#supportacts

[bubblysnowflake4]

Rain 🌧️💧

[sarockradio]

Today is Ausmusic T-Shirt Day!

We love Australian music and the people who create it! Join the movement by wearing a Aussie music t-shirt and making a donation to Support Act at: https://www.ausmusictshirtday.org.au/teams/sa-rock-radio

Thanks in advance,

SA Rock Radio

#AusmusicTShirtDay #MusicMatters #ARIA #HeapsNormal #GildanBrandsAustralia #AAMI

#sarockradio

@supportact @sarockradio @aria_official @heapsnormal @gildanbrandsaustralia @aami_insurance

[independentpathwaysjayconway]

Journal Week 11 Sustaining Your Music Practice

This week's class looked at ways we can keep ourselves busy in times when we are not working on creating music to be released, and also ways of avoiding burnout and ways we can practice good health not just physically but mentally as well.

One way of creating a safety net for your mental well-being is to become part of a community that is supportive of you and are aware of any support you may need to overcome certain challenges faced when engaging with the industry. There are also organisations like SupportAct that provide services for people in times of hardship with depression, anxiety, alcoholism, and loneliness.

I myself have schizophrenia and have had for over 20 years, and am aware of how bad things can get, luckily I do have a support network of doctors, carers, and family that are aware of my current situation.

Another big factor that can contribute to mental health problems is burnout, and we need to know how to identify it if we are trying to operate while suffering burnout. It can appear as something people don't want to admit to or think, 'that would never happen to me'. But burnout affects a lot of people in the music industry. One way of handling burnout is by taking self care and doing things that you love. If you're a musician this would include taking time to do things like making music that appeals to you, even if you're the only one that likes it, or finding ways of experimenting with stuff you don't normally do, like even trying to find that new genre that no one was expecting.

Other ways of staying busy would be to go to already-established music businesses and organisations offering to work for free or volunteering your time to get a look at the different ways the industry works but from the inside. Or looking at ways of generating funds to propel your work in a forward motion by investigating which grants you can apply for, the application process, and then applying for those grants. Grants can be seasonal so the timing of the applications have to be in line with the different organisation's submission requirements to be considered for any funding. Most grant application submission dates close during the month of October.

If we are feeling burnt out or need a little help with our mental health there are apps that can be easily accessed that help you build and sustain healthy self-care habits. A couple of really good ones are Headspace, Reflectly, and Woop.

END JOURNAL WEEK 11 INDEPENDENT MUSIC PATHWAYS

[mitzikernan]

