#silly funny variety show now who's gonna pay for the emotional damage

[justplaggin]

WHO'S CHOPPING ONIONS

[airoasis]

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

New Post has been published on https://hititem.kr/real-lawyer-reacts-to-better-call-saul-episode-1/

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

Oh no what are they doing oh no oh my god oh no all correct this can be a ultimate example of commonly the evidence just speaks for itself this is this is terrible and hilarious hey authorized eagles D James Stone right here instructing you find out how to think like a lawyer in these days we’re gonna evaluate better name Saul episode 1 this is really enjoyable for me seeing that I loved Breaking bad and the character of Saul Goodman was specifically excellent due to the fact he gave such good legal advice of direction it was once authorized recommendation in the context of a drug-dealing psychopath however still just right authorized advice nonetheless be definite to love and subscribe to make certain that you by no means miss out on a future lawyer reacts and of course be certain to leave your feedback within the form of an objection i will both overrule or maintain your objections centered on their legal advantage and of path keep until the end when I give higher call Saul episode 1 a grade for authorized realism so without further ado let’s dig right in – better call Saul episode 1 it can be on judge would use this voice god that is exactly what court docket toilets look like they’re just out of the last century they’ve received these weird push-up cleaning soap dispensers just horribly dirty okay that is uh this seems beautiful accurate so far and that is so funny when you consider that lawyers rather do apply their opening and shutting statements within the rest room before they go into court that is almost always the place you can in finding most trial attorneys when court docket is set to start all right he gave himself a pep talk oh to be 19 again ok you could on no account just storm in to the core of the good the field between guidance table and the choose it does seem like there is a prior relationship right here between the decide and Saul Goodman in view that the decide sent the bailiff into the toilet to get him i am guessing the judge has interacted with Saul sometimes before so he’s giving him some leeway but you can not simply burst in there like that nevertheless it looks as if he will have had prior permission to do this so we will keep looking at k but if you are being honest I imply relatively honest you’ll remember that you just also had an underdeveloped nineteen yr historical mind me in my view I if I were held dependable for some of the silly decisions I made once I was once 19 oh wow and that i guess if we have been in church correct now you get a significant Amen this is fairly good what Saul Goodman is doing is he is making himself look personable your credibility is the whole lot when you are in entrance of the jury so you want to make it look like you are a relatable character you are simply an additional member of the jury so he’s doing a nice job of seeming self-deprecating and forming an emotional reference to this jury in this what appears like a closing argument so thus far excellent which brings us to these three now these three knuckleheads and i am sorry boys however that is what you’re they did a dumb thing that’s additionally relatively good in case you have dangerous data you must get forward of them to front run them and to exhibit that you’re mindful of these unhealthy data however to downplay them and to show that they are not dispositive to your case so i admire what he’s carried out he is virtually making his possess consumers look personable they may be younger they’re knuckleheads as he put it he is making them seem relatable but additionally displaying that they’ve made mistake and looking to get forward of something bad information are towards his case it can be to this point pretty excellent fact one nobody obtained hurt now not a soul very essential to maintain that in mind reality 2 now the prosecution keeps bandying this time period criminal trespass mr.Spenalzo the property proprietor admitted to us that he maintains most portions of his business open to the general public both day and night so trespassing it’s bit of a reach do you think they’ve oh man I fairly like this as good maintain in mind that a trial can go on for days and sometimes weeks so there are 1000s if no longer 1000’s of data dozens of humans testifying a trial is an awfully problematic thing so what Saul Goodman has completed here is reminded the jury of two and best two information due to the fact that a trial is really rather complicated and he simply needs them to focal point on two matters that are principally just right for his case so he elements out that no one obtained damage which could also be essential from a legal viewpoint in that some of the factors of some thing crime they’re being charged with may be prompted with the aid of bodily damage but more importantly it suggests on an emotional level that there’s no need for the jury to punish these boys due to the fact that no person used to be hurt so it dovetails on the emotional and then the 2nd thing that he focuses on is the legal requirement for crook trespass no longer being made if the property owner offers consent to any one entering their property then these boys can not be guilty of the crime of crook trespass so he’s focusing on the one hand on the emotional trigger that nobody was once harm and likewise on the authorized trigger that the aspect of crook trespass isn’t met so out of all of the things that the jury realized in trial he makes a speciality of these two salient elements that are both excellent for his case and that i believe that that may be a very smart way of going about your closing argument here is what i do know these three young guys close honors pupils all clear honors feliz erodes one Saturday night and they just a bit bananas I have no idea call me crazy but i do not consider they should have their vibrant Futures ruined with the aid of a non permanent minut under no circumstances to be repeated lapse of judgment one other good emotion Lemoine you are higher than that that is quite just right there are two rhetorical gadgets that Saul Goodman is utilizing here to pleasant outcomes the first is that he’s regarding the dramaturgical so he is striking the jury up on a stage showing them that individuals are gazing and number two he is ascribing the values that he wants to the jury he is pronouncing that they