#the moment of Gandhi's india politics
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
India’s election calculus is tricky. When Narendra Modi led the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) to power in 2014, he increased his party’s parliamentary seat tally to 282 from 116, essentially by gaining 12 percentage points of the popular vote. It was the first time since 1984 that a single Indian party won enough seats to form a government on its own.
The Indian National Congress party led the ruling coalition that Modi and the BJP defeated in 2014; the party’s vote share fell by 9 percentage points, but its seats dropped from 206 to a mere 44. Five years later, the BJP’s vote share rose again, to 37 percent, giving Modi’s party 303 seats. Congress increased its number of seats to 52, but as in 2014, that wasn’t even enough to merit a formal leader of the opposition in parliament.
In the six-week national election that concluded this month, the BJP’s vote share dropped only marginally, to around 36 percent, but its number of seats fell dramatically, to 240—causing the party to lose its majority. Although Congress’s vote share rose modestly to around 21 percent, its seats increased to 99. As a result, India will have an official leader of the opposition for the first time in a decade. Rahul Gandhi, the Congress party leader and heir to India’s most illustrious political dynasty, may well play that role.
That may seem like a small achievement for India’s beleaguered opposition—and the election result was still the third-worst performance for Congress since India’s first vote in 1952—but it represents a change surprising and seismic enough for some analysts to conclude that Modi’s latest victory was “Pyrrhic,” and that the opposition now has a foundation to win in 2029. As the former British Prime Minister Harold Wilson quipped, “A week is a long time in politics”—and five years an eternity.
In 2029, Modi will be 78 years old, but this year, he still ran a campaign based on his own record and personality. The BJP’s manifesto included more than 50 photographs of Modi. Much commentary about the results has focused on Modi’s declining popularity. Given his political dominance, it is natural for his critics to enjoy a moment of schadenfreude. On the campaign trail, Modi’s rhetoric sounded more shrill, critical of minorities, and insulting toward his opponents; during the election, he even implied that he was divinely ordained to lead India.
This year’s election has also undermined the argument that Modi’s main rival, Rahul Gandhi, is a political lightweight overwhelmed by India’s complexities. Gandhi is descended from three former prime ministers, including India’s first, Jawaharlal Nehru. (His mother, Sonia, serves in the upper house of parliament.) Now 54, Gandhi has been a member of parliament since 2004, winning six of the seven elections that he has contested. Yet the BJP has carried out a relentless and remarkably effective propaganda campaign against him. Modi has described him as a shehzada, or crown prince, while BJP ministers have dismissed him as Pappu, a pejorative term for a young boy of limited intelligence.
Unlike Modi, Gandhi does not assert that he has all the answers; he listens, an approach that may have helped him during the election. He likes to engage the public, and since September 2022 he has led two long marches across the country—the Bharat Jodo Yatra (Unite India March) and the Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra (Unite India for Justice March)—that electrified the masses and transformed his image. According to some estimates, Gandhi wrested 41 parliamentary seats from areas where he marched. He talked to constituents, listened to voters, and spoke about social justice, women’s emancipation, empowering the weak and the dispossessed, and bringing people together.
Those topics may seem mawkish, but India’s last decade has been a period of considerable strife. Discrimination against Muslims has grown, with mosques targeted or claimed by Hindus, homes bulldozed, and interfaith marriages discouraged. The triumphal inauguration of a Hindu temple—sanctioned by the Indian Supreme Court—on the site of a mosque razed in 1992 only further alienated Muslims. The BJP’s policy of imposing the Hindi language in states where it is not spoken widely has fueled animosity. Youth unemployment has risen in many parts of the country, along with inequality.
As in the past, Modi’s campaign focused on divisive issues—but more voters than in the last two elections seemed to listen to Gandhi this time around. These voters likely don’t care about more Indians being listed in global rankings of billionaires; they are uninterested in gleaming high-rises and malls, speedier trains, superior airports, or toll roads connecting long distances. Their concerns are for more access to water, food, electricity, jobs, and justice. Gandhi seemed to fashion the Congress manifesto to respond to those concerns.
This is not to suggest that, if elected to power, the Congress party would meet these perennial needs. Having ruled India for 54 of its 76 years since independence, Congress must bear the blame for India’s lack of development. The party deserves credit for introducing economic liberalization in 1991, but its support for free-market reforms has often been cautious rather than enthusiastic. Furthermore, although Gandhi speaks of harmony, there have been several disturbances under Congress party rule in India—the most notorious being the massacre of Sikhs in 1984 in retaliatory violence after the assassination of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, Rahul’s grandmother.
Nonetheless, Gandhi’s spirited campaign, decency, and collegiality stood in marked contrast to Modi’s personalized and abrasive style. Gandhi seemed to avoid a personality cult by building a consensus-driven campaign and not projecting himself as the face of the opposition alliance. In the leadup to the election, he continued to be ridiculed as an entitled politician, but he focused on his message. And wherever he marched, he chipped votes away from the BJP. One analysis showed that between 600,000 and 700,000 votes going the other way in 30 constituencies would have led to a different outcome.
The BJP has portrayed itself as pro-business, and analysts sympathetic to the BJP have described Congress as leftist, with BJP leaders reinforcing the link. Indeed, Congress introduced many welfare schemes for the poor—but the BJP has not canceled any of them during its time in power and has increased support for some programs. Historically, Congress was a centrist or center-left party reliant on the support of Indian businesses that pursued a prudent fiscal policy. The party was distrustful of private capital and free-market economics. But it was also Congress that took early steps in liberalization, invested in technology, and boosted India’s telecoms network.
For Congress, the road ahead remains long, but its rejuvenation raises interesting possibilities. Most Indian voters are too young to remember a Gandhi���or Nehru—as prime minister. Now, there could soon be three Gandhis in parliament: On Tuesday, Rahul Gandhi’s sister, Priyanka, announced that she would contest one of the two seats that her brother won during this election. Some observers see Priyanka as more charismatic and savvier than Rahul.
Furthermore, a sizable segment of India’s population is under the age of 30, and this generation has rising expectations and aspirations—including an impatience to get rich. Can Congress reinvent itself as India’s so-called banyan tree party that includes everyone under its shade? The BJP offers a muscular nationalism with angry overtones; Gandhi promises that he wants to revive an older idea of India, based on equality and tolerance. Do these younger voters want a calmer, gentler India?
Indian politics has entered a new phase, and the time to ignore Rahul Gandhi may be over. He may still never become India’s prime minister—after all, it seems unlikely that someone from the Gandhi family would want to lead a shaky coalition. But even if he simply persists in emphasizing equality, justice, and empathy, Gandhi will have played a transformative role in Indian politics.
The last decade has shown India’s angry and assertive side, but its founding fathers built the country’s reputation as a soft power that punched above its weight. Reclaiming such moral authority has its virtues. The rules are changing in India, and Gandhi may not only be the son who rises, but also the son who surprises.