Differences between Metamask and Ledger wallets

Are you interested in cryptocurrencies and looking for a reliable wallet to securely manage your digital assets? If so, you've probably come across two popular options: Metamask and Ledger. But what exactly sets these wallets apart? In this blog post, we'll explore the differences between Ledger wallet and Metamask wallet, helping you make an informed decision about which one suits your needs best. When it comes to security, both Ledger and Metamask employ different approaches. Metamask is a software-based wallet that operates as a browser extension, allowing you to store and manage your Ethereum and ERC-20 tokens. While it offers a strong level of security, it relies on the security measures implemented within the browser extension and your device. On the other hand, Ledger is a hardware wallet, resembling a USB drive. It stores your private keys offline, away from potential online threats. By keeping your keys offline, Ledger provides an added layer of security, making it harder for hackers to gain unauthorized access to your funds. The user experience is another aspect where these wallets differ. Metamask provides a user-friendly interface that seamlessly integrates with popular web browsers like Chrome and Firefox. With Metamask, you can manage multiple Ethereum accounts, import/export wallets, and interact with decentralized applications (DApps) with ease. On the contrary, Ledger requires a different setup process. Users need to connect the Ledger device to their computer and install the Ledger Live application. While this might be slightly more complex, Ledger offers a comprehensive interface that allows you to manage multiple cryptocurrencies, access advanced features like staking, and trade on decentralized exchanges (DEXs). Here's a quick comparison chart highlighting the key differences between Metamask and Ledger wallets: FeatureMetamaskLedgerTypeSoftware wallet (browser extension)Hardware wallet (USB device)SecurityRelies on browser and device securityOffline storage of private keysUser InterfaceUser-friendly interface in web browserDedicated application (Ledger Live)Supported CoinsPrimarily Ethereum and ERC-20 tokensWide range of cryptocurrenciesMobilityAccessible from any device with browserRequires physical device connectionTransaction ProcessConfirmation within browser extensionConfirmation on Ledger deviceRecovery OptionsSeed phrase backup for wallet recoverySeed phrase backup for wallet recoveryCostFree to use, gas fees for transactionsUpfront cost for purchasing the deviceCommunity SupportActive community and support channelsComprehensive support resources Differences between Metamask and Ledger Wallets Metamask is a browser extension wallet designed to interact with Ethereum-based networks. It allows users to securely store and manage their Ethereum (ETH) and ERC-20 tokens. Metamask acts as a bridge between your web browser and the Ethereum network, making it easy to connect with DApps and perform transactions seamlessly. Ledger, on the other hand, is a hardware wallet that provides an offline storage solution for cryptocurrencies. Unlike Metamask, which is a software-based wallet, Ledger wallets are physical devices that resemble USB drives. They offer an extra layer of security by keeping your private keys offline, away from potential online threats. Security: Software vs Hardware One of the most significant differences between Metamask and Ledger lies in their security approaches. Metamask is a software wallet that relies on the security measures implemented within the browser extension and the user's device. While Metamask offers a strong level of security, it is still susceptible to malware, phishing attacks, and other vulnerabilities that can compromise the user's private keys. On the other hand, Ledger utilizes a hardware-based approach to security. As a hardware wallet, it stores your private keys offline and signs transactions within the device itself. This isolation significantly reduces the risk of your keys being exposed to online threats. Even if your computer is compromised, the hacker would still need physical access to your Ledger device to access your funds. User Interface and User Experience Metamask provides a user-friendly interface that seamlessly integrates with popular web browsers like Chrome and Firefox. It offers a straightforward setup process and enables users to manage multiple Ethereum accounts within a single interface. Metamask also supports the import and export of wallets, making it easy to transfer your accounts across different devices. Ledger, being a hardware wallet, requires a different setup process. Users need to connect the Ledger device to their computer and install the Ledger Live application to manage their cryptocurrencies. While this might be slightly more complex compared to Metamask's browser extension, Ledger provides a comprehensive interface that allows users to manage multiple cryptocurrencies and access advanced features such as staking and decentralized exchanges. Supported Cryptocurrencies Metamask primarily focuses on Ethereum and its associated tokens. It supports both Ethereum mainnet and various test networks like Ropsten, Kovan, and Rinkeby. Metamask's compatibility with Ethereum-based networks makes it an ideal choice for those heavily involved in the Ethereum ecosystem. In contrast, Ledger supports a wide range of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum, Litecoin (LTC), Ripple (XRP), and many more. The Ledger Live application provides users with the ability to manage different accounts and cryptocurrencies from a single interface, making it convenient for those who hold various cryptocurrencies. Mobility and Accessibility Metamask's browser extension can be easily installed on popular web browsers, allowing users to access their wallets from any device with an internet connection. This makes it highly convenient for individuals who frequently switch between multiple devices or locations. As long as you have access to a browser with Metamask installed, you can manage your Ethereum accounts on the go. Ledger, being a physical device, offers a different level of mobility. While you can easily carry your Ledger wallet with you, using it requires physical access to the device and a computer or mobile device with the Ledger Live application installed. This means that if you forget to bring your Ledger device or don't have access to a computer or mobile device with the Ledger Live application, you won't be able to manage your cryptocurrencies. Transaction Confirmation Process Metamask simplifies the transaction confirmation process by allowing users to review and confirm transactions directly within the browser extension. When initiating a transaction, Metamask displays the transaction details, such as the recipient address and the amount being sent, and prompts the user to confirm the transaction with a simple click. This streamlined process makes it easy for users to review and approve transactions quickly. Ledger, on the other hand, follows a different transaction confirmation process. When using a Ledger device, transaction details are displayed on the Ledger device's screen for verification. Users need to physically