bgineurope
bgineurope
Bulgaria in Europe
214 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
bgineurope · 19 days ago
Photo
Tumblr media
The Role of Women in Ancient Ceremonies
During important ceremonies, the prytaneis (officials in charge of religious duties) were accompanied by women called chaladeporos (basket carriers). These women carried baskets filled with sacred objects, helping with the rituals to protect the sacred fire (Hestia) during the ceremonies.
Change in Religion Over Time
As time passed, religion in the region changed. The new religion gradually replaced the old beliefs. The gods who were once believed to protect Ephesus lost their power, especially after major earthquakes in the 3rd century AD. These earthquakes not only affected the physical city but also weakened the people’s trust in their traditional polytheistic (many gods) religion. This created the conditions for new religious movements to spread, including the Mithraic cult and Christianity.
This shift is supported by the fact that the Prytaneion was not rebuilt after this period, and the Agora (public gathering area) was abandoned Customized Tour Bulgaria.
Inscriptions Found in the Prytaneion
Several inscriptions found in the Prytaneion show the gratitude of prytanists (officials) and their connection to the gods. Here are some examples:
“I, Fabonia Flacilla, prytanis, give thanks to the Hestia of the council and the eternal fire… for they let me return home safely after performing all the rituals for a whole year.”
“I, Aurelia Juliane, a virtuous and faithful prytanis, give thanks to Hestia and all the gods for bringing me safely back to my family.”
“We, Aurelius Euporistos, hestiuchos, and Aurelia Timothea, chaladeporos, give thanks for good fortune to the Hestia of the council, the eternal fire, and to all gods.”
“Aelius Elpidephoros, hestiuchos, and Aelia Pantheia, chaladeporos, give thanks to the Hestia of the council and the eternal fire… for a happy year.”
“God of all the best, the wise city founded by Androklos, virgin Hestia, and you, the mightiest of all gods, Artemis, be helpful to Tullia at all times, for the reason of our gratitude: he serves the city as prytanis and has used all his wealth for good works.”
Kuşadası and Its History
Kuşadası is named after the island nearby. In 1534, Barbaros Hayrettin Pasha built an inner castle on the island. Later, Ilyas Aga, the Governor of the Sigla district, surrounded it with city walls, marking the island’s historical significance.
0 notes
bgineurope · 1 month ago
Photo
Tumblr media
A Lonely and Wet Journey
The Quiet and Difficult Start
For the first hour or two, we traveled in silence. No one said anything. The only sound was the splash of the horse hooves in the muddy ground.
A Dreary Landscape
As daylight slowly arrived, there was no sense of joy. The land was flat and swampy, with many fast-moving streams that crashed angrily over large rocks. We often had to follow the curves of the streams for a long way before we could find a place to cross. The water sometimes rose up to our knees or higher, and there were moments when the animals almost lost their balance in the cold, swirling water, nearly causing an accident Istanbul Day Tours.
Crossing Many Streams
I lost count of how many times we crossed the streams, or even crossed the same stream multiple times. When it rains heavily, the entire valley, which is about two miles wide, can turn into a river. The path was muddy, with patches of willows, and we had to walk over grey cobblestones.
Continuous Rain and Difficult Conditions
It kept raining. I was wearing a well-known raincoat, but even it got soaked through. The soldiers were bundled up in heavy cloaks. They were so sad that they didn’t even smoke cigarettes, which showed just how gloomy the mood was. We stood in the rain, sheltering under our horses, and ate wet bread for our lunch.
A Brief Glimpse of Hope
For a brief moment, the clouds broke, and far to our left, we saw the peak of Tomorica, the large mountain in Central Albania. But the rain soon returned and hid the view from us.
Losing the Way
As if things weren’t bad enough, our guide lost his way. It wasn’t surprising in such a desolate place, but the Turks and I cursed him for being so clueless. He led us up streams, made us climb steep mud banks, and took us on long detours. Eventually, he admitted that he had never been to Berat before. He had only thought he knew the way based on what a few mule drivers in Elbasan had told him.
