#no one is allowed to point out that i missed benedikt's name

[caliburn-the-sword]

welcome to the secret shanghai hunger games!! may the odds be ever in your favour

The bloodbath:

Biblically accurate romajuliette

secret shanghai tumblr pre-fhh would've been cheering her name. i think we still will because we support womens wrongs

!! the inlaws are fighting!!

WHAT DID I TELL YOU??? ENEMIES TO LOVERS FTW

things not looking so good for the benmars stans (me)

cousins alliance ig??

GUYSSS TELL ME THIS DIDN'T HAPPEN IN FLF. but also. rip to rosalind's and silas' headaches from celia and orion arguing the entire time

take the L. no one press F to pay respects

TAKE THE FUCKING L DIMITRI. THAT'S WHAT YOU GET FOR BEING A BITCH

this hurts even more when you read it as tvd/ove alisa

PLEASE GUYS SILAS ABANDONED THEM FOR PHOEBE HONG THAT'S SO ICONIC. also literally both of these groups are "i can't believe that it's finally me and you and you and me just us and your friend STEVE" except fuck paul he's no one's friend

Literally only the montagovs have kills by the end of day 1. that's actually so iconic of them

Day 2:

THE GASP I JUST GUSPED. FUCKING TRAITORRRRR

Did you mean: the OVE epilogue?

the inlaws are getting along again~ <3

GIRL YOU'RE SUCH A BACKSTABBER. WHAT HAPPENED TO THE ALLIANCE???

Did you mean: Rosalind Lang for the duration of flf and fhh?

Day 3:

sibling behaviour honestly

Did you mean: Orion's brainwashing arc?

LVC couple are dead </3 also what an oregon trail type death lmao what

NOOOOOO

w- what happened to their alliance in between day 2 and night 3

Day 4:

NOOOOOOO COME ON SILAS YOU'RE BETTER THAN THAT

what i'm hearing is that the tvd duology would've been over in 5 chapters if they just gave phoebe a gun (she would've been 12 years old)

that one scene in the flf duology

NOOOOO. that resurrection button is looking highly clickable rn

Day 5:

and what if i said that rosalind would actually do this if roma posed a threat to orion's life-

i suddenly really don't like our last two contestants

Day 6:

hot girl shit

Day 7:

was it the sprained ankle orion???

CONGRATULATIONS TO ROSALIND

[an-ephemeral-blog]

Linkspam #2

Top Links

Public Policy After Utopia by Will Wilkinson at the Niskanen Center:

It is intellectually corrupt and corrupting to define liberty or equality or you-name-it in terms of an idealized, counter-factual social system that may or may not do especially well in delivering the goods. Commitment to a vision of the perfect society is more likely than not to lead you astray. Consider how unlikely it is for a typical libertarian to correctly predict more than a couple of the top-ten freest countries on the libertarian freedom index. The fact that ideological radicals are pretty unreliable at ranking existing social systems in terms of their favored values ought to make us skeptical of claims that highly counterfactual systems would rank first. And it ought to lead us to suspect that ideal-theoretical political theorizing leads us to see the actual world less clearly than we might, due to cherry-picking and confirmation bias.

What I Don’t Tell My Students About ‘The Husband Stitch’ by Jane Dykema at Electric Lit:

Reliable information about, or even an official definition of, the husband stitch is conspicuously missing from the internet. No entry in Wikipedia, nothing in WebMD. Instead there are pages and pages of message board entries and forum discussions on pregnancy websites, and a pretty good definition on Urban Dictionary. In James Baldwin’s 1979 New York Times piece, “If Black English Isn’t a Language, Then Tell Me, What Is?” he writes, “People evolve a language in order to describe and thus control their circumstances, or in order not to be submerged by a reality that they cannot articulate.” How can a practice like the husband stitch be warned against if there’s no official discussion of it, no record of it, no language around it, nothing to point at, to teach?

[...] But this is not an essay about the husband stitch. It’s an essay about believing and being believed.

The scientists persuading terrorists to spill their secrets by Ian Leslie at the Guardian:

Implicit in Miller and Rollnick’s critique of traditional counselling was the uncomfortable suggestion that counsellors should turn their professional gaze upon themselves and question their own instinct to dominate. Instead of thinking of himself as an expert sitting in judgment, the counsellor needed to adopt the more humble position of co-investigator. As Miller put it to me, “The premise is not ‘I have you what you need, let me give it to you.’ It’s ‘You have what you need and we’ll find it.’ The patient must feel “autonomous” – the author of their own actions.

Emily Alison, who had trained in MI while working as a counsellor for the probation service in Wisconsin, noticed that interrogations failed or succeeded for similar reasons as therapeutic sessions. Interrogators who made an adversary out of their subject left the room empty-handed; those who made them a partner yielded information. The best ones suspended moral judgment and conveyed genuine curiosity. She concluded that the detainee, like the addict, wants to feel free, despite or rather because of their confinement, and that the interviewer should help them do so.