8 notes
·
View notes
Video
youtube
The Battle for India's Foreign Policy: Congress vs. BJP
Let's take a moment to dive into the fascinating evolution of India's foreign policy over the decades, particularly under the two major political players: the Congress Party and the Bharatiya Janata Party, or BJP. Now, this isn't just a dry history lesson; it's a journey through the shifting sands of international relations that have shaped India's role on the global stage. So, grab a cup of chai, and let's explore how these two parties have navigated the complex waters of foreign policy. First up, let's talk about strategic alignments and partnerships. Under the Congress Party, especially during the era of leaders like Jawaharlal Nehru and Indira Gandhi, India embraced a non-aligned approach. Imagine the Cold War, where the world was divided into two camps: the US and the Soviet Union. Congress aimed to keep India at an arm's length from both, focusing instead on building relationships with nations in the Global South-think Africa and Asia. This was a time when diplomacy was about dialogue, about finding common ground without getting too cozy with any major power. Fast forward to the BJP era, particularly under Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and we see a stark shift. The BJP has taken a more assertive stance, leaning heavily into partnerships with countries like the US and Japan. It's as if India decided to step onto the global stage with a confident strut, aligning itself more closely with Western powers, especially in countering China's growing influence in the Indo-Pacific. This shift is not just about alliances; it's about asserting India's place in a rapidly changing world.
0 notes
Text
What Happened on September 11 in History?
September 11 is a date marked by significant events that have had profound impacts on both global and national scales. Across different centuries and contexts, September 11 has witnessed historical moments that span wars, political transformations, and movements for justice. From the tragedy of the 9/11 attacks to earlier milestones like the construction of the Pentagon or the deposement of Chilean President Salvador Allende, the day carries both painful memories and moments of resilience.
This article explores the key events that took place on September 11, tracing their historical significance and their lasting effects. The narratives of these events reflect the wide spectrum of human history—politics, conflict, architecture, and social movements—that have shaped the modern world. As we explore these events, we are reminded of the ways in which single days can hold the weight of history, offering lessons for the future.
What Happened on September 11 in History?
Kruger to Mozambique (1900)
In the midst of the Second Boer War, September 11 of 1900 marked a crucial moment for the embattled Boer leadership. Paul Kruger, President of the South African Republic (Transvaal), crossed the border into Mozambique, seeking refuge from the advancing British forces. By this point in the war, the Boers, a group of Dutch-speaking settlers in South Africa, had been engaged in a bitter conflict with the British Empire, which sought to assert control over the resource-rich region.
Kruger’s decision to flee marked the beginning of the end for Boer resistance, though guerilla warfare would continue for another two years. His departure symbolized the collapse of formal Boer governance and presaged the annexation of Transvaal by the British. September 11 remains a reminder of how imperial ambitions shaped the political landscape of Southern Africa, with repercussions that would reverberate throughout the 20th century.
Satyagraha (1906)
On September 11, 1906, Mahatma Gandhi coined the term “Satyagraha” in Johannesburg, South Africa. It was a pivotal moment in the history of nonviolent resistance. The word, derived from Sanskrit, means “truth-force” or “soul-force,” and it represented Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence as a powerful tool for social and political change. The movement itself arose in opposition to discriminatory laws imposed on the Indian community in South Africa, but it would later become a cornerstone of Gandhi’s broader political approach in India’s fight for independence from British rule.
This event on September 11 holds great significance in the global history of peaceful protest. The concept of Satyagraha inspired countless civil rights movements across the world, including Martin Luther King Jr.’s campaign for civil rights in the United States. Its impact extends beyond the realm of politics into the fabric of moral and ethical resistance to oppression.
Quebec Bridge Collapse (1916)
The tragedy of the Quebec Bridge’s central span collapsing during reconstruction occurred on September 11, 1916, killing 11 men. This was not the first disaster for the bridge, which had already collapsed in 1907, killing 75 workers. The Quebec Bridge was intended to be the longest cantilever bridge in the world at the time, spanning the St. Lawrence River, and its collapse became a notorious engineering failure.
The second collapse in 1916 further underscored the dangers and complexities of large-scale engineering projects in the early 20th century. Both collapses led to improvements in engineering practices, including more rigorous safety standards and calculations, making the lessons of September 11 vital for the development of modern civil engineering.
Lindbergh’s War Claim (1941)
On September 11, 1941, Charles Lindbergh, the famed aviator, made a controversial public statement claiming that the “British, Jewish and Roosevelt administration” were trying to push the United States into World War II. Lindbergh, who had gained international fame for his solo transatlantic flight in 1927, had become a leading voice in the America First Committee, a non-interventionist group opposed to U.S. involvement in the war.
Lindbergh’s remarks on September 11 sparked significant backlash, as his insinuations were seen as anti-Semitic and unpatriotic. His stance on U.S. involvement in the war ultimately damaged his public reputation. Nonetheless, Lindbergh’s speech was indicative of the isolationist sentiment that existed in the U.S. prior to the attack on Pearl Harbor, which shifted the nation’s stance toward the war.
Pentagon Construction Begins (1941)
Also on September 11, 1941, construction of the Pentagon began in Arlington County, Virginia. Designed by architect George Bergstrom and built by contractor John McShain, the construction was overseen by Leslie Groves. The Pentagon, completed in January 1943, would become the headquarters of the U.S. Department of Defense and one of the most recognizable buildings in the world.
The significance of September 11 in relation to the Pentagon was tragically reinforced 60 years later during the 9/11 terrorist attacks, when American Airlines Flight 77 was hijacked and crashed into the building, killing 125 people inside and 59 on the plane. The Pentagon’s dual connection to September 11 highlights its central role in both U.S. defense strategy and the global fight against terrorism.
Order to Shoot Axis Ships (1941)
On September 11, 1941, U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt issued an order to the U.S. Navy to shoot any Axis ships found in American waters. This order came during a time of increasing tension between the United States and the Axis powers, particularly Germany. Although the U.S. had not yet officially entered World War II, Roosevelt’s directive signaled a clear shift toward greater involvement in the conflict.
This aggressive posture helped lay the groundwork for the U.S. to enter the war just months later, following the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor in December. Roosevelt’s decision on September 11 illustrated the increasingly precarious position of the U.S. as it sought to navigate the complexities of global conflict while maintaining its security.
Hideki Tojo Attempts Suicide (1945)
On September 11, 1945, former Japanese Prime Minister Hideki Tojo attempted suicide rather than face a war crimes tribunal following Japan’s defeat in World War II. Tojo had served as the leader of Japan for most of the war, and his role in Japan’s aggressive military campaigns made him one of the primary figures held responsible for the conflict’s atrocities.
Tojo’s failed suicide attempt on September 11 did not prevent him from facing justice. He was later tried, found guilty, and hanged in 1948 for war crimes. His legacy remains a complex and controversial one, with some viewing him as a symbol of Japan’s wartime leadership and others as a scapegoat for broader military decisions.