are higher than that hoping that they’ll upward thrust to the attribute that he is already ascribed to them so these are two killer persuasive approaches that Saul Goodman has used right here oh god what have they executed oh no he’s simply gonna exhibit a video so for the reason that that is closing argument the entire proof has already are available so the prosecutor would not must lay any basis all of that has already been situated throughout the course of the trial and the judge has already permitted or denied all of the reveals together with god best knows what’s going to be on this videotape oh no oh my god oh no all right this can be a excellent example of in many instances the proof simply speaks for itself in Latin that’s the phrase race if loquitur the object speaks for itself and albeit often it would not require any legal argument you simply exhibit the article itself and that’s dangerous sufficient many times you don’t ought to gild the lily or pound the rubble it can be simply unhealthy sufficient as it is and if I was the prosecutor in this particular case I customarily would have executed the identical factor simply show the tape let it speaks for itself and let the jury come to a decision this doesn’t want any argument at all this is that is terrible aunt hilarious how variety of math is that seven-hundred per defense no no defendant dint three defendants 2,one hundred which by the way bargain what I did for them they going to penitentiary Langer sausage what does that matter so i assume on this case Saul is a public defender as you may be aware of there are two types of presidency attorneys on this context there are the prosecutors who are employed via the state to truly prosecute these alleged of crimes after which there are additionally public defenders who provide a safety to people who can’t manage to pay for one it goes again to the Nineteen Sixties to a Supreme court case called Gideon versus Wainwright which held that beneath the sixth amendments defense to a trial defendants were required to have an legal professional considering that if they did not have an lawyer the proper to an impartial trial would in no way be upheld considering it might be inherently unfair so below Supreme court precedent should you cannot have enough money an lawyer you might be provided a public defender now that simplest applies in the criminal context it does no longer apply in the civil context in case you are sued civilly you are basically to your own and that is where attorneys like me a civil legal professional are available in and we shop your Baron Verulam you could tell me what this twenty six thousand supposed to be for that’s money for Chuck isn’t that what you wanted a measly 26 grand Jesus you are like Peter Minuit with the Indians throw in some beads and shells at the same time you’re at it it is only a begin there’ll be extra until you are gonna simply tear them all up and why was once it made out to me why not Chuck so he in my view instructed you that it is his desire to withdraw from the organization see that might surprise me it’s been just about a 12 months due to the fact that he set foot in right here ok so one of the vital explanations that Jimmy would possibly not want to money this assess or have his consumer money this assess is that there is a doctrine in most jurisdictions that claims that even if you should not have a written contract an express contract that is spelled out and has the entire terms which you can commonly enter into a contract through your habits so I suppose he’s involved about the suggestion that if he cashes this determine he may tacitly comply with the terms of this settlement with this other regulation corporation and therefore give them the deal that they need which isn’t a deal that Jimmy or his customer needs so I think he’s worried about forming a contract contract via his own habits but i suppose we are going to see six hundred thirty bucks is that for one fall to two falls in in the future even at your age that’s gotta hurt true that correct good I got a job for you that is two grand sounding too grand for one hit one hit plus you get to study from the nice k I most often don’t ought to tell you how unethical it’s for an legal professional to go out and pay persons to fake an damage and essentially defraud some terrible victim but let’s speak about one of the nuances right here in the event that they have been to head forward with this plan they’d be carrying out fraud and could be accountable for civil and potentially crook fraud now on top of that they might now not be capable to get compensation for something accidents that they have of course fraud creates an affirmative safeguard to the sort of allegations that they would want to create however more basically they lack what’s known as standing in the ussystem with a view to go forward with a civil fit you must have standing you have to show that you’ve got suffered an injury and whilst you deliberately have interaction on this variety of habits you negate the sort of staining that will provide upward thrust to an injury so no longer best will they now not be capable to get compensation considering they have defrauded any individual however in addition they lack the underlying factors of the the civil suit that lacks standing they usually lack in actionable damage so if they ever get caught this isn’t a just right thing for them all right okay that was once the first episode of better name Saul and it didn’t disappoint I really seem ahead to reviewing future episodes of this series it can be exceptional but now it’s time to supply better name Saul a grade for legal realism so let’s think about this well we have sensible depictions of the monotony of courtroom life now we have some relatively just right arguments being made seeking to enchantment to the jury’s emotional state we have huge organization attorneys being jerks we have the unglamorous life of an legal professional who is solely looking to make ends meet and we now have literal ambulance chasers who are throwing themselves in front of automobiles all in all now we have a practical depiction of plenty of the components that go into a attorney’s existence that not often get any monitor time with simplest minimal dramatic license so i am giving better call Saul episode 1 and a – for legal realism well accomplished so hit that belt to be notified of my next reaction and examine out this playlist I put together that includes all of my prior reactions together with my reaction to fits the nice wife and plenty of others so click on on that playlist and i’m going to see you in court

