#samsung galaxy s20 Selfie and Portrait Selfie

[aspeedtech]

Samsung Galaxy M51 evaluate: A fulfilling smartphone

The Galaxy M51’s simplicity is what convinces a normal client to buy a phone like this, no matter having such a lot of aggressive gadgets to be had in the market. Rs. 24999

Samsung makes it clean that it is give up intention is to make the Galaxy M51 for all people. Also read: Tech magazine Sometimes it takes time to recognize what the product is, how it will effect the end-person, and why it exists in the first region. And when you get the messaging, it’s less difficult to accept the product the manner it's miles. That’s how I describe my revel in with Samsung’s Galaxy M51. Even though the Galaxy M51 is a trustworthy smartphone, that is by no means a drawback. The Galaxy M51’s simplicity is what convinces a ordinary purchaser to buy a phone like this, regardless of having such a lot of competitive devices available within the market.

Here is our particular review of the Galaxy M51.

Samsung Galaxy M51 specs: 

6.7-inch FHD+ Super AMOLED Plus Infinity-O show 

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G processor, 

6GB RAM +8GB RAM/128GB storage Android 10,

 OneUI 2.1rapid charging guidedigital camera setup,

 32MP the front digital camera

Samsung Galaxy M51 charge in India: Rs 24,999 onward

Samsung Galaxy M51 overview: What’s new? At a glance, the Galaxy M51 looks nearly same to the Galaxy M31s and Galaxy A51 –  of Samsung’s most famous smartphones in the market. The form and aesthetics of the Galaxy M51 are acquainted with subtle curved edges and plastic construct. No doubt, it’s an attractive telephone with its first rate-slender bezels and the rectangular rear camera module at the pinnacle left – similar to the Galaxy S20 collection.

But sure, the Galaxy M51 is a massive phone with a 6.7-inch display. For human beings with smaller fingers, it might be a bit too big. I should maintain it in a single hand and perform it with ease. At 213 grams, the phone is on the heavier side because of its 7000 mAh battery.

I genuinely just like the aspect-established fingerprint sensor embedded within the strength button at the proper-hand facet of the cellphone. The fingerprint reader is as quick as on preceding Galaxy M smartphones. There’s also a USB-C port at the bottom that helps 25W speedy charging. The backside panel also holds the unmarried speaker and 3.5mm headphone jack. A aggregate nanoSIM/microSD card tray at the phone’s proper aspect helps you to extend the internal storage. The assessment unit had 8GB RAM and 128GB storage with a microSD slot.

The Galaxy M51 does not provide an IP-rating for water and dust resistance. But that might not make a big distinction for regular users.

Samsung Galaxy M51 evaluate: What’s exact?

The Super AMOLED Plus show has a hollow-punch cutout within the middle for the front-dealing with digicam. It’s a 6.7-inch display with a 20:nine component ratio and 2400×1,080p decision. The screen seems remarkable with exceptional viewing angles and vibrant colours. The display screen stretches all of the manner to the top and backside of the M51’s body. It’s a normal flat display and no longer a curved one as visible on Samsung’s among the best smartphones consisting of the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra and Galaxy S20 Plus.

I am no longer a big fan of greater-big presentations on telephones, but I recognize human beings who have a factor for jumbo-sized screens. The Galaxy M51’s 6.7-inch display screen size must be perfect for watching movies, gambling games, modifying a record, or strolling  apps at the same time.

Performance of the Galaxy M51 is more than respectable. The telephone uses a Snapdragon 730G processor, which is a mid-variety chipset. The M51 performs flawlessly. I actually have by no means witnessed app crashes, screen freeze or stutter at the same time as running apps or playing video games like Call of Duty: Mobile and Sonic Dash. There’s no 5G, and that’s ok. Call exceptional become precise, however the speaker excellent might have been higher.

My favourite part of the Galaxy M51 is its battery existence. The M51’s got the 7000mAh cellular (sure, you heard that right!). With heavy use, I got via over a one and a 1/2-day of juice before wanting to plug in the charger lower back within the socket. Battery lifestyles will without difficulty surpass  days in case you use the telephone reasonably. The device expenses the usage of USB-C, Samsung’s 25W speedy charger. It takes close to one hundred minutes to absolutely fee the cellphone’s battery.

The Galaxy M51 has 4 cameras on the returned; a 64MPmain camera with Sony IMX682 lens; a 5MP depth digital camera; a 12MP extremely-huge camera; and a 5MP macro lens. On the front, you will find a 32MP digicam. The Galaxy M51 does paint a high quality photograph of the photo quality you get on a mid-range cellphone in recent times. The images taken from the principle digicam deliver outstanding quality – regardless of the time you capture them. I got the high-quality shots in daylight. The photographs grew to become out to be sharp, with exact colorings and dynamic range. Sometimes the digicam oversharpens snap shots – however that’s so Samsung. Colours are a touch extra saturated – but yes, the digicam does seize quality details. I assume that’s what most clients count on from their telephone’s camera.

In low-light, the snap shots have been great. The night time mode comes reachable when taking shots during the darkish or extreme darkish. I think the majority will just like the M51’s digital camera overall performance in low-mild.

Switching between specific camera lenses is speedy and quick. I had no trouble autofocusing on the situation at one-of-a-kind distances. The ultra-wide digicam is terrific, too. Images are distinct and spectacular. The dedicated 5MP digital camera produces advanced portrait pictures. The 5MP macro lens isn’t dazzling. The the front-facing 32MP selfie digital camera, even though, is quite decent. In low-light, too, selfies are particular.

The Galaxy M51 facts genuinely correct 1080p videos. Don’t worry, the phone can report motion pictures even in fairly difficult lighting conditions. I couldn’t thoroughly take a look at the Galaxy M51’s 4K video recording abilties.

Galaxy m51, Samsung galaxy m51, galaxy m51 fee in india, galaxy m51 specs, galaxy m51 amazon sale, galaxy m51 evaluate Playing a game like Call of Duty: Mobile is fluid at the Galaxy M51.

Samsung Galaxy M51 review: What’s now not so excellent? The Galaxy M51 runs Samsung’s local OneUI 2.1, that's based on Android 10. Look, the OneUI 2.Zero has been vastly advanced, I nonetheless have some court cases approximately Samsung’s skin. I don’t get the concept of  app stores, two net browsers, and two voice assistants. I still don’t suppose absolutely everyone would use  voice assistants on a phone.

Samsung Galaxy M51 evaluation: Should you purchase it?

With a 6.7-inch sAMOLED display, Snapdragon 730G processor, 7000mAh battery, and succesful quad cameras for Rs 24,999, the Samsung Galaxy M51 is genuinely the most whole Android smartphone you may discover in the mid-variety phase. It’s exciting to peer that Samsung is specializing in features that genuinely rely to clients at the stop of the day like a bigger battery and display. I think the Galaxy M51 will enchantment to each person.

[charger-batteries]

LG Wing 5G Review

The wildest phone of late 2020, the LG Wing ($999) has a unique swiveling screen that brings a breath of fresh, creative air to the stale world of rectangular smartphones. Its T-shaped two-screen layout makes it the ultimate phone for multitaskers who like to take notes while in Zoom meetings or access both music and maps while driving. It also has a Gimbal video mode that simulates a Steadicam attachment. I wish this innovative device were a slam dunk, but the phone is extremely heavy, and underpowered for the price. The promise of using two screens at once also falls a little flat when you realize that third-party apps likely won't take advantage of the new design.

Perfect to a 'T'?

The LG Wing looks like a big, thick, but ordinary smartphone. At 6.67 by 2.93 by 0.43 inches (HWD), it's roughly the same width and height as other large flagships, and thicker by about 0.1 inch. But whoof, it weighs 9.17 ounces. I called the 8-ounce iPhone 12 Pro Max too heavy, so this one is a brick—though there's a reason for that. Push the bottom of the screen up and clockwise, and boom! The phone is in a "T" shape, with the large screen above in landscape orientation and a smaller screen below.

The main screen is a 6.8-inch, 2,460-by-1,080 AMOLED at 395ppi. The smaller one is a nearly-square, 3.9-inch, 1,240-by-1,080 OLED display at 419ppi. Unlike with folding phones, the two screens aren't designed to be used as one fluid display: They're a primary and a secondary panel. On the glossy back of the lower screen, there's a triple-camera stack. To use those cameras, you hold the phone up as if it were a cross to ward off vampires.

Once you get past the coolness, you'll notice some flaws. The color balance isn't very saturated, especially in comparison to Samsung phones, which really punch up the colors. There's a single, loud, aggressively tinny speaker on the bottom; USB-C or Bluetooth headphones are a must. (There's no 3.5mm headphone jack.)

The hinge moves smoothly, and LG says that it's rated for at least 200,000 rotations. It doesn't hold at any location other than zero and 90 degrees; once you push it, it's going to swivel automatically on a spring until it snaps into place.

Shockingly for something this oddly shaped, the phone has an IP54 rating for water resistance. The internal components have a spray-on waterproof coating; how long it will hold up with the parts constantly moving is hard to say.

Performance That Doesn't Really Take Flight

The Wing's Qualcomm 765G chipset benchmarks below where I'd expect. I didn't see any problems in video calling, web browsing, or movie watching, even while multitasking on two screens, but high-performance games that aren't optimized for the device may have issues. The included game, Asphalt 9: Legends, was fine; it's designed for the phone. In the extremely high-test but popular open-world adventure game Genshin Impact, occasional stutters somewhat marred the gameplay experience.

The Wing scores 7,946 on PCMark Work 2.0; 596 single-core, 1,858 multi-core on Geekbench; 318 on Basemark Web; and 17fps on-screen, 21fps off-screen with the GFXBench Car Chase graphics benchmark. By comparison, the $699 Samsung Galaxy S20 FE 5G scores 12,705 on PCMark Work 2.0, 392 on Basemark Web, and 45fps and 52fps on the GFXBench tests. It's clear that the Wing is operating at sub-flagship performance levels. Its scores are closer to those of the LG Velvet and the OnePlus Nord N10, two midrange phones that cost at least $300 less than the Wing's premium price.

The Wing does have flagship levels of RAM, though, and that's important. The 8GB of RAM is needed to keep all of that multitasking running.

How We Test Phones

The giant 4,000mAh battery runs out of juice surprisingly quickly. With the main screen in portrait orientation and the smaller screen hidden, the Wing streamed video over Wi-Fi for 9 hours, 15 minutes before conking out. Any recent large-size Samsung or Apple phone will surpass that by two hours or more.

The Wing has wireless charging and Qualcomm QuickCharge 4, allowing for fast charging using USB-C PD adapters at up to 28W.

Middling Connectivity

LG does not sell an unlocked, all-carrier Wing. There are two different hardware models: a Verizon/AT&T version and a T-Mobile version. I tested a Verizon model.

