#she performs unsafe experiments on unwilling participants | Explore Tumblr posts and blogs

they-are-a-prolife-autist · 2 years ago

Note

“Abortion doesn’t safe lives it ends them”

This line is ironic, it's more dangerous to give birth than to have an abortion, more women die from giving birth than they do from having an abortion.

The reality is if abortion was illegal it wouldn't stop abortions from happening, it would stop safe abortions from happening. If abortions were illegal it would mean drastically decreasing the number of overall abortions being performed at the cost of drastically increasing the number of unsafe abortions.

You talked about how abortions end lives yet if abortions were illegal, which is what pro-life people want, that would end up killing a lot of women who are desperate enough to carry out the procedure on themselves which would mean mutilating themselves and bleeding to death. Ironic that you'd call being against abortion pro-life if this is the consequence of making abortion illegal.

What about women who can not financially take care of a child? What about women who were raped? What about women who used birth control yet still got pregnant? Why should any of these woman be forced to carry out an unplanned pregnancy?

The reality is, a woman should not have to justify her reason to get an abortion, it's her body so it's her choice. Even if it's a ‘dumb’ reason, such as the women didn't want a child, it's her choice, she doesn't need to justify it, let her have her freedom which is her right to choose.

If you don't like abortion that’s fine, you don't have to have an abortion, but for all those pro-life people out there, please stop trying to take away abortion because YOU don’t like it, just as you have the right to choose to not have an abortion women should have the right to choose to get an abortion.

I also saw this not long after reading your introductory post, this is another problem with pro-life:

https://twitter.com/DianaMiller5/status/1522278413096132609?s=20&t=JyYvje8fG5EOR0XMu8ebQg

^ Yet you stand by the statement “abortion kills”

“The risk of death from legal induced abortion is reported to be almost four times greater than the risk of death from childbirth.”

Mortality after a birth 28.2/100,000

After a miscarriage 51.9/100,000

After an abortion 83.1/100,000

As evidenced above, an abortion actually drastically increases a woman’s risk of death. Aside from that, if someone is threatening to commit self harm or suicide in order to violently destroy the life of their offspring… that person needs psychological help and probably intervention in a dangerous situation. Not an abortion.

For example: sex trafficking victims are often coerced into abortions by the trafficker so that he or she can continue to make a profit off of them. A ground-breaking study by the Beazley Institute found 66 human-trafficking survivors had a total of 114 abortions — 114 abortions among 66 women. One sex-trafficking survivor described her experience:

“Over the years I had pimps and customers who hit me, punched me, kicked me, beat me, slashed me with a razor. I had forced unprotected sex and got pregnant three times and had two abortions at [a clinic]. Afterward, I was back out on the street again.”

The prevalence of forced abortions is an especially disturbing trend in sex trafficking."- Laura J. Lederer, the Senior Adviser on Trafficking for the US State Department

The previously quoted survivor of six abortions incurred severe infections from the scar tissue, necessitating a hysterectomy. She could no longer bear children if she wanted. Abortion is, at its best, 100% not safe for at least one unwilling participant. At its worst, these are the possible complications for the most common form of abortion.

* Incomplete abortion which may necessitate a surgical abortion

* Infection of the uterus

* Excessive bleeding

* Torn cervix

* Infection of Fallopian tubes

* Punctured uterus

* Blood clots in the uterus

* Reaction to anesthesia

* Infertility

Now let’s pretend for a second that every single non-elective abortion is performed by someone who is willing to kill themselves in order to also kill their unborn child. That accounts for a grand total of 7.67% of abortions and still doesn’t justify the people actively committing a crime against humanity (Article 7: 1a,b,h,I, and k) and attempting to violate another persons right to life.

“1. Everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law. No one shall be deprived of his life intentionally save in the execution of a sentence of a court following his conviction of a crime for which the penalty is provided by law.

2. Deprivation of life shall not be regarded as inflicted in contravention of this Article when it results from the use of force which is no more than absolutely necessary:

in defence of any person from unlawful violence

in order to effect a lawful arrest or to prevent the escape of a person lawfully detained, and

in action lawfully taken for the purpose of quelling a riot or insurrection.”

