blogtalknews

[blogtalknews]

Grandparents in Arizona Get Help In Determining Visitations Rights For Grandkids

Grandparents Rights in Arizona

There are some situations in Arizona under which grandparents might need to seek custody of their grandchildren or adopt them. In other cases, grandparents might be prevented from seeing their grandchildren by the children’s parents.

Arizona law includes a statute that allows grandparents to seek visitation rights with their grandchildren even if a parent objects. Each of these types of situations will likely require the help of an experienced family law attorney.

The lawyers at the Law Office of Daniel Hutto are experienced in handling grandparents rights cases and can explain the options that might be available to you based on the facts of your case.

Grandparents’ Visitation Rights in Arizona

Under , a person other than a parent, including a grandparent, may petition the court for  To do this, they must follow the process as outlined in . Under this statute, when a grandparent files for visitation rights with a grandchild, the court may grant the petition if it finds that visitation with the grandparent would be in the child’s best interests, and when any of the following are true:

One of the child’s parents is deceased or has been missing for three or more months.

The child’s parents are unmarried, and the child was born out of wedlock.

The child’s parents have been divorced for three or more months.

If the grandparent has served in loco parentis, the child’s parents must have a divorce or legal separation case pending.

The court must find that visitation would be in the child’s best interests. In making this determination, the court must consider the following factors:

The child’s relationship with the grandparent in the past

The grandparent’s motivation for seeking visitation rights

The motivations of the https://dailytimesnews.tumblr.com/post/694878162406064128

[blogtalknews]

CEO who set workers' minimum salary at $70,000 steps down

Dan Price, the CEO from Idaho who set a $70K minimum yearly salary, quits his job

The Seattle CEO from Idaho who rose to national prominence for setting a $70,000 minimum salary for all his employees — and slashing his own to match — has resigned as CEO of the company he founded in college amid accusations of misdemeanor assault. Dan Price said he was stepping down at Gravity Payments, a credit card processing firm, to dedicate more time to “fighting false allegations.” Earlier this year, he was accused of attempting to kiss a woman against her will, the Seattle Times reported.

Price resigned shortly before The New York Times published an investigative story detailing allegations by numerous women of improper behavior. “Mr. Price’s internet fame has enabled a pattern of abuse in his personal life and hostile behavior at his company, interviews with more than 50 people, documents and police reports show,” the Times article said.

…https://dailytimesnews.tumblr.com/post/694881300742651904

[blogtalknews]

Colburn Hintze Maletta Expanding Services for Misdemeanor DUI Defense in Arizona

With the passing of  in the November 2020 election, recreational marijuana is now legal in Arizona. Since marijuana use in Arizona by adults over the age of 21 is legal for both recreational and medical purposes, some people might be unaware that they can be charged with a DUI on marijuana if they are driving while impaired to the slightest degree.

Even though marijuana is now legal, it is still against the law if you “drive while high” – but there are numerous factors to determine whether or not a person is impaired.

If you are facing drugged driving charges, you should get help from an experienced  at Colburn Hintze Maletta.

What is a Marijuana DUI in Arizona?

Like alcohol, it is against  to use marijuana that has THC while in actual physical control of a vehicle and you can be charged with a DUI if you are impaired by it. Unlike alcohol, which has a per se limit of 0.08, the state does not have a per se limit for marijuana in your system.

Under , you can be charged with driving under the influence of marijuana if you are impaired to the slightest degree or when you have the presence of active marijuana in your system.

If you are younger than 21, you cannot drive with any amount of marijuana in your system whether or not your driving is impaired.

Unlike alcohol, there is no breath test available for marijuana. If an officer suspects that you were using marijuana while driving, you will be asked to consent to a blood test, or the officer will secure a warrant to draw blood from you for testing.

If you refuse to submit to a blood test, you will face administrative penalties on your license from the Arizona Department of Motor Vehicles. Under , all drivers in Arizona are deemed to have given implied consent for their breath, blood, or urine to be tested for the presence of alcohol or drugs.