[batterymonster2021]

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

New Post has been published on https://hititem.kr/real-lawyer-reacts-to-better-call-saul-episode-1/

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

Oh no what are they doing oh no oh my god oh no all correct this can be a ultimate example of commonly the evidence just speaks for itself this is this is terrible and hilarious hey authorized eagles D James Stone right here instructing you find out how to think like a lawyer in these days we’re gonna evaluate better name Saul episode 1 this is really enjoyable for me seeing that I loved Breaking bad and the character of Saul Goodman was specifically excellent due to the fact he gave such good legal advice of direction it was once authorized recommendation in the context of a drug-dealing psychopath however still just right authorized advice nonetheless be definite to love and subscribe to make certain that you by no means miss out on a future lawyer reacts and of course be certain to leave your feedback within the form of an objection i will both overrule or maintain your objections centered on their legal advantage and of path keep until the end when I give higher call Saul episode 1 a grade for authorized realism so without further ado let’s dig right in – better call Saul episode 1 it can be on judge would use this voice god that is exactly what court docket toilets look like they’re just out of the last century they’ve received these weird push-up cleaning soap dispensers just horribly dirty okay that is uh this seems beautiful accurate so far and that is so funny when you consider that lawyers rather do apply their opening and shutting statements within the rest room before they go into court that is almost always the place you can in finding most trial attorneys when court docket is set to start all right he gave himself a pep talk oh to be 19 again ok you could on no account just storm in to the core of the good the field between guidance table and the choose it does seem like there is a prior relationship right here between the decide and Saul Goodman in view that the decide sent the bailiff into the toilet to get him i am guessing the judge has interacted with Saul sometimes before so he’s giving him some leeway but you can not simply burst in there like that nevertheless it looks as if he will have had prior permission to do this so we will keep looking at k but if you are being honest I imply relatively honest you’ll remember that you just also had an underdeveloped nineteen yr historical mind me in my view I if I were held dependable for some of the silly decisions I made once I was once 19 oh wow and that i guess if we have been in church correct now you get a significant Amen this is fairly good what Saul Goodman is doing is he is making himself look personable your credibility is the whole lot when you are in entrance of the jury so you want to make it look like you are a relatable character you are simply an additional member of the jury so he’s doing a nice job of seeming self-deprecating and forming an emotional reference to this jury in this what appears like a closing argument so thus far excellent which brings us to these three now these three knuckleheads and i am sorry boys however that is what you’re they did a dumb thing that’s additionally relatively good in case you have dangerous data you must get forward of them to front run them and to exhibit that you’re mindful of these unhealthy data however to downplay them and to show that they are not dispositive to your case so i admire what he’s carried out he is virtually making his possess consumers look personable they may be younger they’re knuckleheads as he put it he is making them seem relatable but additionally displaying that they’ve made mistake and looking to get forward of something bad information are towards his case it can be to this point pretty excellent fact one nobody obtained hurt now not a soul very essential to maintain that in mind reality 2 now the prosecution keeps bandying this time period criminal trespass mr.Spenalzo the property proprietor admitted to us that he maintains most portions of his business open to the general public both day and night so trespassing it’s bit of a reach do you think they’ve oh man I fairly like this as good maintain in mind that a trial can go on for days and sometimes weeks so there are 1000s if no longer 1000’s of data dozens of humans testifying a trial is an awfully problematic thing so what Saul Goodman has completed here is reminded the jury of two and best two information due to the fact that a trial is really rather complicated and he simply needs them to focal point on two matters that are principally just right for his case so he elements out that no one obtained damage which could also be essential from a legal viewpoint in that some of the factors of some thing crime they’re being charged with may be prompted with the aid of bodily damage but more importantly it suggests on an emotional level that there’s no need for the jury to punish these boys due to the fact that no person used to be hurt so it dovetails on the emotional and then the 2nd thing that he focuses on is the legal requirement for crook trespass no longer being made if the property owner offers consent to any one entering their property then these boys can not be guilty of the crime of crook trespass so he’s focusing on the one hand on the emotional trigger that nobody was once harm and likewise on the authorized trigger that the aspect of crook trespass isn’t met so out of all of the things that the jury realized in trial he makes a speciality of these two salient elements that are both excellent for his case and that i believe that that may be a very smart way of going about your closing argument here is what i do know these three young guys close honors pupils all clear honors feliz erodes one Saturday night and they just a bit bananas I have no idea call me crazy but i do not consider they should have their vibrant Futures ruined with the aid of a non permanent minut under no circumstances to be repeated lapse of judgment one other good emotion Lemoine you are higher than that that is quite just right there are two rhetorical gadgets that Saul Goodman is utilizing here to pleasant outcomes the first is that he’s regarding the dramaturgical so he is striking the jury up on a stage showing them that individuals are gazing and number two he is ascribing the values that he wants to the jury he is pronouncing that they are higher than that hoping that they’ll upward