De Gaulle in Poland (1967)
On September 11, 1967, French President Charles de Gaulle visited Poland, marking a significant moment in Cold War diplomacy. De Gaulle’s visit was part of his broader foreign policy strategy, which sought to assert French independence from both the U.S. and Soviet spheres of influence during the Cold War. His diplomatic outreach to Eastern Europe was seen as a way to foster stronger relations with countries behind the Iron Curtain, particularly Poland, which was under Soviet control at the time.
De Gaulle’s visit on September 11 symbolized France’s desire to carve out a distinct role in global politics, one that emphasized sovereignty and independence from the major powers of the time. His efforts to engage with Eastern Europe were met with mixed results, but they reinforced France’s position as a major player in Cold War diplomacy.
Allende Deposed in Coup (1973)
On September 11, 1973, Chilean President Salvador Allende was deposed in a military coup led by General Augusto Pinochet. Allende, the first elected Marxist president in Latin America, had come to power in 1970 with a promise to implement socialist reforms. However, his government faced significant internal opposition and external pressures, particularly from the United States, which feared the spread of socialism in the region.
The coup on September 11 resulted in Allende’s death and ushered in a brutal military dictatorship under Pinochet that would last until 1990. This event marked a dark chapter in Chile’s history, as Pinochet’s regime was responsible for widespread human rights abuses, including the torture and disappearance of thousands of political opponents.
Mubarak Meets with Peres (1986)
On September 11, 1986, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak received Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres in a significant diplomatic meeting. The meeting came in the wake of the historic Camp David Accords, which had led to a peace treaty between Egypt and Israel in 1979. Mubarak’s willingness to meet with Peres on September 11 reinforced Egypt’s commitment to maintaining peaceful relations with its neighbor, despite ongoing tensions in the broader Middle East.
The encounter was part of a broader effort to stabilize the region and foster dialogue between Israel and its Arab neighbors. While the peace process would face many challenges in the following decades, the September 11 meeting was an important step in maintaining diplomatic channels between the two nations.
9/11 Attack on NY’s World Trade Towers (2001)
Perhaps the most significant event associated with September 11 in recent history is the 2001 terrorist attack on New York’s World Trade Towers. On that morning, two passenger planes hijacked by Al Qaeda terrorists crashed into the North and South Towers of the World Trade Center, causing their eventual collapse and resulting in the deaths of 2,606 people in the towers and on the ground. A third plane crashed into the Pentagon, while a fourth, United Flight 93, was brought down by passengers in a field in Pennsylvania before it could reach its intended target.
The 9/11 attacks on September 11 shocked the world and led to profound shifts in global politics. The attacks prompted the U.S. to launch the War on Terror, resulting in military interventions in Afghanistan and Iraq, and reshaping international relations. The day stands as a somber reminder of the vulnerabilities of modern societies to acts of terrorism and the ongoing challenges of ensuring global security.
Catalonia Independence March (2017)
On September 11, 2017, one million people marched in Barcelona in support of Catalonia’s independence from Spain. The march, held on Catalonia’s national day, reflected growing tensions between the regional government and the Spanish state. The independence movement had gained momentum over the previous years, culminating in a controversial independence referendum on October 1, 2017.
The mass demonstration on September 11 was a peaceful but powerful display of the desire for self-determination among many Catalans. However, the movement has since faced significant legal and political challenges, as the Spanish government declared the independence referendum illegal. Despite this, September 11 remains a symbol of Catalonia’s aspirations for greater autonomy and its ongoing struggle for recognition.
Conclusion
September 11 stands as one of the most significant dates in modern history, marked by moments of immense tragedy, diplomatic milestones, and significant political changes. From the establishment of peaceful philosophies like Satyagraha in 1906 to the devastating 9/11 attacks in 2001, the events of this day reflect a wide range of human experiences and global impacts. These incidents have shaped the course of history, influencing politics, social movements, and international relations across the globe.
As we reflect on the various events that occurred on September 11, we are reminded of the power of a single day to change the world. Whether through acts of violence or moments of diplomatic outreach, the events of this day continue to resonate in the present, shaping the way we understand history and its enduring legacies.
0 notes
Text
Indian Independence Day
Indian Independence Day, celebrated annually on August 15th, marks a pivotal moment in the history of India. On this day in 1947, India achieved independence from British colonial rule after a prolonged and arduous struggle. This milestone was the culmination of decades of political activism, nonviolent resistance, and social reform spearheaded by leaders like Mahatma Gandhi, Jawaharlal Nehru,…
View On WordPress
0 notes
Text
Celebrating Cultural Connections: The World Romani Congress in Chandigarh, 1976
In October 1976, Chandigarh, India, hosted a historic gathering that transcended borders and celebrated cultural identity—the World Romani Congress. Organized under the patronage of Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, this landmark event brought together Roma representatives from around the globe to commemorate their shared heritage, discuss common challenges, and advocate for their rights.
Historical Context:
The Romani people, known for their rich cultural heritage and diverse traditions, trace their origins to northern India, making their way across continents over centuries. Despite facing discrimination and marginalization, they have preserved their unique languages, customs, and identity.
Significance of the Congress:
The World Romani Congress in Chandigarh was a significant milestone. It provided a platform for Roma leaders, activists, scholars, and community members to come together and address issues affecting their communities globally. Key topics included education, healthcare, political representation, and cultural preservation.
Participants and Leaders:
Prime Minister Indira Gandhi played a crucial role in supporting and facilitating the congress, highlighting India’s historical ties with the Roma people. Among the prominent figures was Veerendra Rishi, an Indian scholar and historian, who contributed scholarly insights into the historical connections between the Roma and India. His presence underscored the cultural exchange and mutual influences between the Roma and Indian communities over centuries.
Discussions and Outcomes:
Throughout the congress, participants engaged in discussions that ranged from historical ties between the Roma and India to strategies for combating discrimination and promoting socio-economic advancement. Cultural performances, exhibitions, and academic sessions showcased the diversity and richness of Romani culture, fostering greater understanding and appreciation among attendees.
Legacy and Continued Impact:
The World Romani Congress left a lasting legacy by strengthening global Roma solidarity and raising awareness of their cultural contributions. It paved the way for continued international dialogue and collaboration among Roma communities worldwide, inspiring ongoing efforts to uphold their rights and dignity.
Conclusion:
The World Romani Congress in Chandigarh, 1976, stands as a testament to the resilience and cultural pride of the Roma people. By uniting in India, they reaffirmed their historical roots and forged bonds of solidarity that continue to resonate today. This congress remains a pivotal moment in the ongoing struggle for Romani rights and recognition, reminding us of the importance of celebrating diversity and honoring cultural heritage on a global scale.
#Chandigarh#RomaFestival#RomaCongress#India#IndiraGandhi#WorldRomaniCongress#Bharat#RomaAreChildrenOfIndia#RomaIndianDiaspora
0 notes
Text
I saw a post recently about how socialists calling modi a dictator negates the fact that he is one, because if he was, then we wouldn't be able to call him that. Similarly, india is not fascist because then we wouldn't be able to say that either. Even though this will not gain much traction, I would like to write down my understanding of the issue.