A refusal can result in a 12-month suspensionhttps://fairenews.tumblr.com/post/694877143913644032

[blogtalknews]

Phoenix DUI Lawyers Cheer Changes In DUI Laws

Being arrested for a DUI can be frightening for the majority of people. Numerous Arizonans charged with DUIs do not have any previous experience with the criminal justice system and do not know what may happen to them.

The knowledgeable Phoenix DUI Lawyers at Colburn Hintze Maletta can help you comprehend the charges you face and assist you through the process. We are aggressive criminal defense attorney who strive to secure the very best possible results for our customers.

We have actually detailed details about the various types of DUI charges, the charges, and proven reliable DUI defenses below.

What Is A Standard or Regular DUI?

A basic DUI in Arizona can be charged under Arizona Statute ARS 28-1381(A)( 1) or (A)( 2 ). Under the (A)( 1) statute, you can be charged with a routine DUI if you have a blood alcohol concentration of 0.08% to 0.149% within two hours of when the cops stopped you.

Additionally, even if your BAC is listed below 0.08%, you can be charged with a DUI if you are impaired to the smallest degree by drugs or alcohol while driving or having real physical control of your automobile.

When you receive your citation for a novice misdemeanor DUI, it is common to see both ARS 28-1381 (A)( 1) and ARS 28-1381 (A)( 2) noted.

Even if you are convicted of a very first standard DUI offense, the charges can be serious. A very first basic DUI conviction consists of a necessary minimum jail sentence of 10 days. However, if you complete an alcohol evaluation and classes, 9 out of the 10 days can be suspended.

Additionally, you can be put on probation for approximately 5 years if convicted of a novice standard DUI.

There are also minimum fines and assessments of $1,480, and your license can be suspended for a minimum of 90 days. You will have to install an ignition interlock device on your automobile from 6 months as much as one year and finish any alcohol classes that are purchased.

The Arizona MVD will examine 8 points versus your license and require you to finish a Traffic Survival School course if convicted of a regular DUI. A routine DUI charge can likewise include other expenses, consisting of auto insurance premium boosts, SR-22 insurance, car impoundment costs, jail expenses, and others.

https://fairenews.tumblr.com/post/694881372942270466

[blogtalknews]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

PHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford.

Judge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings.

“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed.

Rodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019.

Since the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count.

Judge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion.

A significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways.

According to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”

The judge ruled that omission was “critical.”

“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane.

This is critical.

Det. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could hhttps://fairenews.tumblr.com/post/694881373789503488

[blogtalknews]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

PHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford.

Judge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings.

“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed.

Rodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019.

Since the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count.

Judge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion.

A significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways.

According to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”

The judge ruled that omission was “critical.”

“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane.

This is critical.

Det. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could hhttps://fairenews.tumblr.com/post/694881375032131584

[blogtalknews]

Lawyer Talks About Rise In Criminal Defense Cases

In the field of criminal law, there are a variety of conditions that will tend to negate elements of a crime (particularly the intent element), known as defenses. The label may be apt in jurisdictions where the accused may be assigned some burden before a tribunal. However, in many jurisdictions, the entire burden to prove a crime is on the prosecution, which also must prove the absence of these defenses, where implicated. In other words, in many jurisdictions the absence of these so-called defenses is treated as an element of the crime. So-called defenses may provide partial or total refuge from punishment. …https://fairenews.tumblr.com/post/694881374738448384

[blogtalknews]

Arizona Legal Paraprofessional Offers Service for Divorce Without A Lawyer

The decision to end a marriage is rarely easy and can be scary if you have never gone through the process in the past. While you might believe that divorces are always dramatic, your divorce does not have to be filled with bitter conflict and protracted litigation.

Many Arizonans think that they must hire a divorce lawyer to get divorced or represent themselves. However, you can choose the third option and hire a licensed legal paraprofessional at a significantly more affordable cost as compared to a traditional Phoenix divorce attorney.