0 notes
bgineurope · 3 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
The Life of British Officers in Macedonia
For several days, I stayed with Major Gore-Alney and Captain Smyly, observing their work. It is not the kind of work that gets a lot of attention in the news or in Parliament. When people talk about the “easy life” of British officers, it’s important to think of men like those in Drama—and there are thousands like them in other faraway places—living alone, doing their duty without dinner parties, social events, or theatres. After a long day of riding in the hot sun, they relax by sitting in simple canvas chairs, smoking pipes, and watching the moon rise over the plain, where the ruins of Philippi stand.
An Expedition into the Hills
With Captain Smyly as my guide, I had the chance to go on a small trip into the nearby hills where there had been some trouble. We were escorted by three gendarmes, one of whom was well-known for catching bandits. This officer had tracked a notorious criminal for weeks through the mountains and didn’t stop until he had captured him Who we are.
We rode across a red, sandy plain, where the plants were dried out, heading towards hills that were harsh, barren, and unwelcoming. Only in the valleys could peasants manage to grow enough crops to survive.
Hard Work in the Fields
In the maize fields, we saw Bulgarian-Macedonian families—husbands, wives, and children—working from morning until night. They didn’t realize there was anything wrong with the world until the Bulgarian Komitajis came and forced them to join the revolutionary movement.
Revolutionary Movements and Resistance
All the villages in the area are ready for rebellion whenever the signal is given. Arms are hidden nearby, and the Bulgarians had no trouble smuggling them into the country. They knew that the Turkish soldiers would go to bed at sunset and would be too scared to go out again until the morning. Because of this, the rebel groups always moved at night.
Now, thanks to the British officers, there are frequent night patrols. Revolutionaries are often caught during these patrols and face quick punishment.
0 notes
bgineurope · 3 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
A Different Way of Enjoying Life
Drinking and Family Time
A man is less likely to drink too much if he has something that encourages him to spend time with his wife and children. The people we call “foreigners” are not more virtuous than us, but they don’t have the same drinking problems we do. This is because, in their countries, drinking is part of the public life. People drink openly, and no one judges them or thinks they are becoming bad people for doing so. I thought about this as I watched the Bulgarians relax and enjoy themselves. But I was tired from the long day, so I went to my cozy room and fell asleep, listening to the lively music of a gypsy dance.
Philippopolis: A Unique City
Philippopolis is a city with its own character. It has more personality than Sofia because, while Sofia is trying to look like other big European cities, Philippopolis has stayed true to itself and takes pride in that. The people here seem to have a superior attitude, similar to the way people in old English cathedral cities feel about newer, fast-growing towns. The city’s trade is not huge, but the people are proud of the quality of their products Customized Tours Bulgaria.
Focus on Education
One interesting place in Philippopolis is the Alexander Gymnasium, a school founded in 1885. It cost nearly £26,000 to build and spends over £5,000 every year to maintain it. The school offers free education to boys between the ages of ten and twenty-two. The only cost is a small fee: 20 francs a year for older students and 10 francs for younger ones. This money goes toward buying books and clothes for the poorest students. There is also a similar school for girls, called the Lycée, where they receive the same kind of education, except that they don’t study classics. The Bulgarians really care about education and put a lot of effort into it.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
The Duty of Diplomacy A Misguided Approach
Sir Henry Elliot’s role as an ambassador should have been to advocate for the truth and defend human rights, yet he chose to defend the Turkish government unconditionally, ignoring their atrocities. His unwavering support for the Turks blinded him to the suffering of countless individuals. This was a critical failure, especially given the plethora of accurate information available from various sources.