Also, the idea that all leftists seem to idolise the gandhis is by itself a 'gotcha' moment is somewhat comical. Indeed, there are leftists who think that the Congress rule was much more favorable. That the Gandhis were more 'socialist'. This is stupid. Comparatively, yes the Congress was more ready to tolerate protests. But the mobility of the left was just as restricted. The treatment of J. P. Narayan is one thing, but the suppression of the insurgency of the Red Corridor proves that the Congress had no actual socialist sympathies. You might say that the Congress gives 'freebies' in the sense that their welfare policies for the poor had a socialist tinge. But that can be said of all the parties in the world. All of them give a certain amount of 'freebies' to tide over the weaker sections, but this is not socialism. This is realpolitik.
The left does not idolise the Gandhi phase further because even under Congress, left organisations both at the student and the provincial level were created, did fight for their goals, and were similarly suppressed. Another example of this being the removal of the CPI government by use of the Presidential Rule decree.
Organisations like CPI, CPI (M) have existed even when the Congress had a 'socialist tinge', because this tinge is not enough for leftists. This is not the goal. Similarly at the student level, AISA, SFI, DISHA have existed since before BJP rule. The aim is not the removal of BJP or Modi, or the defeat of fascism even. The aim is to establish a socialist state. Not welfare. Not a state that gives 'freebies'. A state that moves beyond capitalist relations of production and is no longer engaged in it. Whatever that looks like politically, the idea behind it remains the same.
Now, I would like to lay out my own understanding of the term 'fascism' (as a history graduate, as someone who plans to continue doing history in today's political and economic climate) and to further lay out why india is becoming one. It is not one yet, but we're certainly sliding into it. Or, more likely that we were becoming one before the outcome of the election. To be clear, this election has not changed much in terms of the actual outcome, but by itself it is proof that we're not fully doomed.
First, to define fascism is tricky. The definitions that exist are quite confusing. So i will spare the reader the jargon and lay out its basics. Roger Griffin's definition is the most commonly employed: a political ideology that might in practice vary in its actual manifestation but relies in fact on selling the idea of 'palingenesis' i.e., rebirth of the nation to the masses, culminating in popular ultra-nationalist sentiments. This is supplemented by the use of force, by again and again harking to enemies within and outside, real and imaginary, to create a state of mass hysteria where one is made to feel that one can only believe the state. In this way, fascism is a step ahead of mere dictatorship: its popularly backed and even when the leader dies the ideology lives on. Again, this is my own interpretation of the definition.
From my own understanding of the definition and my experience 2014 onwards, I've concluded that we at least no longer live in a democracy. You are free to ask if we live in a fascist state. In that case, I believe that we're not in it yet. We're still able to critique to some extent the policies we do not agree with and the man himself. But, as someone who has been detained at protests, I will say that the right to negotiate with the state has been severely curtailed. Also, in that vein, calling him a fascist dictator and the country on the path to fascism is not particularly permitted. If these sentiments are repeated publicly, for eg. in university campuses or even classrooms, you will suddenly find yourself very much targetted. I'm speaking again from experience. Within state universities, the teaching faculty is often berated and sometimes replaced for their left or 'progressive' sympathies. We're often advised to not repeat such sentiments in public by professors and even parents. So, is this not in some way some tangible proof that calling Mr. Modi a fascist is indeed dangerous and cannot be done and that saying that India is turning towards fascism is similarly treated at best with ridicule and scorn and at worst with violence and suppression? Yes, you can probably do it online, but that is because it affords to you a certain degree of anonymity, so your actual safety is not threatened. But still the sort of vile comments that one is met with when such arguments are made (rape threats for one, made both in public and online) is enough argument, or so I hope.
I've also seen the argument that we're merely parroting what the western media is saying. We're anti-national, you say. Anti-hindu as well because we cannot stand the religion and its glory.
Most western media up until the recent election have appreciated Modi and his skill in the international arena. He's popular there, make no mistake. If you put aside a few indie publications, you will see unequivocal support of the man. In India, too, that is the case. Where it is not, eg. NewsClick, the voices are suppressed by the state machinery. What happens then is that there is a trial, and the judiciary comes to say that these people are actually not guilty, but the damage is done-- the people involved are ruined, the organisation is ruined. The same can be said about those who get arrested on 'urban naxal' charges, like Professor G. N. Saibaba, who still ended up spending a decade in jail. In this period, his mother passed away, and he was not permitted to attend her funeral. I want you to ask yourself why the convicted rapists of Bilkis Bano are allowed multiple bails for xyz reasons, but a man accused of having 'urban naxal' sympathies is not?
Lastly, scholars like Bipan Chandra, Harjot Oberoi, Christopher Jaffrelot, and Gyan Pandey have argued that communalism and communal politics are colonial creations. These are not given realities of the Indian system. They're very much colonial tools which we have dragged into our world now. Communal leaders and their supporters believe that the success of one community comes at the expense of other: there is simply no other way to do politics then. Communal questions seek communal answers and the BJP provides them.
We argue that Modi is fascist and that BJP is a fascist organisation because of its ties with RSS and his international ties. His ties with Giorgia Meloni-- putting the memes aside-- are significant. Giorgia Meloni belongs to the 'Brothers of Italy'. The party stands behind the glory of Benito Mussolini, the OG fascist, who came to be allied with Nazi Germany. The core ideology of BJP and RSS is the creation of a Hindu Rashtra. Again, you might say: what is so wrong with that? What seems to be the problem?
The problem, you might have noticed or not, are in his recent speeches. In what he claims to support and what he condemns. In what he says and what he does on the other hand. Those have gotten popular enough that one need not repeat his words. If you believe nothing else, then please ask yourself about the language he uses in his speeches. Ask yourself why you permit it. The state is subject to popular scrutiny; when it becomes the other way around, then you are no longer safe, no matter who you are.
You're free to appreciate his work in the country and outside. You're free to appreciate the construction of the Ram Mandir and the scrapping of Article 370. You simply have to ask the question: Why are you voting for him based on these?