Stephanie Villalobos at De Novo Law is a licensed legal paraprofessional with decades of experience in family law, and she is licensed to represent her clients throughout their divorce matters up to and including divorce trials.

Here are seven steps you can follow to get a divorce with the help of an a Licensed Legal Professional without needing to hire an expensive divorce lawyer.

  1. Know the Requirements and the Law

If you are planning to divorce, you need to understand the following requirements to file a petition in Arizona:

You or your spouse must have lived in the state of Arizona for at least 90 days before you can file your petition.

If you and your spouse share children, your children must have lived in Arizona for at least six months before the Arizona court will have jurisdiction over child custody and parenting time.

Once yhttps://fairenews.tumblr.com/post/694881378925461504

[blogtalknews]

Amazon Says Woman's Death Was Not Heat Related

Amazon upgraded warehouse AC system after saying worker’s death wasn’t heat-related

Amazon upgraded the air conditioning system at a New Jersey warehouse where it blamed a worker’s death during a heat wave last month on a “personal medical condition,” according to three facility employees and photographs seen by NBC News.

One photo shows a large new ducting system installed on a ground floor of the warehouse in Carteret, known as EWR9, with the ducts pointing upward.

 Workers said the equipment was part of a new industrial air conditioner that the company added weeks after the death of Rafael Reynaldo Mota Frias, a 42-year-old Dominican national, in mid-July. It wasn’t clear if the system was up and running yet.

Employees also said more fans had been installed around the warehouse in recent weeks. The area where Frias was working when he collapsed was known to be especially hot and with little air circulation, according to seven workers at the site.

Amazon said it regularly updates its facilities. “Our climate control systems constantly measure the temperature in our buildings, and our safety teams are empowered to take action to address any temperature-related issues,” said spokesman Sam Stephenson. He said the company takes safety precautions in warm weather, always provides access to water stations — not just on hot days — and encourages employees to take breaks to hydrate.

…https://martinewswire.tumblr.com/post/694475101106798592

[blogtalknews]

Victory for Children in Charter_School Rule Changes

Charter-School Change Is a Victory for Children

Give President Joe Biden’s administration credit: It listened to outraged parents (and editorialists) and decided to scrap provisions of a proposed regulation that would have made it far more difficult to open and expand public charter schools. The reversal is a victory for families nationwide, especially in urban areas where charters are most commonly found.

The original proposal, issued by the Department of Education, could have prevented public charter schools from opening in communities where existing schools are under-enrolled. Yet the very reason some schools are under-enrolled is that they are failing, forcing parents to seek other options. Some decide to home school. Some who can afford the tuition payments choose private school. But those options are off-limits to most families, leaving too many children — often in Black and Latino communities — trapped, badly damaging their career prospects and setting back the work of building a more racially equitable society.

Read More

…https://yallmedianews.us/post/693863575440261120https://voxlegalnews.tumblr.com/post/694291600519692288

[blogtalknews]

Amazon Says Woman's Death Was Not Heat Related

Amazon upgraded warehouse AC system after saying worker’s death wasn’t heat-related

Amazon upgraded the air conditioning system at a New Jersey warehouse where it blamed a worker’s death during a heat wave last month on a “personal medical condition,” according to three facility employees and photographs seen by NBC News.

One photo shows a large new ducting system installed on a ground floor of the warehouse in Carteret, known as EWR9, with the ducts pointing upward.

 Workers said the equipment was part of a new industrial air conditioner that the company added weeks after the death of Rafael Reynaldo Mota Frias, a 42-year-old Dominican national, in mid-July. It wasn’t clear if the system was up and running yet.

Employees also said more fans had been installed around the warehouse in recent weeks. The area where Frias was working when he collapsed was known to be especially hot and with little air circulation, according to seven workers at the site.

Amazon said it regularly updates its facilities. “Our climate control systems constantly measure the temperature in our buildings, and our safety teams are empowered to take action to address any temperature-related issues,” said spokesman Sam Stephenson. He said the company takes safety precautions in warm weather, always provides access to water stations — not just on hot days — and encourages employees to take breaks to hydrate.