When Trauma Becomes Dominance: An Interview with Sarah Schulman by Adam Fitzgerald at Lit Hub:

A person who was very hurt can do a tremendous amount of damage in somebody else’s life. If you’re on the receiving end of this—whether it’s coming from someone who is a supremacist or someone who hasn’t processed their own trauma—it can be equally damaging to you. There are dramatic cases of transformation. In 1945, Jews were probably the most oppressed people in the world. By 1948 and the founding of the state of Israel, you see a Jewish nation-state subordinating an entire people, the Palestinians. For some individuals or for some entities, you see a transformation from profound trauma and oppression to an unjust dominance.

Certainly with white gay men, who during the AIDS crisis died in enormous numbers and were treated with gross indifference by the state and by their families, today, if they are middle class or above, in many cases enjoy the privilege of the whiteness. And in Europe we’re seeing, for example, more white gay men moving towards the right and voting for right-wing parties. So that’s another example of being transformed into an oppressive entity.

On the Table, the Brain Appeared Normal by John Branch at the New York Times:

The brain arrived in April, delivered to the basement of the hospital without ceremony, like all the others. There were a few differences with this one — not because it was more important, but because it was more notorious.

Third-Party Party-Crashing? The Fate of the Third-Party Doctrine by Michael Bahar, David Cook, Varun Shingari and Curtis Arnold at Lawfare:

This fall may prove a landmark in the ongoing debate between security and privacy.  Poised to take action are both the U.S. Supreme Court, in Carpenter v. United States, and the U.S. Congress, with the impending sunset of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA). Decisions made—or not made—this autumn will have ripple effects in the United States and around the globe.

This post explains the dynamics of the Supreme Court’s upcoming decision in Carpenter, and how it could impact this and other important surveillance authorities.  It then discusses the implications of Carpenter to the emerging global privacy regime, and the conflicts of law that may ensue.

Something is wrong on the internet by James Bridle at Medium:

Someone or something or some combination of people and things is using YouTube to systematically frighten, traumatise, and abuse children, automatically and at scale, and it forces me to question my own beliefs about the internet, at every level.

Other Favorites

We Warned You About Milo and You’re Still Not Listening by Katherine Cross at the Establishment - on the willingness of centrists to redeem Milo Yiannopoulos

The rules about responding to call outs aren’t working by Ruti Regan at RealSocialSkills.org

Avengers in Wrath: Moral Agency and Trauma Prevention for Remote Warriors by Dave Blair and Karen House at Lawfare - a deep dive into the psychology and morality of drone warfare

Heroku’s Ugly Secret by James Somers at Rap Genius - how a change in routing algorithms blew up in Heroku’s face thanks to poor documentation

The Complexities of Trans Gerudo Town by Laura Dale at Let’s Play Video Games - on gender in Zelda: Breath of the Wild

California Police and Civil Liberties Groups Agreed on a Simple Transparency Measure. Gov. Brown Vetoed It Anyway. by Dave Maass at the Electronic Frontier Foundation

For George Washington, #BringBackOurGirls meant something very different by Fred Clark at Patheos - on George Washington’s attempts to re-enslave Oney Judge

My Path To Becoming A Third Parent by David Jay at the Establishment - building a different kind of family

Christopher Wray and the Myth Created by Parallel Construction by Marcy Wheeler at Emptywheel - discussion of FISA Section 702, which allows warrantless surveillance of US citizens, and FBI Directory Christopher Wray’s defense of it

The Cost of White Comfort by Chenjerai Kumanyika at HiLoBrow - who gets comforted after racial harms

2 Broke Lab Rats: Human Research Subjects in Film and Television by Marci Cottingham at Sociological Images

In Praise of Theory in Design Research: How Levi-Strauss Redefined Workflow by Bill Selman and Gemma Petrie at EPIC - how Levi-Strauss’s theory of the bricoleur helped redefine Mozilla’s approach to user experience

It’s a Fact: Supreme Court Errors Aren’t Hard to Find by Ryan Gabrielson at ProPublica

Factory science by Martin Schmidt, Benedikt Fecher and Christian Kobsda at Elephant in the Lab - on the meaning of authorship in the digital age

You Can’t Understand Anti-Queer Violence In Jamaica Until You Understand Colonialism by Shanna Collins at Medium

Was Emily Brontё’s Heathcliff black? by Corinne Fowler at the Conversation

On Minimization as a Patriarchal Reflex by Matthew Remski at their personal website

AI Model Fundamentally Cracks CAPTCHAs, Scientists Say by Merrit Kennedy at NPR

Interpreting Harriet Tubman’s Life on a Silent Landscape by Anne Kyle at the Preservation Leadership Forum - on creating the Harriet Tubman Underground Railroad Byway (this was of special interest to me as I visited it this past summer)

Causal inference and random trials by Daniel Little at Understanding Society - how much can we learn from random control trials?

Sorry Facebook, Blasphemy Is Not Apolitical by Sarah McLaughlin at Popehat

UI design as if users actually mattered: backwards compatibility by Dan Luu at their personal website