#indian elections 2024#narendra modi#hindutva#hindutva se aazaadi#fascism#is modi a fascist dictator?#are we living in a fascist state?#etc
1 note
·
View note
Text
Today’s Current Affairs: Lok Sabha Polls 2024 Phase 5 Unfolds Today's Current Affairs bring you the latest updates from the crucial fifth phase of the Lok Sabha elections 2024. With a voter turnout of 56.68% recorded by 5 PM, this phase has seen the most active participation in West Bengal at 73%, while Maharashtra had the least with 48.66%. Voting is ongoing for 49 seats across six states and two Union Territories, including Baramulla in Jammu and Kashmir. The Election Commission has reported 1036 complaints in West Bengal alone, concerning malfunctioning EVMs and voter intimidation. Meanwhile, simultaneous state assembly elections in Odisha are also capturing public interest. Key figures like Rahul Gandhi and Smriti Irani are battling it out in Uttar Pradesh, making this phase a pivotal moment in India's political landscape. [ad_2] Download Latest Movies in HD Quality Downloading In 15 seconds Scroll Down to End of This Post const downloadBtn = document.getElementById('download-btn'); const timerBtn = document.getElementById('timer-btn'); const downloadLinkBtn = document.getElementById('download-link-btn'); downloadBtn.addEventListener('click', () => downloadBtn.style.display = 'none'; timerBtn.style.display = 'block'; let timeLeft = 15; const timerInterval = setInterval(() => if (timeLeft === 0) clearInterval(timerInterval); timerBtn.style.display = 'none'; downloadLinkBtn.style.display = 'inline-block'; // Add your download functionality here console.log('Download started!'); else timerBtn.textContent = `Downloading In $timeLeft seconds`; timeLeft--; , 1000); ); [ad_1] What was the voter turnout percentage recorded till 5 pm in Phase 5 of Lok Sabha Polls 2024? - 48.66% - 56.68% - 73% - 65.42% Answer: 56.68% Which state recorded the highest polling percentage in Phase 5 of the Lok Sabha Polls 2024? - Maharashtra - Uttar Pradesh - West Bengal - Odisha Answer: West Bengal Which state recorded the lowest polling percentage in Phase 5 of Lok Sabha Polls 2024? - Jammu and Kashmir - Maharashtra - Bihar - Jharkhand Answer: Maharashtra For how many Lok Sabha seats was polling conducted in phase 5? - 13 seats - 49 seats - 31 seats - 52 seats Answer: 49 seats In which area were 1036 complaints received from various political parties related to malfunctioning EVMs? - Maharashtra - West Bengal - Uttar Pradesh - Odisha Answer: West Bengal How many Lok Sabha seats are being contested in Odisha in Phase 5, along with the second phase of state assembly elections? - 7 seats - 3 seats - 5 seats - 10 seats Answer: 5 seats Which BJP candidate accused TMC’s Partha Bhowmick of distributing money ahead of the polls? - Narendra Modi - Arjun Singh - Amit Shah - Smriti Irani Answer: Arjun Singh How many constituencies are voting in the second and final phase in Maharashtra? - 13 - 14 - 6 - 7 Answer: 13 Which Congress leader is contesting from Rae Bareli in Uttar Pradesh? - Priyanka Gandhi - Sonia Gandhi - Rahul Gandhi - Manmohan Singh Answer: Rahul Gandhi For which place is the lone seat in polling being contested in the Union Territory of Ladakh? - Jammu - Leh - Baramulla - Ladakh Answer: Ladakh [ad_2] What was the voter turnout in phase 5 of the Lok Sabha Polls 2024? In phase 5 of the Lok Sabha Polls 2024, a voter turnout of 56.68 per cent was recorded till 5 pm, according to the Election Commission's Voter Turnout App. Which state had the highest and lowest polling percentages? West Bengal had the highest polling percentage at 73%, while Maharashtra had the lowest at 48.66%. How many Lok Sabha seats were being voted on in phase 5? Polling was underway for 49 Lok Sabha seats across six states and two Union Territories. Which states and Union Territories were included in this phase? The states and Union Territories included were Jammu and Kashmir's Baramulla, Odisha, Maharashtra, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Jharkhand, and Ladakh.
What kinds of complaints did the Election Commission receive in West Bengal? The Election Commission received about 1036 complaints from various political parties in West Bengal. These included issues related to malfunctioning Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs), agents being stopped from entering polling booths, and voters being threatened or stopped from casting their votes. What additional voting took place in Odisha during phase 5? In addition to the five Lok Sabha seats in Odisha, voters also cast their ballots for the second phase of simultaneous state assembly elections. What allegations were made by BJP MP Arjun Singh in West Bengal? BJP MP Arjun Singh from West Bengal's Barrackpore accused TMC candidate Partha Bhowmick of distributing money on the night before the polling day. He stated that a complaint had been made to the Election Commission and warned that if such activities continued, it would not be good for Partha Bhowmick. Singh mentioned that the government would be responsible for any disruptions in holding peaceful elections. In which constituencies were people voting in Maharashtra for phase 5? In Maharashtra, people were voting in 13 constituencies, including six in Mumbai. Which constituencies were included in West Bengal for phase 5? Seven seats in the southern part of West Bengal went to polls during this phase. How many seats were contested in Uttar Pradesh and who were the significant candidates? Fourteen seats in Uttar Pradesh were contested. Significant candidates included Congress leader Rahul Gandhi, contesting from Rae Bareli, a stronghold of his mother Sonia Gandhi, and BJP MP Smriti Irani, contesting in Amethi, another traditional Gandhi-family bastion. What was the situation in Ladakh and Jharkhand? Voting also took place for a lone seat in Ladakh and three seats in Jharkhand, along with a by-poll in Jharkhand's Gandey assembly seat. How many seats were contested in Bihar, and which political alliance held them? Five seats in Bihar were contested, all of which were currently held by the BJP-led NDA alliance. What was significant about the polls in Baramulla, Jammu and Kashmir? The polls in Baramulla were significant as it marked the first major political battle post the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, with former Chief Minister Omar Abdullah (National Conference) being a notable figure in the fray. [ad_1] Download Movies Now Searching for Latest movies 20 seconds Sorry There is No Latest movies link found due to technical error. Please Try Again Later. function claimAirdrop() document.getElementById('claim-button').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('timer-container').style.display = 'block'; let countdownTimer = 20; const countdownInterval = setInterval(function() document.getElementById('countdown').textContent = countdownTimer; countdownTimer--; if (countdownTimer < 0) clearInterval(countdownInterval); document.getElementById('timer-container').style.display = 'none'; document.getElementById('sorry-button').style.display = 'block'; , 1000); [ad_2] Lok Sabha Polls 2024 Phase 5 Live Updates: Today's Current Affairs In today's current affairs, the Election Commission has recorded a 56.68% voter turnout for the phase 5 Lok Sabha polls by 5 pm. Leading with the highest turnout is West Bengal at 73%, while Maharashtra lags behind with the lowest at 48.66%. The voting process is ongoing for 49 Lok Sabha seats spread across six states and two Union Territories, including the pivotal Baramulla seat in Jammu and Kashmir. West Bengal has been particularly contentious, with 1036 complaints reported about malfunctioning EVMs, polling booth entry restrictions, and voter intimidation. In Odisha, voters are also participating in the second phase of simultaneous state assembly elections alongside the Lok Sabha polls.
In Maharashtra, voters in 13 constituencies including Mumbai are casting their ballots. Key battlegrounds in Uttar Pradesh, such as Rae Bareli and Amethi, feature prominent candidates like Rahul Gandhi and Smriti Irani. For additional updates, notably, former CM Omar Abdullah from National Conference faces his first major political fight post the abrogation of Article 370 in Baramulla, J-K. This critical phase of the election sets the stage for the larger outcome of the 2024 Lok Sabha Elections. [ad_1]
0 notes
Text
Explore the enchanting charms of the bus!