confirm the transaction by pressing buttons on the device itself. This additional step provides an extra layer of security, as it ensures that the transaction details are verified on the Ledger device itself, minimizing the risk of transaction tampering. Recovery Options In the unfortunate event of losing access to your wallet or your device being damaged, both Metamask and Ledger offer recovery options to regain access to your funds. Metamask utilizes a seed phrase (typically 12 or 24 words) during the initial setup process. This seed phrase acts as a backup of your private keys and can be used to restore your wallet on any device that supports Metamask. It's crucial to keep your seed phrase secure and never share it with anyone. Ledger also relies on a seed phrase for wallet recovery. During the initial setup, users are provided with a 24-word seed phrase, commonly known as the Ledger Recovery Phrase. This seed phrase should be carefully written down and stored in a secure location. In case of loss or damage to the Ledger device, the seed phrase can be used to restore access to your funds on a new Ledger device. Cost Considerations Metamask is a free browser extension wallet, and there are no fees associated with using its core features. However, it's important to note that when performing transactions on the Ethereum network, users need to pay gas fees, which are required to process and confirm transactions. These gas fees are not specific to Metamask but apply to all Ethereum transactions. Ledger, being a hardware wallet, comes with a cost. The price of a Ledger device varies depending on the model and features. While there is an upfront cost associated with purchasing a Ledger wallet, it offers enhanced security features that can justify the investment for individuals holding significant amounts of cryptocurrencies. Community and Support Metamask has a vibrant community of users and developers within the Ethereum ecosystem. It benefits from regular updates and improvements, with active support channels available, including documentation, community forums, and social media platforms. The Metamask team is responsive to user feedback and actively addresses any issues or concerns raised by the community. Ledger also boasts a strong community and offers comprehensive support for its users. The Ledger Live application provides a dedicated support section with resources, FAQs, and troubleshooting guides. Additionally, Ledger has a customer support team that can assist users with any queries or technical difficulties they may encounter. Conclusion In summary, Metamask and Ledger are two distinct types of wallets, each offering unique features and security measures. Metamask is a browser extension wallet that provides a user-friendly interface and seamless integration with Ethereum-based networks, making it suitable for those heavily involved in the Ethereum ecosystem. On the other hand, Ledger is a hardware wallet that prioritizes security by storing private keys offline, offering broader cryptocurrency support, and catering to users with larger cryptocurrency portfolios. When deciding between Metamask and Ledger, it's essential to consider your specific needs and priorities. If you value convenience, easy accessibility, and primarily interact with Ethereum and its associated tokens, Metamask may be the ideal choice for you. Its browser extension allows for seamless integration with popular web browsers, enabling you to manage your Ethereum accounts from any device with an internet connection. On the other hand, if security is your top priority and you hold a diverse range of cryptocurrencies beyond Ethereum, Ledger's hardware wallet provides an added layer of protection. With offline storage of private keys and transaction verification on the device itself, Ledger minimizes the risk of online threats compromising your funds. Moreover, Ledger's support for multiple cryptocurrencies makes it a versatile option for those who hold various digital assets. Additionally, consider your level of technical expertise and comfort with hardware devices. Metamask's software-based approach makes it more accessible to users who are familiar with browser extensions and don't want to deal with the setup and management of a physical device. Ledger, while offering enhanced security, requires a setup process that involves connecting the device to a computer or mobile device and installing the Ledger Live application. Furthermore, consider the scale of your cryptocurrency holdings. If you have significant investments in digital assets, the added security features of a hardware wallet like Ledger may provide peace of mind. However, if you hold a smaller amount of cryptocurrencies or frequently engage in small transactions, the convenience and accessibility of Metamask may be sufficient for your needs. It's important to note that both wallets have their strengths and weaknesses, and the choice ultimately depends on your specific requirements and preferences. Some individuals even use both wallets simultaneously, leveraging the unique features of each to diversify their security measures and access different functionalities. In conclusion, Metamask and Ledger are two popular wallets that cater to different user preferences and priorities. Metamask offers a user-friendly interface and seamless integration with Ethereum-based networks, while Ledger provides enhanced security through its hardware wallet approach and broader cryptocurrency support. By understanding the differences between these wallets and assessing your individual needs, you can make an informed decision and select the wallet that best aligns with your cryptocurrency management requirements. FAQs What are the user interface differences between Metamask and Ledger? Metamask provides a user-friendly interface as a browser extension, seamlessly integrating with popular web browsers. Users can manage multiple Ethereum accounts and easily interact with DApps. Ledger, on the other hand, requires a different setup process. Users need to connect the Ledger device to their computer and use the dedicated Ledger Live application to manage their cryptocurrencies. Which cryptocurrencies are supported by Metamask and Ledger? Metamask primarily focuses on Ethereum and its associated tokens. It supports Ethereum mainnet and various test networks. Ledger, on the other hand, supports a wide range of cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Ripple, and many more. Ledger's broader cryptocurrency support makes it a suitable choice for users who hold various digital assets. How do I recover my wallet with Metamask and Ledger? Metamask and Ledger both offer recovery options in case of wallet loss or device damage. Metamask provides a seed phrase (usually 12 or 24 words) during the setup process. This seed phrase acts as a backup and can be used to restore your wallet on any device supporting Metamask. Ledger also relies on a seed phrase, known as the Ledger Recovery Phrase. By securely storing this phrase, you can restore access to your funds on a new Ledger device. Read More: - Metamask vs Coinbase wallet - Trust Wallet vs Metamask - Best Mobile Wallets for Cryptocurrencies - FOMO vs FUD - Polkadot vs Ethereum Read the full article

