#like i've internalized that It's Not About Me a good while ago. bitterly. so now seeing people go 'actually it's mean and hurtful to say
Explore tagged Tumblr posts
Text
i'm barely a writer at this point so idk but ngl i'm kinda fascinated by people who raise the question of "if you normally don't like X, then why did you click on my fic in the first place, HMMM?". yknow, i mean, idk how other people do it, maybe it's just me, but i sorta author-jump? and sometimes an author i like has written something i usually don't enjoy, and sometimes i click out of pure curiosity. and when i don't like it, i click out, yeah, it's a nope for me! but when i do like or even adore it, i comment. positively. it's That Simple 4 me
#online existence is interesting in that you'd think some things are widespread but they really aren't#like i've internalized that It's Not About Me a good while ago. bitterly. so now seeing people go 'actually it's mean and hurtful to say#you dislike something i like very much' i go wuh? it's just someone stating their preferences? it's not about you?#again obviously it's the matter of phrasing because 'EW i HATE X lmao' =/= 'i don't really vibe with X' are both technically 'someone sayin#they dislike the thing i like' but cmon they're clearly not the same. it's just that when you talk about 'people saying they dislike' my#understanding is that people have said they dislike. not they they hate or that it fucking sucks. would i be hurt if someone said they#didn't like... idk. atz? no! it's their gotdamn right! in fact i would be interested in hearing out why because the way different people#perceive things is fascinating to me. but would i be hurt if someone said they HATED them with this particular tone of voice?#yeah. yeah i would. and i'd think this person must not really care about what others feel if they're so eager to loudly share the full#intensity of their opinions. but many such people are well-liked so it's none of my business in the end right.
2 notes
·
View notes
Note
I keep thinking about that post about Loki possibly returning for Avengers 5 and Secret Wars, and while mainly I'm rolling my eyes and internally screaming "please, no more", a part of me is bitterly laughing at the ridiculousness of it all. Like, really?? How many "one more time"s does he need? How many "one more time"s do they need to do the same thing over and over to him? Have they not sent their message about how they all feel about him, loud and clear?
I also keep thinking about Tom's quotes in the article. He says, "Loki is a splendid torch which I've got hold of for the moment".... but didn't the show already make it painfully clear that Loki was out and Sylvie was in? That Loki was lame and Sylvie is bigger better badder, yadda yadda yadda? Why do we need a rehash of that? Are they going to literally have a "torch passing" ceremony, where Loki passes a torch to Sylvie (except he stumbles and falls and immediately starts crying, of course!)?
And he also says, "and I want to make it burn as brightly as I can before passing it on to future generations".... but wasn't the show supposed to be the end-all beat-all of Loki and the extent of his powers? What could be better than Loki bound up in a tree for all eternity, alone, exiled, isolated, and crying, keeping that tree watered forever with his never-ending stream of tears? Is Tom secretly implying that the ending of the series actually sucked? Would he DARE to do that?!?! Wouldn't anything else be an insult to the brilliance and creativity and hard work that was The Ending Of That Show?? And also, is he really so naive to think that any writer or director would actually allow HIS Loki to even be a fraction as powerful as we all know Loki is supposed to be?? Oh Tom, please!!!
Sorry for the sarcasm overdose, but I'm just so done. It's comic relief to me now. I don't think anything they could do could make me care again. (But the sad thing is, I WANT to care again! 😭) They are just beating a decomposing corpse of a dead horse now. But I will say, it is interesting that he said "for future generations", seemingly implying the next torch bearer will be younger? Sylvie Di Martino, or whatever her name is, is not that young. I think she's at least dragging 35 behind her on a trailer hitch, so maybe they will bring on Kid Loki? I wouldn't really care either way, but at least Kid Loki would give me some kind of peace. I will NEVER call Sylvie Loki. NEVER. Not after how obnoxious they all were about her. The writers/directors had a chance to build a bridge with the Loki fandom, but they burned it instead. So, no.
Well, anyway, Avengers 5 is a long time away. There's no script, no director, and even after that it will probably undergo at least 2 years of rewrites, so we have a long time to not think about it.
And God bless you if you actually made it through all of this!! I wish you all the best, and love and comfort and peace @latent-thoughts !
❤️❤️❤️
I feel ya, Anon. *HUGS*
Also, I've stopped reading or listening to anything Tom says these days. He's nothing like the Tom of 10-12 yrs ago, which I mourn. Because he seems to have forgotten everything about Loki from that time, including every detail and input he himself put into Loki. It's like he has been supplanted by a Disney-Marvel bot. 😔
Whatever they'd do with Loki in future, I know it's not going to be good. I had some hope prior to the series, but it was crushed in the end. Loki isn't the Loki he used to be from the 2011-2013 era, he's unrecognisable. I just call him Larry in my head.
Hence, I'm done with Marvel now (I assume most of his original fans are as well). They can keep announcing that Loki will be in their future projects, because he's their cash cow, but we're disillusioned and over it.
Personally, I'm simply bunking in the 2011-2013 era. The fics are good there. And my imagination is limitless. 🥹
~Latent-Thoughts
10 notes
·
View notes