Read More

…https://buzzyblastnews.tumblr.com/post/693861917692936192https://voxlegalnews.tumblr.com/post/694291601179164672

[blogtalknews]

Arizona toughens stance on DUI offenses

Why Arizona Has Such A Tough Stance on DUI offenses

DUI penalties in Arizona are notoriously harsh, and it’s no wonder why. With a strict 0.08% BAC limit and some of the harshest penalties in the country, those caught driving under the influence in Arizona can expect to face some serious consequences. In this article, we’ll explore the reasons behind Arizona’s tough stance on DUI offenses, and we’ll take a look at some of the penalties you can expect if you’re convicted of a DUI.

What is a DUI and why is it such a big deal in Arizona?

DUI, or driving under the influence, is a serious offense in Arizona. Arizona has a strict 0.08% BAC limit for drivers, and those caught driving with a BAC above this limit can expect to face serious consequences.

There are many reasons why Arizona takes such a tough stance on DUI offenses. One reason is that DUI offenses can be dangerous. Drunk drivers are more likely to get into accidents, and these accidents can often be deadly. In addition, drunk drivers can also cause property damage and injuries to other drivers and passengers.

The DUI Penalties in Arizona

The penalties for a DUI conviction in Arizona can be severe. As we mentioned earlier, a DUI conviction can lead to fines, jail time, and other penalties which can add up to thousands of dollars. Additionally, a DUI conviction can lead to increased insurance rates and may make it difficult to find employment or housing.

The penalties for a DUI in Arizona are some of the harshest in the country. If you are convicted of a DUI, you can expect to face hefty fines, jail time, and the loss of your driver’s license.

Some of the penalties for a DUI in Arizona include:

a fine of up to $5,000

jail time of up to six months

the loss of your driver’s license for up to one year

How to avoid a DUI charge in Arizona

If you are in Arizona and plan to drink, it is important to make arrangements for a safe ride home. There are a number of ways to avoid a DUI charge in Arizona, and the most important thing is to be aware of the laws and take precautions.

Some ways to avoid a DUI charge in Arizona include:

drinking in moderation

choosing a designated driver

using a taxi or ride-sharing service

using public transportation

It is also important to be aware of the symptoms of drunk driving. If you think you may be too drunk to drive, it is best to find another way home. Symptoms of drunk driving include difficulty walking, slowed reaction time, and poor judgment.

What to do if you’re arrested for a DUI in Arizona

If you are arrested, you will likely be taken to a police station or jail. You will be required to take a breathalyzer test, and you may also be asked to provide a blood or urine sample.

It is important to know your rights if you are arrested for a DUI in Arizona. You have the right to remain silent, and you should not answer any questions without an attorney present. You also have the right to an attorney, and you should contact one as soon as possible.

Conclusion

Drunk driving is a serious offense and can have devastating consequences. Arizona has some of the harshest penalties in the country for DUI offenses, and those caught driving under the influence can expect to face fines, jail time, and other penalties which can add up to thousands of dollars. Additionally, a DUI conviction can lead to increased insurance rates and may make it difficult to find employment or housing.

Without an accomplished Scottsdale DUI Lawyer at your side, you could end up facing the maximum penalty or being sentenced to unnecessary jail or prison time. In addition, you could also end up paying extremely high court fines and fees because you didn’t have an attorney negotiating or fighting on your behalf.

If you live in Scottsdale-Phoenix area contact The Shah Law Firm to speak with an experienced DUI Lawyer. The Shah Law Firm offers clients affordable rates and payment plans. Get the representation you deserve at a fair price. Call (602) 888-0369

https://buhttps://voxlegalnews.tumblr.com/post/694291599162736640

[blogtalknews]

Spending on business travel not expected to return to normal for another 4 years

Business travel spending might not return to pre-pandemic levels until 2026

Business travel spending might not recover to pre-pandemic levels until sometime in 2026 — two years later than previously expected — as inflation, labor shortages and geopolitical issues slow the sector’s rebound, according to a new industry forecast.