Overlooked Reports from Consuls
Despite his bias, there were still numerous other sources of information available to him. French, German, Austrian, Greek, and Russian Consuls provided accurate weekly reports detailing the situation on the ground. These reports, which Elliot could have accessed, painted a grim picture of the ongoing atrocities. Additionally, German railway officials, who lived near the burning villages and could smell the rotting bodies, submitted their own observations. Yet, Elliot dismissed these reports, believing that they were all part of a Russian conspiracy Private Bulgaria Tours Yachting.
Dismissal of Credible Evidence
Elliot’s skepticism extended even to the reports from American missionaries. He regarded the accounts from these various diplomats and officials as worthless, dismissing them based solely on his unfounded belief that they were all in the pay of Russia. He also received a few reports from Mr. Dupuis, the Consul at Adrianople, which he deemed exaggerated for reasons he never clarified. Instead of investigating these claims further, he opted to ignore them altogether.
Misguided Assurance from the Turkish Porte
In a misguided attempt to confirm his biases, Elliot sent his dragoman to the Porte to inquire about the situation. The dragoman returned with assurances that the Turks were treating the Bulgarians with kindness, portraying them as victims rather than aggressors. Accepting this narrative without question, Elliot smiled and proclaimed, “I knew it,” choosing not to report on the brutal realities that contradicted this portrayal.
The Dangers of Exaggeration Claims
Elliot’s actions, particularly his assertion that the reports of atrocities were exaggerated, demonstrate a troubling lack of accountability. He recklessly claimed that the Bulgarians had committed atrocities equal to those of the Turks, despite having no evidence to support such a statement. By prioritizing a narrative that absolved the Turkish government, he dismissed the overwhelming evidence of suffering among the Bulgarian population.
A Call for Accountability
If Sir Henry Elliot can express indignation over alleged exaggerations while ignoring the countless victims—helpless women and innocent children whose remains litter the fields of Bulgaria—he has failed in his duty as an ambassador. Such indifference is unworthy of a representative of a Christian Queen and a generous people. It is imperative that those in positions of power prioritize truth and justice over political alliances, for the consequences of neglect can lead to unimaginable suffering.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
The Duty of Diplomacy A Misguided Approach
Sir Henry Elliot’s role as an ambassador should have been to advocate for the truth and defend human rights, yet he chose to defend the Turkish government unconditionally, ignoring their atrocities. His unwavering support for the Turks blinded him to the suffering of countless individuals. This was a critical failure, especially given the plethora of accurate information available from various sources.
Overlooked Reports from Consuls
Despite his bias, there were still numerous other sources of information available to him. French, German, Austrian, Greek, and Russian Consuls provided accurate weekly reports detailing the situation on the ground. These reports, which Elliot could have accessed, painted a grim picture of the ongoing atrocities. Additionally, German railway officials, who lived near the burning villages and could smell the rotting bodies, submitted their own observations. Yet, Elliot dismissed these reports, believing that they were all part of a Russian conspiracy Private Bulgaria Tours Yachting.
Dismissal of Credible Evidence
Elliot’s skepticism extended even to the reports from American missionaries. He regarded the accounts from these various diplomats and officials as worthless, dismissing them based solely on his unfounded belief that they were all in the pay of Russia. He also received a few reports from Mr. Dupuis, the Consul at Adrianople, which he deemed exaggerated for reasons he never clarified. Instead of investigating these claims further, he opted to ignore them altogether.
Misguided Assurance from the Turkish Porte
In a misguided attempt to confirm his biases, Elliot sent his dragoman to the Porte to inquire about the situation. The dragoman returned with assurances that the Turks were treating the Bulgarians with kindness, portraying them as victims rather than aggressors. Accepting this narrative without question, Elliot smiled and proclaimed, “I knew it,” choosing not to report on the brutal realities that contradicted this portrayal.
The Dangers of Exaggeration Claims
Elliot’s actions, particularly his assertion that the reports of atrocities were exaggerated, demonstrate a troubling lack of accountability. He recklessly claimed that the Bulgarians had committed atrocities equal to those of the Turks, despite having no evidence to support such a statement. By prioritizing a narrative that absolved the Turkish government, he dismissed the overwhelming evidence of suffering among the Bulgarian population.