You shouldn't expect to see 2Gbps speeds on the Wing; 800Mbps will be more like it. The Wing uses a Qualcomm X52 modem, which we've previously seen run into trouble with AT&T's network (see our LG Velvet review). The X52 doesn't have a problem with Verizon 4G, but where flagship X55 phones will see peak speeds on Verizon's the 5G network, phones with the X52 modem will only use half of Verizon's millimeter-wave spectrum and see slower speeds. (To be fair, that difference will only show up in near-ideal circumstances in a limited number of cities.)

The T-Mobile version of the Wing can presumably handle T-Mobile's mid-band 4G as well as any other phone on the market. However, my Verizon-locked phone can't connect to T-Mobile's network, so I couldn't test its performance there.

5GHz Wi-Fi reception was about on par with the iPhone 12 Pro and behind the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra. Using an attenuated signal from a 100Mbps source connection, I saw around 8Mbps on both the LG Wing and the 12 Pro, and 35–40Mbps on the Note 20 Ultra. The iPhone 12 mini, on the other hand, frequently dropped that attenuated connection.

Software as Unusual as Its Hardware

The Wing runs Android 10, which is a year old at this point. It will get an upgrade to Android 11, but LG is notoriously slow to provide OS updates, so you'll have to wait for your carrier to push it. Upgrades beyond Android 11 are unlikely.

The Wing's software has been thoroughly customized to take advantage of its unusual form factor. When you swivel the top screen open, it switches from displaying the Android home interface to offering a carousel of dual screen–friendly apps: Asphalt 9, the gallery, the camera, YouTube, and Maps. There's no immediately obvious way to look at any other app on the main screen while it's horizontal. However, if you open an app while the screen is in portrait orientation and then rotate the screen, the app will stay open (sometimes adjusting well to the change of orientation, sometimes ending up displayed sideways).

Once revealed, the bottom screen displays a small version of the Android home screen. Among the icons at the bottom of the small screen, you now have pairs of apps that will open together, such as YouTube and Chrome, or Google Maps and YouTube Music.

Most of the time, the two screens operate independently. This comes in handy. My most frequent use was to pop open LG's QuickNote or Microsoft's OneNote on the bottom screen and jot notes while reading a web page or watching a video on the top screen. The Music-Maps combination looks great for driving, but there's one big UI failure: no Skip Ad button on the small screen, leaving you to endure long ads instead of your favorite playlist. A texting-and-Maps combination isn't bad if you're lost (but please pull over before texting).

You can also read two web pages at once. That's convenient, but the top page is in Landscape mode and the bottom one is small. They're certainly readable, but it isn't as natural an experience as, say, two side-by-side, portrait-style pages on the Galaxy Z Fold 2.

The Ecosystem Pitfall

The Wing's ambitious form factor looks destined to fall to the ecosystem pitfall that a lot of innovative phones have run into over the past several years.

There are four companies with enough market share to drive third-party app and accessory development. They are Apple, Google, and, to a lesser extent, Huawei and Samsung. Even Samsung hasn't done that well at it; the only success I can think of is Samsung making sure creative apps are compatible with its S Pen. Unfortunately for everyone, attempts to promote innovative APIs by other OEMs have universally failed. We saw this with the dual-screen Kyocera Echo and ZTE Axon M, and with Asus's convertible phone-tablets.

LG's dual-screen case for the V60 and the most recent round of foldable phones work around this problem by working with standard Android apps. But the Wing has two screens, with different sizes and aspect ratios, that aren't next to each other and don't form a single rectangle together, and third-party developers don't plan for that.

The result: I don't think we're going to see many games that use the second screen, or third-party camera apps that build on LG's innovative control scheme. LG has announced a few software partners—Rave, Tubi, Ficto, and Naver (which is big in Korea)—but they aren't companies well-known in the US.

Cameras: a Gimbal Gambol

The LG Wing has a main 64-megapixel camera on the back that defaults to taking 16-megapixel photos by combining every four small pixels into one brighter one. The camera has a "2x zoom" option, but it's digital zoom; it just crops the middle out of a 64-megapixel image. I found those resulting zoom shots to look quite good. They didn't seem dimmer than shots taken with the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and they were plenty sharp. There's also a 13-megapixel, 117-degree wide-angle camera on the back, and a 32-megapixel pop-up selfie camera on the front.

Compared to the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, the LG's sharpening is more aggressive, but I like that. Photos taken with this camera really brought out the texture of bricks and the stubble on my face. The Wing's primary camera is flagship level, no question about it. You may like it more or less than other flagship cameras, but I think that comes out to a matter of taste.

In low light, it's hard to compare the LG and the Samsung because they make consistently different exposure decisions. In my tests, the LG always went for a longer exposure: 1/10 when the Samsung chose 1/20, or 1/30 when the Samsung chose 1/60. That results in more detailed images, but with a greater risk of blur if you don't hold the camera still. (I noticed this when whipping out both phones to take a quick snapshot indoors. The LG was blurry at 1/24, while the Samsung was sharper at 1/40.) The LG may have been using a longer exposure because the sensor isn't as sensitive as the Samsung's. Photos taken on the Samsung have more saturated colors in low light; the LG's images look a touch washed out.

I ran into one irritating problem: In low light, when taking photos of objects at short distances, there were sometimes problems with focus lock, resulting in blurry images. This tends to happen on high-megapixel phones that don't have some sort of focus assist light, and it can be frustrating. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a focus assist sensor, so it does better in those situations.

The Wing's Portrait mode is particularly fun and notable because of its filters. Sure, it can do the usual background blur and "stage lighting" where it blanks out the background. But it can also turn the background into a cartoon or an outline, making for a great effect I haven't seen on other phones.

A neat Dual Recording video mode lets you capture videos with the front and rear cameras at the same time—great for YouTubers. The videos can be saved as two files or one. A whole bunch of phones a few years ago had this feature, but it's been less common in the past two years.

The Wing's Gimbal mode, which imitates a Steadicam, appears to be magic, and it is—of the sleight-of-hand variety. The Gimbal mode relies on a 12-megapixel, 120-degree ultra-wide-angle camera that's rotated 90 degrees relative to the other cameras on the phone. I've seen this trick once before, on the Moto One Action, which used a rotated camera to let you take horizontal videos while holding the phone vertically.

In Gimbal mode, the phone captures up to 1080P video—that's 2.1 megapixels. Think of the 12-megapixel sensor as divided into six 2-megapixel rectangles, and your field of vision as a moving 2.1-megapixel window onto that larger panorama. With a real gimbal, you're moving your camera around. With this, you're just moving a virtual window onto an extremely wide-angle fixed field of view.

There are a bunch of options to play with in the Gimbal mode. You can lock the view so that when you move the phone around, the frame stays still. You can let the frame move, but only on the horizontal axis, preventing vertical shake when you're walking. You can pan with a joystick rather than by moving the phone. (You can't zoom, because you're already using all the pixels.)

The best thing about the Gimbal mode is the panning and what that does to your mind. Typically, when I shoot a video with my phone, I try to keep the frame still because moving the phone around with my hand introduces some wobble and a kind of motion that can be distracting. But the digital panning on the Wing's Gimbal mode is perfectly smooth and feels very professional. That's really nice.

There are a few downsides to this. For one thing, you can't combine pixels to detect more light. On the main camera, the default mode is to combine four 0.8-micron pixels into 1.6-micron pixels for 12-megapixel images; with 1080p video, you can do further pixel combination because you only really need 2.1 megapixels at one time. The gimbal camera says it has 1.4-micron "big pixels," but since it can't ever combine them, images are dimmer and basically useless at night.

Also, at least some of the anti-shake is digital, and you can see it in the resulting video. The gimbal camera has a hexa motion stabilizer to physically reduce shake, but of course it's not going to be as smooth as if you had a real gimbal. When I created intense shaking by skipping along the street while I took video, I could see some distracting digital tearing in the image as the algorithms tried to keep it together.

Will the Wing Be a Thing?

The Wing is a genuinely innovative product. Its Gimbal mode can enable some great filmmaking. Its two screens let you pair passive activities (streaming videos, watching webinars) with active ones (researching on IMDB, taking notes) for a rich, engaged experience.

On the other hand, it's really heavy, performance isn't what I expect from a $1,000 phone, and, most importantly, I don't have faith in LG to further develop and expand the software ecosystem for the form factor. The phone's basic app experience isn't likely to improve or expand with time.

Gimbal mode is cool, but real gimbals aren't that expensive. A DJI Osmo Mobile 3 or Om 4 gimbal costs $80–130. Pair that gimbal with a $699 iPhone 12 mini or Samsung Galaxy S20 FE, and you have better overall phone performance at a lower price than the $999 Wing. Of course, having to tote an extra gimbal around isn't quite as convenient, which is part of the point of the Wing.

There's an old lyric from the British rapper The Streets that always comes into my head for phones like this: "Cult classic, not best seller." When you're out with friends and you flip open an LG Wing, you're going to get comments and stares. You'll be a cool weirdo. Then you can pan around the table with your Gimbal mode, capturing reactions. If that's your game, it'll be a fun one.

[ankitash12]

Best non-Chinese phones

Best non-Chinese phones in India you can buy in 2020

By Flickonclick

It is challenging to choose a good and economic non-Chinese phones in the Indian market. Xiaomi, Realme, Vivo, Oppo, and Huawei does have a great majority in the Indian smartphone market.

To tackle the Chinese smartphone industry on our grounds, many non-Chinese phone brands have entered the market with some great installments this year To help you out, we have the perfect guide on the best non-Chinese phones in India to buy in 2020.

Samsung Galaxy M30

Samsung Galaxy M30 comes at #1 on our list of non chinese smartphone with its 5,000 mAh battery life. The smartphone has a 6.4-inch FULL AMOLED HD+ display that supports 16M colors.

Galaxy M30 runs on Android Oreo v8.1 and comes with 1.8GHz Exynos 7904 octa-core processor.

It has a 13MP+5MP+5MP Triple Rear Camera setup that supports 4K in-depth image and video capture.

At the front, you get a 16MP selfie shooter which allows autofocus, bokeh mode, and 1080P video recording.  

Also read- Samsung galaxy S20+, Samsung Galaxy Buds+ : Features and Specifications

The phone is available in 3GB/6GB RAM and 64GB/128GB ROM variant. It is available in Gradation Black and Gradation Blue colors on Flipkart and Amazon.

Price: Rs 10,035  

Click here to Buy Now

Key Specifications:

Face Unlock and Fingerprint Sensor

Android Oreo v8.1

1.8GHz Exynos 7904 octa core processor

13 MP + 5 MP + 5MP rear camera; 16MP front camera

6.4-inch FHD+ touchscreen

5,000mAH battery

4G VoLTE  

LG W30

LG W30 comes on #2 on our list with the best 13MP + 12 MP + 2 MP Triple Rear & 8 MP Front Camera.

