adamlanzaradfem
104 posts
Don't wanna be here? Send us removal request.
Text
58 notes
·
View notes
Text
“Terfs” and not, just, many normal people with no ideology whatsoever that do this. Its basic logic that a manly woman can be called a man. She’s being insulted, and, it takes just a bit more logic to get here but don’t lose me, that means the person who insulted her thinks she should stop being masculine. Not, that women can actually be men
Bi-kisses is “against” social gender logic but then thinks manly women being called men is proof trans men are men
This takes someone saying “that women is a man” in a nonliteral way and using it as proof that “gender is a fuck”. That’s a phrase insane social gender people use and this tweet agrees with that. Though this one goes with bi-kisses’ blog theme as it mentions testosterone, a natural hormone, so in her mind, it’s all natural for women to be considered men
Tdlr: Bi-kisses is against social gender logic, but uses social situations (people calling manly women men, and women taking testosterone) as proof of transgenderism. Taking testosterone is social. Transsexuality is social.
0 notes
Text
"I'm tired of the word patriarchy we don't live in one. Use the words I used here instead like transandrophobia and nonbinary"
Trans men in a fucking nutshell 😭
I'm just so tired of holding up the concept of patriarchy. I'm so sick of pretending it is the focus of my problems. Yes some ancestor of mine or yours lived in and upheld this particular iteration of patriarchy. Yes some of our modern beliefs are part of or reactionary to that patriarchal ideal. Yet I have never lived in one. The vitriol and pain I have experienced is more generic, and also more personal, than "patriarchy" can describe. I am so so tired of having to include it in every conversation about gender, or when I read of it. The word is rarely used as it was made to be used, and more to describe the supposed role of men in a sexist world. The point of feminism, I thought, was to destroy such a concept. You have power as women, or as men(not to speak of nb people at the moment). Your ability to destroy and to be oppressed has pretty much equalized in a generic sense, or at least enough that a substantial amount of the population is in flux. Act like it. Wield that power and responsibility. I beg you. Androphobia regardless of the specific group is perpetuated by men AND women and does not always center around patriarchal ideals
(this is about the US, if you live elsewhere I am not claiming I know what type of system you live under. Even in the US, if you are actively living within a religious group that individual group is likely patriarchal)
102 notes
·
View notes
Note
why r u wasting this beautiful url on 1019572848 gorrilion reply threads of arguing with gay retards. u should make ur own posts.
lmao thanks for the messages. i stalled answering this beyond an okay point but. i have some posts in the drafts but they are still my take on other ideas of people. i’ll post some of that and get used to making my own posts completely. i really appreciate you wanting to see posts from me
0 notes
Text
damn…, i was legitimately writing a response for each of these words…
how?
You’re a TERF. Just because you only have a hate boner for trans men and not cis men, that doesn't mean your "sisters" aren't the opposite. And the fundamental problem is that you're still a man-hating fuck, just a different kind of man-hating fuck.
4 notes
·
View notes
Text
i saw a viral post on here that said “a country that allows trans men to get abortion allows cis women to get abortions” “a country that cis women can get abortions in may not allow trans men to get abortions” so trans men should be included in a conversation with their weird terms like “uterus haver”
i was thinking, well, true. i don’t support this, but wow here’s a trans thing that actually is true. anything i have seen that a transgender person has said that can be argued that this idea is false, such as a statement i saw once that explicitly said the opposite of this, means nothing
then theres obnoxious shit the end: “we aren’t cis women. your fight for cis women doesn’t include us”
this is why i argue against transgender: they are so unpleasant. you read this coldly written entitled statement and you immediately go “you excluded yourself??” without even thinking. they make the arguments against their ideas come to mind immediately
they choose to exclude themselves from women, and then they want women to include them. “trans men can’t get healthcare since they are legally male” you changed your gender to that yourself. you aren’t a “man who happens to be trans”. you went to the doctor to do this and take testosterone to do this
their unpleasantness makes it where you do want to argue against that “.2% of the population’s just trying to be themselves”. you could get crazy and even argue against their original idea. what i was referencing before was when i saw a discourse ig account of a trans man say that abortion should only be allowed in the case of rape, incest, and trans men. now that i think about it, i have seen a trans woman youtuber say the same thing, rape/incest/trans men should be the exceptions. i saw a post last night that took two paragraphs to say that “trans men are so brave for being pregnant since they’re men” and that could be argue that idea
yes, i know that isnt going to happen🤣, but if you want to act like them, any way that this “could happen” shouldn’t be supported. and this post can be applied to the entire community as a whole. the overall attempt to grow their parallel society where trans people are worshiped with men, past the point men are even cared for in the regular world, should be opposed of
i can be a crazy person with how i oppose of them, but it’s my instinctual reaction to how these people act, and it’s just too easy to say something
1 note
·
View note
Text
"i am a fem-aligned nonbinary person who goes by they/she/he pronouns and i am currently in a queer ethically non-monogamous relationship with my partner :)"
her boyfriend: my name's mike and i hate minorities
5K notes
·
View notes
Text
pattern recognition for abuse from tumblr posts
you’ve been abused by women who liked masculine men? doubt … 🤣
This feels like the start to a horror movie and I love it
211K notes
·
View notes
Text
mfer said “behold,”
i have my reasons for not liking groups of people and i don’t think its wrong and my rationale for that is that my reasons actually make sense. i dont have anything against them personally, if one came around i wouldnt dislike him
No matter how you slice it, "I don't like this group of people and think they shouldn't exist because I don't find them sexually attractive" is fucked up.