thrust to the attribute that he is already ascribed to them so these are two killer persuasive approaches that Saul Goodman has used right here oh god what have they executed oh no he’s simply gonna exhibit a video so for the reason that that is closing argument the entire proof has already are available so the prosecutor would not must lay any basis all of that has already been situated throughout the course of the trial and the judge has already permitted or denied all of the reveals together with god best knows what’s going to be on this videotape oh no oh my god oh no all right this can be a excellent example of in many instances the proof simply speaks for itself in Latin that’s the phrase race if loquitur the object speaks for itself and albeit often it would not require any legal argument you simply exhibit the article itself and that’s dangerous sufficient many times you don’t ought to gild the lily or pound the rubble it can be simply unhealthy sufficient as it is and if I was the prosecutor in this particular case I customarily would have executed the identical factor simply show the tape let it speaks for itself and let the jury come to a decision this doesn’t want any argument at all this is that is terrible aunt hilarious how variety of math is that seven-hundred per defense no no defendant dint three defendants 2,one hundred which by the way bargain what I did for them they going to penitentiary Langer sausage what does that matter so i assume on this case Saul is a public defender as you may be aware of there are two types of presidency attorneys on this context there are the prosecutors who are employed via the state to truly prosecute these alleged of crimes after which there are additionally public defenders who provide a safety to people who can’t manage to pay for one it goes again to the Nineteen Sixties to a Supreme court case called Gideon versus Wainwright which held that beneath the sixth amendments defense to a trial defendants were required to have an legal professional considering that if they did not have an lawyer the proper to an impartial trial would in no way be upheld considering it might be inherently unfair so below Supreme court precedent should you cannot have enough money an lawyer you might be provided a public defender now that simplest applies in the criminal context it does no longer apply in the civil context in case you are sued civilly you are basically to your own and that is where attorneys like me a civil legal professional are available in and we shop your Baron Verulam you could tell me what this twenty six thousand supposed to be for that’s money for Chuck isn’t that what you wanted a measly 26 grand Jesus you are like Peter Minuit with the Indians throw in some beads and shells at the same time you’re at it it is only a begin there’ll be extra until you are gonna simply tear them all up and why was once it made out to me why not Chuck so he in my view instructed you that it is his desire to withdraw from the organization see that might surprise me it’s been just about a 12 months due to the fact that he set foot in right here ok so one of the vital explanations that Jimmy would possibly not want to money this assess or have his consumer money this assess is that there is a doctrine in most jurisdictions that claims that even if you should not have a written contract an express contract that is spelled out and has the entire terms which you can commonly enter into a contract through your habits so I suppose he’s involved about the suggestion that if he cashes this determine he may tacitly comply with the terms of this settlement with this other regulation corporation and therefore give them the deal that they need which isn’t a deal that Jimmy or his customer needs so I think he’s worried about forming a contract contract via his own habits but i suppose we are going to see six hundred thirty bucks is that for one fall to two falls in in the future even at your age that’s gotta hurt true that correct good I got a job for you that is two grand sounding too grand for one hit one hit plus you get to study from the nice k I most often don’t ought to tell you how unethical it’s for an legal professional to go out and pay persons to fake an damage and essentially defraud some terrible victim but let’s speak about one of the nuances right here in the event that they have been to head forward with this plan they’d be carrying out fraud and could be accountable for civil and potentially crook fraud now on top of that they might now not be capable to get compensation for something accidents that they have of course fraud creates an affirmative safeguard to the sort of allegations that they would want to create however more basically they lack what’s known as standing in the ussystem with a view to go forward with a civil fit you must have standing you have to show that you’ve got suffered an injury and whilst you deliberately have interaction on this variety of habits you negate the sort of staining that will provide upward thrust to an injury so no longer best will they now not be capable to get compensation considering they have defrauded any individual however in addition they lack the underlying factors of the the civil suit that lacks standing they usually lack in actionable damage so if they ever get caught this isn’t a just right thing for them all right okay that was once the first episode of better name Saul and it didn’t disappoint I really seem ahead to reviewing future episodes of this series it can be exceptional but now it’s time to supply better name Saul a grade for legal realism so let’s think about this well we have sensible depictions of the monotony of courtroom life now we have some relatively just right arguments being made seeking to enchantment to the jury’s emotional state we have huge organization attorneys being jerks we have the unglamorous life of an legal professional who is solely looking to make ends meet and we now have literal ambulance chasers who are throwing themselves in front of automobiles all in all now we have a practical depiction of plenty of the components that go into a attorney’s existence that not often get any monitor time with simplest minimal dramatic license so i am giving better call Saul episode 1 and a – for legal realism well accomplished so hit that belt to be notified of my next reaction and examine out this playlist I put together that includes all of my prior reactions together with my reaction to fits the nice wife and plenty of others so click on on that playlist and i’m going to see you in court