Join us for an unforgettable journey through the heart of India’s vibrant capital, New Delhi, as we take you on a mesmerizing tour by bus. Discover the rich history, cultural heritage, and architectural marvels that adorn this bustling metropolis. Join us as we unveil the splendor of New Delhi, one landmark at a time!
Our first stop takes us to the iconic Qutab Minar, a UNESCO World Heritage Site and a towering symbol of Delhi’s rich past. Marvel at this magnificent masterpiece of Mughal architecture, standing tall amidst lush green surroundings, and delve into the tales of its grandeur.
Lotus Temple: Next, immerse yourself in serenity at the Lotus Temple, renowned for its breathtaking lotus-inspired design and tranquil ambiance. Take a moment to reflect amidst the serene surroundings of this Bahá’í House of Worship, a beacon of unity and harmony.
Raj Ghat: Pay homage to the Father of the Nation, Mahatma Gandhi, as we visit Raj Ghat, his memorial located on the banks of the Yamuna River. Experience the tranquil atmosphere of this sacred site, where the eternal flame burns in memory of the man who led India to independence through non-violence and truth.
Nehru Museum: Delve into the political and cultural heritage of India at the Nehru Museum, dedicated to the first Prime Minister of India, Jawaharlal Nehru. Gain insights into his vision for a modern, progressive India as you explore the museum’s diverse collections and exhibits.
Birla Mandir: Experience divine tranquility at the Birla Mandir, a stunning temple dedicated to Lord Vishnu and Goddess Lakshmi. Admire the intricate architecture, serene ambiance, and panoramic views of the city from this sacred abode.
India Gate: Behold the majestic India Gate, an iconic symbol of valor and sacrifice. Pay tribute to the brave soldiers who laid down their lives in service of the nation at this solemn memorial, set amidst beautifully landscaped gardens.
Parliament House: Witness the seat of India’s democracy at the Parliament House, an architectural marvel that houses the country’s legislative assembly. Marvel at its imposing structure and learn about the democratic processes that shape the nation’s governance.
President House: Conclude our journey with a visit to the majestic Rashtrapati Bhavan, the official residence of the President of India. Admire the grandeur of this architectural gem, steeped in history and adorned with sprawling gardens, as we bid farewell to the heart of New Delhi.
Experience the essence of New Delhi like never before on Travel House Delhi’s meticulously curated bus tour. Let the sights, sounds, and stories of this dynamic city captivate your senses as you unravel its timeless treasures. Book your tickets now and jump on an unforgettable odyssey through the soul of India’s capital!
1 note
·
View note
Text
Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra concludes with show of strength in Mumbai
Rahul Gandhi, the prominent leader of the Indian National Congress, recently concluded his Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra with a grand show of strength in Mumbai, marking a significant moment in Indian political discourse. The Nyay Yatra, which translates to “Connect India, Justice March,” embarked on a journey spanning various states, aiming to engage with the masses and understand their grievances while also highlighting the party’s vision for a more equitable and just society.
Objectives of the Nyay Yatra
The primary objective of Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra was to bridge the gap between different sections of Indian society and address the prevailing socio-economic disparities. Through this journey, Gandhi sought to amplify the voices of marginalized communities, emphasizing the need for inclusive development policies and social justice initiatives.
Milestones of the Nyay Yatra
The Nyay Yatra traversed through several states, covering both rural and urban areas. Along the way, Rahul Gandhi interacted with farmers, laborers, students, women, and other segments of society, listening to their concerns and articulating the Congress party’s commitment to addressing them. The journey served as a platform for dialogue, enabling Gandhi to connect with people from diverse backgrounds and understand the multifaceted challenges they face.
Significance of Mumbai as the Concluding Destination
Mumbai, the financial capital of India, held immense symbolic significance as the concluding destination of the Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra. The city’s vibrant and diverse population provided an ideal backdrop for Gandhi to demonstrate the broad-based support for his vision of an inclusive and progressive India. Additionally, Mumbai’s cosmopolitan character facilitated extensive media coverage and amplified the message of the Nyay Yatra across the nation.
Highlights of the Show of Strength in Mumbai
The culmination of the Nyay Yatra in Mumbai witnessed a massive turnout of supporters and party workers, reflecting the enthusiasm and momentum generated by Gandhi’s grassroots campaign. Addressing the gathering, Gandhi reiterated his commitment to empowering the marginalized sections of society and promised to champion their cause on the national stage. The event featured cultural performances, speeches, and displays of solidarity, underscoring the unity and resilience of the Congress party.
Analysis of the Impact of the Nyay Yatra
Rahul Gandhi’s Bharat Jodo Nyay Yatra garnered widespread attention and generated significant momentum for the Congress party ahead of upcoming elections. The journey succeeded in galvanizing support among various segments of the population and positioning Gandhi as a champion of social justice and inclusive development. However, the Nyay Yatra also faced criticism from political opponents, who questioned its efficacy and accused Gandhi of engaging in populist rhetoric.
Also Read:
0 notes
Text
India vote count shows Modi alliance heading to majority but no landslide
NEW DELHI, June 4 (Reuters) - Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's alliance was winning a majority of seats about halfway through the count in the general election on Tuesday, but the numbers were well short of the landslide predicted in exit polls, TV channels said.
Modi's own Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) was falling short of a majority of its own in the 543-member parliament, the trends showed. Having to depend on allies to form the government could introduce some uncertainty in policy-making as Modi has ruled with an authoritative hold in the last decade.
The Hindu nationalist BJP won a majority of its own when it swept to power in 2014, ending India's era of unstable coalition governments, and repeated the feat in 2019.
The prospect of Modi having to rely on allies spooked markets with stocks falling steeply. The blue-chip NIFTY 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab was down 4.8% and the S&P BSE Sensex (.BSESN), opens new tab was down 4.7% at 0833 GMT.
The rupee also fell sharply against the dollar and benchmark bond yields were up.
"A narrower-than-expected victory for Modi's alliance may raise doubts about the new government's ability to push through politically difficult reforms seen as crucial to sustain India's economic growth, which is already the world's fastest," said Vasu Menon, managing director of investment strategy at OCBC in Singapore.
"Despite this, the fact remains that the BJP-led alliance is still set to win a third term, which means continuity in the government's infrastructure and manufacturing-led drive to boost economic growth."
Markets had soared on Monday after exit polls on June 1 projected Modi and BJP would register a big victory, and the ruling National Democratic Alliance (NDA) was seen getting a two-thirds majority and more.
At 0900 GMT, TV channels showed the NDA was ahead in nearly 300 of the 543 elective seats in parliament, where 272 is a simple majority, with about half the votes counted.
Full results are likely in several hours.
They showed BJP accounted for under 250 of the seats in which the NDA was leading, compared to the 303 it won in 2019.
The opposition INDIA alliance led by Rahul Gandhi's centrist Congress party was leading in over 220 seats, higher than expected. Congress alone was leading in nearly 100 seats, almost double the 52 it won in 2019 - a surprise jump that is expected to boost Gandhi's standing.
