Random generic crud about how I feel and don't feel and what interests me,and hardly ever if it doesn't he/him or they/them please for pronouns.
Last active 4 hours ago
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
of wishbones, chapter 1 by beemotionpicture
Alfred is already waiting by the car when he reaches the Manor's entrance. For a moment, Bruce stands in the foyer, meeting Alfred's eyes where he sees the same bittersweet wistfulness that must be in his own. There are no greetings exchanged, but there's always been meaning in their quiet moments. Both silence and words are gifts, Master Bruce. Those which I will always offer whenever you need them. Bruce has learned to appreciate that. He's learned to appreciate a lot of things over the years. The ride over is spent similarly silent, but Bruce feels more comforted now than ever by Alfred's presence, feeling like he had when he was a young boy. They pull up to the driveway of the center, and Alfred opens the door for him again, but this time, Bruce clasps a hand on his shoulder. "Thank you, Alfred," he says, and that is enough for them.
masterlist
9 notes
·
View notes
Text
funds so I can escape a transphobic household
hoping this is the last time i have to come here to raise funds. a lot of you remember i raised money not long ago for an ab0rtion. well, lmao. as soon as one situation was squared away a new one came up. after my operation i thought i could settle here for a while wit my aunt while i got back on my feet, but her boyfriend has been nothing but transphobic, verbally abusive, and threatening since i got here. i'm scared for my safety need money to travel back to my hometown. looking to raise $400 for hotel fee and gas. thanks, again.
https://paypal.me/jennycarsons (ignore deadname) cash app: $courtcarsons 0/$400
4K notes
·
View notes
Photo
981 notes
·
View notes
Text
I love laying on the floor :) who else loves laying on the floor? I love laying on the floor :)
7K notes
·
View notes
Text
folks love to blame the fact that younger people are "always" on their phones or computer, always on the internet, wasting their youth, wasting their time, whatever manufactured problem they have with the situation... but what they fail to realize is that everyone is always on their phones and/or computers- because they have to be.
everything is online in 2024. you need to keep up with your school and/or attend classes? almost all of it is entirely online. you want to apply for medical insurance or food/bill assistance? the call center tells you to apply online because they're too swamped to help you in person or on the phone. want to apply for a job? the receptionist or person at the desk tells you to submit an application online, they don't handle paper ones anymore. you need to check on medical documents? they're in an online "portal" now. you need to pay your bills? completely online- some places don't employ call centers at all anymore. you need to stay in contact with important individuals like landlords, social workers, lawyers, therapists, or other professionals? email is always the preferred method of contact. it leaves a trail. check your bank balance? some banks are online only and do not have brick-and-mortar locations anymore. need to look up the address or phone number for the nearest hospital? yeah you get the point. internet.
i went without internet and a phone for months last year and it was the most stressful period of my life. i couldn't apply for anything. i couldn't log into any of my accounts for anything. i couldn't go anywhere. i couldn't use uber or lyft. i couldn't look up information for my pharmacy. i couldn't pay for anything or even check most of my bank accounts. i was screwed. he reason we're on our phones/computers all day long is because we literally have to be, because the internet is so interwoven into our every day lives that it's not a choice- it's literally a necessity. lay off with this mentality. most people do not want to be online as much as they are. it's just necessary.
2K notes
·
View notes
Text
Like/reblog if you think that you don't need to medically transition to be transgender
43K notes
·
View notes
Text
Trying to prove a point
REBLOG IF YOU THINK AROACE / aro/ ace PEOPLE ARE A VALID PART OF THE LGBTQ+ COMMUNITY , LIKE IF YOU DON’T
7K notes
·
View notes
Text
Can we please stop putting down autistic, ADHD, and other neurodivergent people whose traits are considered 'cringe', 'dorky', 'weird' or something else considered to be socially unacceptable?
We get enough shit from neurotypical people—we don't need to throw each other under the bus too.
"But they're making us look bad!"
I. Don't. Care. It's wrong to put each other on hierarchies. Simple.
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
You Might Not Be Normal About Trans Men If...