[batterymonster2021]

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

New Post has been published on https://hititem.kr/real-lawyer-reacts-to-better-call-saul-episode-1/

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

Oh no what are they doing oh no oh my god oh no all correct this can be a ultimate example of commonly the evidence just speaks for itself this is this is terrible and hilarious hey authorized eagles D James Stone right here instructing you find out how to think like a lawyer in these days we’re gonna evaluate better name Saul episode 1 this is really enjoyable for me seeing that I loved Breaking bad and the character of Saul Goodman was specifically excellent due to the fact he gave such good legal advice of direction it was once authorized recommendation in the context of a drug-dealing psychopath however still just right authorized advice nonetheless be definite to love and subscribe to make certain that you by no means miss out on a future lawyer reacts and of course be certain to leave your feedback within the form of an objection i will both overrule or maintain your objections centered on their legal advantage and of path keep until the end when I give higher call Saul episode 1 a grade for authorized realism so without further ado let’s dig right in – better call Saul episode 1 it can be on judge would use this voice god that is exactly what court docket toilets look like they’re just out of the last century they’ve received these weird push-up cleaning soap dispensers just horribly dirty okay that is uh this seems beautiful accurate so far and that is so funny when you consider that lawyers rather do apply their opening and shutting statements within the rest room before they go into court that is almost always the place you can in finding most trial attorneys when court docket is set to start all right he gave himself a pep talk oh to be 19 again ok you could on no account just storm in to the core of the good the field between guidance table and the choose it does seem like there is a prior relationship right here between the decide and Saul Goodman in view that the decide sent the bailiff into the toilet to get him i am guessing the judge has interacted with Saul sometimes before so he’s giving him some leeway but you can not simply burst in there like that nevertheless it looks as if he will have had prior permission to do this so we will keep looking at k but if you are being honest I imply relatively honest you’ll remember that you just also had an underdeveloped nineteen yr historical mind me in my view I if I were held dependable for some of the silly decisions I made once I was once 19 oh wow and that i guess if we have been in church correct now you get a significant Amen this is fairly good what Saul Goodman is doing is he is making himself look personable your credibility is the whole lot when you are in entrance of the jury so you want to make it look like you are a relatable character you are simply an additional member of the jury so he’s doing a nice job of seeming self-deprecating and forming an emotional reference to this jury in this what appears like a closing argument so thus far excellent which brings us to these three now these three knuckleheads and i am sorry boys however that is what you’re they did a dumb thing that’s additionally relatively good in case you have dangerous data you must get forward of them to front run them and to exhibit that you’re mindful of these unhealthy data however to downplay them and to show that they are not dispositive to your case so i admire what he’s carried out he is virtually making his possess consumers look personable they may be younger they’re knuckleheads as he put it he is making them seem relatable but additionally displaying that they’ve made mistake and looking to get forward of something bad information are towards his case it can be to this point pretty excellent fact one nobody obtained hurt now not a soul very essential to maintain that in mind reality 2 now the prosecution keeps bandying this time period criminal trespass mr.Spenalzo the property proprietor admitted to us that he maintains most portions of his business open to the general public both day and night so trespassing it’s bit of a reach do you think they’ve oh man I fairly like this as good maintain in mind that a trial can go on for days and sometimes weeks so there are 1000s if no longer 1000’s of data dozens of humans testifying a trial is an awfully problematic thing so what Saul Goodman has completed here is reminded the jury of two and best two information due to the fact that a trial is really rather complicated and he simply needs them to focal point on two matters that are principally just right for his case so he elements out that no one obtained damage which could also be essential from a legal viewpoint in that some of the factors of some thing crime they’re being charged with may be prompted with the aid of bodily damage but more importantly it suggests on an emotional level that there’s no need for the jury to punish these boys due to the fact that no person used to be hurt so it dovetails on the emotional and then the 2nd thing that he focuses on is the legal requirement for crook trespass no longer being made if the property owner offers consent to any one entering their property then these boys can not be guilty of the crime of crook trespass so he’s focusing on the one hand on the emotional trigger that nobody was once harm and likewise on the authorized trigger that the aspect of crook trespass isn’t met so out of all of the things that the jury realized in trial he makes a speciality of these two salient elements that are both excellent for his case and that i believe that that may be a very smart way of going about your closing argument here is what i do know these three young guys close honors pupils all clear honors feliz erodes one Saturday night and they just a bit bananas I have no idea call me crazy but i do not consider they should have their vibrant Futures ruined with the aid of a non permanent minut under no circumstances to be repeated lapse of judgment one other good emotion Lemoine you are higher than that that is quite just right there are two rhetorical gadgets that Saul Goodman is utilizing here to pleasant outcomes the first is that he’s regarding the dramaturgical so he is striking the jury up on a stage showing them that individuals are gazing and number two he is ascribing the values that he wants to the jury he is pronouncing that they are higher than that hoping that they’ll upward thrust