[scottinaussie]

Chris Hemsworth for #ausmusictshirtday

[chowie-chow-blog]

👆⬅️for more pix After a few setbacks I finally got to see the mightly @truckbandmelbourne at #BendigoHotel HOLY COW !! When do I get to see them again ?? (Shot with @customslr @CanonAustralia) FOLLOW @chowie_photography @truckbandmelbourne @alexdeegandrummer @daveleslie64 @kevinhuntmusic @mark.donaldson.39@thebendigo #LifesTooShortGoSeeABand • • • • • • • • • • #TourLife #truck #SupportAct #performance #Guitar #Drums #Bass #Vocals #rockshow #backstagePass #LiveMusicConcertPhotography #SuppportLiveMusic #bestmusicshots #CustomSLR #Sponsored #gratitudeposts #grateful #SonyAlphaA6300 #Canon5DMkIV #melbournemusicscene #RockPhotographhy #livemusic #photography #thankful #grateful #gratitude #featureartists #rockmusic #originalartists (at Bendigo Hotel) https://www.instagram.com/p/CRjHnuOtw6C/?utm_medium=tumblr

[mulgatheartist]

It's Petey the Roadie Platypus, he's on the poster and merch for this weekends gigs at the Brass Monkey raising funds for @supportact. ⁣ ⁣ There's also tees and prints of Petey available wih the proceeds going to @supportact who provide financial assistance to live event industry workers. ⁣ ⁣ Check out @stagekings_australia for the gig deets and tickets and @isoking_au for the tees and prints. ⁣ ⁣ The story of Petey the Roadie Platypus⁣ ⁣ Once there was a platypus called Petey and he was one of the best roadie platypus's going around. He often placed in the top ten in the annual international roadie championships (AIRC). Petey had a pretty good roadie career and travelled the world and worked with heaps of the world's biggest bands doing his roadie thing. He eventually hooked up with Kendrick, his good ole buddy from the Aussie outback and became Kendrick's number one guitar tech dude. Petey even learnt a lot of Kendricks jams and filled in for him on some gigs when Kendrick was sick as a brick.⁣ ⁣ The End⁣ ⁣ #mulgatheartist #supportact #platypus #platypusart #roadie #supportact #guitarart #rocknroll #australianartist (at The Brass Monkey Cronulla) https://www.instagram.com/p/CMmN7AhAKV2/?igshid=1jkxmsisints4

[tdkjusettes]

Oh no @rufusttaylor...don't hit him so hard!!! - Credit pic to @ebony.lauren - Roundhay Park, Leeds, Aug 16th 2019 with @teddysphotos - Stage outfit by @acebright13 for @bunsosteelana - #JustinHawkins #TheDarkness #theactualdarkness #Rufusttaylor #singer #frontman #performer #showman #songwriter #guitarplayer #drummer #drumsticks #vicfirthsticks #vocalist #hitter #singerhunter #edsheeran #Leeds #supportact #rockstar #rocknroll #bandphotographer #stagephotographer #rockphotographer #concertphotographer #tdkjusettes (at Roundhay Park) https://www.instagram.com/p/B1REYhSIGHw/?igshid=fmud86u5x5a6

[redcymbals]

Special Edition ‘Blue’ Timbale Sticks - Available now in our store. The blue colour was selected in support of musicians’ mental health - every purchase helps us donate each month to the great work of Support Act who support music industry workers through various initiatives. Check out their work at www.supportact.org.au @supportact Specifications: · Diameter : .440" · Length : 16" #supportact #mentalhealth #drumsticks #redsticks #red #redcymbals (at Red Cymbals) https://www.instagram.com/p/Cnx1rMUShLK/?igshid=NGJjMDIxMWI=

[karlswilliams]

Here’s a little poem I wrote when reckoning with the passage of time and the changes it brings. Many of us (particularly in the music world) have had our lives caught in limbo for a while now and that has taken quite a toll. For me at least, it has been a time of questioning - whether all the years have amounted to any legitimacy as an artist (and other assorted doubts). Such questions are particularly sharpened when staring down the throat of an empty bank account. This is a limbo of its own and one we all encounter, perhaps a little too frequently in the arts. It haunted us before the pandemic and will remain with us after. I hope there will come a time when the necessity of art-making in all capacities is broadly acknowledged in the same way we understand oxygen is needed in the air we breathe. I am unsure if our current government understands either of those concepts. As I reflect, and in light of the fact that tomorrow is #ausmusictshirtday I thought this is a good moment to acknowledge the amazing work of @supportact. They helped me out recently and they have helped many of my friends in the past. I am very grateful they exist and I hope you will wear your favourite Australian music t-shirt tomorrow in solidarity. Give them your support if you are in a position to do so: www.ausmusictshirtday.org.au So thank you @supportact, and thank you to anyone who has ever come to a show, purchased merch, streamed my music, hired me for a gig or supported my music in any way. I am immeasurably grateful ❣️ . . . #supportact #supportmusic #supportlives #amtd2021 https://www.instagram.com/p/CWaoZkWpwMc/?utm_medium=tumblr

[sarockradio]

The massive nationwide celebration of Australian music, Ausmusic T-Shirt Day, is coming up on Thursday 30 November and our team needs your help!

