#still be stirring the pot. be careful about biases tho bc obv we've been taught to read some things as more aggressive than others)
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
yall ever see a post correcting disinformation but the correction has a lot of red flags that suggest its also either mis- or dis- information? its like the "net zero information" thing but instead there is information, the information is just "theres a lot of unreliable sources on this entire topic"
#like i cant becoem an expert in this random topic rn but something is Not Right#red flags include:#no sources#source that doesnt or just barely mentions the thing we're talking about#incorrect timelines#saying that something doesnt matter (it prob does)#numbers that dont match up (the numbers in the body of the work should match any tables/figures and if not should be explained)#no credentials or their credentials arent shit#(<- obv respect ppls privacy but the point here is that if somebody says theyre an expert you should check what other experts have to say)#incendiary posts (not just mentioning a hot topic but something where if the topic was changed the structure and tone of the post would#still be stirring the pot. be careful about biases tho bc obv we've been taught to read some things as more aggressive than others)#theres more red flags but these are just the ones that applied to a post i just saw#i keep seeing stuff like it and going 'if i turned this in for a class id fail bc the research sucks' lmao
8 notes
·
View notes