A Call for Accountability
If Sir Henry Elliot can express indignation over alleged exaggerations while ignoring the countless victims—helpless women and innocent children whose remains litter the fields of Bulgaria—he has failed in his duty as an ambassador. Such indifference is unworthy of a representative of a Christian Queen and a generous people. It is imperative that those in positions of power prioritize truth and justice over political alliances, for the consequences of neglect can lead to unimaginable suffering.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
The Duty of Diplomacy A Misguided Approach
Sir Henry Elliot’s role as an ambassador should have been to advocate for the truth and defend human rights, yet he chose to defend the Turkish government unconditionally, ignoring their atrocities. His unwavering support for the Turks blinded him to the suffering of countless individuals. This was a critical failure, especially given the plethora of accurate information available from various sources.
Overlooked Reports from Consuls
Despite his bias, there were still numerous other sources of information available to him. French, German, Austrian, Greek, and Russian Consuls provided accurate weekly reports detailing the situation on the ground. These reports, which Elliot could have accessed, painted a grim picture of the ongoing atrocities. Additionally, German railway officials, who lived near the burning villages and could smell the rotting bodies, submitted their own observations. Yet, Elliot dismissed these reports, believing that they were all part of a Russian conspiracy Private Bulgaria Tours Yachting.
Dismissal of Credible Evidence
Elliot’s skepticism extended even to the reports from American missionaries. He regarded the accounts from these various diplomats and officials as worthless, dismissing them based solely on his unfounded belief that they were all in the pay of Russia. He also received a few reports from Mr. Dupuis, the Consul at Adrianople, which he deemed exaggerated for reasons he never clarified. Instead of investigating these claims further, he opted to ignore them altogether.
Misguided Assurance from the Turkish Porte
In a misguided attempt to confirm his biases, Elliot sent his dragoman to the Porte to inquire about the situation. The dragoman returned with assurances that the Turks were treating the Bulgarians with kindness, portraying them as victims rather than aggressors. Accepting this narrative without question, Elliot smiled and proclaimed, “I knew it,” choosing not to report on the brutal realities that contradicted this portrayal.
The Dangers of Exaggeration Claims
Elliot’s actions, particularly his assertion that the reports of atrocities were exaggerated, demonstrate a troubling lack of accountability. He recklessly claimed that the Bulgarians had committed atrocities equal to those of the Turks, despite having no evidence to support such a statement. By prioritizing a narrative that absolved the Turkish government, he dismissed the overwhelming evidence of suffering among the Bulgarian population.
A Call for Accountability
If Sir Henry Elliot can express indignation over alleged exaggerations while ignoring the countless victims—helpless women and innocent children whose remains litter the fields of Bulgaria—he has failed in his duty as an ambassador. Such indifference is unworthy of a representative of a Christian Queen and a generous people. It is imperative that those in positions of power prioritize truth and justice over political alliances, for the consequences of neglect can lead to unimaginable suffering.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 6 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Armed Goriyani Detachments
The Goriyani movement in Bulgaria consisted of various armed detachments that fought against the communist regime. These groups were made up of individuals from different backgrounds who were determined to resist the oppressive government. Here are some notable Goriyani detachments and their activities:
Early Detachments
Goriyani Detachment from the Godech District: Established in 1947, this detachment was led by Todor Dimitrov Filipov. They were part of the early resistance efforts against the communist regime.
Sixth Pirin Detachment: Formed in early 1947 under Gerasim Todorov’s leadership. To increase their mobility, this detachment split into two smaller groups, with the second led by Kiril Bengazov. Unfortunately, both groups were defeated, and 84 members and supporters faced court trials, resulting in twelve death sentences Istanbul Day Tour.