Please join us in helping Support Act to raise funds for musicians, managers, crew and music workers who are doing it tough by wearing your Aussie music t-shirt on Thursday 30 November and making a donation to our fundraising page:

https://www.ausmusictshirtday.org.au/teams/sa-rock-radio

Thanks in advance,

SA Rock Radio

 #ausmusictshirtday

@supportact @sarockradio @aria_official @heapsnormal @gildanbrandsaustralia @aami_insurance

[ozevents]

Music workers in the arts encouraged to apply for Support Act grants

Music workers in the arts encouraged to apply for Support Act grants

Music industry charity Support Act is encouraging anyone working professionally in music across the arts and who is in financial difficulty as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, to apply for one of their new MusicKeeper or CrewKeeper cash grants. Since announcing the creation of the new grants in March, which were made possible thanks to funding from the Australian Government through the Office…

[mitzikernan]

Polygon vs Polkadot

Once upon a time in the world of blockchain technology, two networks emerged with great promise: Polkadot and Polygon. These networks sought to address the limitations and scalability issues faced by Ethereum, the pioneer of smart contracts and decentralized applications. If you're curious about the differences between Polkadot and Polygon and how they are revolutionizing the blockchain landscape, you've come to the right place! In this blog, we will embark on a journey to explore the unique characteristics and functionalities of Polkadot and Polygon. We'll delve into their architectures, consensus mechanisms, use cases, and more. By the end of this captivating tale, you'll have a clear understanding of the distinctions between these two remarkable networks and how they are shaping the future of blockchain technology. So, whether you're a developer looking to build on a scalable and interoperable blockchain or simply an enthusiast seeking to expand your knowledge, join us on this adventure to unravel the mysteries of Polkadot and Polygon. Together, let's uncover the fascinating world of decentralized applications and discover how these networks are propelling us towards a more connected and efficient digital future. Are you ready? Let's dive in! Here's a quick chart highlighting the key differences between Polkadot and Polygon: FeaturePolkadotPolygonArchitectureRelay Chain and parachainsMain chain and Layer 2 solutionsScalability ApproachParallel chains with interoperabilityLayer 2 solutions for Ethereum scalabilityConsensus MechanismNominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS)Ethereum's existing consensus mechanismInteroperabilityEnables communication between independent blockchainsFocuses on enhancing Ethereum's compatibility and scalabilityUse CasesSpecialized blockchains, finance, supply chain, identityEthereum scalability, DeFi, gaming, NFTsDevelopment ToolsSubstrate, Polkadot JSPolygon SDK, Polygon.jsGovernance ModelDecentralized governance through token holder votingRelies on Ethereum's governance and consensus mechanismsCommunity SupportActive and supportive communityEngaged community offering resources and technical assistanceTarget MarketProjects requiring interoperability and specialized chainsEthereum-based projects seeking scalability and Layer 2 solutions Differences between Polkadot and Polygon Introducing Polkadot: The Interoperable Powerhouse Polkadot, often hailed as the "Internet of Blockchains," is a protocol designed to facilitate interoperability among multiple blockchains. Created by the co-founder of Ethereum, Dr. Gavin Wood, Polkadot aims to create a decentralized web where different blockchains can communicate and share information seamlessly. Polkadot's Architecture: The Relay Chain and Parachains At the heart of Polkadot's architecture lies the Relay Chain, which serves as the main chain responsible for network consensus and security. The Relay Chain is built upon a unique proof-of-stake (PoS) consensus algorithm called Nominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS), which enables token holders to nominate validators who secure the network. But what truly sets Polkadot apart is its concept of Parachains. Parachains are independent blockchains that run in parallel to the Relay Chain, each with its own governance, rules, and characteristics. These parachains can be highly specialized, catering to specific use cases or industries. The ability to connect and communicate with other parachains on the Polkadot network is what makes it truly interoperable. Cross-Chain Communication and Shared Security One of the key advantages of Polkadot is its ability to facilitate cross-chain communication. Thanks to the shared security model, any parachain in the Polkadot ecosystem can interact with other parachains, enabling seamless transfer of assets and data between them. This cross-chain interoperability opens up a world of possibilities for developers, allowing them to build decentralized applications (dApps) that can utilize functionalities from different chains. The Polkadot Governance Model Polkadot's governance model emphasizes decentralization and community-driven decision-making. Token holders have the power to propose and vote on network upgrades, making them active participants in shaping the future of the protocol. Additionally, Polkadot incorporates an on-chain treasury system that allocates funds for projects and initiatives that benefit the ecosystem, promoting innovation and growth. Unveiling Polygon: Scaling Ethereum to New Heights While Polkadot tackles interoperability, Polygon focuses on scalability and enhancing the Ethereum network. Formerly known as Matic Network, Polygon aims to address Ethereum's limitations by providing a framework for building and connecting Ethereum-compatible blockchains. Polygon's Layer 2 Solutions Polygon achieves scalability through its Layer 2 solutions, which are protocols built on top of the Ethereum mainnet. These Layer 2 solutions operate independently while leveraging Ethereum's security and decentralization. One of the most notable solutions