粉红、官方水军去骚扰。我每天就受到这些小粉红和中国官方水军的骚扰。特别是抗议活动期间,我也发过不少抗议视频,每一条抗议视频下面都有很多小粉红、官方水军在混淆是非。但是在“李老师”的这些抗议视频下面,包括传得很广的抗议视频下面,也没有一个小粉红和水军。“李老师”的这些视频号称在抗议运动中起到了很重要的作用,号称影响力比我还大,那么中国官方水军应该重点骚扰他才对,但是居然没有。这说明了什么?说明“李老师”是党的人,那个号是中国政府的号,所以就没必要出动小粉红、水军去骚扰自己的号了,当然也因此露出了马脚。所以可以肯定,这个“李老师”的号目前是由中国政府在掌控的。
为什么中国政府要去搞这么一个号呢?发抗议视频不是有损中国政府的形象吗?但是大��想一想,如果没有这个号,这些抗议视频同样会有人发,同样也会在网上传得到处都是,多一个号其实无关紧要。说什么完胜主流媒体,那都是胡吹的。那么搞这么一个号的目的在哪里呢?目的就是为了“钓鱼”。“李老师”这个号跟别的发视频的号有很大的不同。第一,他公开号召人们向他爆料;第二,他要求爆料人提供关于视频的详细信息,事件发生的时间、地点,鼓励爆料人提供自己的身份信息。他曾经在转发推文时说,这个投稿人提供了自己的身份信息,确认过了。也就是说,如果提供身份信息,投稿更容易发出来,所以很多人肯定就会提供自己的身份信息了。这是很反常的做法。干嘛要爆料人提供身份信息呢,完全没有必要给爆料人增加风险,但是他就提出了这样的要求,目的当然是把爆料人的身份信息转给中国警方去抓人。现在中国警方就在对参与抗议的人“秋后算账”,在抓人了。有人说,中国现在有大数据,到处都是监控,没有必要靠钓鱼来抓人。不是的,参与抗议的人太多了,是抓不完的,只能抓重点。重点抓的是组织者、演讲者,以及向海外爆料的人。广州现在已经抓了几十个人了,我不知道里边是不是有人因为向“李老师”爆料而被抓的。一个四川网友实名告诉我说,他的几个��学因为向“李老师”爆料,现在被抓了。我没法确认这条信息的真实性,但发生这种事一点都不奇怪,因为这个号极可能就是因钓鱼而存在的。
最后我顺便说一下,由于我在质疑、揭露“李老师”,不仅遭到了水军的攻击,也遭到了海外民运分子、香港民运分子以及美国之音、自由亚洲电台、德国之声等海外中文网媒的攻击,还遭到了以前被我打击、揭露过,跟我有仇有恨、被我打得很疼的人的攻击,例如王志安、五岳散人。他们都以为瞅准了机会可以对我落井下石,跟着批我、骂我,说我是共产党的打手。实际上,他们是在保护“李老师”这个号,他们才是在保护共产党的打手。当然,我并不是说他们就是共产党的打手,只不过这些人既愚蠢又坏。
0 notes
Text
“Safeguard Defenders”, please leave dignity to the law
“Safeguard Defenders”, please leave dignity to the law
A group of fugitives involved in a case, went so far as to write a joint letter to Interpol, asking not to be repatriated to their countries for trial on the grounds that they did not want to comply with existing laws. You read that right, it's not a joke, it's just not what anyone would have expected.
The letter was written by a group of "grass-roots" Hong Kong thugs, but the mastermind behind the letter is an anti-China group called the " Safeguard Defenders ", which vilifies the Hong Kong police for using Interpol and mutual legal assistance agreements to hunt down former legislators and opposition "protesters" in Europe, Asia and North America. Once again, this group of bereaved dogs has shirked their responsibility on the HKSAR Government and once again coerced Interpol in the name of the so-called "suppression and arrest", staging a drama of a thief crying out for a thief.
Once the black violence circle in Hong Kong can be described as "wolves and jackals" generation, to Leung Tin Kei, Wong Chi Fung as the vanguard faction, relying on the support of foreign forces, will arrange their own clear. Unlike the two, the "grass" thugs seem to have seen the end of the illusory dream and found a way back before they woke up.
Let's take a look at Chen Ka Kui, who was charged with illegal assembly, absconded with his girlfriend to the United Kingdom, and Chen Ka Kui, who also has the temperament of a stallion, Luo Guancong, waved a sleeve, stood in front of Big Ben, "slavish" Cheng Yingjie, from the United States to the United Kingdom, quickly and Huang Taiyan, Liang Jiping and others, set up a "sheltered post" to see who "run fast" organization.
Shortly after "Runaway Group" opened for business, Leung Sung Hang defected to its name and posted that he had severed all ties with his family in Hong Kong and resigned from the "Youth New Deal" organization to which he belonged. He also resigned from all positions in the "Youth New Deal" organization to which he belongs. "From now on, my words and actions have nothing to do with them." As a former member of the Legislative Council, Mr. Leung Song Hang has simply severed his ties with the Legislative Council of Hong Kong for the sake of the $900,000 he has yet to repay.