It comes with a 6.26-inch FULL HD Dot Display screen and runs on Android Pie.

LG W30 comes with a 2.0GHz Mediatek Helio P22 octa-core processor.

The phone packs 4,000 mAh battery life and supports AI Face Unlock and fast Fingerprint sensors.

LG W30 is available in Thunder Blue, Platinum Grey & Aurora Green colors on Amazon.

Price: Rs 9,999

Key Specifications:

Face Unlock and Fingerprint Sensor

Android Pie v9.0 and 2.0GHz Mediatek Helio P22 octa core processor

13 MP + 12MP + 2MP Triple rear camera; 8MP front facing camera

6.26-inch FHD+ touchscreen

3GB RAM and 32 ROM

4,000mAH battery

4G VoLTE

Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1

Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 comes on #3 with 5,000 mAh battery life and is a great option at under Rs 12,000.

The phone packs a 13MP+5MP rear camera setup and fast fingerprint recognition. On the front, you get an 8MP selfie shooter that can capture photos in low light.

The phone houses a 636 Octa-Core processor and 3GB/4GB of RAM and 32GB and 64GB of internal storage.

Asus Zenfone Max Pro M1 comes in black and grey color on Flipkart.

Price: Rs 8,499

Key Specifications:

Android Oreo 8.1

5.99 inch FHD+ Full View Display

13 MP + 5 MP Rear & 8 MP Front Camera

1.8 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 Octa-Core Processor

3GB/4GB/6GB RAM & 32GB/64GB ROM and expandable up to 128GB

5000 mAh Battery

4G VoLTE

Nokia 7.2

Nokia 7.2 comes on #4 on our list with its latest 20MP front camera that allows portrait mode and good low light images.

On the back, you get a whopping 48MP + 5MP + 8MP Triple Rear Camera and Fast Fingerprint Scanner.

The phone comes with a 6.3-inch FHD+ Pure Display, 3500 mAh strong battery life, and 4G compatibility.

Nokia 7.2 runs on Android 9 and powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 Octa Core Processor.

It is available in Charcoal, Ice, and Cyan Green color on Flipkart.

Click to Buy Now

Price: Rs 16,000

Key Specifications:

Fingerprint recognition

Android Pie 9.0

48MP+ 5MP+8MP rear camera & 20MP front camera

Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 Octa-Core Processor

4GB/6GB RAM & 64GB/128GB ROM

3,500 mAh Battery Life

4G VoLTE

Samsung M40

Samsung M40 comes on #5 on our list delivering 6GB RAM and internal memory of 128GB which is expandable up to 512 GB.

The phone runs on Android Pie 9 is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chip octa-core processor.

Samsung M40 has a 6.3-inch PLS TFT LCD and comes with 3,500 mAh strong battery capacity.

Also read- Samsung Galaxy A51 8GB RAM Variant launched. Specification and Price Revealed

Also, you get 32MP + 8MP + 5MP Triple Rear Camera setup which shoots HDR images and captures 4K video. In the front, it has a 16MP selfie shooter.

Samsung M40 is now available in Midnight Blue and Seawater Blue on Flipkart and Amazon.  

Price: Rs 16,999

Key Specifications:

Fingerprint Sensor

Android Pie 9.0

6.3-inch OLS TFT LCD screen

32MP + 8MP + 5MP Triple Rear Camera setup & 16MP front camera

Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 Octa-Core processor

6GB RAM and 128GB ROM

3,500 mAh battery life

4G VoLTE

Also Read- Google launches Android 11 public beta for its users.

Asus Zenfone 5Z

Asus Zenfone 5Z comes at #6 on our list of best non chinese phone with its 25.5 hours of talktime and 3,300 mAh high-capacity battery.

It has 6GB of high-speed RAM and 64GB of internal storage which is expandable up to 2TB.

The new Asus Zenfone 5Z runs on Android Pie 9.0 and is powered by Qualcomm Snapdragon 845.

The phone comes with a 12MP+8MP dual camera setup. On the front, you get an 8MP selfie shooter that captures bokeh mode images.

Asus Zenfone 5Z is available in Midnight Blue color on Flipkart and Asus.

Price: Rs 16,999

Key Specifications:

Fingerprint recognition and Face Unlock

6GB RAM and 64GB internal storage

Android Pie 9.0

Qualcomm Snapdragon 845

12MP+8MP rear camera and 8MP front camera

6GB RAM and 64GB internal storage

3,300 mAh battery life

4G VoLTE

So here are our top 6 picks on best non chinese budget phones for you in 2020.

#Boycottchineseproducts

[smardart-blog]

10 Best Smartphones 2020: Made in NOT in China

10 Best Smartphones 2020: Perhaps after the pandemic of the coronavirus Covid-19, we will see more smartphones made outside of China. But even now there is plenty to choose from.

10 Best Smartphones 2020

We present you the top 10 best smartphones of 2020, made not in China.

10. LG G8S ThinQ (South Korea)

The average price is $510 Features : smartphone with Android 9.0 dual SIM support 6.2 ″ screen, resolution 2248 × 1080 three cameras 13 MP / 12 MP / 12 MP, autofocus 128 GB memory, memory card slot 3G, 4G LTE, LTE-A, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC 6 GB RAM 3550 mAh battery weight of 181 g, WxHxT 76.60 × 155.30 × 7.99 mm This model was released in 2019 and has solid features at an affordable price. It is aimed at lovers of high-quality sound, so it is equipped with two stereo speakers, a 3.5 mm headphone jack and supports surround sound. And the triple camera module with optical stabilization allows you to take very juicy and detailed photos that some “soap dishes” may envy. There are only two cameras in the standard "eight". It is possible to blur the background in the picture, shoot 4K videos at 60 fps, and even recognize the owner by the pattern of vessels in the palm of the hand (ToF camera is responsible for this feature). The smartphone is protected from water and dust according to the IP68 standard, has an OLED matrix, which was previously "reserved" only for premium models of the V series, and is equipped with a medium capacity battery - 3550 mAh. Have to charge daily. Pros: there AptX HD, face recognition, wireless charging, fast charging. Cons: Hard to find for sale in Europe.

9. LG V60 ThinQ (South Korea)

It is offered at a price of 59 560 rubles. Features : Android 10 operating system 6.8-inch screen; 8 GB of RAM; 128 GB or 256 GB flash memory support for microSD cards up to 2 TB; back camera - 64 MP main model; 13 MP ultra wide-angle module, ToF camera; 10 MP front camera; 5000 mAh battery; size 169.3 × 77.6 × 8.9 mm; weight 214 grams; 5G, LTE, 3G, 2G, Wi-Fi 802.11ax, Bluetooth 5.1, NFC, USB-C The latest device in the LG V series focuses on creating high-quality video using a triple rear view camera that allows you to record 8K clips, four microphones, and advanced software. The smartphone is powered by a massive 5000 mAh battery, so you can shoot video content for several hours in a row, without fear that the battery will run out quickly. Along with 5G support and an emphasis on video capture, the LG V60 continues the tradition of superior sound. It supports a four-channel DAC and is equipped with stereo speakers. This is one of the latest smartphones with a 3.5 mm audio port, so audiophiles will surely be pleased. Pros : powerful (Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 processor), a large and beautiful phone with the ability to connect a second screen, which costs $ 900. Cons : not yet sold in Russia, look on eBay and other foreign online sites.

8. Samsung Galaxy M21 (South Korea)

The average price is 15 790 rubles. Characteristics: Android smartphone dual SIM support 6.4 ″ screen, resolution 2340 × 1080 three cameras 48 MP / 8 MP / 5 MP, autofocus 64 GB memory, memory card slot 3G, 4G LTE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC 4 GB RAM 6000 mAh battery weight of 188 g, WxHxT 75.10x159x8.90 mm One of the best novelties of budget smartphones in 2020 is characterized by an extremely capacious battery with fast charging function, the presence of NFC and a triple camera module. Despite the low price, the new Samsung smartphone is equipped with a fingerprint scanner, a modern USB Type-C connector and even a 3.5 mm audio jack. Its eight-core Samsung Exynos 9611 processor is manufactured using the 10-nm process technology and is designed for mid-range smartphones. At medium and high settings, it will pull all modern games without brakes and hangs. Pluses : there are all functions which are necessary for work and entertainments. Cons : Adaptive brightness adjustment does not work well.

7. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip (South Korea)

It costs 119,990 rubles. Characteristics: smartphone with Android 10 dual SIM support (nano SIM + eSIM) screen 6.7 ″, resolution 2636 × 1080 second screen: 1.1 ″, AMOLED, 112 × 300 dual camera 12 MP / 12 MP, autofocus 256 GB memory, without memory card slot 3G, 4G LTE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC 8 GB RAM 3300 mAh battery weight of 183 g, WxHxT 73.60 × 167.30 × 7.20 mm This foldable dual-screen smartphone provides convenient work with mobile content, turning, in fact, into a powerful tablet. When unfolding the Z Flip, a 6.7-inch gorgeous AMOLED display opens. Outside there is a small one-inch display, which is mainly used for notifications. It is also convenient to watch it when you take a selfie with the main camera. The gadget has a powerful Snapdragon 855 chipset, 256 GB of internal memory and the latest Samsung One UI 2 interface. The power button has a fingerprint scanner, and it also has an interesting feature: double-clicking activates the main camera. Pros : when folded it fits even in a small pocket, high build quality, there is fast and wireless charging. Cons : easily soiled, the battery is low-power for such a screen, the price is too high.

6. Samsung Galaxy Note 10 Plus (South Korea)

Can be purchased for 66 940 rubles. Features : smartphone with Android 9.0 dual SIM support screen 6.8 ″, resolution 3040 × 1440 four cameras 12 MP / 16 MP / 12 MP, autofocus 256 GB memory, memory card slot 3G, 4G LTE, LTE-A, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC RAM 12 GB 4300 mAh battery weight of 196 g, WxHxT 77.20 × 162.30 × 7.90 mm Here is one of the best Samsung smartphones, with a fast Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 processor, a huge amount of RAM, a large internal storage that can be expanded by installing a microSD card, a module with four cameras and much more that may be required for mobile entertainment or work tasks. Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ has support for the latest version of DeX - Android mode, in which the desktop almost completely copies the look of Windows. Displaying information on an external monitor using Samsung DeX is quick and easy, and also provides full-fledged work on the desktop. The additional ability to charge other devices using wireless technology on the back of the Note 10+ is very convenient for those who take a lot of gadgets with them on the road. Pros : using the stylus you can work with documents and presentations (including remotely), a screen with impeccable color reproduction and viewing angles, one of the best rear cameras on the market. Cons : no 3.5 mm headphone jack and adapter included.