is Polygon's Proof-of-Stake (PoS) chain called Polygon POS, which offers faster transaction processing times and significantly lower fees compared to the Ethereum mainnet. Sidechains and Plasma Chains Within the Polygon ecosystem, there are two primary types of chains: sidechains and Plasma chains. Sidechains are fully independent blockchains that run alongside the Ethereum mainnet. They have their consensus mechanisms and validators, enabling them to process transactions and execute smart contracts at a high throughput. On the other hand, Plasma chains are more lightweight and designed for specific use cases. They inherit Ethereum's security but operate with reduced functionality, making them ideal for applications with less complex requirements. The Polygon Commit Chain Similar to Polkadot's Relay Chain, Polygon has its own central chain called the Polygon Commit Chain. The Commit Chain acts as the bridge between the Ethereum mainnet and the various Layer 2 solutions within the Polygon ecosystem. It ensures the security and integrity of transactions and data transfers between the Ethereum network and the Layer 2 chains. Bridging Ethereum and Beyond Polygon's main goal is to enhance Ethereum's scalability and usability. By providing a framework for building Layer 2 solutions, Polygon allows developers to create high-performance dApps without sacrificing the security and decentralization offered by the Ethereum mainnet. This scalability upgrade has the potential to alleviate Ethereum's congestion issues and reduce transaction costs, making it more accessible for users and businesses. Ethereum Compatibility One of the notable aspects of Polygon is its Ethereum compatibility. It offers a seamless transition for developers and projects already built on Ethereum. Polygon supports Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and Solidity, the same programming language used in Ethereum smart contracts. This compatibility allows developers to easily migrate their dApps or deploy new ones on Polygon, leveraging its scalability benefits while maintaining compatibility with the vast Ethereum ecosystem. A Hub of Innovation and Collaboration Polygon has positioned itself as a hub for innovation and collaboration within the blockchain space. It has gained significant traction and support from both developers and users. Polygon boasts a growing ecosystem of projects, protocols, and decentralized finance (DeFi) applications. The network's vibrant community and developer-friendly environment have contributed to its rapid expansion and adoption. Polkadot vs. Polygon: A Comparative Analysis Now that we have explored the unique features of Polkadot and Polygon individually, let's compare them across several key dimensions to gain a deeper understanding of their similarities and differences. Scalability and Interoperability Both Polkadot and Polygon address the scalability challenges faced by Ethereum, albeit through different approaches. Polkadot achieves scalability by enabling multiple independent blockchains (parachains) to run in parallel, with the ability to interoperate and share assets and data. On the other hand, Polygon enhances Ethereum's scalability by providing Layer 2 solutions, such as sidechains and Plasma chains, which process transactions off-chain while leveraging Ethereum's security. Governance and Consensus Mechanisms Polkadot and Polygon employ different governance models and consensus mechanisms. Polkadot utilizes a Nominated Proof-of-Stake (NPoS) consensus algorithm, where token holders nominate validators to secure the network. The governance process involves token holders proposing and voting on network upgrades. Polygon, on the other hand, primarily relies on Ethereum's existing governance and consensus mechanisms since it operates as an extension of the Ethereum network. Ecosystem and Adoption Both networks have witnessed substantial growth in their ecosystems and adoption. Polkadot has attracted a diverse range of projects and parachains, fostering an environment of cross-chain collaboration and innovation. Its interoperability features have garnered attention from developers seeking to build scalable and specialized blockchains. Polygon, with its Ethereum compatibility and Layer 2 solutions, has become a popular choice for developers aiming to enhance the scalability of their Ethereum-based dApps. The network has seen significant adoption, particularly in the DeFi space, with numerous protocols and applications migrating or launching on Polygon. Use Cases and Target Markets Polkadot's architecture, with its parachains and interoperability, makes it well-suited for use cases that require specialized blockchains and seamless communication between them. This includes applications in finance, supply chain management, identity verification, and more. On the other hand, Polygon's focus on Ethereum scalability positions it as a prime choice for developers and projects looking to enhance their Ethereum-based applications, especially in the domains of decentralized finance, gaming, and non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Development Tools and Community Support Both Polkadot and Polygon offer a range of development tools and community support to attract and assist developers in building on their respective networks. Polkadot provides a comprehensive set of development tools, including Substrate, a framework for building customizable blockchains, and Polkadot JS, a JavaScript library for interacting with Polkadot-based chains. The Polkadot community is active and supportive, offering resources, documentation, and developer grants to encourage innovation and growth. Polygon also offers a developer-friendly environment with a suite of tools and frameworks. Developers can utilize Polygon's software development kits (SDKs), such as the Polygon SDK and the Polygon.js library, to build and deploy dApps on the network. Additionally, Polygon provides extensive documentation, tutorials, and hackathons to support developers throughout their journey. In terms of community support, both Polkadot and Polygon have established vibrant and engaged