He/They | 23 | Artist | Poet | Fanperson | D&D Enthusiast
Last active 60 minutes ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
My mom has her TV on in her room almost 24/7 and it's always on some news outlet or other. We talk a lot about politics and world/national/local events. And we do have a lot of varying views on a lot of things but we're both adults who are capable of saying "well we've both stated we have differing opinions and it's clear that we're actually arguing at this point and not just talking so let's put away the topic for now." But there are also other times where I'm just too overwhelmed by my own life to think about what's going on in the bigger world around me, so my mom knows to be hesitant to bring up news stuff with me (i.e. she doesn't just start talking about politics/world events with me rather she'll ask if I'm in the mindset to discuss things when she wants my opinion on something). This is all relevant.
We've always been able to talk about nearly everything from the economy to the school system to human rights to human tragedy and we've never tried to censor ourselves around each other (outside of getting too emotional with our language). But about two weeks ago when the United Healthcare CEO was assassinated, my mom, who is in her 50s, came to me and she said "Did you see that the CEO of United Healthcare got unalived?"
And I just sat there and looked at her completely confused and she was like "did you not hear about it? It's all over the news. It happened in clear view on the street." Like the problem was that I hadn't heard of the event not that my Gen-X mother had just in a real life conversation said the word "unalived".
And I told her as much. "Yes I've heard that. Why did you say 'unalived' instead of 'murdered'?
And she told me that she just thought that since I'm touchy about heavier topics sometimes (which is definitely true, that does occasionally happen) she thought it would be better to just not use the "heavy" words. I asked her if she realized, honestly, how stupid that was because regardless of the word she used, she was still talking about a murder, it didn't change the subject matter, she was only making the subject matter seem less significant and severe by changing the word to baseless internet lingo that a bunch of misguided, clout-chasing influencers spread.
She hadn't. She's doesn't use the Internet replacement words a lot, online or otherwise. This was a first. She thought this was a different situation, and a fine one to use it in, and like the above stories people shared, it's still not.
I'm allowed to say there are days where I want to avoid heavier topics because I'm overwhelmed. I'm allowed to not ever really discuss certain topics because they actually trigger me based on my own experiences. But people who are out here living their whole lives like just talking about about difficult or controversial topics, or asking questions about it, or enjoying media where it's portrayed (especially when it's actually portrayed respectfully) are being ridiculous, and they're handicapping themselves. They're never going to learn how to talk about hard things, or how to handle hard things. And honestly I feel bad for them.
Luckily, in my case, once I explained why my mom saying what she said was incredibly weird and honestly devaluing to the conversation, she backtracked and told me that (like I said above) she doesn't talk like that regularly and she has no intention to start; it's just that this was a huge news event and that day had been particularly rough for me emotionally and she wasn't sure how to approach it. So her intentions were good and I'm very lucky that she understands and also agrees that the Internet censorship language is incredibly unnecessary.
we have GOT to kill tiktok/twitter self-censorship i just witnessed a grown adult say the word “smex” out loud to our professor
54K notes
·
View notes
Text
*During a TVA meeting*
Hunter B-15: Trust me, the meeting is going to be extremely short this time.
Wade, dying to go home to Logan: I'll only believe you if you make it mandatory for everyone to be in a plank position for the entirety of the meeting.
104 notes
·
View notes
Text
⚠️🚨 FLASH WARNING IF YOU OPEN THE VIDEO OR END UP WATCHING THE MOVIE
youtube
I just want more people to see this. I've watched this movie like three times this week. It's so bad and yet... It's sweet and silly and the dancing is very good đź‘€
Definitely a holiday classic for me and my friends now lol
#was very surprised to see Chad Michael Murray AND Maxwell Caulfield in this movie#haven't seen either of those guys in something in a while#christmas movies#cheesy holiday romcoms#holiday romcom#the merry gentlemen#dot says#movie recommendation#flash warning#photosensitive warning#tw flashing#Youtube
1 note
·
View note
Text
Merry Chrysler!