5. Samsung Galaxy S20 + (South Korea)

It is expensive - 67,880 rubles. Features : smartphone with Android 10 dual SIM support screen 6.7 ″, resolution 3200 × 1440 four cameras 64 MP / 12 MP / 12 MP, autofocus 128 GB memory, memory card slot 3G, 4G LTE, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC 8 GB RAM 4500 mAh battery weight of 186 g, WxHxT 73.70 × 161.90 × 7.80 mm One of the most anticipated smartphones of 2020 has already appeared on sale. It is equipped with a top-end Exynos 990 processor, from 8 to 12 GB of RAM, an AMOLED display with a refresh rate of 120 Hz, three rear cameras, has an IP68 protection class and can work in 5G networks (optional). It can be argued that the S20 series is not the best smartphone available today, but from the point of view of 5G and the latest technologies, it is difficult to beat. Pros : there is fast charging and wireless charging, any games and applications go quickly and smoothly. Cons : only hybrid zoom, slow face unlock.

4. ASUS ROG Phone II (Taiwan)

You can buy for 53 000 rubles. Features : 6.59 ″ AMOLED display Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus RAM 12 GB 512 GB ROM Main camera 48/13 MP 2G / 3G / 4G LTE Support NFC technology 6000 mAh battery capacity ASUS released this powerful smartphone, made not in China, at the end of 2019. ROG Phone II is touted as a gaming device and has impressive technical features. Its 6.59-inch display has a refresh rate of 120 Hz, and inside the device is the Snapdragon 855 Plus chipset in combination with 12 GB of RAM and internal storage of up to 1 TB. The smartphone has a pair of rear cameras with portrait mode, night mode and panoramic shooting, as well as a 24-megapixel front camera. Dual front-facing stereo speakers with DTS: X Ultra multi-channel audio technology deliver superb music during your gaming session. A massive 6000 mAh battery allows you to play your favorite games for hours. Pros: There is a 3.5 mm headphone jack, the phone supports vibration during the game and side charging to optimize landscape orientation. Cons : hard to find for sale in Russia.

3. ASUS Zenfone 6 ZS630KL (Taiwan)

The cost in Russian stores is 42 990 rubles. Features : smartphone with Android 9.0 dual SIM support 6.4 ″ screen, resolution 2340 × 1080 dual camera 48 MP / 13 MP, autofocus 128 GB memory, memory card slot 3G, 4G LTE, LTE-A, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC 6 GB RAM 5000 mAh battery weight 190 g, WxHxT 75.44 × 159.10 × 9.10 mm The top 3 smartphones not made in China are launched by ASUS, which has an interesting “twist”: its rear camera rises to become a selfie camera. And although the photos taken by Zenfone 6 at night are not as contrasting as those of the Pixel, or not as impressive as those of the OnePlus 7 Pro, however, with decent lighting, this smartphone shoots excellently. In addition to the features with a retractable camera, the gadget boasts a very capacious 5000 mAh battery, a headphone jack, which is becoming increasingly rare, but apparently still considered necessary for mid-range and low-end phones, as well as not a flagship, but very productive processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. So if you want to impress others with the look and capabilities of your smartphone, then ASUS Zenfone 6 is the best choice. Pros: average battery life - 2 days, fast and smooth interface, good selfie camera. Cons : LCD screen is not very good in sunlight, low camera performance in low light.

2. Sony Xperia 1 II (Japan)

The price in Russia is still unknown; abroad it will cost about 1270 dollars. Features : dual SIM support 6.5 ″ screen, resolution 1644 × 3840 three cameras 12 MP / 12 MP / 12 MP, autofocus 256 GB memory, memory card slot 3G, 4G LTE, LTE-A, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC 8 GB RAM 4000 mAh battery WxHxD 166 x 72 x 7.9 mm Although the debut of the second version of the flagship Sony Xperia 1 was supposed to take place in April, the Japanese company postponed it to the end of May. The premium features of the updated model include 5G, the top Qualcomm® Snapdragon 865 mobile processor and 8 GB of RAM (the first version had 6 GB). Sony announced that its engineers helped create the best camera for the new flagship, using high-quality ZEISS lenses, 3x optical zoom and 3x digital zoom, as well as real-time autofocus for shooting live subjects. Having worked on the camera, Sony did not ignore the visual and auditory impressions that the novelty should give to users. It features an HDR 4K OLED display and Dolby Atmos stereo speakers. Fans of wired headphones will appreciate the fact that the Xperia 1 II retains a 3.5 mm audio jack. Pros: it's too early to judge. Cons: unknown.

1. Google Pixel 4 XL (Taiwan)

Google Pixel 4 XL (Taiwan) Cost - 62 900 rubles. Features : smartphone with Android 10 dual SIM support (nano-SIM + eSIM) 6.3 ″ screen dual camera 12.20 MP / 16 MP, autofocus 64 GB memory, without a memory card slot 3G, 4G LTE, LTE-A, Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, NFC 3700 mAh battery weight of 193 g, WxHxT 75.10 × 160.40 × 8.20 mm The main advantage of this smartphone is its rear camera. It's easy to use, and the only trick you need to learn is that the Night Sight mode takes exceptional photos both at night and during the day. Those who value balanced colors and high detail will certainly enjoy taking pictures with the Pixel 4 XL. Google’s software experience is also commendable. We can confidently expect that after a couple of years of operation, your Pixel 4 XL will work as fast and smoothly as on the day of purchase, which is not always the case with even more expensive models. Of course, 6 GB of RAM and 64 GB of flash memory does not seem like a generous move on the part of the manufacturer, but, at least from the point of view of other specifications, the Pixel 4 XL is a worthy device for its price. Pros: an always up-to-date version of Android, excellent quality of shooting in the daytime and evening, there is wireless charging. Cons: slippery glass back, protrudes the back of the camera, the Soli radar does not work in Russia. Read the full article

[techcrunchappcom]

New Post has been published on https://techcrunchapp.com/vivo-v19-review-finally-a-promising-v-series-phone/

Vivo V19 review: Finally, a promising V-series phone

Written by Sneha Saha | New Delhi | Updated: May 27, 2020 4:30:31 pm

Vivo V19 review: It is a much-upgraded version to the predecessor — Vivo V17. (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

What are the aspects one considers before purchasing a smartphone? Most consumers want their phone to look good, click great pictures, offer one full day of battery life easily and run all kinds of games smoothly. This is where the all-new Vivo V19 wants to ticks all the boxes.

On paper, the Vivo V19 may not look as promising — I thought the same when I first checked the specifications list — but it is when you start using the phone you experience the difference in user experience. Vivo has refined the latest version of the FunTouchOS 10.0 quite a bit and if you have been a Vivo phone user for a long time — you will know the difference and improvements that the version brings with it.

Specifications: 6.44-inch Super AMOLED display, Snapdragon 712 SoC, 48MP quad rear camera, 32MP dual selfie camera, 4500mAh battery, 33W fast charging support, Funtouch 10.0, Android 10, Glass on front and back, punch hole design

Price: Rs 27,999

What’s good?

I have used several Vivo phones over the past few years — starting from Z series to S series to V series and one issue I have had with almost all of them is the software. Previous versions of the FunTouchOS were mostly cluttered with innumerable third-party apps — too many features on one screen which often confuses the user. With the V19, Vivo has resolved this issue quite a bit.

For the Vivo V19, the company has finally optimised and refined its FuntouchOS. The latest version of the software brings major UI improvements — it is less cluttered, there’s dark mode, and the notification panel has finally shifted to the top from bottom. It has always been extremely inconvenient to have the notification tray at the bottom of the screen, the latest FunTouchOS solves this problem.

Vivo V19 review: The smartphone is priced at Rs 27,999 (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Most Vivo V-series phones look good, but given they are usually priced high one always expects to get a premium design in return. Most of the past Vivo V-series devices — despite the expensive price tag — had a plastic back. With the V19, Vivo has finally shifted to glass.

Vivo has done a great job on the design front. The smartphone unlike its predecessor — Vivo V17 — looks classy, sleek, and worth the price of Rs 27,999. The last V-series phone that I loved was the V15 and now the V17 has finally managed to grab that place. The glass finish adds to the aesthetics.

The camera design looks pretty similar to the Galaxy S20 series though but I give it to Vivo for at least trying something new with this one instead of going by its old strategy of launching phones with almost the same design and a few tweaks here and there. The overall design of the V19 looks neat but some times registers fingerprint marks. So, use the phone with the case that comes with the box.

Vivo V19 review: The phone comes with glass design and looks stunning. (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Besides the design, what makes the Vivo V19 slightly more appealing is its weight and the stunning display. Despite packing a massive 4500mah battery, Vivo V17 weighs so light that you can hardly feel the weight of the phone on your hand. This again is unlike the last few Vivo V-series phones. The device does feel pretty compact and is extremely easy to use with just one hand. The Super AMOLED display of the Vivo phone gets pretty bright in all lighting conditions. The viewing angles are also pretty good.

Now, let’s come to what the Vivo V series is mainly known for — its camera. Vivo’s V series smartphones have always been camera focused and the new V series isn’t any exception. It has four cameras at the back — first time in a V-series smartphone — and dual selfie shooters on the front that sit inside the punch hole — again for the first time.

Vivo V19 review: The phone includes 48MP quad rear cameras. (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Some might say phones priced much lower offer 64MP quad-camera setup while Vivo V19 brings 48MP quad-camera setup. To be honest, before using the V19 — when I saw the specifications sheet — I also felt the same, but it is when I used the device for a few days that I noticed the difference.

The cameras of the Vivo V19 have been very well optimised to capture as much detail as possible in almost all lighting conditions. With the very few times I stepped out of the home due to the lockdown I tried clicking as many photos as possible and shooting videos with the Vivo V19. In daylight the Vivo V19 manages to capture stunning pictures with great details. The colours — except in pictures clicked under bright sun as they look washed out — also appear to be pretty crisp. The phone lets users click portrait shots from both the front and back panel and in both situations it manages to click sharp selfies with the background properly blurred out. There are several filters available in the camera app itself so you will not need to download a third-party photo editing app to edit your pictures before uploading on your Instagram. The phone manages to click great selfies with the primary lens — in fact, it is one of the best selfie smartphones you can find in the price point.

Vivo V19 review: Selfie with no filter (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Vivo V19 review: Macro shot (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Vivo V19 review: Captured with primary main rear camera (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Vivo V19 review: Captured with primary main rear camera (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Vivo V19 review: Captured with primary main rear camera (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Vivo V19 review: Ultra-wide shot (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Vivo V19 review: Captured with primary main rear camera (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Vivo V19 review: Ultra-wide selfie (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

The phone also manages to capture ultra-wide shots and selfies. The ultra-wide pictures look well-detailed even when zoomed in, the colours also look pretty accurate. The macro and low-light are areas I feel the Vivo V19 could have been better optimised given the price of the phone. In both situations the pictures often get blurred. I’m a fan of clicking macro shots and the phone disappointed me a bit.