to the attribute that he is already ascribed to them so these are two killer persuasive approaches that Saul Goodman has used right here oh god what have they executed oh no he’s simply gonna exhibit a video so for the reason that that is closing argument the entire proof has already are available so the prosecutor would not must lay any basis all of that has already been situated throughout the course of the trial and the judge has already permitted or denied all of the reveals together with god best knows what’s going to be on this videotape oh no oh my god oh no all right this can be a excellent example of in many instances the proof simply speaks for itself in Latin that’s the phrase race if loquitur the object speaks for itself and albeit often it would not require any legal argument you simply exhibit the article itself and that’s dangerous sufficient many times you don’t ought to gild the lily or pound the rubble it can be simply unhealthy sufficient as it is and if I was the prosecutor in this particular case I customarily would have executed the identical factor simply show the tape let it speaks for itself and let the jury come to a decision this doesn’t want any argument at all this is that is terrible aunt hilarious how variety of math is that seven-hundred per defense no no defendant dint three defendants 2,one hundred which by the way bargain what I did for them they going to penitentiary Langer sausage what does that matter so i assume on this case Saul is a public defender as you may be aware of there are two types of presidency attorneys on this context there are the prosecutors who are employed via the state to truly prosecute these alleged of crimes after which there are additionally public defenders who provide a safety to people who can’t manage to pay for one it goes again to the Nineteen Sixties to a Supreme court case called Gideon versus Wainwright which held that beneath the sixth amendments defense to a trial defendants were required to have an legal professional considering that if they did not have an lawyer the proper to an impartial trial would in no way be upheld considering it might be inherently unfair so below Supreme court precedent should you cannot have enough money an lawyer you might be provided a public defender now that simplest applies in the criminal context it does no longer apply in the civil context in case you are sued civilly you are basically to your own and that is where attorneys like me a civil legal professional are available in and we shop your Baron Verulam you could tell me what this twenty six thousand supposed to be for that’s money for Chuck isn’t that what you wanted a measly 26 grand Jesus you are like Peter Minuit with the Indians throw in some beads and shells at the same time you’re at it it is only a begin there’ll be extra until you are gonna simply tear them all up and why was once it made out to me why not Chuck so he in my view instructed you that it is his desire to withdraw from the organization see that might surprise me it’s been just about a 12 months due to the fact that he set foot in right here ok so one of the vital explanations that Jimmy would possibly not want to money this assess or have his consumer money this assess is that there is a doctrine in most jurisdictions that claims that even if you should not have a written contract an express contract that is spelled out and has the entire terms which you can commonly enter into a contract through your habits so I suppose he’s involved about the suggestion that if he cashes this determine he may tacitly comply with the terms of this settlement with this other regulation corporation and therefore give them the deal that they need which isn’t a deal that Jimmy or his customer needs so I think he’s worried about forming a contract contract via his own habits but i suppose we are going to see six hundred thirty bucks is that for one fall to two falls in in the future even at your age that’s gotta hurt true that correct good I got a job for you that is two grand sounding too grand for one hit one hit plus you get to study from the nice k I most often don’t ought to tell you how unethical it’s for an legal professional to go out and pay persons to fake an damage and essentially defraud some terrible victim but let’s speak about one of the nuances right here in the event that they have been to head forward with this plan they’d be carrying out fraud and could be accountable for civil and potentially crook fraud now on top of that they might now not be capable to get compensation for something accidents that they have of course fraud creates an affirmative safeguard to the sort of allegations that they would want to create however more basically they lack what’s known as standing in the ussystem with a view to go forward with a civil fit you must have standing you have to show that you’ve got suffered an injury and whilst you deliberately have interaction on this variety of habits you negate the sort of staining that will provide upward thrust to an injury so no longer best will they now not be capable to get compensation considering they have defrauded any individual however in addition they lack the underlying factors of the the civil suit that lacks standing they usually lack in actionable damage so if they ever get caught this isn’t a just right thing for them all right okay that was once the first episode of better name Saul and it didn’t disappoint I really seem ahead to reviewing future episodes of this series it can be exceptional but now it’s time to supply better name Saul a grade for legal realism so let’s think about this well we have sensible depictions of the monotony of courtroom life now we have some relatively just right arguments being made seeking to enchantment to the jury’s emotional state we have huge organization attorneys being jerks we have the unglamorous life of an legal professional who is solely looking to make ends meet and we now have literal ambulance chasers who are throwing themselves in front of automobiles all in all now we have a practical depiction of plenty of the components that go into a attorney’s existence that not often get any monitor time with simplest minimal dramatic license so i am giving better call Saul episode 1 and a – for legal realism well accomplished so hit that belt to be notified of my next reaction and examine out this playlist I put together that includes all of my prior reactions together with my reaction to fits the nice wife and plenty of others so click on on that playlist and i’m going to see you in court

[airoasis]

