Text
More random zois. i think this is all before vacay!
5 notes
·
View notes
Text
Making my own zoi is still hard to do given the current presets, but this is not too far off!
0 notes
Text
oh well...
BLADE OF FRONTIERS
489 notes
·
View notes
Text
#The way Crowley distances himself from Aziraphale by putting on his glasses for the first time this season in the bookshop
10K notes
·
View notes
Text
Hello, dear friends! ☀️ Wishing you a bright and beautiful Monday to kick off the week! 🥰 It was a long and productive weekend for me and I hope you had a wonderful weekend too! 😍
Crochet patterns for all these kawaii amigurumi toys are available here -> https://etsy.me/3orGpdt 💛💙
22 notes
·
View notes
Photo
Halle Bailey photographed by Rob Rusling for V Magazine
1K notes
·
View notes
Text
more of my sims.. the world will slowly be run by girls
3 notes
·
View notes
Photo
this is how january will look like
That feeling when you realize what a mess you made and you don’t know where to start with cleaning it up.
22K notes
·
View notes
Photo
There’s a protest going on against AI art over on artstation, so I feel like now is the time for me to make a statement on this issue!
I wholeheartedly support the ongoing protest against AI art. Why? Because my artwork is included in the datasets used to train these image generators without my consent. I get zero compensation for the use of my art, even though these image generators cost money to use, and are a commercial product.
Musicians are not being treated the same way. Stability has a music generator that only uses royalty free music in their dataset. Their words: “Because diffusion models are prone to memorization and overfitting, releasing a model trained on copyrighted data could potentially result in legal issues.” Why is the work of visual artists being treated differently?
Many have compared image generators to human artists seeking out inspiration. Those two are not the same. My art is literally being fed into these generators through the datasets, and spat back out of a program that has no inherent sense of what is respectful to artists. As long as my art is literally integrated into the system used to create the images, it is commercial use of my art without my consent.
Until there is an ethically sourced database that compensates artists for the use of their images, I am against AI art. I also think platforms should do everything they can to prevent scraping of their content for these databases.
Artists, speak out against this predatory practice! Our art should not be exploited without our consent, and we deserve to be compensated when our art is exploited for commercial use.
64K notes
·
View notes
Text
0 notes
Text
115 notes
·
View notes