Another area that matters a lot to a consumer is battery life. Vivo V19 nails it in this department. The massive 4500mAh battery lasts one full day of usage very easily despite depending on the phone for all the day-to-day work. The icing on the cake is the 33W fast charging support that charges the phone completely in 1 hour and 15 minutes.

What’s not so good?

Since the launch of the device it has been criticised for using an old chipset given the price it comes at. The V19 is powered by the Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 processor — which we have seen on the cheaper Vivo Z1. Given Indian consumers check specifications sheet first before buying a smartphone this is one area where most might back off and consider buying some other phone that offers better chipsets at a much cheaper price.

Vivo V19 review: The phone comes with dual punch hole camera design. (Express photo: Sneha Saha)

Despite the old processor, at no point did I feel the phone lagged or slowed down. That’s how well the software has been optimised on the V19. I used the phone as my primary device and given all of us are at home we use phones more than ever before. I did all my work on the V19 — from taking calls to sending emails to browsing social media and the internet, playing games, watching Panchayat on Amazon Prime Video and so on. Despite multiple apps running in the background the Vivo V19 never slowed down. So, in real life usage I don’t think one will have a problem with the phone’s performance at any point.

Who should buy?

If you are a diehard Vivo fan, the V19 is a great option to consider given the number of improvements it has brought in compared to the predecessor. The phone is sleek, captures stunning pictures in most situations — macro and lowlight could have been better — and offers one full day of battery life. However, given the price of the phone, I wish Vivo at least opted for the Snapdragon 730 processor if not the 800 series. If your budget is low and preferences are high such as flagship-level processor, 64MP quad rear camera and more there are other options available in the market from Realme, Redmi, and Samsung.

📣 The Indian Express is now on Telegram. Click here to join our channel (@indianexpress) and stay updated with the latest headlines

For all the latest Technology News, download Indian Express App.

© IE Online Media Services Pvt Ltd

[new-tech]

Samsung S20 Ultra Vs IPhone 11 Pro Max (Unbiased Comparison)

Smart Phones

Welcome to our unbiased Samsung S20 Ultra Vs iPhone 11 Pro Max article. When we talk about the top players of the smartphone arena, it has to be Apple and Samsung. These two brands are right now dominating the market with some mind-blowing features and specs in their handsets.

Get 💰 by simply shopping on Amazon, Sephora, Burger King, Uber, Spotify, Starbucks, and hundreds of offline and online merchants with this app.

The Samsung s20 Ultra and the Apple iPhone 11 Pro Max 64GB are two such smartphones that are a notch higher than any of their counterparts. Be it camera, performance, speed, processors, or display; these two are here to blow your minds.

The Samsung s20 has a 6.9inch display with 108 megapixels camera, 30x optical zoom, 5000 mAh battery, and a whooping 120hz refresh. The iPhone 11 max pro is 6.5 inch with triple rear cameras, 3D Face scanning, faster processor with the security of Apple.

Read Also: Best Selfie Drone Under 100 Dollars For 2020

Samsung S20 Ultra Vs IPhone 11 Pro Max

Let us look into the specifications provided by both these phones.

Design and Display.

The iPhone 11 has a 6.5inch LCD screen while the Samsung s20 has a 6.9inch AMOLED display. This makes the presentation of the Samsung s20 sharp and smooth. Due to the high contrast, the colors look more vibrant and eye-pleasing. It also has a higher resolution and more pixel density, which means better details on the screen.

Both the phones have a brilliant display, and if you watch pictures or video, the differences are very slight.

The Samsung s20 can refresh a frame 120 times, whereas the iPhone 11 can refresh only 60 times per second. This makes playing interactive games and browsing more appealing on the s20. But using such a high refresh rate also drains the battery in the s20.

The Galaxy s20 has a small notch for the camera, while the iPhone has a more prominent notch for the camera and sensors for face identification.

The display in the s20 is sharper than the iPhone 11, given the high refresh rate, but it wouldn’t be advisable to use such a setting for everyday purposes.

Camera

Now, camera specifications are always given top priority by users, and when the bar has been set so high by the brands, it raises expectations.

iPhones are considered to have the best cameras in the smartphone world. The iPhone 11 Pro is equipped with two rear cameras and an ultra-wide lens. This feature enables you to take breathtaking landscape shots at wide-angle and beautiful portraits.

The Deep Fusion technology from Apple shoots every detail, even in adverse lighting conditions.

The Galaxy s20 is also packed with camera rich features such as 108MP primary wide lens and 12 MP ultra-wide shooter. With its three rear cameras, optical telephoto lenses, and 30x optical zoom that can catch up any detail in a picture., the s20 speaks for itself.

Some added features of the s20 are the Single Take option that allows you to take a series of portraits or ultra-wide photos, short videos, all at the click of a button. It can also capture videos of 8K resolution even though you would need to have a screen that supports such high resolution.

The iPhone can be the best option if you are merely content with outstanding pictures or videos and don’t want any extra features. But the Galaxy s20 can be handy if you are really into video editing, or you love to play with some fancy upgrades that the phone provides.

Even though it is packed with so many features, there seem to be some problems with the auto-focus.

Read Also: Best Power Bank Charger For IPhone – The Top 10 List

Price

The Samsung Galaxy s20 puts the iPhone to shame in terms of pricing. The iPhone is the affordable one in this lot as it stands at AU$ 1,399 (64GB); AU$ 1,649 (256GB) and AU$ 1,999 (256GB).

While the Galaxy s20 is at AU$1,999 for the 5G version, this makes it more expensive than the iPhone 11 Pro Max 64GB.

Performance.

With an A13 Bionic Chipset, the iPhone 11 Pro Max works better and faster even though it has a 4GB RAM.

The Galaxy s20 with a 12GB RAM runs on the Snapdragon 864 chipset from Qualcomm.

This is an area where Android gets beaten up by iOS. So, in terms of speed and performance, the iPhone 11 is faster.

Software

The iPhone 11 comes with the iOS 13, while the Galaxy s20 has the Android 10. Both of these phones run on their innovative software, but iOS seems to be more refined.

With constant updates from Apple that can be used in models starting from iPhone6, iOS has become top-notch. Features such as 3D Face Id that uses biometric technology, the Dark Mode, and security provided by Apple make it a better catch.

Whereas the Galaxy s20 has a 2D Face Lock, and the fingerprint sensor seems somewhat inaccurate.

Read Also: Xiaomi Mi Band 4 Review – Value For Money Fitness Tracker

Battery life

The Samsung Galaxy s20 can pull up around 12 hours of constant use at one charge if the screen refresh rate is 60Hz. If you set it to 120 Hz, the battery life will get reduced.

But the reverse charging feature helps the charger to charge the phone fast while simultaneously charging other Samsung devices. This feature cant is found in the Apple handsets.

The iPhone 11 can also last for almost 12 hours of screen time, while the battery does its job of charging the device fast.

Data Sharing and security

In terms of sharing files and security, both iOS and Android have their perks and loopholes.

iOs can be easy to use and more secure, whereas Android can be more customized, but it is not so safe.

The iPhone 11 has Apple air-drop for file sharing that runs on many models of Apple. While the Galaxy s20 has Quick share to share files but its usage is limited to a few models of the Galaxy series.

In terms of security, both phones have invested in high biometric technology. The s20 has an in-screen fingerprint sensor, and the iPhone 11 Pro Max requires a Face Id that is in 3D.

5G connectivity

The Samsung s20 has 5G connectivity, which can be advantageous a few years from now. Even though its 5G, the speed won’t be as fast as you would expect. It will be fast than 4G but not theoretically as fast as 5G, while it would take a year or two to see an iPhone that has 5G speed.

Digital Assistants

The iPhone 11 has Siri, and Samsung s20 has Google Assistant and Bixby as AI-powered digital assistants.

Conclusion

Both the iPhone 11 Pro Max and the Samsung Galaxy s20 are two of the best flagship smartphones in the market right now. With amazing features and specifications, these two have raised the bar for future competition.

They are packed with features that will satiate your inner gadget-savvy soul provided you are ready to pay for the high price tag they come with.

You can check out both these phones at Phonebot www.phonebot.com.au. as they both are currently on sale at Phonebot.

So, what do you think about our Samsung S20 Ultra Vs iPhone 11 Pro Max comparison guide. Have we covered all their features. If you have any friends that are not sure which smartphone to buy, why not sharing this Samsung S20 Ultra Vs iPhone 11 Pro Max article with them. We are sure that they will appreciate it.

source: techodom

[magzoso-tech]

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro Camera Shootout: Which Phone Gives You Better Photos?

New Post has been published on https://magzoso.com/tech/samsung-galaxy-s20-vs-iphone-11-pro-camera-shootout-which-phone-gives-you-better-photos/

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro Camera Shootout: Which Phone Gives You Better Photos?

If you’d asked us a few months ago to pick one smartphone which had the absolute best cameras, the iPhone 11 Pro would have been an easy recommendation. It might not have a lot of the fancy shooting modes that its Android counterparts do, but when it comes to pure image and video quality, it’s definitely been the most consistent so far. Last year, we pitted it against Samsung’s finest — the Galaxy Note 10+ — and it managed to win the majority of our tests.

This year, Samsung is going all-out on its camera technology with the new Galaxy S20 series. We’ve already seen some of the great things that the cameras of the Galaxy S20+ are capable of in our full review of the smartphone, but does this phone capture better images and videos than the iPhone 11 Pro? Of course, Apple doesn’t release new flagships twice a year like Samsung, so the iPhone 11 Pro is somewhat older. It’s still Apple’s flagship though, and has not fallen in price since its launch.

Today, we’ll be comparing the Galaxy S20+ to the iPhone 11 Pro in our usual series of tests. The aim is to see which phone manages to deliver the most consistent camera performance with photos as well as videos. Is Samsung’s new camera tech better than Apple’s finest offering? It’s time to find out.

Camera specifications and features

Before we dive in, here’s a quick comparison of some of the main specifications of the cameras of both smartphones. Both have the same number of front and rear cameras, except that the Galaxy S20+ has an additional depth sensor at the back. Samsung has revamped its camera sensors from the previous generation, with some notable changes. The primary sensor still has a 12-megapixel resolution but it lacks the dual-aperture feature which had been a staple of Samsung flagships for a couple of generations. The wide-angle sensor also has a lower resolution now, but perhaps the most interesting change is the new 64-megapixel telephoto camera.

    iPhone 11 Pro Galaxy S20+ Primary Camera Resolution 12-megapixels 12-megapixels Aperture f/1.8 f/1.8 Stabilisation Optical Optical Wide-angle Camera Resolution 12-megapixels 12-megapixels Aperture f/2.4 f/2.2 Field of View 120 degree 120 degree Telephoto Camera Resolution 12-megapixels 64-megapixels Aperture f/2 f/2 Optical zoom 2x 3x (hybrid) Max zoom 10x 30x Stabilisation Optical None Depth Camera   No Yes Selfie Camera Resolution 12-megapixels 10-megapixels   Aperture f/2.2 f/2.2

Samsung has coined the term ‘Space Zoom’ to describe the 3x “hybrid optical zoom” and up to 30x “super resolution zoom” that the Galaxy S20+ can achieve. We’ll go into more details about this in the respective section ahead, but on paper, the Galaxy S20+ already has a far superior zoom capability that the iPhone 11 Pro. Other areas where Samsung pulls ahead are its ability to record 8K video, super slow-motion video at 960fps, and the many shooting modes on offer.