Spending by business travelers, a key source of revenue for airlines and hotels, some of the hardest-hit industries in the pandemic, has been on the upswing this year. Spending worldwide is set to rise nearly 34% in 2022 to $933 billion, according to the Global Business Travel Association’s annual report and forecast, published Monday.

That’s still far short of the more than $1.4 trillion in business travel generated in 2019, before the Covid pandemic. One reason is that high inflation is driving up travel costs, which the industry group last week said would continue to climb through 2023.

For example, this year through July, revenue per available room in U.S. hotels was $92.36, up from $88.05 over the same period of 2019, according to preliminary data from hotel data firm STR. Occupancy was 63%, down from nearly 67% in 2019.

Read More

…,

https://dailypress-news.tumblr.com/post/694206483806699521

https://thirdshorenews.tumblr.com/post/694281534572806144

[blogtalknews]

Arizona DUI Charges Getting A Bit More Reach

What are the types of Arizona DUI charges?

There are many different types of Arizona DUI charges, and each one carries a different penalty. A Scottsdale DUI lawyer can help you understand the charges against you and build a defense strategy.

DUI charges can be a serious matter, and if you are convicted, you could face a number of penalties. It is important to understand the different types of DUI charges that are available in Arizona, and to have a strong defense strategy in place. A Scottsdale DUI lawyer can help you build a defense and protect your rights.

Arizona DUI charges

There are a number of different types of DUI charges that may be imposed in Arizona. The most common are:

DUI with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) over .08

DUI per se, which is a charge for drivers who have a BAC of .08 or more

aggravated DUI, which is a more serious charge that can result in harsher penalties

super extreme DUI, which is a more serious charge that applies to drivers with a BAC of .15 or more

child endangerment DUI, which is a charge for drivers who have a child in the car when they are arrested for DUI

vehicular homicide, which is a criminal charge that can be filed against a driver who kills someone while driving under the influence

Each of these charges carries its own set of penalties, and it is important to understand what you are facing if you are arrested for DUI. A Scottsdale DUI lawyer can help you understand the charges against you and build a defense strategy.

Arizona DUI penalties

Penalties for a DUI conviction in Arizona can vary depending on the charge but can include a jail sentence, a fine, probation, and a driver’s license suspension.

First DUI offense

In most cases, a first DUI offense will result in a jail sentence of between 10 days and 6 months, a fine of between $500 and $2,500, and probation. A driver’s license suspension will also likely be imposed.

Second DUI offense

For a second DUI offense, the penalties are typically more severe. A jail sentence of between 30 days and 1 year is common, as is a fine of between $1,000 and $3,500. There is also a good chance that probation will be required, and a driver’s license suspension will be imposed for 2 years or more.

Third DUI offense

For a third DUI offense, the penalties are even harsher. A jail sentence of between 90 days and 1 year is common, as is a fine of between $2,000 and $4,500. Probation is almost always required, and a driver’s license suspension will be imposed for 3 years or more.

It is important to note that these are just the standard penalties for a DUI conviction in Arizona. The charges against you may be more severe if you caused an accident or injured someone while driving under the influence. If you are arrested for DUI, it is important to speak with a Phoenix DUI lawyer right away. They can help you understand the charges against you and build a defense strategy.

Scottsdale Arizona DUI lawyer costs

If you are arrested for DUI in Arizona, it is important to speak with a lawyer right away. A Scottsdale DUI lawyer can help you understand the charges against you and build a defense strategy.

Lawyers typically charge an hourly rate for their services, so the cost of a DUI lawyer can vary depending on the lawyer’s experience and qualifications. However, a Scottsdale DUI lawyer will typically charge less than $200 per hour.

In addition to the lawyer’s fee, you may also have to pay court costs and fines if you are convicted of DUI. These costs can add up quickly, so it is important to have a good defense strategy in place. A Scottsdale DUI lawyer can help you protect your rights and get the best possible outcome in your case.