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

New Post has been published on https://hititem.kr/real-lawyer-reacts-to-better-call-saul-episode-1/

Real Lawyer Reacts to Better Call Saul (Episode 1)

Oh no what are they doing oh no oh my god oh no all correct this can be a ultimate example of commonly the evidence just speaks for itself this is this is terrible and hilarious hey authorized eagles D James Stone right here instructing you find out how to think like a lawyer in these days we’re gonna evaluate better name Saul episode 1 this is really enjoyable for me seeing that I loved Breaking bad and the character of Saul Goodman was specifically excellent due to the fact he gave such good legal advice of direction it was once authorized recommendation in the context of a drug-dealing psychopath however still just right authorized advice nonetheless be definite to love and subscribe to make certain that you by no means miss out on a future lawyer reacts and of course be certain to leave your feedback within the form of an objection i will both overrule or maintain your objections centered on their legal advantage and of path keep until the end when I give higher call Saul episode 1 a grade for authorized realism so without further ado let’s dig right in – better call Saul episode 1 it can be on judge would use this voice god that is exactly what court docket toilets look like they’re just out of the last century they’ve received these weird push-up cleaning soap dispensers just horribly dirty okay that is uh this seems beautiful accurate so far and that is so funny when you consider that lawyers rather do apply their opening and shutting statements within the rest room before they go into court that is almost always the place you can in finding most trial attorneys when court docket is set to start all right he gave himself a pep talk oh to be 19 again ok you could on no account just storm in to the core of the good the field between guidance table and the choose it does seem like there is a prior relationship right here between the decide and Saul Goodman in view that the decide sent the bailiff into the toilet to get him i am guessing the judge has interacted with Saul sometimes before so he’s giving him some leeway but you can not simply burst in there like that nevertheless it looks as if he will have had prior permission to do this so we will keep looking at k but if you are being honest I imply relatively honest you’ll remember that you just also had an underdeveloped nineteen yr historical mind me in my view I if I were held dependable for some of the silly decisions I made once I was once 19 oh wow and that i guess if we have been in church correct now you get a significant Amen this is fairly good what Saul Goodman is doing is he is making himself look personable your credibility is the whole lot when you are in entrance of the jury so you want to make it look like you are a relatable character you are simply an additional member of the jury so he’s doing a nice job of seeming self-deprecating and forming an emotional reference to this jury in this what appears like a closing argument so thus far excellent which brings us to these three now these three knuckleheads and i am sorry boys however that is what you’re they did a dumb thing that’s additionally relatively good in case you have dangerous data you must get forward of them to front run them and to exhibit that you’re mindful of these unhealthy data however to downplay them and to show that they are not dispositive to your case so i admire what he’s carried out he is virtually making his possess consumers look personable they may be younger they’re knuckleheads as he put it he is making them seem relatable but additionally displaying that they’ve made mistake and looking to get forward of something bad information are towards his case it can be to this point pretty excellent fact one nobody obtained hurt now not a soul very essential to maintain that in mind reality 2 now the prosecution keeps bandying this time period criminal trespass mr.Spenalzo the property proprietor admitted to us that he maintains most portions of his business open to the general public both day and night so trespassing it’s bit of a reach do you think they’ve oh man I fairly like this as good maintain in mind that a trial can go on for days and sometimes weeks so there are 1000s if no longer 1000’s of data dozens of humans testifying a trial is an awfully problematic thing so what Saul Goodman has completed here is reminded the jury of two and best two information due to the fact that a trial is really rather complicated and he simply needs them to focal point on two matters that are principally just right for his case so he elements out that no one obtained damage which could also be essential from a legal viewpoint in that some of the factors of some thing crime they’re being charged with may be prompted with the aid of bodily damage but more importantly it suggests on an emotional level that there’s no need for the jury to punish these boys due to the fact that no person used to be hurt so it dovetails on the emotional and then the 2nd thing that he focuses on is the legal requirement for crook trespass no longer being made if the property owner offers consent to any one entering their property then these boys can not be guilty of the crime of crook trespass so he’s focusing on the one hand on the emotional trigger that nobody was once harm and likewise on the authorized trigger that the aspect of crook trespass isn’t met so out of all of the things that the jury realized in trial he makes a speciality of these two salient elements that are both excellent for his case and that i believe that that may be a very smart way of going about your closing argument here is what i do know these three young guys close honors pupils all clear honors feliz erodes one Saturday night and they just a bit bananas I have no idea call me crazy but i do not consider they should have their vibrant Futures ruined with the aid of a non permanent minut under no circumstances to be repeated lapse of judgment one other good emotion Lemoine you are higher than that that is quite just right there are two rhetorical gadgets that Saul Goodman is utilizing here to pleasant outcomes the first is that he’s regarding the dramaturgical so he is striking the jury up on a stage showing them that individuals are gazing and number two he is ascribing the values that he wants to the jury he is pronouncing that they are higher than that hoping that they’ll upward thrust to the