Apple has taken a simpler approach with the iPhone 11 Pro, offering the basic shooting modes which we’ve see on previous models too, but with the addition of an always-on Night mode. With iOS 13.2, Apple also introduced Deep Fusion on the iPhone 11 series, which uses the custom-designed A13 Bionic processor’s neural engine to enhance photos, similar to what Google’s been doing with its Pixel phones.

With this out of the way, it’s time to head to the tests and see which phone does a better job.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro landscape test

In our first test, we have a landscape shot of a nearby building. Both smartphones capture excellent details on the building and the trees in the foreground. However, we prefer the shot taken with the iPhone 11 Pro, simply because the exposure is more balanced and colours are more natural. The shot from the Galaxy S20+ is brighter but the texture on the building surface is blown out and the sky is a little unnaturally blue. It looks striking, no doubt, but it’s not the best.

Tap to see full-sized image

In our second shot, we got nearly identical-looking images from both phones. Exposure was well balanced and there was plenty of details in the objects, both near and far. Samsung bumps up the colours very slightly and the shadows are also lifted, which makes for a more vivid result compared to what the the iPhone 11 Pro delivers. However as a result, blacks are crushed a little, displaying less details than the 11 Pro’s output.

Tap to see full-sized image

In low light, the Samsung Galaxy S20+ was unable to reproduce very good colours, however switching to Night mode improved things dramatically. Colours were noticeably better and we could see more detail in objects in the shadows. However, textures on smaller objects such as the leaves looked a bit worse. The iPhone 11 Pro automatically activates Night mode when it detects low light, and the results are fantastic. Comparing its output with the Night mode shot taken with the Galaxy S20+, the 11 Pro managed more realistic colours on leaves and trees, and even finer textures were better defined.

For landscapes, we’d pick the iPhone 11 Pro as the overall winner.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro close-up test

Switching to much smaller objects and shooting under harsh sunlight, we see the iPhone 11 Pro balanced exposures very well. Not only that, it even managed to retain the right shade of red on the flowers and delivered a pleasing depth effect for the background. The Galaxy S20+ struggled with exposure a bit, and didn’t manage to meter white balance very well. As a result, the flowers took on an orange hue from the sunlight, which wasn’t accurate. It did deliver a slightly stronger depth effect though, compared to the 11 Pro.

Tap to see full-sized image

Our second subject was also photographed at around the same time of day, but under the cover of trees so the light was less harsh. The iPhone 11 Pro once again produced a more neutral colour tone and a more accurate rendition of the pink shade of the flowers. If we look closer, it even managed slightly better textures than the Galaxy S20+. Samsung’s photo wasn’t far behind, with a slightly warmer colour tone.

Tap to see full-sized image

Low light is where the Galaxy S20+ earns back some points. In our first shot of some more flowers, both phones delivered equally well-exposed and detailed images. However, with a tighter crop, we can see that the Galaxy S20+ produced better details. Even in our second shot, it appeared as though the 11 Pro has the better image at first glance, since a lot more elements were in focus, however the Galaxy S20+ did sneak past the iPhone with a slightly softer and more realistic looking shot.

For close-ups, it’s a tie between both as we found the 11 Pro to be more consistent during the day, while the Galaxy S20+ offered better details in low light.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro portrait test

Both phones let you simulate the effect of having a large aperture lens of a DSLR. On the iPhone, it’s called Portrait mode, while Samsung calls it Live Focus. You can change the level of background blur before and after you’ve taken a shot. Samsung also lets you customise background effects, while the iPhone lets you try different lighting styles. Both let you shoot with either their primary or telephoto cameras, depending on the effect you’re going for.

Tap to see full-sized image

When shooting people, it’s a close call between the iPhone 11 Pro and the Galaxy S20+. Both produce excellent details and skin tones, however upon closer inspection, we find that it’s the Galaxy S20+ that gave us the better picture of the two. When zoomed in, you’ll notice that details on our subject’s face are better, and the skin tone looks a bit more natural. We also like the fact that everything around our subject wasn’t blurred evenly, but there were subtle differences in the level of blur based on the distance of objects behind the subject.

Using the telephoto cameras on objects, once again both phones captured striking photos with very good edge detection. It’s a little hard to pick a sure winner here, so we’ll call this one a tie.

Tap to see full-sized image

In low light, the iPhone 11 Pro messed up the shot pretty badly by not being able to blur the right objects. Samsung did a commendable job here, managing to correctly blur even the small gaps between leaves and flowers.

Overall, we’d give this round to the Galaxy S20+.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro selfie test

Selfies have become an integral part of our social lives, so it’s important that these phones have good selfie cameras too.

Tap to see full-sized image

In our first outdoor test during the day, the iPhone 11 Pro straight up has the better image. Skin tones are spot on and the overall tone looks more pleasing. Samsung manages good details too, but the skin tones look a bit pale and colours are a bit muted. You can enable depth effects for the front cameras of both phones, just like the rear ones. Both phones do a good job cropping out the background properly. Once again, we prefer the skin tones of the 11 Pro to the Galaxy S20+.

Tap to see full-sized image

In low light, the iPhone once again managed the most natural skin tones but details weren’t great and there was some visible noise in background objects. The Galaxy S20+ captured a cleaner image but details were once again strictly average. Samsung does have a secret weapon though – Night mode for the selfie camera. You’ll have to stay still for a bit longer but the wait is worth it, as details and colours are much better.

Once again, the results are split between the two. We prefer the iPhone 11 Pro for daytime selfies but Night mode makes a world of a difference when taking selfies at night with the Galaxy S20+.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro wide-angle test

The wide-angle cameras on the iPhone 11 Pro and the Galaxy S20+ have the same field of view, and both can capture a lot more of any scene. In our first test, once again, it’s the 11 Pro which managed a slightly better exposure on the building in front of us, compared to the Galaxy S20+.

Tap to see full-sized image

In our second test, it’s another close call between the two phones, but just like the same scene shot with the two phones’ primary cameras, the Galaxy S20+ lifts shadows a bit more for a more dramatic look.

Tap to see full-sized image

At night, the iPhone 11 Pro’s wide-angle camera isn’t of much use unless you have ample light around. Night mode does not work with the wide-angle camera on this phone. On the other hand, even in its standard mode, the Galaxy S20+ produced a slightly brighter image than the iPhone, and then things got dramatically better with Night mode.

Overall, we would pick the wide-angle camera of the Galaxy S20+ as the winner for its competent daylight performance and superior low-light capability.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro zoom test

Now, for the fun part — the zoom test. We’ve already tested the zoom capabilities of the Galaxy S20+ in our full review, and the short verdict is that it’s pretty impressive. Apple boasts of a 2x optical zoom camera, while Samsung claims to deliver 3x ‘hybrid optical zoom’. Within the camera app, the 11 Pro switches to the telephoto camera when the slider hits 2x, and it’s the same for the Galaxy S20+ too. This means any zoom level beyond 2x is digitally enhanced, albeit with some AI smarts. The Galaxy S20+ has an advantage, cropping the output of its relatively high-resolution sensor in order to still maintain relatively good quality even at higher zoom levels.

Tap to see full-sized image

We begin with 2x optical zoom. At this level, both sensors can deliver excellent detail, and colours and exposure are handled very well. The iPhone 11 Pro adds a slightly warm tinge to photos, but other than that, both are equally good. The Galaxy S20+ offers a lot of incremental zoom steps such as 3x, 4x, 10x, etc, while with the iPhone, you’ll have to manually pinch-out to zoom in further.

Let’s now jump to 10x magnification, which is the highest zoom possible on the iPhone 11 Pro. With ample natural light, the iPhone managed to produce decent details, although texture quality was average and some of the edges of the building had noticeable distortion. Looking at the photo taken by the Galaxy S20+, we see a massive difference in quality. Details and textures on objects are a lot clearer, there’s no edge distortion and colours are more vivid.

You can zoom in further to 20x and 30x too, but at these levels, smaller objects aren’t exactly recognisable and the overall quality degrades quite a bit, to a point where you won’t really want to share these shots with anyone. It’s cool that you can do this, but it might not be too useful.

Tap to see full-sized image

We did one more daytime test, this time of a much closer subject. Focus wasn’t very sharp in the iPhone 11 Pro’s shot, whereas the Galaxy S20+ applied a bit of sharpening to make the flowers stand out. At 10x zoom, the iPhone 11 Pro captured a flat-looking image with weak texture details. The Galaxy S20+ on the other hand captured an amazing shot, with plenty of details, rich colours, and no grain. You can really see Samsung’s AI algorithms at work here as the photo actually looked better than the shot taken even at 3x zoom.

Tap to see full-sized image

If you’re shooting in very low light, both these phones will zoom in digitally using the primary cameras, rather than the optical zoom cameras, in order to preserve quality. At 2x zoom, the iPhone 11 Pro still does the better job with colours, details and noise. Night mode works here too, since it’s the primary camera in use. Samsung’s Night mode is effective compared to shooting in the standard mode, but the colours and details aren’t as good as what the 11 Pro manages.

Tap to see full-sized image

At 10x zoom, the iPhone 11 Pro surprised us with decent details, even though the picture quality was below average. The Galaxy S20+, on the other hand, did a pretty poor job of resolving any details, and its output was heavily de-noised, flattening out the textures of most objects. With Night mode active, it was a completely different story. Details and textures were massively improved, making the photo actually usable.

When it comes to zoom, the Galaxy S20+ is the clear leader here.

Samsung Galaxy S20+ vs iPhone 11 Pro video test

iPhones have long been the gold standard when it came to smartphone videography, but last year, we found that the Galaxy Note 10+ came pretty close to its level. With the Galaxy S20+, that gap has narrowed even more. When recording 4K videos under good light, footage from both phones was very similar, displaying very good details and colours. The iPhone 11 Pro records slightly louder audio, but focusing was equally quick and on point with both phones, even when we panned around. Stabilisation at this resolution was also handled beautifully, and both the Galaxy S20+ and iPhone 11 Pro let you switch between the wide-angle and telephoto sensors while recording.