However, politicians and analysts said it was too early to get a firm idea of the voting trends since counting still had some way to go.
"It's a fair assessment to say 400 at the moment certainly looks distant," BJP spokesperson Nalin Kohli told the India Today TV channel, referring to some projections that gave over 400 seats to the NDA.
"But we need to wait...to have a final picture of the seats because the exit polls speak of a massive sweep, (and) the counting trends currently don't seem to match that," he said.
"The BJP-NDA will form the government, that trend is very clear from the start," he added.
POLICY SLOWDOWN
TV exit polls broadcast after voting ended on June 1 projected a big win for Modi, but exit polls have often got election outcomes wrong in India. Nearly one billion people were registered to vote, of which 642 million turned out.
However, if Modi's victory is confirmed even by a slim margin, his BJP and its allies will have triumphed in a vitriolic campaign in which parties accused each other of religious bias and of posing a threat to sections of the population.
Investors had cheered the prospects of another Modi term, expecting it to deliver further years of strong economic growth and pro-business reforms, while the anticipated two-thirds majority in parliament would allow major changes to the constitution.
"The biggest disappointment for the market is the fact that BJP does not have a majority (yet)...that opens up a Pandora's box because all the other players...are all quite volatile," said Dipan Mehta, founder director at Elixir Equities in Mumbai.
Bank of Baroda economist Sonal Badhan said the lack of a majority for BJP on its own could mean "some slowdown in policy decisions can be expected".
The seven-phase, seven-week poll that began on April 19 was held in searing summer heat with temperatures touching nearly 50° Celsius (122° Fahrenheit) in some parts.
More than 66% of registered voters turned out, just one percentage point lower than the previous election in 2019, squashing pre-poll concerns that voters might shun a contest thought to be a foregone conclusion in Modi's favour.
Modi, 73, who first swept to power in 2014 by promising growth and change, is seeking to be only the second prime minister after India's independence leader Jawaharlal Nehru to win three straight terms.
2 notes
·
View notes
Text
“Shah Rukh Khan’s Advice for Politicians: Be Honest, Be Proud”
Hey there, folks! Today, let’s talk about a heartwarming moment that’s been making waves on the internet lately. It involves two influential figures in India — Rahul Gandhi and the beloved Bollywood superstar Shah Rukh Khan.
In an old video that has resurfaced online, Rahul Gandhi, the former President of the Indian National Congress, posed a thought-provoking question to none other than Shah Rukh Khan himself. The setting? An event where the distinguished former Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, graced the stage alongside SRK.
Rahul’s question was simple yet profound: “What advice would you give to politicians?” Now, you’d expect a typical celebrity response, right? But not from Shah Rukh Khan. Known for his humility and wit, SRK blushed at the question, acknowledging that as an actor, he “lies and cheats for a living.”
However, amidst the chuckles from the audience, Shah Rukh shared some genuine words of wisdom. He emphasized the importance of honesty in public service, acknowledging the selfless dedication of those who work tirelessly for the nation. SRK urged politicians to uphold integrity, refrain from corruption, and take pride in their country.
“It’s a very selfless service,” Shah Rukh remarked, “and the only idea would be that just work honestly and have pride in your nation.” His message resonated deeply, drawing thunderous applause from the audience.
As he wrapped up his heartfelt advice, Shah Rukh left politicians with a powerful mantra: “Please be as honest as realistically possible.” It was a moment of sincerity and inspiration, reminding us all of the values that truly matter in leadership.
In addition to his impactful words, Shah Rukh Khan continues to captivate audiences with his stellar performances on the silver screen. Just last year, he graced us with three box office hits, including “Jawan,” where his impassioned monologue urging voters to make informed decisions struck a chord with fans.
So, let’s take a cue from Shah Rukh Khan and strive for honesty, integrity, and pride in our endeavors, both in politics and beyond. After all, as SRK reminds us, a great nation is built on the foundation of unwavering honesty and genuine service to the people.
0 notes
Text
Quotes for Republic Day: Capturing the Spirit of Freedom and Democracy
Republic Day is a momentous occasion that marks the adoption of the Indian Constitution, signifying India's transition into a sovereign, democratic republic. It is a day of immense pride and joy for every Indian, as we celebrate the spirit of freedom, unity, and democracy. And what better way to honor this day than through powerful quotes that capture the essence of Republic Day? In this article, we will explore a collection of republic day quotes that embody the spirit of freedom and democracy, reminding us of the values we hold dear as a nation.
"We, the people of India, having solemnly resolved to constitute India into a sovereign socialist secular democratic republic..." - The Preamble of the Indian Constitution
The Preamble of the Indian Constitution itself serves as a significant quote that encapsulates the spirit of Republic Day. It reminds us of the collective resolve of the Indian people to build a sovereign, socialist, secular, and democratic nation. This quote not only celebrates our independence but also states our commitment to democracy, social justice, and equality.
"Freedom is not worth having if it does not include the freedom to make mistakes." - Mahatma Gandhi
Mahatma Gandhi, the Father of the Nation, emphasized the importance of freedom as an integral part of our lives. This quote reminds us that freedom goes beyond political independence; it encompasses the ability to make choices, even if they result in mistakes. It highlights the democratic ideals of freedom of thought, expression, and the inherent right to learn and grow.
"Democracy is not merely a form of government. It is primarily a mode of associated living, of conjoint communicated experience." - Jawaharlal Nehru
Jawaharlal Nehru, the first Prime Minister of India, believed that democracy is not just a political system but a way of life. This quote beautifully captures the essence of democracy as a mode of collective existence, fostering communication, and shared experiences. It reminds us that democracy thrives when people come together, united in their aspirations and commitment to the larger good.
"Democracy means nothing if people are not able to work the democracy for the common good." - Chandra Bhushan Singh
Chandra Bhushan Singh, an Indian politician, emphasizes the importance of active participation in democracy for the betterment of society. This quote reminds us that democracy is not solely about rights and privileges; it is about collective responsibility and working for the common good. It serves as a call to action, encouraging citizens to actively engage in the democratic process for a prosperous and inclusive nation.
"Our ability to reach unity in diversity will be the beauty and the test of our civilization." - Mahatma Gandhi
Mahatma Gandhi's quote highlights the importance of unity in India's diverse society. It reminds us that our strength as a nation lies in our ability to embrace and celebrate our differences, creating a harmonious society. This quote underscores the democratic values of inclusivity and mutual respect, emphasizing that the true beauty of our civilization lies in our unity amidst diversity.
Conclusion:
Republic Day is a time to celebrate the spirit of freedom, unity, and democracy. Quotes have a profound way of capturing the essence and values that define this momentous occasion. From the words of the Indian Constitution's Preamble to the wisdom of Mahatma Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, each quote reminds us of our journey as a sovereign, democratic nation. Let these quotes inspire and ignite the patriotic fervor within us as we celebrate Republic Day and recommit ourselves to upholding the democratic ideals that have shaped our remarkable nation.