It is incredibly disturbing to me that so many people can look at the horrific societal pressure women are under to make our bodies convenient, how we are bullied into harming ourselves because we are denied equal pay, protection from our abuses, accommodation for our bodies etc… and the response is to glorify and promote genocide and call it female empowerment. We’ve been told for centuries that we have to hide our bodies, our needs, and our femininity in order to be taken seriously and become successful, and that our equality must come at the price of our own health and safety, the lives of our children, and the integrity of our biology. Our identities as women has not only been stolen from us, but weaponized against us. Instead of demanding true equality, we’ve settled for “close enough,” and “last resort” options that dehumanize us. We are teaching our daughters that it is empowering to conform, to meet the patriarchy on its terms and play the game by rules that don’t include us. We’re holding up hangers and threatening self harm just to feel like we are getting a seat at the mans tables, because if we’re convenient to them they won’t abuse us. If we can “take back” our pregnancy and still be beautiful, able to work for them, fuckable… we are safe and equal. THAT is a fucked up mindset and we deserve better.

Love how people get pedantic about terminology to avoid discussing the actual issues. ♥️

#pro life #i am the prolife generation #prolife #prolife feminist #feminism #feminist #womens rights #abortion

156 notes · View notes

victoriazoey26 · 7 years ago

Text

Psychological Evaluations in Utah Divorce and Custody Cases

There is a lot of fuss and fanfare about psychological evaluations in family law to determine child custody. The most common reason we hear for requesting a psychological evaluation in Utah family law cases (divorce, custody, visitation, shared parenting), is, “I think my ex is bipolar and I want custody of my children.” Many clients want to have a psychological evaluation performed in their cases, but what happens in those evaluations is a big mystery to them.

youtube

When the purpose of the psychological evaluation is to determine which parent is more suitable to parent children (a Child Custody Evaluation), there are guidelines that an evaluator must use. On February 21, 2009, the American Psychological Association revised their “Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Divorce Proceedings”. They are now known as the “Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Family Law Proceedings“, an acknowledgment to the fact that the definition of family in America is changing, and psychological evaluations are no longer used only in divorce.

Contrary to what most parents believe, the purpose of a psychological evaluation is not to see if either parent has a mental health diagnosis. The Psychologist’s contact with the parents is unlikely to be sufficient for the Psychologist to actually make a diagnosis. At best, they may be able to observe characteristics which might be “consistent with” a certain diagnosis or disorder.

If the purpose of the examination is not to make a diagnosis, then what is it? In a nutshell, the purpose is of the psychological evaluation, or child custody evaluation, is:

Where possible, to answer the referral question that was set out in the Court’s order which required one or both parents, and the Child, to participate in the evaluation; and

To determine the psychological best interests of the Child. Where appropriate, the Psychologist can make a recommendation as to which parent is better equipped to meet the psychological needs of the Child.

10 Things to Discuss with Your Attorney

Sometimes the Court will choose the evaluator, and sometimes the Court will allow the parties or attorneys to choose or have input regarding which psychologist will perform the evaluation. In that case, here are 10 important things to discuss with your attorney:

How much will the psychological evaluation cost?

Who will pay for the psychological evaluation?

Does this Expert generally prepare a written report? If so, does the Expert generally prepare the report on time, or request multiple extensions of time to prepare the report? If you don’t want your case to drag on, is this the Expert for you?

When this Expert prepares a report, does he or she generally make a recommendation to the Court, or avoid making a recommendation to the Court?

What does this Expert charge for his or her time in depositions, and for court time? Is it a higher hourly rate or an expensive flat fee? If your case goes to trial, you will probably need this Expert to come to court. Can you afford to pay for that?

Has your Attorney worked with this Psychologist before? If so, what were your Attorney’s impression of his or her work?

In your Attorney’s experience, does this Psychologist generally make a recommendation which favors mothers? Or fathers? If your Attorney’s experience is that a particular psychologist almost always recommends one parent over the other, and that parent is not you, you should discuss your concerns with your Attorney.

youtube

If need be, will the Psychologist participate in depositions and testify in court? Believe it or not, some psychologists who will perform custody evaluations do NOT want to give a deposition or go to court in any way, shape or form. Although they can be compelled to do so, discuss with your Attorney why you would voluntarily agree to hire an unwilling expert.

Is the Expert willing to supply his or her information, notes, etc. in response to a subpoena, to the extent permissible by law? Does your Attorney know if the Expert has redacted information or notes when his or her records were subpoenaed? If so, why? Was there a legal basis for doing so, or was the Expert trying to hide something that should be discoverable?

What is the Expert’s working relationship with the Guardian Ad Litem? Does your Guardian Ad Litem always suggest this Expert? If so, why? Does the Expert have discussions with the Guardian Ad Litem that he or she does not disclose to your Attorney?

Free Consultation with Child Custody and Divorce Lawyer

If you have a question about child custody question or if you need to get divorced, please call Ascent Law at (801) 676-5506. We will help you.

Ascent Law LLC8833 S. Redwood Road, Suite CWest Jordan, Utah 84088 United StatesTelephone: (801) 676-5506

Ascent Law LLC

4.9 stars – based on 67 reviews