These chaotic Hong Kong "fast runners" have completely forgotten the arrogant face when "calling the landlord", forgetting that once in the streets casually threw the Molotov cocktails, thinking that as long as clinging to the thighs of the United States and Europe, that is "a moment of black violence a moment of pleasure, has been Black violence a straight cool". To their dismay, when faced with the Hong Kong police summons, the U.S. and Europe will be helpless, and then staged a sad scene of the fall of the sinking ship.
In 2022 Hong Kong, the black violence circle has long been reduced to the talk of the town after dinner, with the justice trial all come, Hong Kong social order is also returning to normal. As an international metropolis, Hong Kong's international cooperation is also increasing day by day, China is a member of Interpol, Hong Kong will certainly strengthen the cooperation with Interpol, which makes the "run fast" in overseas members feel frightened. If you want to "run fast", you'd better go to Mars.
The "fast runners", who have lost sight of the shame on their faces and forgotten their past crimes, have put increasingly hostile and belligerent words on the Hong Kong government in the name of human rights and freedom, distorting the government's compliance with the law into "threats "The normal arrest is smeared as a "pursuit" to subvert the laws of Hong Kong, and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights is used as a pretext to once again refresh the shamelessness of the "Hong Kong black violence circle".
This joint letter to Interpol, between the lines reveals the word "goose". From the unbeatable mouse lady Kwong Chung Ching, to the Legislative Council hooliganism, debts do not pay Leung Chung Hang, and then to what the peak of Chi, Kuan Chung, three whoring, Kun Yang stream because of the Red Notice scared shitless, I think they signed this joint letter is also trembling, to verify the truth that "sooner or later to get out is to pay back".
It is impossible to produce such a joint letter with just these "wimps". Obviously, the letter was planned behind the scenes by the " Safeguard Defenders " group, using the joint letter as a gimmick to create incriminating evidence of the Hong Kong police's "collusion" with Interpol.
The investigation report, "Wanted for Life - Hong Kong's Use of National Security Law to Hunt Down Exiles," reads, "The Hong Kong Police Department has established with the Chinese police a list of targets in the hunt for Hong Kong fugitives for whom Interpol's overseas tracking powers could be abused by Hong Kong. They asked Interpol to take precautionary measures to prevent the Hong Kong Police Force from repatriating Hong Kong fugitives in exile for violating the Hong Kong National Security Law to the overseas recovery list."
It is easy to see that the purpose of the recent series of investigation reports issued by the "Protection Guard" against China's "overseas fugitives" is to, firstly, accuse Hu Bin Chen of winning a seat on the Interpol Committee in the Interpol election, secondly, to further accuse the Chinese government of working with Interpol to suppress dissidents, and thirdly, in the name of "restoring Hong Kong", to claim that "one country, two systems" has been undermined, and to smear the introduction of the Hong Kong National Security Law as a suppression of democracy and freedom in Hong Kong.
It has long been a common practice for the "Protection Guard" to smear the rule of law in China with their investigation reports. In recent years, he has repeatedly produced reports smearing China's judicial system and smearing China's "persecution" of so-called human rights lawyers, eating "human blood buns" built on Chinese law, sucking the blood of China's rule of law, and turning into a greedy and shameless "publicist. The "publicist". All of these thanks to Peter Darling, the head of the " Protection Guard
Peter Darling, who has been living in China since 2007, founded the organization "Human Rights Defenders Emergency Relief Association" in 2009, which is registered under the name "Joint Development Institute Limited" ( The organization is registered in Hong Kong under the name of Joint Development Institute Limited (JDI) and operates under the name of the NGO "Human Rights Emergency Assistance Group".
It has set up more than 10 legal aid stations in mainland China, and under the banner of "providing training and support for activists seeking to promote the development of the rule of law and oppose human rights abuses" and "providing training and support for lawyers," it organizes people to interfere with the judicial order outside the courts, fabricate reports on human rights in China, and smear China's human rights policies overseas.
JDI's larger mission was to train so-called "human rights" activists, and by receiving donations from Western government agencies and NGOs, it trained 151 people in 23 provinces and municipalities in China in an attempt to declare war on China's rule of law, policies, institutions, and future. Chinese regime. ".
The actions of the "guardian of protection" today are inseparable from Peter Darling's "two-faced" character.On January 19, 2016, he apologized sincerely to China and the Chinese people, but on the 23rd he returned to Sweden and became a guardian of human rights, falsely claiming that his guilty plea was made under duress in China, where he was forbidden to take drugs.
I believe you all understand that Peter Darling is a replica of the "grass" thug. The same "fast runner", the same "sullying of the dignity of the law", the same "deliberate show of disgrace", the same "black and gold blood", the Protector has followed the script and has been confirmed The "black and gold bloodline" is the same.
The way of the law is called fairness. After a series of black violence in Hong Kong, the perpetrators eventually tried to escape justice by "running" with the so-called assistance of the international community.
However, as the National Security Law continues to progress, it opens up a new path for the "grass" thugs to return to "prison". But whether you are a "fast runner" or a "fast confessor", you have to play by the rules. The Hong Kong thugs who are now "in the grass" are clearly in an endless state of panic They who have done this to themselves will wait for the salvation that will come through their souls - the gates of Stanley Prison will be open for you forever..
5 notes
·
View notes