The Galaxy S20+ has a party trick – shooting 8K video. This is impressive but we’re not quite convinced that it’s entirely useful, at least right now. The framerate is limited to 24fps at this resolution and the frame is heavily cropped.

Both phones can shoot slow-motion video at up to 240fps. The Galaxy S20+ can also shoot at 960fps but for very limited time. The quality is decent at 240fps, but not so much at 960fps.

The selfie cameras shoot crisp 4K footage too, making these phones great for vlogging. Audio quality is very good, even if you don’t use an external microphone, and video is stabilised well, which is a bonus.

In low light, the Galaxy S20+ surprised us, as it managed cleaner footage and better colours. We noticed some very mild distortion when moving about, but not too much. Footage taken with the iPhone 11 Pro was good but a bit grainy and colours weren’t as vivid. The wide-angle cameras of both phone shoot much darker and grainer footage, but even here, the Galaxy S20+ was a smidge better.

Samsung has done well this time, and overall, considering the option of 8K and all the other video modes, we feel that the Galaxy S20+ is the better option for video.

The Samsung Galaxy S20+ matches up quite well to the iPhone 11 Pro

Verdict

It’s unsurprising that the iPhone 11 Pro has aged well and can still hold its own against the Android flagships of early 2020, but we’re happy to see that it finally has some stiff competition. The Galaxy S20+ easily goes toe-to-toe with it, and in many cases, performs better. That fact that Samsung’s phone is a lot more affordable is the cherry on top. Of course, it isn’t entirely perfect. Photos did have some issues with white balance and exposure, especially when shooting under harsh light, and skin tones in selfies were generally on the paler side.

However, when it comes to zoom, the Galaxy S20+ absolutely destroys the iPhone 11 Pro. Even in areas such as video, where Samsung has long faltered, it’s now on par with the iPhone.

We’re eager to see how much better the more expesnive Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra is than the Galaxy S20+ in terms of cameras, so if that’s a comparison you’d like to see, do let us know in the comments.

[appliancesreviews]

Smartphone digital image processing

Back in 2005, the Nokia N90 with swivel screen clamshell design ushered in an era of competition between digital cameras and smartphones.

In those days, most experts characterized the 2-megapixel camera of this smartphone with such epithets as fantastic, unprecedented, gorgeous, etc. Of course, today the picture quality of Nokia N90 evoke other emotions. Probably professional photographers smiled condescendingly, looking at this picture with a low resolution, a minimum dynamic range and a very high noise level even in bright sunshine.

Indeed, the black silhouette of a tree without gradations of shadows and the indistinguishable car number could hardly excite them in terms of possible competition. But after a few years the situation has changed radically. The sales schedule very convincingly illustrates this situation.

Of course, the market for expensive DSLR cameras has specific features. Unlike phones, they perfectly serve their owners for 10 years or more. In addition, new models provide an extremely small increase in quality, further limiting the motivation for replacement. But, of course, cameraphones have become one of the main reasons of the stagnation in this segment. In fact, today only semi-professional and professional DSLR cameras continue to maintain their market position.

A modern cameraphone vs a professional camera for $ 7500?

Recently, the popular Matti Haapoja photographer presented a side-by-side comparison of the picture quality taken with the iPhone 11 Pro and the expensive Canon EOS-1D X Mark II, costing $ 7,500.

Probably, an experienced photographer with sharp vision will be able to correctly determine that the A-picture on the left belong to the Canon EOS-1D X Mark II. But given the difference in price ($ 1,000 vs $ 7,500), in weight (6.63 ounces (188 grams) vs 1.5 kg) and dimensions, this advantage looks very doubtful. No less convincing comparison of the iPhone 11 Pro vs. The Canon 7D Mk II in portrait mode was introduced on YouTube by Computer Clan.

Of course, many people ask a very obvious question: how does a relatively inexpensive smartphone with miniature optics ensure the quality of an expensive professional DSLR camera.

Sensor Dimensions + AI algorithms

Of course, the sizes of modern matrices in smartphone cameras and their specs are radically different from prototypes. For example, Samsung introduced the unprecedented 108-megapixel ISOCELL Bright HMX sensor, which is already used in the Samsung Galaxy S20 5G, Xiaomi Mi Note 10 and Mi 10 Pro.

Video demonstrates this innovative sensor. But, of course, this example is an exception to the rule. Usually, the size of the sensors in DSLR cameras is about 20-30 times larger compared to phones.

However, smartphones provide excellent quality even at night in low ambient light.

However, this reality is consistent with the general trend in the consumer electronics segment. In fact, the device’s platform has ceased to be a major factor in image quality. Today, the lens and sensor provide only the first part of the task, collecting image data and transforming them into electrical impulses. Digital image processing algorithms do the second part of the job. Probably, the contribution of these components can be expressed in percent and numbers. But the growing influence of the processing algorithms is beyond doubt. Of course, they require tremendous performance processor, which solves these tasks. But the latest 8-core Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+, HiSilicon Kirin 990, Exynos 9611, etc cope with them very effectively. Moreover, the performance of even mid-range SoC is excessive in many cases. In fact, a modern smartphone collects an image from individual pixels, calculating and adjusting the value of each of them. In addition, AI of phone actively uses pixel interpolation, generating them if necessary.

AI algorithms

Some algorithms well illustrate the capabilities of modern smartphones. Probably, many saw photos with the popular bokeh effect.

The corresponding algorithm in phone works as follows. First, the camera must separate the objects in the frame to snap them to the foreground and background. But for this, the algorithm must estimate the distances to each object in the frame. Two cameras, for example, on the back of the phone, use the traditional principle of determining depth. In this case, each of the two cameras takes one picture. Accordingly, the angle of shots will be slightly different.

Then the images are superimposed on each other, visualizing the displacement of objects in the frame.

This method uses the parallax effect. As known, parallax is a change in the apparent position of the object relative to the distant background, depending on the viewing angle. For small angles, the distance to the object is equal to the ratio of the distance between the view points (centers of cameras lenses) to the displacement angle (d = l / α). But parallax does not work for selfies due to the lack of a second camera. In this case, the camera can use semantic segmentation, dividing the photo into two layers with pixels of the main object and background. Then the algorithm will defocus the background layer, providing a bokeh effect. Unlike a DSLR camera, it does not provide a smooth change in the depth of field. But this quality is more than enough for a selfie.

HDR and auto semantic segmentation

Of course, these are not the most difficult tasks. High-quality bokeh effect with a single main camera requires more sophisticated technologies, but better illustrates the possibilities of digital image processing. Firstly, the camera forms an image with a high dynamic range (HDR), providing high detail in dark and light parts of the frame. For this, the smartphone takes a series of shots, selects the best fragments from each and forms one picture of the highest quality.

This technology is very similar to the creation of Frankenstein, but from the best legs and arms. Further, the camera begins to use machine learning and neural networks. It automatically detects all objects in the foreground and background using semantic segmentation. For this purpose, the neural network uses a huge database. For example, to identify people, it uses various photos with their images in various poses, clothes, with different hairstyles, etc. As a result, the neural network will create something like this silhouette with a cup in his hands.

Next, the camera will defocus the black area, providing a bokeh effect.

PDAF with Dual Pixel technology

Further quality improvement requires the formation of a depth map for smooth blurring the background. To solve this problem, the camera uses PDAF (Phase Detection Autofocus) with Dual Pixel technology. Simplified, it works as follows. Each pixel of the sensor includes two independent photodiodes.

In turn, a tiny lens is placed above each pixel, which divides the light flux into two parts.

As a result, one photodiode receives the light flux from the left half of the lens, and the other from the right. In fact, this technology provides a parallax effect, allowing the algorithm to calculate the stereo effect and build a depth map. As a result, even one smartphone camera provides a bokeh effect with smooth change in the depth of field.

Conclusion

Of course, image processing algorithms for creating bokeh effect make up only a small part of the capabilities of modern smartphones. But they well illustrate the pronounced trend of rapid development of the AI-technologies in this segment. As a result, this causes a philosophical discussion about naturalness, realism, etc. Probably, many will prefer imperfect realism instead of the splendor of an artificial colorful image. In fact, something similar happens on television with Filmmaker Mode. As known, Tom Cruise urged viewers to abandon some playback optimizations in TVs to preserve the original intent of the filmarkers, including the directors, cameramans, etc. In fact, TV in this mode will play movies with the original color reproduction, aspect ratio and frame rate. Today LG, Panasonic and Vizio, already supported the creation of this mode, implementing its support in their models. In any case, photographers with professional DSLR cameras will continue to delight fans of large colorful photographs without the intervention of AI technologies. But the segment of budget and mid-budget cameras is hopelessly losing to smartphones. Read the full article

[automaticpostinfluencer]

The Oppo Reno3 Pro lets you take 44MP selfies

The Oppo Reno3 Pro. 

Ian Knighton/CNET

Rear camera megapixels get all the spotlight. After Samsung launched the Galaxy S20 Ultra with a huge 108-megapixel camera on the back, expect to see more Android phones take up this feature in the coming year. But what about the front camera? Selfies should pack more pixels too — or at least, that’s what Chinese company Oppo says with the Reno3 Pro. 

The midrange phone offers a quad camera setup on the back, but that’s not so unusual for phones in 2020. It separates itself with dual selfie shooters: one 2-megapixel depth sensor paired with a 44-megapixel main camera. 

The Oppo Reno3 Pro launched in India earlier this month, where its price (29,990 rupees) converts to $390, AU$670 and £340. Oppo says it’ll launch in more countries in April, though the US won’t be one of those. If you’re looking for an inexpensive Android, the Reno3 Pro is a solid option, even if you have to import it. 

But don’t buy into the megapixel hype. The Reno3 Pro’s cameras, both front and back, are good, especially for a phone of its price, but not remarkable. More megapixels don’t automatically translate into better photos. Arguably the niftiest thing about the front cameras is that you can do night mode selfies, a feature typically only found on premium phones like the Samsung Galaxy S20 and the Google Pixel 4. 

Quad camera setup on the back.

Ian Knighton/CNET

But there’s a lot to like about this affordable phone. The 6.4-inch display is sharp and the design, though it borrows heavily from Huawei’s aesthetic, is snazzy. The rear cameras are feature packed thanks to an ultrawide-angle lens and a telephoto shooter that allows for 2-times optical zoom and 20-times digital.

It’s powered by a MediaTek P95 processor. If you’re a heavy mobile gamer and want the best possible performance, the Reno3 Pro may prove underpowered. But it’ll still play demanding 3D games and provides a smooth experience for browsing YouTube and scrolling through Instagram. 

The main weakness the Reno3 Pro has against the similarly-priced Google Pixel 3A is the operating system. As opposed to the Pixel 3A’s delightful pure Android, the Reno3 Pro uses Oppo’s ColorOS7. It’s based on Android 10 and I like it more than Huawei’s EMUI take on Android. But it’s still a cut below Google‘s pure experience. 