You think we all pass 100% of the time with no issues or effort
You don't think feminine trans men are "real" trans men
You assume we're all transitioning to escape misogyny
You think we aren't oppressed by society
You think our problems are inherently transmisogynistic
You think it's okay to reduce us to our genitals for any reason
You think masculine trans men being themselves are inherently toxic
You think us demanding to be seen and heard and have space within our own community is us being "MRAs" and "transmisogynists"
You think transandrophobia (the idea that trans men experience oppression based on their specific intersection of transness and gender) doesn't exist or inherently is transmisogynistic
You're only okay with trans men if they don't go on T and/or get surgery
You actively try to discourage trans men from going on T and/or getting surgery
You think the previous two points don't include bottom surgery
You think all trans men are bottoms
You think gay trans men are fetishizing gay cis men
You think all transmasc artists are inherently cringe/bad at what they do
You think transmascs only exist to uplift transfems
You think anyone presenting as masculine is inherently dangerous
You think that only men/masculine presenting people can be dangerous
You think that women/feminine presenting people are always safe
You don't think trans men are in danger when forced to use the women's restroom
You think that any oppression/discrimination transmascs face is "run of the mill transphobia" or "run of the mill misogyny"
You think anything I've said on this post means that transmisogyny isn't real or matters less
You're about to leave a comment on this post accusing me of being a transmisogynist or wanting attention or wanting to be oppressed
7K notes
·
View notes
Text
btw there isn't a dress code for any queer identity. there isn't a dresscode for intersex people, genderqueer people, non binary people, gay people, lesbians, bisexual people, trans men, trans women, genderfluid people, she/hers, they/thems, he/hims, it/its, any pronoun set, agender people, transmascs, transfemmes, pansexuals, polyamorous people, aromantic people, asexual people, bigender people, butches, femmes, crossdressers, drag performers, sapphic people, achillean people, mtfs, ftms, gender non conforming people, transsexuals, transvestites, dykes, faggots, trannies, queers, all transgender people, cishet people, men, women, and every person on planet earth. there's no dress code necessary to be your given self. hope that helps
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
I saw someone misgender a nonbinary person and when they were corrected this mf said "I prefer to use she/her on her ❤" I'M SORRY??? HUHH??
So close! You actually don't get to choose someone else's pronouns for them! Hope that helps! 💖💞
7K notes
·
View notes
Text
"love is love" until it doesn't include sex
"love is love" until it lives in separate beds
"love is love" until it is queer platonic
"love is love" until it does not comply with compulsory sexuality and amatonormativity
love IS love, for aspecs, for sex sepulsed folk and for platonic relationships
"love is love" apply to more than same-sex relationships in a world where romantic and sexual relationships are considered more valuable
Remember to advocate for Asexuals and Aromantics this pride. Because we are also here, and we are also queer
46K notes
·
View notes
Text
Different not less! But when it comes to destigmatizing disability, it's also important to note that "less capable" doesn't equal "less human" or "less worthy." And we shouldn't have to argue that we aren't actually less capable to prove our worth. We get to be different in a way that leaves us less capable and STILL be fully human and valuable people
312 notes
·
View notes
Text
Like there absolutely are autistic people who genuinely can't understand verbal communication/follow requests/participate in most social settings. But these autistics are usually not the ones walking around crossing people's boundaries repeatedly just to then explain that unfortunately they can't help doing that because they're autistic. So what I'm saying is that IF someone's social skills are good enough for them to interact verbally with people in normal social settings without assistance, they should ALSO be able to respect a clearly communicated boundary
346 notes
·
View notes
Text
"All autistics have low empathy" - This statement is wrong.
"Autistics having low empathy is a MYTH, we actually have HIGH empathy!" - This statement is ALSO wrong.
Autistics can have low empathy, they can have high empathy, they can have learned empathy. The myth would be that all autistics only experience one end of the empathy spectrum.
In spreading around misinformation that autistics actually have high empathy, you are disregarding the autistics who do have low empathy. And vice versa.
22K notes
·
View notes
Text
That being said, if you're allistic and find yourself being mad at an autistic person because of something you haven't actually communicated to them because you feel that you "shouldn't have to say it" and that "they'd figure it out if they really cared to", then YOU are in fact the one causing a problem and the one who needs to work on improving your communication skills
7K notes
·
View notes
Text
I think what low support needs people get wrong when they feel invalidated by the terms low support needs vs high support needs is that they think "low support needs" implies "insignificant support needs/no support needs". But that's not what it means. Every disabled person has support needs. Just because they are on the low end compared to certain other disabled people's, that does not imply that they aren't real and valid. Someone else needing more support than you doesn't imply that your disability isn't a real disability
1K notes
·
View notes