communities. These communities consist of developers, enthusiasts, and stakeholders who actively participate in discussions, provide technical assistance, and contribute to the improvement of the networks. The communities organize meetups, online forums, and conferences to foster collaboration and knowledge-sharing among members. The Future Outlook As we gaze into the crystal ball, the future of Polkadot and Polygon appears promising. Both networks have already made significant strides in addressing the scalability and interoperability challenges of blockchain technology. However, their journeys are far from over, and they continue to evolve and improve. For Polkadot, the main focus is on expanding its ecosystem and attracting more parachains to join the network. The introduction of parachain auctions allows projects to secure a slot on the Relay Chain and connect with the Polkadot network. This feature will likely drive further growth and innovation within the Polkadot ecosystem. Polygon, on the other hand, aims to enhance its Layer 2 solutions and further strengthen its integration with Ethereum. The network is actively exploring various scaling techniques, including Optimistic Rollups and zk-rollups, to provide even greater scalability and throughput. Polygon's commitment to interoperability is evident through its collaborations with other networks and protocols, enabling seamless asset transfers and interactions across different blockchain ecosystems. Both Polkadot and Polygon are also expected to face competition from other blockchain networks and Layer 2 solutions. The blockchain industry is constantly evolving, and new technologies and protocols continue to emerge. However, with their strong foundations, dedicated communities, and unique value propositions, Polkadot and Polygon are well-positioned to thrive in this competitive landscape. In Conclusion In this epic battle of blockchain networks, we have explored the differences between Polkadot and Polygon. Polkadot, with its emphasis on interoperability and its novel architecture of Relay Chain and parachains, offers a scalable and interconnected ecosystem. On the other hand, Polygon focuses on enhancing Ethereum's scalability through Layer 2 solutions, making it a popular choice for Ethereum developers. Both networks have their unique features and advantages, attracting developers and projects from various domains. The future looks bright for Polkadot and Polygon as they continue to push the boundaries of blockchain technology, fostering innovation, and reshaping the decentralized landscape. Whether you choose the interoperable power of Polkadot or the scalability of Polygon, both networks contribute to the evolution of blockchain technology, bringing us closer to a decentralized future where collaboration, scalability, and efficiency reign supreme. FAQs What is Polkadot? Polkadot is a blockchain protocol designed to enable interoperability between multiple independent blockchains. It consists of a Relay Chain, which handles network consensus and security, and parachains, which are individual blockchains running in parallel. Polkadot aims to create a decentralized web where different blockchains can communicate and share information seamlessly. What is Polygon? Polygon, formerly known as Matic Network, is a scaling solution for the Ethereum network. It provides a framework for building and connecting Ethereum-compatible blockchains, known as Layer 2 solutions. Polygon enhances Ethereum's scalability by processing transactions off-chain while leveraging Ethereum's security and decentralization. It offers various types of chains, including sidechains and Plasma chains, to cater to different use cases. How do Polkadot and Polygon differ? The main difference between Polkadot and Polygon lies in their focus and approach. Polkadot emphasizes interoperability and enables communication between independent blockchains through its Relay Chain and parachains. On the other hand, Polygon focuses on enhancing Ethereum's scalability by providing Layer 2 solutions, such as sidechains and Plasma chains. While both networks address scalability issues, Polkadot achieves it through parallel blockchains, while Polygon achieves it through off-chain processing. What are the benefits of Polkadot and Polygon? Polkadot's key benefits include interoperability, allowing different blockchains to communicate and share assets, and its decentralized governance model, which enables token holders to participate in decision-making. Polygon, on the other hand, offers enhanced scalability for Ethereum-based applications, faster transaction processing times, and lower fees compared to the Ethereum mainnet. Additionally, both networks have vibrant communities, provide developer-friendly environments, and attract a wide range of projects and protocols. What are the use cases for Polkadot and Polygon? Polkadot's interoperability and specialization capabilities make it suitable for various use cases, such as decentralized finance (DeFi), supply chain management, and identity verification. It enables developers to create specialized blockchains that can seamlessly communicate with each other. Polygon, with its focus on Ethereum compatibility, is ideal for projects looking to enhance their Ethereum-based applications. It has gained significant adoption in the DeFi space and is also well-suited for gaming, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and other Ethereum-based use cases. Are Polkadot and Polygon competitors? While Polkadot and Polygon both aim to address scalability and interoperability challenges, they take different approaches and target different markets. Polkadot focuses on creating a network of independent blockchains, while Polygon enhances Ethereum's scalability. They can be seen as complementary solutions rather than direct competitors. Developers and projects may choose either network based on their specific needs and requirements. Read More: - Polygon vs Cardano - Polkadot vs Ethereum - Polygon vs Ethereum - Polkadot vs Solana - Wax Blockchain vs Ethereum - Ripple (XRP) vs Ethereum (ETH) Read the full article