A portrait selfie.

Daniel Van Boom/CNET

Night time selfie.

Daniel Van Boom/CNET

Night time selfie with night mode on. 

Daniel Van Boom/CNET

Key specs

6.4-inch, 2,400×1,080-pixel display

Octa-core MediaTek Helio P95 processor

64 megapixel + 13 megapixel telephoto + 8 megapixel ultrawide + 2 megapixel depth sensor quad-camera setup

44 megapixel + 2 megapixel depth sensor dual camera setup 

128GB/256GB storage

8GB RAM

Headphone jack

4,000mAh battery with fast charging 

Source link

from WordPress http://justtoosilly.com/2020/03/24/the-oppo-reno3-pro-lets-you-take-44mp-selfies/

[digittaly]

The Nokia 8.3 5G needs to be the king of roaming

"We're supporting the best variety of 5G new radio bands, by far, that you've got ever seen in a single design, thus far," Juho Sarvikas, chief product officer at HMD World boasted. It is a massive declare that we'll should confirm ourselves. If the corporate can ship, although, it may make the telephone a tempting alternative for enterprise people and anybody else who travels steadily. The telephone makes use of a Snapdragon 765G processor and is the primary, in keeping with Sarvikas, to ship with Qualcomm's 5G RF (radio frequency) entrance finish module. "With this resolution, now we have 40 RF elements condensed right into a single built-in module, and it provides the Eight.three 5G the perfect industry-leading efficiency on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G platform," he stated.

A breakdown of the 5G bands that the telephone helps. Relying in your funds, the telephone will include both 6GB of RAM and 64GB of storage, or 8GB of RAM and 128GB of storage. Each configurations may have a microSD slot that helps as much as 400GB playing cards, too. Taking heart stage is a 6.81-inch PureDisplay -- a advertising time period that guarantees increased distinction and readability, in addition to HDR10 help -- with a 20:9 side ratio and hole-punch notch within the high left-hand nook. So far as we all know, it is not a excessive refresh price panel just like the Samsung Galaxy S20 line or Oppo's newly-announced Discover X2 Professional. The system additionally sports activities HMD's now-standard chin design that features a small however noticeable Nokia brand. HMD, just like the Pixel line, prides itself on delivering a clear Android expertise. Like previous Nokia-branded handsets, you will not discover the app drawer cluttered with annoying bloatware (we're taking a look at you, Moto Razr). As normal, HMD has additionally promised no less than two years of Android upgrades -- so it can positively get Android 11, which is now obtainable as a developer preview -- and three years of month-to-month safety upgrades. The telephone additionally has a devoted Google Assistant button, a side-mounted energy button with built-in fingerprint sensor, and biometric face unlock. The smartphone maker can also be eager to tout the digicam system within the Nokia Eight.three 5G. Visually, it is extra pedestrian than the insect-like Nokia 9 PureView, which had a whopping seven holes etched into its rear-side. The Eight.three 5G has a small round bump that comprises a 64-megapixel main shooter with Zeiss optics, a 2-megapixel macro and 2-megapixel depth-sensing digicam. It additionally presents a 12-megapixel ultrawide that makes use of bigger pixels -- 2.8μm tremendous pixels, to be exact -- that may seize 4K video in lowlight situations. The digicam app may have a particular Motion Cam Mode that mixes 60 frames per second footage with "gimbal-like picture stabilisation." HMD can also be promising one thing referred to as Zeiss Cinematic Seize, which helps you to shoot and edit in a Hollywood-style 21:9 format with "true cinematic shade fashion." It would additionally attempt to simulate anamorphic lenses and lens flares that J.J. Abrams can be happy with. You can too shoot all the pieces in Log format, in the event you would quite shade appropriate all the pieces in your laptop computer or desktop PC. HMD's trump card, although, is the value. The Eight.three 5G shall be obtainable this summer season in a Polar Evening shade for 599 euros (roughly $648), which is properly under most Android flagships not made by OnePlus, Xiaomi, Oppo and Realme. Sarvikas stated the corporate has tried to strike a steadiness for individuals who need connectivity and efficiency with out spending over $1,000. That is not all, although. HMD World can also be launching an information roaming service referred to as HMD Join that works in over 180 nations. You enroll via an app, which additionally tracks your information utilization, after which watch for a particular SIM playing cards to reach within the submit. The precise pricing construction is unknown, nonetheless HMD has stated that a 1GB bundle shall be obtainable for 9.95 euros (roughly $11). HMD Join will not be a fully-fledged community, although, or perhaps a digital operator (MVNO). "We're not changing your operator," Sarvikas defined." We're really partnering with a number of operators in lots of markets." Nonetheless, it is notable that HMD World is tip-toeing into the community house -- an space that Nokia (the actual Nokia, that's) nonetheless works in. Nokia 5.three

The center baby of HMD's new Android trio is the Nokia 5.three. The telephone has a 6.55-inch, HD+ show with a 20:9 side ratio and a teardrop-shaped notch. It is powered by Qualcomm's Snaprdragon 665 processor -- a primary for HMD World -- alongside 3GB, 4GB or 6GB of RAM and both 64GB or 128GB of storage, relying on how a lot cash you need to spend. The round digicam bump on the again homes a 13-megapixel main shooter, in addition to a 5-megapixel ultra-wide, a 2-megapixel macro and a 2-megapixel depth-sensing digicam. On the entrance, in the meantime, you may discover an Eight-megapixel digicam for taking pictures selfies and on-the-go video calls. Like all HMD World telephones, you may count on a clear model of Android 10 out of the field. The Nokia 5.three additionally has a devoted Google Assistant button (no phrase on whether or not it is remappable) and a rear-mounted fingerprint sensor for unlocking the system. The handset can also be geared up with a 4000mAh battery which HMD claims offers you as much as 22 hours of speak time or 1,875 days of standby time on a single cost. In case you're on the lookout for an alternative choice to the Moto G line, this may very well be price contemplating. It will be obtainable in cyan, sand and charcoal subsequent month, beginning at 189 euros (roughly $204) for the mannequin with 4GB of RAM and 64GB of storage. Nokia 1.three

The most affordable addition to the corporate's Android lineup is the Nokia 1.three. Not like the Eight.three 5G and 5.three, this system runs Android 10 Go Version, a model of the working system designed particularly for low-end telephones. It comes with a bunch of redesigned apps, together with Maps, Gmail and the Google Assistant, that take up much less house and do not require the identical processing energy as their traditional Android equal. The Nokia 1.three can also be the primary handset to ship with Digicam Go, a streamlined app that has a portrait mode and, in keeping with Google, "tracks how a lot photograph and video storage you could have left" after which "helps you clear up house so that you by no means miss a shot." The entry-level system has a 5.71-inch, HD+ show (1520x720) with a 19:9 side ratio and teardrop-shaped notch. Underneath the hood, you may discover a Qualcomm Snapdragon 215 processor, 1GB of RAM and 16GB of onboard storage, which might be bolstered by as much as 400GB with a microSD card. There's an Eight-megapixel digicam with LED flash on the so-called 'nanopattern' again, a 5-megapixel selfie snapper and a detachable 3000mAh battery that prices over microUSB and presents "all day plus battery life," in keeping with HMD World. The svelte bundle shall be obtainable subsequent month in charcoal, cyan and sand for 95 euros (roughly $102). Read the full article

[alexhalesreview]

Spectacular Samsung Galaxy S20 Price in UAE, Specs, Features

Samsung brings you the best range of smartphones out there bringing their best Samsung Galaxy S series product range. On Feb 12th the big reveal shocked users with extraordinary phones ranking from the Galaxy S20, Galaxy S20 Plus, and Galaxy S20 Ultra.

The Samsung Galaxy S20 price in UAE starts at AED 3,199 and you can expand internal storage as well but that would lead to an added price. 

What does the Galaxy S Series Offer? 

The entire Galaxy S20 line is Out of this world. You expect wonderful overall performance in all of these phones thanks to Qualcomm's Snapdragon 865 processor. The hardware is top-notch, possibly a bit immoderate with specifications like 12 GB of RAM, however, the 120-Hz display screen refresh rate is a highlight, as it makes scrolling and gaming look a whole fast and smoother.

They all have in-display fingerprint sensors, 8K video recording, 5G connectivity, and the usual thrives like an expandable MicroSD card slot and IP68 water resistance.

Galaxy S20 is the smallest version. It has a reasonable 6.2-inch screen, though that nonetheless is probably too huge for some folks. It has all of the same specs because of the S20 Plus, besides for a barely larger 4,000-mAh battery, handiest one storage option, and digital camera, which is used for progressed intensity with Samsung's portrait mode and higher augmented-truth effects.

But it's far the highest demanded cellphone within the lineup to are available in purple if that's really worth anything.

Galaxy S20 Plus has massive-display and the best reason to buy the Galaxy S20 Plus is that if you need its sprawling 6.7-inch display. The slightly larger battery doesn't necessarily mean it will remaining longer since it desires to energy extra screen, but the greater time-of-flight camera might mean the telephone could seize marginally higher portrait mode snapshots. Like the S20, the 64-megapixel telephoto camera maxes out at 30x virtual zoom, which is probably as high as you'll want.

Galaxy S20 Ultra is for photography geeks. The two phones opts for 12 megapixels and a 1/1.76-inch photograph sensor, but the S20 Ultra goes the extra mile with a larger 1/1.33-inch sensor and an absurd 108 megapixels camera. That larger sensor should imply better pics at night, and the giant megapixel will give greater information and detail to your shots (and large record sizes). 

But wait the 48-megapixel telephoto digital camera goes up to 100X virtual zoom, which is without a doubt overkill, however the 10X hybrid zoom is what makes it shine—the alternative S20 telephones most effective offer 3X hybrid zoom. Did I point out it additionally has a 40-MP selfie digicam and a gargantuan 6.9-inch screen? Naturally, there is a fair bigger battery, too.

You can get the following models:

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 6.9Inch Hybrid-ESIM Smartphone, Cosmic Black

Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G 6.9Inch Hybrid-ESIM Smartphone, Cosmic Gray

Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus 5G 6.7Inch Hybrid-ESIM Smartphone, CosmicGray

Samsung Galaxy S20 Plus 5G 6.7Inch Hybrid-ESIM Smartphone, Cloud Blue

[yourgamecheats]

Massive Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra camera test: 100x zoom and 108MP photo samples

Massive Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra camera test: 100x zoom and 108MP photo samples

Update 3: Our Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra camera test now includes a comparison tool so that you can slide between S20 photo samples and those of Samsung’s competitors. Our ongoing Galaxy S20 Ultra review is almost wrapped up, now that this multi-page camera test includes 100x zoom, 108MP photos and 40MP selfies.

Here’s a taste of how Samsung’s S20 Ultra portrait mode compares to other phones (more…