attribute that he is already ascribed to them so these are two killer persuasive approaches that Saul Goodman has used right here oh god what have they executed oh no he’s simply gonna exhibit a video so for the reason that that is closing argument the entire proof has already are available so the prosecutor would not must lay any basis all of that has already been situated throughout the course of the trial and the judge has already permitted or denied all of the reveals together with god best knows what’s going to be on this videotape oh no oh my god oh no all right this can be a excellent example of in many instances the proof simply speaks for itself in Latin that’s the phrase race if loquitur the object speaks for itself and albeit often it would not require any legal argument you simply exhibit the article itself and that’s dangerous sufficient many times you don’t ought to gild the lily or pound the rubble it can be simply unhealthy sufficient as it is and if I was the prosecutor in this particular case I customarily would have executed the identical factor simply show the tape let it speaks for itself and let the jury come to a decision this doesn’t want any argument at all this is that is terrible aunt hilarious how variety of math is that seven-hundred per defense no no defendant dint three defendants 2,one hundred which by the way bargain what I did for them they going to penitentiary Langer sausage what does that matter so i assume on this case Saul is a public defender as you may be aware of there are two types of presidency attorneys on this context there are the prosecutors who are employed via the state to truly prosecute these alleged of crimes after which there are additionally public defenders who provide a safety to people who can’t manage to pay for one it goes again to the Nineteen Sixties to a Supreme court case called Gideon versus Wainwright which held that beneath the sixth amendments defense to a trial defendants were required to have an legal professional considering that if they did not have an lawyer the proper to an impartial trial would in no way be upheld considering it might be inherently unfair so below Supreme court precedent should you cannot have enough money an lawyer you might be provided a public defender now that simplest applies in the criminal context it does no longer apply in the civil context in case you are sued civilly you are basically to your own and that is where attorneys like me a civil legal professional are available in and we shop your Baron Verulam you could tell me what this twenty six thousand supposed to be for that’s money for Chuck isn’t that what you wanted a measly 26 grand Jesus you are like Peter Minuit with the Indians throw in some beads and shells at the same time you’re at it it is only a begin there’ll be extra until you are gonna simply tear them all up and why was once it made out to me why not Chuck so he in my view instructed you that it is his desire to withdraw from the organization see that might surprise me it’s been just about a 12 months due to the fact that he set foot in right here ok so one of the vital explanations that Jimmy would possibly not want to money this assess or have his consumer money this assess is that there is a doctrine in most jurisdictions that claims that even if you should not have a written contract an express contract that is spelled out and has the entire terms which you can commonly enter into a contract through your habits so I suppose he’s involved about the suggestion that if he cashes this determine he may tacitly comply with the terms of this settlement with this other regulation corporation and therefore give them the deal that they need which isn’t a deal that Jimmy or his customer needs so I think he’s worried about forming a contract contract via his own habits but i suppose we are going to see six hundred thirty bucks is that for one fall to two falls in in the future even at your age that’s gotta hurt true that correct good I got a job for you that is two grand sounding too grand for one hit one hit plus you get to study from the nice k I most often don’t ought to tell you how unethical it’s for an legal professional to go out and pay persons to fake an damage and essentially defraud some terrible victim but let’s speak about one of the nuances right here in the event that they have been to head forward with this plan they’d be carrying out fraud and could be accountable for civil and potentially crook fraud now on top of that they might now not be capable to get compensation for something accidents that they have of course fraud creates an affirmative safeguard to the sort of allegations that they would want to create however more basically they lack what’s known as standing in the ussystem with a view to go forward with a civil fit you must have standing you have to show that you’ve got suffered an injury and whilst you deliberately have interaction on this variety of habits you negate the sort of staining that will provide upward thrust to an injury so no longer best will they now not be capable to get compensation considering they have defrauded any individual however in addition they lack the underlying factors of the the civil suit that lacks standing they usually lack in actionable damage so if they ever get caught this isn’t a just right thing for them all right okay that was once the first episode of better name Saul and it didn’t disappoint I really seem ahead to reviewing future episodes of this series it can be exceptional but now it’s time to supply better name Saul a grade for legal realism so let’s think about this well we have sensible depictions of the monotony of courtroom life now we have some relatively just right arguments being made seeking to enchantment to the jury’s emotional state we have huge organization attorneys being jerks we have the unglamorous life of an legal professional who is solely looking to make ends meet and we now have literal ambulance chasers who are throwing themselves in front of automobiles all in all now we have a practical depiction of plenty of the components that go into a attorney’s existence that not often get any monitor time with simplest minimal dramatic license so i am giving better call Saul episode 1 and a – for legal realism well accomplished so hit that belt to be notified of my next reaction and examine out this playlist I put together that includes all of my prior reactions together with my reaction to fits the nice wife and plenty of others so click on on that playlist and i’m going to see you in court