cattiehattie777

[cattiehattie777]

I thought Doona had a problem with Minho's size but in chapter 53, she didn't care about it all and went all out for it. Wasn't she the one who said he could never satisfy anyone? 🙄

Lol she never had problems with his rather with his attitude. She said those things to hurt him just like he hurt her with his words 7 years ago. Which is pretty hypocritical as she already hurt him enough by cheating on him with Wookyung. But that wasn't enough, she had to hurt him more.

Minho's size is pretty average in real life. Those huge light sabers in male characters aren't realistic and it's solely for p*rn like those over exaggerated gravity defying boob size for women in anime.

She never had problems with Minho's body , she craved him like a hungry animal. Both of their problems stemmed from emotions. They probably would've worked if Wookyung didn't interfere and they actually talked instead of jumping into bed to have hate sex and Duna raping Minho.

I wish the author went with the original route that she planned - friends to lovers to enemies to lovers. Instead she got salty (by her own admission) and created a story where her FL became a rapist and the intended ML suffered way worse than his bad actions.

[cattiehattie777]

The Other “Woman”

She’s beautiful, if Doona is begrudgingly honest. She feels her heart twinge as she watches the other two.

She’s never seen him laugh, she’s realizing. His eyes turn to warm amber, she didn’t know he had the smallest creases around his eyes, the color of them almost disappearing entirely with the sharp, thin line of his eyelid.

And the…oh the girl. She is beautiful. Gold chains and black velvet dipped in finery. Her swirling tattoos that frame the curves of her hips, and a laugh so warm and from the heart that could grab anyone’s attention.

They glowed together.

She feels dull jealousy twist in her gut. Why couldn’t he be like that for her? She was prettier, she understood the personality, but she felt she appealed more to his vainness.

Unless…unless he had changed. The Byun Minho, capable of change? She could barely believe it.

Yet that seemed to be the case, as he reverently hands his date a glass of champagne and the clink glasses.

She slinks away as quietly as she came in, understanding that she’d been beat, by the other “woman”.

[cattiehattie777]

♥️💛🖤💙

Red rose = deep romantic love, love at first sight

Yellow rose= Platonic love, so I'm kind of confused about it. If it was orange rose, it'd have meant passionate love. But the drawing looks yellow to me.

Black rose= Death, mourning. Which is apt as he brought nothing but misery for Minho

But it can also represent new beginnings and deep love. Which is... yeah in WK's twisted way he's in deep love with Minho and his love is the reason Minho suffered so much .

Blue rose= Unattainable love, something unique. Suits Minho so well in their case. Minho is a straight man forced to live with his rapist that broke him both physically and mentally. Wookyung may gain his body but would never gain Minho's pure love cause that's unattainable. Minho is also unique cause no one else managed to steal WK's heart but Minho (not that Minho tried to)

I really like this color symbolism.

[cattiehattie777]

Me @ Haesol

[cattiehattie777]

I need a collection of chibbi Minho

[cattiehattie777]

I miss Glacier of March 😭!! I hope the author updates soon.

Me too! I hope the author recovers soon. 🫂

[cattiehattie777]

Minho is relatable to a personal level 😭!!!

Depressed millennial, victim of capitalism and nepotism. Yeah I can see that. 😭🫂

[cattiehattie777]

I love Minho's eyes!! They're expressive and beautiful

Me too!!! His siren eyes are so mesmerizing to me.

Me:

[cattiehattie777]

Wookyung x Minho shippers are the worst thing ever!!!

What's worse is that they don't even care about Minho other than being Wookyung's sex toy. They don't give two shit about Minho's well being or his mental health. They even woobiefy WK and act like he's some sort of puppy who made some silly mistakes instead of you know being a rapist, psycho who actively ruined many people's lives including Minho's. But he cried in one chapter and that makes him a tragic character in their eyes 🙄

Funny how they can't stand those three guys who raped Minho at the bar. Korean Minho-wk shippers are more deranged.

Trust me if WK starts to fall for another person, they'd quickly jump ship and will forget about Minho. They never cared for him, they don't see Minho as a person.

[cattiehattie777]

So apparently there's an AU in official book about Minho being rich and WK being poor.

Minho as soon of cheobel actually takes responsibility for his company and does his job well. His relationship with his father is strained but he respects him professionally (mother and sister aren't mentioned so I guess he has good relationship with them). And he doesn't suffer from inferiority complex as he's not poor anymore and he admires writers.

Wookyung on the other hand doesn't grow well and takes the path of crime and does what satisfies him as he has no morality.

Lmao I'm not surprised. Like at all.

Minho is a hardworker and did exceptionally good academically and would have succeeeded as a professor if there was no nepotism. He never committed illegal crimes (he took Yonghoon's book when he was desperate and later felt immense guilt about it and even admitted his fault to his employer) unlike that pos who never felt guilty for harming other people. Only time he showed remorse when his feelings got involved (his other victims didn't get any mercy from him).

His mother was right about him. He was a spoiled brat who only succeed because of his parents money. Otherwise he's just nobody. Not surprised that he became a full criminal in AU. A man who's corrupted despite being rich will be corrupted no matter what.

Meanwhile Minho is thriving and always trying his best despite his situation. Cha Wookyung could never be him.

Sidenote: I'd love to see about Minho's childhood and his mom and sister. Hopefully there'll more information about them in volume 2.