Continued Resistance
Pazardjik District Detachment: Active until late 1949, this detachment played a significant role in the ongoing resistance efforts.
Three Goriyani Detachments in Pirin Mountain: Organized in 1949, these detachments operated in the mountainous regions, continuing the fight against the regime.
First Sliven Detachment: This well-armed group consisted of 28 members, led by Penyo Christov Michov. They were destroyed in mid-November 1950.
Second Sliven Detachment: Established in April 1951, this detachment, under Georgi Marinov Turpanov, had about 150 members, including several women. They were active in the Sliven Mountains, facing significant opposition from military troops stationed in the area.
Expanding the Movement
Rilski Bojtzi Detachment: Formed in Dupnitza in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, this group operated in Dupnitza and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Yambol District Detachment: Active in the spring of 1950, this group contributed to the resistance efforts in the region.
Ruse Detachment: Created in September 1950 by eight individuals in Ruse, this detachment grew to 40 members, gaining many supporters in local villages. However, it was destroyed by May-June 1951.
Rila Warriors: Also established in 1950 under Nikola Hajdutov, they operated in Dupnitsa and Gorna Dzhumaja.
Notable Organizations
Stara Zagora Armed Detachment: Set up in October 1950, it had 145 underground members by the end of 1951.
Goriyani Bulgarian Resistance Movement: Founded in early April 1951, primarily by students from Plovdiv, this group had 46 members, including three women and several runaway soldiers. In August 1951, they established a second detachment led by Georgi Komitov.
Kazanluk Goriyani Detachment: Initiated by eight members in April 1951 near the village of Stryama. As their numbers grew, they split into three smaller groups, each operating in different areas of the Kazanluk district.
Karlovo Detachment: Formed at the beginning of 1951 by brothers Atanas and Ivan Batalov from Karavelovo. Their activities spanned the Karlovo and Staroselo regions of the Balkan Mountains.
Later Developments
Summer of 1951: Four additional Goriyani detachments were established in the Plovdiv region.
Sapareva Banya Goriyani Detachment: Created in autumn 1951 but was soon discovered and destroyed.
Popovo Detachment: Led by Dobri Christov Chupukov, this armed group consisted of 16 members and operated in the Popovo district until its destruction in early 1952.
Elena Area Detachment: Set up in 1950, this group was uncovered and destroyed in 1951, but another detachment emerged in the same area in 1954.
These detachments played a crucial role in the fight against the communist regime, demonstrating the resilience and determination of the Bulgarian people during a difficult time in their history.
0 notes
bgineurope · 10 months ago
Photo
Tumblr media
Life in Belgrade A Blend of Tradition and Modernity
Traditional Peasant Attire
In the streets of Belgrade, you’ll encounter peasants dressed in traditional garb, reflecting the region’s rich cultural heritage. Their legs are covered in rough, homemade stockings, often adorned with a red band, while their feet are clad in simple sandals secured with straps across the instep and around the ankle. Peasant women, with plain features and a tendency towards plumpness, wear short petticoats and colorful headscarves.
Vibrant Market Scenes
Market days are bustling affairs, with Belgrade housewives taking charge of their own shopping. As they haggle over prices, a variety of characters roam the crowd. A wandering vendor sings his sales pitch for sweet drinks, while priests of the Servian Church, distinguished by their long black hair, whiskers, and flowing black robes, receive respectful greetings. A policeman, resembling a soldier with a horse pistol at his belt, marches through, followed by an official beating a kettledrum to announce proclamations Private Tours Bulgaria.
Military Presence
Along the dusty country roads, the sound of bugles heralds the arrival of young soldiers marching with a determined stride. Their attire, though worn and dusty, speaks of their dedication to duty. Dark blue forage caps and breeches bear the marks of their journey, while clover or ears of wheat adorn their caps as symbols of luck and abundance. Leading the detachment, the officer, mounted on a fine horse, embodies precision and order amidst the rustic surroundings.
0 notes