[chowie-chow-blog]

👆⬅️ for more pix Here's a blink and you've missed it gig in between lockdown numbers ?? Again proving indeed The amazing @karlyjewell supporting the mighty @truckbandmelbourne recently at #BendigoHotel (Shot with @customslr @CanonAustralia) ☆ FOLLOW ☆ @chowie_photography @karlyjewell @truckbandmelbourne @monkeynavigator @bass.boss.beaton @mariano_marcos_ @thebendigo • • • • • • • • • • #TourLife #karlyjewel #SupportAct #performance #Guitar #Drums #Bass #Vocals #rockshow #backstagePass #LiveMusicConcertPhotography #SuppportLiveMusic #bestmusicshots #CustomSLR #Sponsored #gratitudeposts #grateful #Canon5DMkIV #melbournemusicscene #RockPhotographhy #livemusic #photography #thankful #grateful #gratitude #featureartists #rockmusic #originalartists (at Bendigo Hotel) https://www.instagram.com/p/CRgf4L3NI2m/?utm_medium=tumblr

[mulgatheartist]

It's Kendrick the Shredder Koala, he's shredding on the poster and merch for this weekends gigs at the Brass Monkey raising funds for @supportact. ⁣ ⁣ There's also tees and prints of Kendrick available wih the proceeds going to @supportact who provide financial assistance to live event industry workers. ⁣ ⁣ Check out @stagekings_australia for the gig deets and tickets and @isoking_au for the tees and prints. ⁣ ⁣ The story of Kendrick the Shredder Koala⁣ ⁣ Once there was a koala called Kendrick and when he was five he first started playing his dads guitar. He first learnt Smoke on the Water by Deep Purple and then Smells like Teen Spirit by Nirvana. He felt a real connection to the guitar and from the first time he picked up the guitar he would practice on it for a minimum of 3 hours per day without his dad telling him to go practice the guitar "because I'm paying ten dollars per month for that online course and if you don't practice you can pay for it" and in no time at all he was shredding so hard. He would put on concerts for his fam and then he was playing at the local street festival and then he got a manager and the gigs started rolling in. When Joe Satriana toured Australia he was the support act and even got to shred on a song with Joe during Joe's set. That was pretty sweet. After that he recorded heaps of albums and toured the world heaps of times and had a fabulous musical career. ⁣ ⁣ The End⁣ ⁣ #mulgatheartist #supportact #koala #koalaart #guitar #supportact #guitarart #rocknroll #australianart #joesatriani (at The Brass Monkey Cronulla) https://www.instagram.com/p/CMkyyWRg4nW/?igshid=fjefdg46smdq

[beelingevents]

Today is #ausmusictshirtday... A day where the Australian music community and its friends come together! If you don’t know about today then know that today is the day we raise funds for @supportact... and incredible organisation that has supported many in our industry who are in crisis (particularly right now) How can you help? Don your fave Australian Music T-Shirt and post with the above hashtag, to help raise awareness and then donate (link in bio) NOW is the time to come together... everyone needs music and shows in their world!!! PS: you can pick up this particularly tee @prinnie_stevens show THIS Sunday @marysunderground xxx #supportact #apra #triplej #artistssupportingartists #music #livemusic #liveperformance #belindajaneling #beelingevents #littlenanbybee #gettingbacktoabetterme https://www.instagram.com/p/CHzFg0Xr7FN/?igshid=1a1rzhudehtbn