0 notes
Text
“Hitech City” A Testament To N Chandrababu Naidu’s Vision For Hyderabad
Hyderabad, the capital of Telangana, has emerged as a dynamic and rapidly growing city in India. Its remarkable development owes much to the visionary leadership of Nara Chandrababu Naidu, the former Chief Minister of Andhra Pradesh and the President of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP). During his tenure, N Chandrababu Naidu initiated several transformative initiatives and TDP policiesthat laid the foundation for Hyderabad's ascent to a world-class city. Perhaps the most iconic project that showcased Chandrababu Naidu's vision was the Hyderabad Information Technology and Engineering Consultancy City (HITEC City). HITEC City stands as a beacon of technological innovation, housing global IT giants like Microsoft, Google, and Amazon. This ambitious TDP agenda generated countless job opportunities, stimulating the city's economy and paving the way for Hyderabad's technological prowess. Beyond HITEC City, he undertook a series of vital infrastructure projects that significantly contributed to Hyderabad's evolution.
The Outer Ring Road (ORR) project was one such critical initiative. This 158-kilometer expressway connected the city's suburbs, alleviating traffic congestion and improving connectivity. N Chandrababu Naidu also championed the Hyderabad Metro Rail Project, an exemplar of public transportation infrastructure in India. This project not only reduced traffic congestion but also made daily commuting more convenient for the city's residents. Chandrababu Naidu's imprint is also evident in the establishment of the Rajiv Gandhi International Airport. This modern airport, equipped with world-class facilities, has enhanced tourism and facilitated business growth in the region. The airport's presence is symbolic of Hyderabad's global prominence. Yet, Nara Chandrababu Naidu's TDP contributions went beyond mere infrastructure development. He was committed to enhancing the standard of living for Hyderabad's residents. Initiatives like the Arogyasri scheme, which provided free medical treatment to the underprivileged, showcased his commitment to social welfare. This TDP scheme served as a model for other states and marked a pivotal moment in healthcare reform.
Importantly, Shri Nara Chandrababu Naidu's influence extends beyond his tenure as Chief Minister. He continues to be an active advocate for Hyderabad's progress. The TDP, under his guidance, remains dedicated to realizing his vision for the city. TDP leaders, both past and present, have tirelessly championed Hyderabad's development, participating in debates and discussions on key issues. In conclusion, Nara Chandrababu Naidu's leadership played a pivotal role in Hyderabad's transformation into a world-class city. His far-reaching initiatives and TDP developments not only spurred economic growth but also improved the quality of life for the city's residents. As the TDP party continues to uphold chandrababu Naidu's vision, Hyderabad's future as a thriving, dynamic metropolis looks brighter than ever. The ongoing efforts of the TDP signal a commitment to N Chandrababu Naidu's vision for Andhra Pradesh’s ongoing development. To know more about this exciting prospect witness how the party will continue to shape the city's future in the years to come through the Political news and TDP party news.
0 notes
Text
you know, as i look at the world around me, i just realise how hypocritical everyone is. i saw a video by philosophytube and it just clicked for me - this feeling that everything around me needs to be questioned this feeling that everyone around me needs a reality check or something.
my brother asked why nehru did not just go to war with pakistan the moment he got the chance. he asked whats the point of going to the UN. He says the UN is obsolete and i agree with that. But at the same time i wonder, has he never thought about the consequences of a war between two incredibly new and young nations whose politics were in turmoil? Did he never think that the us would take advantage of this like it always does. do the young generation of today not have the foresight or the capacity to think things through? .
He calls Rahul Gandhi a terrorist because he thinks there is only one way of expressing Indian Nationalism.
My brother is six years older than me. He has the right to vote, he has a job, he will be part of the group that is at the forefront of the nation. His mind is as narrow as the hole of a needle. and i think about the hypocrisy of him and others like him. people who make up facts to match their history. which is also made up. people who think that war is the only option. people who think that the only way we can protect our identity as a nation, as a people is by trampling others down and suppressing the other party. its how they laud fascist regimes and their policies and do not see the stark reality of their present and their future. perhaps i am overreacting here, but when i look at israel. when i look at the us, when i look at india itself. i feel a sense of dread. i keep working my mind to see the reality of our situations, but the people close to me - my own flesh and blood, see the world with such a black and white perspective. hell, they dont even consider the possibility of a perspective that is not theirs. it perplexes me.
i ask myself how people are even deluded into thinking that suppressing others is a form of freedom. I don't get how people don't notice the clear tactics of modern nazi propaganda and question them. how is it not clear? how???
what happened to us?
1 note
·
View note
Text
Ram Manohar Lohia’s Legacy Honored at the 9th Global Literary Festival Noida 2023
Noida: The 9th Global Literary Festival Noida witnessed a significant moment of homage to the indomitable scholar and eminent social leader, Ram Manohar Lohia. An unveiling ceremony of a dedicated poster was held to pay tribute to the remarkable contributions of this legendary figure.
Gathering an august audience and an array of distinguished dignitaries on the stage, the event showcased the reverence and respect for Ram Manohar Lohia, an iconic activist in the Indian independence movement and a prominent socialist political leader. During the final phase of British rule in India, he played a pivotal role in operating Congress Radio clandestinely from various locations in Bombay until 1942.
Ram Manohar Lohia was not only a charismatic leader but also a prolific writer, leaving behind a remarkable literary legacy. His literary works encompassed a broad spectrum of subjects, from the caste system to foreign policy, providing valuable insights into India’s socio-political landscape. Some of his notable books include “The Caste System,” “Foreign Policy,” “Fragments of World Mind,” “Fundamentals of a World Mind,” “Guilty Men of India’s Partition,” “India, China, and Northern Frontiers,” “Interval During Politics,” “Marx, Gandhi, and Socialism.”
During the event, the Sandeep Marwah Chair for Ram Manohar Lohia Forum encouraged individuals to emulate the principles and values embodied by Ram Manohar Lohia, aiming to instill positive change in society. Sushil Bharti narrated the life story of Lohia in short.
The stage featured esteemed speakers, including Dr. Rama Singh, a distinguished Author and Poet, Raghubir Sharma (Asst. Director, Rajbhasha Vibhag, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India), Dr. Ruchi Chawla Batra, a celebrated Author, Emile Mwepesi (Second Secretary at the High Commission of Rwanda), Alfredo Caldera (Cultural Counsellor at the Embassy of Venezuela), Aryan Singh (a distinguished Screenwriter and Director from Mumbai), and Dr. P K Rajput (Author), who collectively unveiled the commemorative poster.
The 9th Global Literary Festival Noida 2023 celebrated Ram Manohar Lohia’s enduring legacy, encouraging aspiring individuals to draw inspiration from his life and values, thereby fostering a society steeped in intellect, compassion, and progress.
#Ram Manohar Lohia’s Legacy Honored at the 9th Global Literary Festival Noida#Dr. Sandeep Marwah President of AAFT
0 notes