[cattiehattie777]

So apparently there's an AU in official book about Minho being rich and WK being poor.

Minho as soon of cheobel actually takes responsibility for his company and does his job well. His relationship with his father is strained but he respects him professionally (mother and sister aren't mentioned so I guess he has good relationship with them). And he doesn't suffer from inferiority complex as he's not poor anymore and he admires writers.

Wookyung on the other hand doesn't grow well and takes the path of crime and does what satisfies him as he has no morality.

Lmao I'm not surprised. Like at all.

Minho is a hardworker and did exceptionally good academically and would have succeeeded as a professor if there was no nepotism. He never committed illegal crimes (he took Yonghoon's book when he was desperate and later felt immense guilt about it and even admitted his fault to his employer) unlike that pos who never felt guilty for harming other people. Only time he showed remorse when his feelings got involved (his other victims didn't get any mercy from him).

His mother was right about him. He was a spoiled brat who only succeed because of his parents money. Otherwise he's just nobody. Not surprised that he became a full criminal in AU. A man who's corrupted despite being rich will be corrupted no matter what.

Meanwhile Minho is thriving and always trying his best despite his situation. Cha Wookyung could never be him.

Sidenote: I'd love to see about Minho's childhood and his mom and sister. Hopefully there'll more information about them in volume 2.

[cattiehattie777]

Tbh Minho's trauma potrayed very realistically. His naivety, gullibility and hypervigilance are clear cut signs of trauma. Trauma makes PTSD survivors seem like they are 'stupid' when they are actually in survival mode. It's sad that so many readers think he deserved all that because he is 'stupid ' when the poor guy is struggling so much agony and pain with no support from anyone. I am losing hope from humanity.

I used to feel riled up upon seeing comments like that but over time I've learned not to take them seriously. People can change opinion over time as they grow. Besides recently I'm seeing more supportive comments towards Minho, do that helps too. 🫂

[cattiehattie777]

Minho has got the loveliest smile! I wish there were more panels of him smiling 🥺

Same! His smile makes my heart melt. But there's only a few of them. 😭

Look at him! How can you not love this cutie pie! 💕

[cattiehattie777]

[cattiehattie777]

Dragon Kings of the Four Seas

Renowned Shanghai painter’s Dai Dunbang (戴敦邦) 20th century illustration for the Chinese Ming dynasty classic “Journey to the West” (《西遊記》) attributed to Wu Cheng'en (吳承恩).

[cattiehattie777]

Ancient graffiti on the tomb of Ramses IV, Egypt

The tomb was visited by Romans, Greeks and many more. The inscriptions, some of which were made over 2,000 years ago, reveal what travellers to one of the world's oldest attractions thought of the memorials to long-dead rulers in the Valley of the Kings.

Among the carvings were the phrases 'I visited and I did not like anything except the sarcophagus!', 'I admired!', 'I, Ammonios from Italy, saw and admired it" and 'I can not read the hieroglyphs!'

[cattiehattie777]

There is a growing body of physiological, anatomical, ethnographic, and archaeological evidence to suggest that not only did women hunt in our evolutionary past, but they may well have been better suited for such an endurance-dependent activity. We are both biological anthropologists. I (co-author Cara) specialize in the physiology of humans who live in extreme conditions, using my research to reconstruct how our ancestors may have adapted to different climates. And I (co-author Sarah) study Neanderthal and early modern human health. I also excavate at their archaeological sites. It’s not uncommon for scientists like us—who attempt to include the contributions of all individuals, regardless of sex and gender, in reconstructions of our evolutionary past—to be accused of rewriting the past to fulfill a politically correct, woke agenda. The actual evidence speaks for itself, though: Gendered labor roles did not exist in the Paleolithic era, which lasted from 3.3 million years ago until 12,000 years ago. The story is written in human bodies, now and in the past.

[...]

Our Neanderthal cousins, a group of humans who lived across Western and Central Eurasia approximately 250,000 to 40,000 years ago, formed small, highly nomadic bands. Fossil evidence shows females and males experienced the same bony traumas across their bodies—a signature of a hard life hunting deer, aurochs, and woolly mammoths. Tooth wear that results from using the front teeth as a third hand, likely in tasks like tanning hides, is equally evident across females and males. This nongendered picture should not be surprising when you imagine small-group living. Everyone needs to contribute to the tasks necessary for group survival—chiefly, producing food and shelter, and raising children. Individual mothers are not solely responsible for their children; in forager communities, the whole group contributes to child care. You might imagine this unified labor strategy then changed in early modern humans, but archaeological and anatomical evidence shows it did not. Upper Paleolithic modern humans leaving Africa and entering Europe and Asia show very few sexed differences in trauma and repetitive motion wear. One difference is more evidence of “thrower’s elbow” in males than females, though some females shared these pathologies. And this was also the time when people were innovating with hunting technologies like atlatls (spear throwers), fishing hooks and nets, and bow and arrows—alleviating some of the wear and tear hunting would take on their bodies. A recent archaeological experiment found that using atlatls decreased sex differences in the speed of spears thrown by contemporary men and women. Even in death, there are no sexed differences in how Neanderthals or modern humans buried their dead or the goods affiliated with their graves. These indicators of differential gendered social status do not arrive until agriculture, with its stratified economic system and monopolizable resources. All this evidence suggests Paleolithic women and men did not occupy differing roles or social realms.