Conclusion

If you are arrested for a DUI in Scottsdale Arizona, it is important to speak with a lawyer right away. A Scottsdale DUI lawyer can help you understand the charges against you and build a defense strategy.

Lawyers typically charge an hourly rate for their services, so the cost of a DUI lawyer can vary depending on the lawyer’s experience and qualifications. In addition to the lawyer’s fee, you may also have to pay court costs and fines if you are convicted of DUI. These costs can ahttps://www.lawyerclock.com/posthttps://voxlegalnews.tumblr.com/post/694291602415484928

[blogtalknews]

Arizona ranks #4 for states with the most deadly road rage shootings, study says

article-text">Read More …https://insightnewswire.tumblr.com/post/693864226622783489https://thirdshorenews.tumblr.com/post/694291486342299648

[blogtalknews]

Maricopa County judge finds police, prosecutors presented unfair, biased case to grand jurors

PHOENIX — In a new ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court judge found police and prosecutors presented a troubling, unfair, and biased case to grand jurors in order to obtain negligent homicide charges against a woman in the fatal traffic accident of Phoenix officer Paul Rutherford.

Judge Jennifer Ryan-Touhill remanded the case against Nubia Rodriguez back to the grand jury, essentially resetting the criminal proceedings.

“The State allowed their witness [Phoenix Detective Michael Davidson] to present evidence designed to evoke sympathy from the jurors to distract the Grand Jury on whether probable cause exists,” according to the judge’s order. “The court finds the State failed to present evidence to the Grand Jury in a fair and impartial manner.”

The Maricopa County Attorney’s Office now has less than two weeks to bring the case back to grand jurors. If prosecutors do not, the case will be dismissed.

Rodriguez was charged more than a year after the crash, which occurred on March 21, 2019.

Since the criminal charges, her defense attorneys have filed multiple motions alleging that Phoenix police and MCAO prosecutors used false testimony, faulty data, and cherry-picked evidence to obtain the negligent homicide count.

Judge Ryan-Touhill agreed with several of the defense’s arguments in her motion.

A significant issue highlighted by the judge is when Det. Davidson and prosecutors withheld clearly exculpatory evidence from Phoenix police’s own investigation that showed Rutherford stepped out into moving traffic without looking both ways.

According to the final report filed by the department’s traffic reconstruction expert, Alex Gibbs, “It needs to be considered that [Officer] Rutherford could have also avoided the collision if he had stopped and looked west down the two-way left turn lane prior to entering it.”

The judge ruled that omission was “critical.”

“Nowhere in his testimony does Det. Davidson acknowledge that Officer Rutherford failed again to look west into traffic before stepping into the two-way left turn lane.

This is critical.

Det. Gibbs’ statement regarding Officer Rutherford’s contribution to the incident is clearly exculpatory and the State should have presented it to the Grand Jury,” Ryan-Touhill wrote. She added, “If the Grand Jury was told that Officer Rutherford ‘could have also avoided the collision,’ the jurors may not have found probable cause that a crime was committed and Defendant committed that crime.”

Ryan-Touhill issued a similar rebuke to MCAO and Phoenix PD last year after ABC15 had exposed the two agencies colluded to falsely charge protesters as members of a made-up gang.

Jennifer Liewer Communications Director

Contact ABC15 Chief Investigator Dave Biscobing at Dave@abc15.com.

Original Article https://www.abc15.com/news/local-news/investigations/maricopa-county-judge-finds-police-prosecutors-presented-unfair-biased-case-to-grand-jurors

…https://storybuzznews.tumblr.com/post/693863858578800640https://thirdshorenews.tumblr.com/post/694291485174202368

[blogtalknews]

Arizona ranks #4 for states with the most deadly road rage shootings, study says

article-text">Read More …https://insightnewswire.tumblr.com/post/693864226622783489https://stillernewsservice.tumblr.com/post/694291551422152704