Here's a novel idea: DON'T DATE OR SLEEP WITH THEM BUT RESPECT THEM ANYWAY!!! Because that's the fucking baseline of fucking common human decency!!!
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
that’s bad what has happened to, but you expect strangers to have a more extreme version of empathy than that. women don’t receive that either
men/boys are usually raped by men, and that’s taken more seriously than male on female rape. you want to make a woman the stereotypical rapist, or at least expect society to change their subconscious connotation of a rapist being a man
6K notes
·
View notes
Text
kek. i don’t have to like feminine men
you’re not the arbiter of “common decency”. you’re posts aren’t wholesome towards every group yourself
No matter how you slice it, "I don't like this group of people and think they shouldn't exist because I don't find them sexually attractive" is fucked up.
Here's a novel idea: DON'T DATE OR SLEEP WITH THEM BUT RESPECT THEM ANYWAY!!! Because that's the fucking baseline of fucking common human decency!!!
18 notes
·
View notes
Text
“harass” i brought up what i relate to men and thats not femininity. i dont have to like that
accusing people of being abusers for posts that have nothing to do with abuse, classic tumblr
This feels like the start to a horror movie and I love it
211K notes
·
View notes
Text
nerdylilpeebee regarding your tags, i “moved the goal post” to see if you would instead condemn the more extreme situation then. you didn’t. you are the one with “double think” since you will condemn op but won’t condemn the same concept but violence instead. “misandry” what have i said thats anti men? my point is that you are excessively pro men
This feels like the start to a horror movie and I love it
211K notes
·
View notes
Text
it wasn’t to move the goal post; it was to see if this person would instead condemn a more extreme version of the situation then
yes self defense includes what you mention: but i am not bringing up weapons. if a woman has a weapon, then it does call for more extreme versions of self defense. my point is when it’s not self defense.
i’d say hitting an aggressor is not as bad as bad as being an aggressor
yeah, i asked this person that because they say the vindication in this case “makes them just as bad as him”
the question is would you be mad if this was two women or two men?
that’s actually a good point, but my point is to point out double standards regarding gender. this person who supports men’s rights activism and who my was reply was too has them
being lied and manipulated doesn’t justify lying and manipulating on return
my point is that that person who replied to this post with a men’s rights appeal will say this, but then not condemn the same concept but for violence instead because its a men’s rights concept
For all we know, this woman is a manipulative harridan who the guy is scared to break up with.
i would accuse you of being like a radfem here, but you did say sometimes hitting back is unjustified, so i dont think youre like a radfem
turns out we treat actual physical violence differently than lying and manipulation
thats a double standard in of itself to treat violence as more justified, but you’re bold text makes me think you think you think violence is worse, so this is a small misunderstanding of my ideas
you can go to jail for self defense
you’re right so i did have that wrong in my replies trying to defend both (i defended both violent and non violent vindication)
i love how you are ostensibly defending op, but are accusing peebee of hypocrisy
my point isn’t to defend op. my point is the hypocrisy.
i also love how you mention legally then mention morally
no, the other person brought up the legal definition then i mentioned both to highlight that there’s a meaning to the legal definition
she cares more about revenge than actually leaving the guy
true. but my point is people who celebrate men kicking women after the violent interaction is over and he can walk away and then start talking about “self defense” are doing that too
the biggest thing, my point isn’t to defend anyone. ive hit my brother back and he’s hit me back, ect, (it’s how we had fun). im just pointing out the double standards of the person who originally replied to this post with a men’s rights appeal because they won’t condemn a different men’s rights concept
This feels like the start to a horror movie and I love it
211K notes
·
View notes
Text
how do you think anyone finds their partner on a dating site? she was probably told about it at first. or it’s just a fake post. really has nothing to do with my points, the point is one of those men’s rights people i was replying in support of vindication for men, but is against it for women because of a men’s rights appeal “no one would support a man doing this”
This feels like the start to a horror movie and I love it
211K notes
·
View notes
Text
i dont have “sisters”. most radfems don’t like me. if you admit i dont hate men why tag this post with “transandrophobia is misandry”. it shows that what is thought of men and “trans men” aren’t the same. this made up word from tumblr describes me well, so do keep that right. its not men, it’s the people who want to force me to comply with their beliefs
nice tags to get a gang of trans men on this post going lmfaooo
edit: i mean if you want me to unblock sounds fine🤷🏻♂️ i blocked because u mentioned blocking me. people on tumblr send a reply and then block right after
You’re a TERF. Just because you only have a hate boner for trans men and not cis men, that doesn't mean your "sisters" aren't the opposite. And the fundamental problem is that you're still a man-hating fuck, just a different kind of man-hating fuck.
4 notes
·
View notes