4K notes
·
View notes
Text
I'm surprised I haven't seen this on Tumblr yet.
Ten years of having to do it to 'em.
22K notes
·
View notes
Text
the point of art is not to be great but to make it transparently obvious that there is something wrong with you
141K notes
·
View notes
Text
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
[ID: a screenshot of the “Almost Christmas” Ace Attorney meme behind a slightly transparent stock image of an ice cube. End ID.]
it’s defrosting
28K notes
·
View notes
Text
The plague doctors that the media has made really is the pinnacle of clothing. and its so sad to see what actual plague doctors were like
81K notes
·
View notes
Text
I submitted both these guys and I love them both dearly but I gotta go with J'onn here because both his real name and his hero name are alliterative and that's what the tournament is all about! He's a double whammy of alliteration!
Anti-Propaganda is not allowed. Please only give reasons to vote for something and not give reasons to vote against something.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
Was going through my keepsakes box and found the Christmas card I made for my parents in 2009 and it's the funniest fucking Christmas card I think I've ever made:
(For context, my dad left us at Christmastime in 2008 and 2009 was the first year my siblings and I were gonna have to go see his extended family without our mom)
#I can't stop laughing about the 'for dad' side being blank#like yeah fuck that guy#lmfao#i cackled#dot says#christmas cards#christmas#my childhood
0 notes
Text
To preface this I do see and appreciate the homoeroticism of Glinda and Elphaba’s relationship, but that being said, I’m noticing a phenomenon of people who’ve seen the movie but not the full show saying “Glinda and Elphie are obviously gay, and also Fiyero is lame and unnecessary.” For one thing, those opinions on Fiyero will likely change after Part 2 comes out because he is both important and awesome, but also? I really do love Glinda and her bond with Elphaba, but quite frankly I don’t think she deserves Elphie. Glinda’s biggest flaw is her cowardice (and even that isn’t fair, because she’s in a tough situation and her survival mode is to work within the system as best she can), and Act 2 proves she simply won’t take the same risks that Fiyero will for Elphie until it’s too late. Fiyero is brave and devoted to Elphie in ways Glinda isn’t (even when she wants to be). Glinda isn’t the one who sacrifices everything she’s ever known and nearly gets tortured to death to protect Elphaba. Not to mention that Elphaba’s fighting spirit and willingness to speak up are matched in Fiyero. AND the way the theme of finding not just worth but beauty in “unattractive” people comes full circle with Elphie and Fiyero. Just. End me now. They make me INSANE. It isn’t until after Elphaba’s apparent death that Glinda’s bravery really shines. The end of the show is basically Glinda acknowledging she should’ve done better and promising she WILL do better, she will be Glinda “The Good,” all thanks to what she’s learned from Elphaba. It’s kind of the point that Glinda wasn’t perfect for Elphie (and that’s okay, because their relationship was beautiful and profound anyway). I’m so excited to see movie fans experience this ride once Part 2 comes out.
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
Remember earlier this year when Boeing very clearly had a whistleblower executed? And law enforcement didn't even look for anyone or release any info about it or anything?
People keep comparing Luigi Mangione's case to the subway murderer who got off because of systemic eugenics, but I think there's something more apt about the fact that a CEO had someone executed in recent memory, with zero attempts to find a culprit, while they spared no expense at all to find (and probably frame, it's beginning to look like) someone who shot a CEO. It's always fine to slaughter if you're rich, but if you kill the rich, they will hunt you down.
44K notes
·
View notes
Text
Perhaps it was the modesty of the gesture…but in the spring of 1937, one broke through. He had written it himself in the music of the hour. His first composition in 100 years. He had engaged a local record company. And when the musicians they hired proved unsatisfactory, he played all the instruments himself. The audacity of it all was matched only by its sincerity. He had made the near-perfect valentine… with one flaw. One perfectly premeditated flaw. — INTERVIEW WITH THE VAMPIRE 1.06 | "Like Angels Put in Hell by God"
3K notes
·
View notes
Text
They're so funny for always looking like a rich couple actually
8K notes
·
View notes